Karnataka High Court
Karnataka State Road Transport … vs M Chiranjeevi on 5 March, 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE ST" DAY OF MARCH, PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE,K.»sREEt§H'A"R'=Ti¢.é" V & THE HON'BLE MR. }USTICE_T€LN.VEAN*.JG"O_Pl\L.A':.GGWDA WRIT APPEAL NO.3VA59:V6:j;2:OO9 (GM?RE$_;..'§ BETWEEN: % " VA A' 1. Karnataka State Ro~a'd"wf': - TranSDort;C'O'?P.i)rati30n; A V Represemfegi 5_y_--.its' " . Managihg Director, 4' KSRTQ, Cer1'tr-~a;I.__Qt'f.i_¢e.__ ' " K.HV. Road,j¥Sha€fItfTi.na«g'ar, . Baragalu-re. ~* .. * 2. The Execa.:tiv"e:4_ErTginéer,:. " A _. Civil Engnineeririg _Dep.artmen'"t, _VlV3anga[<3_%.re D.ivision;~«.. _ _ KS.RT(3,_ '<:'e..;~.::raa Office Btjiiding, % B'aTng:3l_0're__¥+.TV56O 0011. ' Now'R.e fireseh'té:--dTV.by its: H Shwetha Anand, Adv.) Chief Law Officer f_j~..«.KS-.RTC Cent}?-al Office, _ *Shan5finagan ' «B"a--ng.a_|0'rj3 -- 560 027. * % " :APPELLANTS AND : M. Chiranjeevi, S/o. K. Muniswamy Raju Aged about 49 years, Class -- 1 Contractor, Residing at No.1820/1, 8"' Cross, 'C' Block, Shankari Nagar, : ' Bangaiore -- 560 092. This Writ appeal is filed of the._i(airr.1.ata%gaVVVHigh Court Act praying to set aside_...th'e._o'~rder pass_ecf_.%n Writ Petition No.11356/2007 dated ;31/oa/zoos'. This appeal coming on hearing this day, K.SREEDHAi?;'R,AO J;.","ct'ei.i'yered»thelfoliowing:- deeu Respovnceint ca"r'r'éed"o,ut certain construction works of the appeliants. of contract, it is stipuiated that 1%, cessa"is_to' be d"eidu"cted from the running biiis if the I-fit"c-0nt'ii;~a'ct:,,,'is en,trusVt«e'd'""subsequent to 1.11.2006. If the C'contracdt:i:'s..,:entrus_i;ed prior to the said date, the cess has to be paid by.itiifieivnconcerned Department of the Board. The Notification incorporating the above stipuiation is vide G.O.i'~Io.LD 3oo LET zoos, Bangaiore dated "di.@_8§1.2oo7. 75% : DvE*i\i''i"< 1' 2. In the instant case, works are executed on 23.2.2007. The contract work is entrusted by acceptance of tender prior to 18.1.2007. The Governmentj"'C5rde*r," issued shalf have oniy a prospective effect have a retrospective effect. In that__view, theipasésigciw. it by the iearned Singfe Judge directé'_ng': amounts to the respondent and p__ropei=,_
Appeai dismissed.
ksj/-~