{"id":100883,"date":"2011-02-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011"},"modified":"2018-03-16T00:13:20","modified_gmt":"2018-03-15T18:43:20","slug":"mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011<\/div>\n
                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                         File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000122\n                                                                                CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000155\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a021,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a021,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud\n           H.No.55,\u00a01st\u00a0floor\n           Basistha\u00a0pur\u00a0Lane\u00a0-\u00a01\n           Near\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Bus\u00a0Stand\n           Dispur\n           Guwahati\u00a0781\u00a0006\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n           RITES\u00a0Limited\n           RITES\u00a0Bhawan\n           No.1,\u00a0Sector\u00ad29\n           Gurgaon\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.M.Sharma,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Group\u00a0General\u00a0Manager\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                               Decision\u00a0Notice\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                           at\n                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000122\n                                                                                                CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000155\n\n\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000122<\/p>\n
1.     The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 dt.3.5.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 RITES \u00a0 seeking \u00a0 the \u00a0 name\/s \u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n
       designation \u00a0 of \u00a0 Nodal \u00a0 Officer\/s \u00a0 appointed\u00a0 by\u00a0 RITES\u00a0 Management\u00a0 to\u00a0 finalize\u00a0 the\u00a0 various\u00a0 pending\u00a0<\/p>\n
       issue\/s.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.M.Sharma,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a010.6.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0nodal\u00a0officer\u00a0appointed\u00a0by\u00a0RITES\u00a0<\/p>\n
       management \u00a0 to \u00a0 finalize \u00a0 various \u00a0 issues \u00a0 under \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 Act, \u00a0 2005 \u00a0 is \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 A.K.M.Sharma \u00a0 PIO\/GGM\u00a0<\/p>\n
       (Marketing\u00a0&\u00a0Client\u00a0Services).\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.7.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
       stating\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005,\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0PIO\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0is\u00a0mandatory\u00a0u\/s\u00a05(1),\u00a0<\/p>\n
       within \u00a0 one \u00a0 hundred \u00a0 days\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 enactment\u00a0 of\u00a0 Act,\u00a0 as\u00a0 such\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 can’t\u00a0 be\u00a0 said\u00a0 to\u00a0 be\u00a0 RITES\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Management\u00a0representative\u00a0and\u00a0requested\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0name\u00a0&\u00a0Designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0person\u00a0(Nodal\u00a0Officer)\u00a0<\/p>\n
       appointed\u00a0by\u00a0RITES\u00a0Management\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0rules\/regulations\/RITES\u00a0Manual\/Policy\/SoP\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0<\/p>\n
       along\u00a0with\u00a0 \u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0he\u00a0order.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0Rahul\u00a0Jha,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a013.8.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Shri\u00a0A.K.M.Sharma\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0nodal\u00a0officer\u00a0appointed\u00a0by\u00a0RITES\u00a0Management\u00a0to\u00a0finalize\u00a0various\u00a0issues\u00a0<\/p>\n
       under\u00a0RTI.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0Cell\u00a0with\u00a0Smt.\u00a0S.K.Sharma,\u00a0AGM(Admn.)\u00a0as\u00a0its\u00a0in\u00ad<\/p>\n
       charge\u00a0 has\u00a0 recently\u00a0 been\u00a0 constituted\u00a0vide\u00a0order\u00a0dt.25.5.10.\u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.18.10.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000155<\/p>\n
2.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.3.5.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0RITES\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0report\u00a0<\/p>\n
       on\u00a0his\u00a0two\u00a0letters\u00a0dt.16.2.09\u00a0and\u00a030.10.08.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.M.Sharma,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a03.6.10\u00a0as\u00a0follows:<\/p>\n
       ‘Appropriate\u00a0authorities\u00a0in\u00a0RITES\u00a0had\u00a0considered\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0and\u00a0concluded\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0news\u00a0item\u00a0on \u00a0<\/p>\n
       page\u00a07\u00a0of\u00a0issue\u00adI\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RITES\u00a0update\u00a0Vol.1,\u00a02008\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0subject\u00a0project,\u00a0is\u00a0in\u00a0order\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0name(s) \u00a0<\/p>\n
       of\u00a0the\u00a0deserving\u00a0officers\u00a0have\u00a0rightly\u00a0been\u00a0included\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0news\u00a0item.
\n          It\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0Action\u00a0Taken\u00a0Report\u00a0(ATR)\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0prepared<\/p>\n
         Not \u00a0 satisfied \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 reply, \u00a0 the\u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed\u00a0 an\u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dt.7.7.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n
         reiterating \u00a0 his \u00a0 request \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 information. \u00a0 \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Rahul \u00a0 Jha, \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 vide \u00a0 his \u00a0 order\u00a0<\/p>\n
         dt.13.8.10\u00a0 upheld\u00a0 the\u00a0 decision\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.\u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n
         second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.10.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000122<\/p>\n
3.       During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Sharma, \u00a0 Respondent \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 besides \u00a0 him \u00a0 who \u00a0 has \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n
         nominated\u00a0as\u00a0Nodal\u00a0Officer\u00a0to\u00a0deal\u00a0with\u00a0issues\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0RTI,\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0about\u00a0which\u00a0 \u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n
         already\u00a0\u00a0been\u00a0intimated\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0other\u00a0officer\u00a0who\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0designated\u00a0as\u00a0Nodal\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Officer\u00a0by\u00a0RITES\u00a0to\u00a0finalize\u00a0various\u00a0pending\u00a0issues.<\/p>\n
4.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0inform\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0<\/p>\n
         to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0formally\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a021.3.11\u00a0.\u00a0<\/p>\n
5.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000155<\/p>\n
6.       It\u00a0is\u00a0clear\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO’s\u00a0reply\u00a0and\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0action\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
         taken\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0two\u00a0letters\u00a0that\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0RITES\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0Since\u00a0available\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
         has\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0and\u00a0since\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0\u00a0not\u00a0clear\u00a0what\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0required\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         appeal\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0observations\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0closed\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0end\u00a0.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                                             \u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                                                                             (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar
\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.    Shri\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud
\n      H.No.55,\u00a01st\u00a0floor
\n      Basistha\u00a0pur\u00a0Lane\u00a0–\u00a01
\n      Near\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Bus\u00a0Stand
\n      Dispur
\n      Guwahati\u00a0781\u00a0006<\/p>\n
2.    The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n      RITES\u00a0Limited
\n      RITES\u00a0Bhawan
\n      No.1,\u00a0Sector\u00ad29
\n      Gurgaon<\/p>\n
3.    The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n      RITES\u00a0Limited
\n      RITES\u00a0Bhawan
\n      No.1,\u00a0Sector\u00ad29
\n      Gurgaon<\/p>\n
4.    Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000122 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000155 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a021,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0February\u00a021,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Sud H.No.55,\u00a01st\u00a0floor Basistha\u00a0pur\u00a0Lane\u00a0–\u00a01 Near\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Bus\u00a0Stand Dispur Guwahati\u00a0781\u00a0006 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer RITES\u00a0Limited RITES\u00a0Bhawan No.1,\u00a0Sector\u00ad29 Gurgaon Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.M.Sharma,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Group\u00a0General\u00a0Manager Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000122 CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000155 ORDER Background CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000122 1. The \u00a0 Applicant […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-15T18:43:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-15T18:43:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":609,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-15T18:43:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-15T18:43:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-15T18:43:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011"},"wordCount":609,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011","name":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-15T18:43:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajesh-kumar-sud-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-21-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sud vs Ministry Of Railways on 21 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100883\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}