{"id":100186,"date":"2011-02-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011"},"modified":"2018-05-11T09:38:31","modified_gmt":"2018-05-11T04:08:31","slug":"mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      At\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                           File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000083\n                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000098\n                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000100\n\n\nDate\u00a0(s)\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing:\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a014,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a014,\u00a02011\n\nThe\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           1.      Mr.\u00a0Raesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud,\n                   Emp\u00ad\u00a09596,\u00a0RITES\u00a0Ltd,\n                   First\u00a0Floor,\u00a0House\u00a0No.\u00a055,\n                   Basisthapur\u00a0Lane\u00a0\u00ad1,\n                   Near\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Bus\u00a0Stand,\n                   Dispur,\u00a0Guwahati,\n                   Assam\u00ad781006\n\n           Respondent(s)\n\n           1.      RITES\u00a0LTD,\n                   GGM(Mareting\u00a0and\u00a0Client\u00a0Services),\n                   RITES\u00a0LTD,\n                   RITES\u00a0Bhavan,\n                   Plot\u00a0No\u00ad\u00a01,\u00a0Sector\u00ad\u00a029,\n                   Gurgaon,\n                   Haryana\n\n           Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Mr.\u00a0A.K.M\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0GGM\/MCS,\u00a0RITES\n                            \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Rahul\u00a0Jha,\u00a0Executive\u00a0Director,\u00a0RITES\n                            \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Vijai\u00a0Kishore,\u00a0GM\/HW,\u00a0RITES\n                            \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0K.K.\u00a0Kapoor,\u00a0AGM\/\u00a0FHW,\u00a0RITES\n\n\n           Information\u00a0Commissioner             :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n\n___________________________________________________________________\n       \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                   At\n                                            New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000083\n\n\n\n                                                 ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.    The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a003.05.2010\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0RITES,\u00a0Gurgaon,\u00a0<\/p>\n
      seeking\u00a0the\u00a0Action\u00a0taken\u00a0Report\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0of\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud\u00a0dated\u00a013.06.2009\u00a0including\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
      day\u00a0progress\u00a0and\u00a0outcome\u00a0results.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.06.2010\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Action\u00a0Taken\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Report\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0prepared\u00a0hence\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0RITES\u00a0Ltd.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0<\/p>\n
      admissible\u00a0Claims\/\u00a0Bills\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0employees\u00a0are\u00a0paid\u00a0on\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0basis\u00a0and\u00a0any\u00a0Bill\/Claim\u00a0not\u00a0payable\u00a0<\/p>\n
      due\u00a0to\u00a0any\u00a0reason\u00a0is\u00a0returned\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0employee\/division.\u00a0No\u00a0Bill\/Claim\u00a0in\u00a0original,\u00a0bearing\u00a0<\/p>\n
      due\u00a0approvals\u00a0of\u00a0Competent\u00a0Authority,\u00a0duly\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0F&A\u00a0Division,\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R.K.\u00a0Sud\u00a0Emp\u00a0<\/p>\n
      No.\u00a09596\u00a0is\u00a0pending\u00a0for\u00a0payment\u00a0in\u00a0F&A\u00a0Division.\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0First\u00a0Appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n
      before\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0on\u00a009.07.2010\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0once\u00a0again.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a012.08.2010\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0after\u00a0going\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0merits\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0case\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
      providing\u00a0due\u00a0opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0for\u00a0his\u00a0submissions,\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0upholding\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
      all\u00a0admissible\u00a0Claims\/Bills\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0employees\u00a0are\u00a0paid\u00a0on\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0basis\u00a0and\u00a0any\u00a0Bill\/claim\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
      payable\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0any\u00a0reason\u00a0is\u00a0returned\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0employee\/Division.\u00a0Still\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Applicant\u00a0 \u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0Second\u00a0Appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a013.10.2010\u00a0seeking\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0T.A\u00a0<\/p>\n
      bills\u00a0amounting\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0Rs.\u00a013,219\/\u00ad\u00a0and\u00a0Rs.\u00a020,690\/\u00ad.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                             \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000098<\/p>\n
Background\n<\/p>\n
 2.    The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a003.05.2010\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0RITES,\u00a0Gurgaon,\u00a0<\/p>\n
      seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a04\u00a0points\u00a0as\u00a0follow:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      (a)       Action\u00a0 Taken\u00a0 Report\u00a0 on\u00a0 the\u00a0letter\u00a0relating\u00a0Rs.\u00a07.933\/\u00ad\u00a0 old\u00a0bills\u00a0\/\u00a0 vouchers\u00a0payments\u00a0of \u00a0<\/p>\n
      Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud\u00a0dated\u00a002.02.2009\u00a0to\u00a0JGM,\u00a0RITES\u00ad\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0progress\u00a0and\u00a0outcome\/results.<\/p>\n
      (b)       Action\u00a0Taken\u00a0Report\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0of\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud\u00a0relating\u00a0Rs.\u00a0756\/\u00ad\u00a0and\u00a0Rs.\u00a07,933\/\u00ad.<\/p>\n
      (c)       Details\u00a0of\u00a0payments\u00a0of\u00a0vouchers\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0amount\u00a0to\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud,l\u00a0Emlpl\u00a0No\u00ad\u00a09596 \u00a0<\/p>\n
      along\u00a0with\u00a0Dates.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      (d)       Names\u00a0and\u00a0Designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0persons\u00a0responsible\u00a0for\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0payments\u00a0and\u00a0when\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n
      payments\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0released.\n<\/p>\n
\n      The \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 replied \u00a0 on \u00a0 11.06.2010 \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Action \u00a0 Taken \u00a0 Report \u00a0 was \u00a0 not \u00a0 prepared \u00a0 hence\u00a0<\/p>\n
      information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0RITES\u00a0Ltd.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0admissible\u00a0Claims\/\u00a0Bills\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      employees\u00a0are\u00a0paid\u00a0on\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0basis\u00a0and\u00a0any\u00a0Bill\/Claim\u00a0not\u00a0payable\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0any\u00a0reason\u00a0is\u00a0returned\u00a0<\/p>\n
      to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0employee\/division.\u00a0No\u00a0Bill\/Claim\u00a0in\u00a0original\u00a0bearing\u00a0due\u00a0approvals\u00a0of\u00a0Competent\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Authority,\u00a0duly\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0F&A\u00a0Division,\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R.K.\u00a0Sud\u00a0Emp\u00a0No.\u00a09596\u00a0is\u00a0pending\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
      payment\u00a0in\u00a0F&A\u00a0Division.\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0First\u00a0Appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0on\u00a010.07.2010\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0once\u00a0again.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
      Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a012.08.2010\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0after\u00a0going\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0merits\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0case\u00a0and\u00a0providing\u00a0<\/p>\n
      due\u00a0 opportunity\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 for\u00a0 his\u00a0submissions,\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0upholding\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0<\/p>\n
      admissible\u00a0Claims\/Bills\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0employees\u00a0are\u00a0paid\u00a0on\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0basis\u00a0and\u00a0any\u00a0Bill\/claim\u00a0not\u00a0payable\u00a0<\/p>\n
      due\u00a0to\u00a0any\u00a0reason\u00a0is\u00a0returned\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0employee\/Division.\u00a0Still\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0<\/p>\n
      filed\u00a0his\u00a0Second\u00a0Appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a013.10.2010\u00a0seeking\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0T.A\u00a0bills.<\/p>\n
                                                                     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000100<\/p>\n
Background<\/p>\n
3.    The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a003.05.2010\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0RITES,\u00a0Gurgaon,\u00a0<\/p>\n
      seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a04\u00a0points\u00a0as\u00a0follow:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      (a)       Action\u00a0Taken\u00a0Report\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a012.06.2009\u00a0of\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud\u00a0relating\u00a0TTA\u00a0Bills \u00a0<\/p>\n
      of\u00a0Rs.\u00a044,253\/\u00ad\u00a0and\u00a0Rs.\u00a022,185\/\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0progress\u00a0and\u00a0outcome\/results.\n<\/p>\n
         (b)       Details\u00a0of\u00a0payments\u00a0of\u00a0vouchers\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0amount\u00a0to\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud,l\u00a0Emlpl\u00a0No\u00ad\u00a09596 \u00a0<\/p>\n
        along\u00a0with\u00a0Dates.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        (c)       Intimate\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0communication\u00a0by\u00a0JGM,\u00a0what\u00a0action\u00a0is\u00a0taken\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0endorsement\u00a0on\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n
        letter\u00a0dated\u00a027.04.2006\u00a0of\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud\u00a0and\u00a0what\u00a0are\u00a0the\u00a0results.<\/p>\n
        (d)       Names\u00a0and\u00a0Designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0persons\u00a0responsible\u00a0for\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0payments\u00a0and\u00a0when\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n
        payments\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0released.\n<\/p>\n
\n        The \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 replied \u00a0 on \u00a0 11.06.2010 \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Action \u00a0 Taken \u00a0 Report \u00a0 was \u00a0 not \u00a0 prepared \u00a0 hence\u00a0<\/p>\n
        information\u00a0sought\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0RITES\u00a0Ltd.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0admissible\u00a0Claims\/\u00a0Bills\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        employees\u00a0are\u00a0paid\u00a0on\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0basis\u00a0and\u00a0any\u00a0Bill\/Claim\u00a0not\u00a0payable\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0any\u00a0reason\u00a0is\u00a0returned\u00a0<\/p>\n
        to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0employee\/division.\u00a0No\u00a0Bill\/Claim\u00a0in\u00a0original\u00a0bearing\u00a0due\u00a0approvals\u00a0of\u00a0Competent\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Authority,\u00a0duly\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0F&A\u00a0Division,\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R.K.\u00a0Sud\u00a0Emp\u00a0No.\u00a09596\u00a0is\u00a0pending\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
        payment\u00a0in\u00a0F&A\u00a0Division.\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0First\u00a0Appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Authority\u00a0on\u00a012.07.2010\u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0once\u00a0again.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
        replied\u00a0 on\u00a0 12.08.2010\u00a0 stating\u00a0 that\u00a0after\u00a0 going\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0 merits\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0 case\u00a0 and\u00a0 providing\u00a0due\u00a0<\/p>\n
        opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0for\u00a0his\u00a0submissions,\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0uppholding\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0PIO\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0admissible\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Claims\/Bills\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0employees\u00a0are\u00a0paid\u00a0on\u00a0day\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0basis\u00a0and\u00a0any\u00a0Bill\/claim\u00a0not\u00a0payable\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n
        reason \u00a0 is \u00a0 returned \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 concerned\u00a0employee\/Division.\u00a0Still\u00a0 not\u00a0 satisfied,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Second\u00a0Appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a017.10.2010\u00a0seeking\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0T.A\u00a0bills.<\/p>\n
Decision\u00a0<\/p>\n
4.      During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a03\u00a0appeals\u00a0pertain\u00a0to\u00a0payments\u00a0of\u00a0TA\u00a0Bills\u00a0<\/p>\n
        and\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0no\u00a0bill\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0Mr.\u00a0R.K.\u00a0Sud\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0left\u00a0unpaid\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0their\u00a0records\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0this\u00a0<\/p>\n
        information\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0in\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a03\u00a0cases\u00a0.\u00a0<\/p>\n
        The\u00a0Commission\u00a0however,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0allow\u00a0inspection\u00a0to\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        relevant\u00a0files\u00a0in\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a03\u00a0cases\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0can\u00a0satisfy\u00a0himself\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
        indeed\u00a0\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0The\u00a0inspection\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0completed\u00a0<\/p>\n
        by\u00a025.03.2011.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.      The\u00a0appeals\u00a0are\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
                                                        (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                              Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
CC:\n<\/p>\n
1.\u00a0      Mr.\u00a0Raesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud,\n         Emp\u00ad\u00a09596,\u00a0RITES\u00a0Ltd,\n         First\u00a0Floor,\u00a0House\u00a0No.\u00a055,\n         Basisthapur\u00a0Lane\u00a0\u00ad1,\n         Near\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Bus\u00a0Stand,\n         Dispur,\u00a0Guwahati,\n         Assam\u00ad781006 \u00a0\n\n\n\n2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer,\n         RITES\u00a0LTD,\n         GGM(Mareting\u00a0and\u00a0Client\u00a0Services),\n         RITES\u00a0LTD,\n         RITES\u00a0Bhavan,\n         Plot\u00a0No\u00ad\u00a01,\u00a0Sector\u00ad\u00a029,\n         Gurgaon,\n         Haryana\n\n\n\n3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\n      RITES\u00a0LTD,\n     GGM(Mareting\u00a0and\u00a0Client\u00a0Services),\n     RITES\u00a0LTD,\n     RITES\u00a0Bhavan,\n     Plot\u00a0No\u00ad\u00a01,\u00a0Sector\u00ad\u00a029,\n     Gurgaon,\n     Haryana\n\n\n\n4.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 At New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000083 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000098 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000100 Date\u00a0(s)\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing:\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a014,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a014,\u00a02011 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Parties: Applicant 1. Mr.\u00a0Raesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud, Emp\u00ad\u00a09596,\u00a0RITES\u00a0Ltd, First\u00a0Floor,\u00a0House\u00a0No.\u00a055, Basisthapur\u00a0Lane\u00a0\u00ad1, Near\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Bus\u00a0Stand, Dispur,\u00a0Guwahati, Assam\u00ad781006 Respondent(s) 1. RITES\u00a0LTD, GGM(Mareting\u00a0and\u00a0Client\u00a0Services), RITES\u00a0LTD, RITES\u00a0Bhavan, Plot\u00a0No\u00ad\u00a01,\u00a0Sector\u00ad\u00a029, Gurgaon, Haryana Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Mr.\u00a0A.K.M\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0GGM\/MCS,\u00a0RITES \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Rahul\u00a0Jha,\u00a0Executive\u00a0Director,\u00a0RITES \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Vijai\u00a0Kishore,\u00a0GM\/HW,\u00a0RITES \u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0K.K.\u00a0Kapoor,\u00a0AGM\/\u00a0FHW,\u00a0RITES Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 At New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000083 ORDER Background […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-05-11T04:08:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-11T04:08:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1009,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-05-11T04:08:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-05-11T04:08:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-11T04:08:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011"},"wordCount":1009,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011","name":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-05-11T04:08:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-14-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 14 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100186\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}