{"id":100636,"date":"2009-12-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009"},"modified":"2014-11-24T22:59:32","modified_gmt":"2014-11-24T17:29:32","slug":"ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
OFFICE OF THE ASST.<\/p>\n
BIJAPUR CIRCLE.\n<\/p>\n
CTS. NO. 1005.\n<\/p>\n
GOKUL ROAD.\n<\/p>\n
BIJAPUR.   –\n<\/p>\n
2. SJ. BHAGAT,
\nCHEMIST.  _
\nNO. 131\/B. ZN” BLOCK’.\n<\/p>\n
RAJAJ I NAGAR.\n<\/p>\n
BANGALORE -~ 560 010.  ‘<\/p>\n
3. RAJENDRA
\nS\/0. MANOHAR ANVEKAR. 1
\nKAMAT CO?\u00bb–‘EPOUN1′)’.’*–.:” ‘ ”\n<\/p>\n
MAVINK;-‘~'{fTA}’* L
\nBENG.RE..Vl1?;I,AGE,\u00ab_ _
\n     .-\n<\/p>\n
U’f”{ARAK”Aj\\J_N A9 g,-,r)1S’ i’R__IC’l’. <\/p>\n
4. RS.  ”\n<\/p>\n
CP\u00a7E1\\’\u00a3_IST,.  V
\nS.P.~COMPOUND.. ”\n<\/p>\n
NH — I-7. EI71ATKAT}'”\n<\/p>\n
\u00a2 U1_TA.RA.mN NADA DlS’E’RIC’I’.\n<\/p>\n
 ._ .  …..   RESPONDEINTS
\n{COMMON}
\n  S(SY:”‘SR1..’P.H.G0TK_H1ND1.1~1.c.G.P. FORR~1_}
\n1  (R2 ‘&);R34 NOTICE DISPENSED}<\/p>\n
 CRLPS ARE FILED U\/S. 482 CR.P.C BY THE<\/p>\n
~ .  V “ADVVOCA’l’E FOR THE P}3″l’I’}’IOE\\FE3RS PRAYING TO QUASH THE\n<\/p>\n
– _ V~fI3ROCEE2[)INGS IN QC. No. 24\/2009 ON” “rm: FILE OF
\n JVUDECIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS. 111 COURT. HUBLI, SO
\n‘  FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNEI3 AND TO PASS SUCH<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n
3.<\/p>\n
which was anaiysed and signed on behalf 0!’ the G(\u00a7\\’:e1:i1:h’iveI11<\/p>\n
Analyst and also Director 0!” Centra} Drug  <\/p>\n
pegitioners have challenged the same._0n ‘gi7QL1hd’_f_th’at,u’<\/p>\n
under Sec. 25(3) Drug Inspector has-1.0  <\/p>\n
seized item to the Gove1″n11V1eVri’t…Ana’lyst.gbuL ‘i_h’ere “is no?<\/p>\n
provision under Sec. 25(3) {.0  s.eimeV_ioV_l.ihe Centrai
\nDrug Laboratory. Tho1.1vgr’2 V:i’h.e  it to the
\nGovernment. A11a1.13’5\\1. i'{:.’}’1’ElE;,. the Director.<\/p>\n
\nCentral   to Sec. 25(3) and\n[4] of    It is the contention of\nthe  which is avaiiable to the\n<\/pre>\n
I1}E1r1LifE3.(‘IIl!l’1’ifTC’,:’i’vie)’   F01′ the second opinion is<\/p>\n
being;d’eprived.’* ._:Seec):’i(i1y. the drug, which was sent to the<\/p>\n
vC}\u00bb:).\\{ei’r111’ien! _}X112alyst’ for its report, is after the expiry date of the<\/p>\n
Adifug. Haw requires to be imeifered by this Court<\/p>\n
Lnnelexf See.’  of Cr.\u00a5’.C.\n<\/p>\n
 _ T 2.’r\u00a3h support: of his submission the learned Counsel<\/p>\n
 e ‘pEV\u00e91eesA’re1ia11ce on a judgment. reported in AIR 2008 SC 1939<\/p>\n
 V.  A\/Iecifearnen Biotech Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Rubina Bose, Drug<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
Inspector}. wherein the H’on’ble Supreme Court has held that ~
\nobtzatmfng a report Lmder Section 25(4). which. deprivesyizeheifight
\nofa person to prefer an appeal’\/’or second opinion. _  i<\/p>\n
3. Under See. 25(1) the Di’ug[Inspeyotfjor’xyheis <\/p>\n
unit ofthe seized drug to the M,:1gisti’ateA and aft’eru5obV’tainir;gthe;_<\/p>\n
report from the Drug Analyst t.h’end’t1nder No-\u00a7.–I issued
\nunder Rule 3 of the 1945i’Dif_ug  it  to be signed by the
\nMagistrate. In the instant (T,-“r:tsei.,”Vitibhetsytvhrior. jjeen sent. by the<\/p>\n
Magistrate to  :_Centraii.”D.i”rug__VLaboratory. Hence.<\/p>\n
the saidiyaction ‘arm V\\1*io1\u00e91:t_e’svv—__the- provision. Hence. the case<\/p>\n
which is pending in-m”e:.’Ac.oVLn::_ ‘below is required to be interfered<\/p>\n
by settirig aside the entire proceedings.<\/p>\n
 ‘V   Government Pleacier has filed statement of<\/p>\n
it  objeetionsV___vnf,f1aVtr”tincier Sec. 25(1) Drug Inspector has to send} the<\/p>\n
-\u00ab..fj;’v’A”.s\u00e9i’nfip1\u20acS’fer report to the Government Analyst, and in the<\/p>\n
:’ns.t\u00e9mt_.=’case Government Analyst” who was promoted as a<\/p>\n
VM  D_e}2{1t’y Director ofCent1’al Drug Laboratory has issued a report<\/p>\n
t<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
in the capacity of Government Analyst as a Director._.._ Hence,<\/p>\n
there is no contravention of the provisions. Fiii’i:l:ier.’iE is<\/p>\n
subrnitted that. Government of Endia has issued”Not’il”iLta”‘t’iO:r’i–‘in,<\/p>\n
the year 1985 as per Aimexure\u00bbF~7; \u00bbno_t’_ifyir;lg oiie.l:pe1*sonV as a ‘ . C<\/p>\n
Government Analyst. The said person  ap’po’intedl, .iiiai.;\u00a7’rK\u00a2n<\/p>\n
he came to be promoted as’>_[“)’i~1:zect.or’v-of Ce1it11’a’i:._’i;;a_bore1tory.’<\/p>\n
Hence. there is no report n’1ac_l__ell’by his Gover1_im_e51it’, Analyst
\nsince he is promoted as .Ditfe–ctC{1fl oi:’Dor11AgtLaboratory. He has<\/p>\n
relied upon a judgment. Zreported’by\u00bb_i1ie7HonTble Supreme Court<\/p>\n
in AIR 1979’_S_  ~.l.3″<'_'\u00abt\\\/':'.r'sT'_:e'11  Misra U. State of<\/p>\n
U.P., wlierein iti'7l.iasll'beeii_:'b:e_lti that — {Ct} Drugs and Cosmetics
\nAct (23 C2f"l 940).    of samples by Inspector direct<\/p>\n
to Dir;\u00e9c'ioz* CenIf'r'a\u00a3 Drugs Laborcttorg — Perrnfssibilizgy.<\/p>\n
5.:\/_—fE’heAexpres’s’i’on unless the sample has already been<\/p>\n
_  in the Central Drug Laboratory Clearly<\/p>\n
iiilc:Ii.cates_tl;iaiL_.apart from the mode prescribed in Sec. 25(4) the<\/p>\n
“._’SE1.l”l’i;]l\u20ac_’~’.~ c:a_ri be sent forA11aiyst of the Central Drug Laboratory.<\/p>\n
‘~.iTlie19’e~\u00absis no prohibition un er the Act or the Rules barring the<\/p>\n
inspector from sending sample directly to the Di1’eet_o~r,:”Central<\/p>\n
Drugs Laboratory. Section 25(1) and {4} eiearlix-*<\/p>\n
sending of the sample directly to t.hemC,entra.i’ i\u00a7a~boi:am_{y’.’~.<\/p>\n
which is eiaborately discussed in }):’v_3\u00a31′–E\u00a7~:V 7’=,a1″-id’ Ii:”ee.oI”‘iA:1t_i’1e<\/p>\n
judgment. Hence, it. is SL1bI11iii.t3\u00abf__j that;,_in tiheetinistjant ease ‘Eh\u00a7_-‘:1<\/p>\n
Inspector has sent” the san1piei”‘t:o the Gmreirnmefant Analyst.
\nUnder Section 258]  C}io\\Ii’e’r~.3:i’r.r_1.ent: Anaiyst has also
\nissued report. who was _al_s”o=.inV._ehar\u00a7;”eV’oi3iDi’1’eetor of Central<\/p>\n
Drugs Labo1’at.ory.Zgtiiencize t.he”re is’ i1o”‘eon-t;i*aventi.ion.
\n it hiave iiieaiii; :t’.11e’a.r’izgmen’ts.<\/p>\n
7. The ease V017 pe-t:i\u20acio’nei’ requires an interpretation.<\/p>\n
which-may  in the eriminai petition. If it had<\/p>\n
 ‘bC\u20acI:l”- i’na:ie Hilde!’ I-‘tr’t’i(‘Ie 226 under writ ju.risciliet.ion. there<\/p>\n
wchildi  iaeeiiha scope for interpretation. Hence under Sec.<\/p>\n
25[3]’rand.  there is contravention. it is not for this<\/p>\n
  *Court. t.CVVci\u00a3c%ide. But the purpose of t.he report under Sec. 25(1)<\/p>\n
“isVt.o'”exan1ine the contents of the drug. It is contemplated<\/p>\n
 unjcler Sec. 25(1) the Drug Inspector has forwarded the drug<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
S<\/p>\n
belongs to the petitioner to the Drug Analyst. Accordir1gl\u00a7*–f)ri.:g<\/p>\n
Analyss\ufb01 himself has examined in the capacity oifilie Dli’1i’:%e’:o.r”oi’v.<\/p>\n
Central Drug Laboratory. Under iliese e.i’r’eL1r:isv!,af1ee’s, izhe\ufb01<\/p>\n
prayer made by petitioner that the:;\u00bbrespQ[i”rdent 4C:orI1_rlIi.’1_I,1j.e(l<\/p>\n
an error in foiwardiiig the drlig sarripie-._after E3153: ‘ex’piry.’tla1eV.L<\/p>\n
and also as to whether the I’\u20ac}l)C)I”_l.”l~$”‘SLi(:'(.Il. ei1.he,1fl\u00a7.’.:5[3VlllVor {4} i1 <\/p>\n
for him to make submission___bei’c)re.._Vthe ‘iagisirate. The
\njudgment referred by thele.21ri’1e(:1%.j_eoi.iriLseAl”i”or the petitioner is
\nrioi applicable in this ease.fQ.r’–!.;he._reasoi1.sVsi;a–t’ed above.<\/p>\n
Aeeord_ingly_.1Peivitiioris arve”ljVable_’1o be rejected.
\nPetitioner l1″eselw_eCl._ Ili’:1._e~i”:y to place all the materials<\/p>\n
beiTo1’e 3 he 5c;;()I’:i pe1’e11t C’o1,1r1_._A ,<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy OFFICE OF THE ASST. BIJAPUR CIRCLE. CTS. NO. 1005. GOKUL ROAD. BIJAPUR. – 2. SJ. BHAGAT, CHEMIST. _ NO. 131\/B. ZN” BLOCK’. RAJAJ I NAGAR. BANGALORE -~ 560 010. ‘ 3. RAJENDRA S\/0. MANOHAR ANVEKAR. 1 KAMAT CO?\u00bb–‘EPOUN1′)’.’*–.:” ‘ ” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-24T17:29:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-24T17:29:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1167,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-24T17:29:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-24T17:29:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-24T17:29:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009"},"wordCount":1167,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009","name":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-24T17:29:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-shivani-laboratories-vs-drugs-inspector-on-11-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S.Shivani Laboratories vs Drugs Inspector on 11 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100636\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}