{"id":101316,"date":"2009-10-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009"},"modified":"2016-01-18T01:40:28","modified_gmt":"2016-01-17T20:10:28","slug":"abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 983 of 2008()\n\n\n1. ABDUL SAMAD, S\/O. ABDURAHIMAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. ABDUL LATHEEF DO.....DO.....\n3. ABDUL GAFFOOR, DO...DO....\n4. LIYAKKATHALI, DO....DO....\n5. AYISHUMMA,  DO....DO....\n6. NOORJAHAR DO....DO.....\n7. BRIYA HAJJUMMA,W\/O. ABDURAHIMAN\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. PATHUMMA, D\/O. KIZHAKKE PEEDIKAYIL\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.KRISHNANUNNI (SR)\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :06\/10\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                        THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                          R.S.A. NO.983 of 2008\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                   Dated this the 6th day of October, 2009\n\n\n                              J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>                               &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>\n     Appellants-defendants who were unsuccessful in the courts<\/p>\n<p>below in defending the suit for decree for prohibitory injunction based<\/p>\n<p>on possession have preferred this Second Appeal urging as a<\/p>\n<p>substantial question of law whether in the absence of measurement of<\/p>\n<p>disputed property with reference to title deeds and declaration of title,<\/p>\n<p>courts below were legally correct in finding possession of the disputed<\/p>\n<p>property in favour of respondent?\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.     Property schedule in the plaint is Kaikkottu Thodika Nilam<\/p>\n<p>and Tank which according to the respondent originally belonged to<\/p>\n<p>Venkita Hassan, father of plaintiff No.1 as per Ext.A1, partition deed<\/p>\n<p>No.1300\/1969 and on his death it devolved on his wife and children<\/p>\n<p>(respondent, plaintiff No.1 and others). Right of other legal heirs were<\/p>\n<p>purchased by respondent and plaintiff No.1 as per Ext.A2, document<\/p>\n<p>No.1737\/1976. Respondent and plaintiff No.1 claimed that they are in<\/p>\n<p>possession of the suit property and produced Ext.A3 series, receipts for<\/p>\n<p>payment of revenue. During the pendency of the suit plaintiff No.1<\/p>\n<p>died.  Appellants contended that respondent, plaintiff No.1 or their<\/p>\n<p>R.S.A. No.983 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>predecessor had no right, right and interest over the property and that<\/p>\n<p>the Tank referred to in the plaint schedule is situated in R.S. No.25\/3<\/p>\n<p>and not R.S. No.19\/1 in which respondent and deceased plaintiff No.1<\/p>\n<p>claiming right, title, interest and possession. They contended that the<\/p>\n<p>Tank and property on its north, south and west belonged to Alikutthy,<\/p>\n<p>their brother as per document No.1292 of 1958 and partition deed<\/p>\n<p>No.2760 of 1964.        Tank with the land was allotted to the share of<\/p>\n<p>appellants.     Learned munsiff observed that there is no payment of<\/p>\n<p>court fee under Section 27(a) of the Court Fees Act and hence an<\/p>\n<p>enquiry into title is not required.        Learned munsiff found that<\/p>\n<p>respondent and deceased plaintiff No.1 were in possession of the suit<\/p>\n<p>property on the date of suit and granted decree as prayed for. First<\/p>\n<p>appellate court has concurred with the finding of learned munsiff.<\/p>\n<p>Contention of learned Senior counsel is that in a case of this nature<\/p>\n<p>principle that possession follows title has to be adopted.  In this case<\/p>\n<p>trial court found on evidence that possession of suit property which is<\/p>\n<p>a Tank is with the respondent and deceased plaintiff No.1. Exhibit A1<\/p>\n<p>is the partition deed No.1300 of 1969 as per which according to the<\/p>\n<p>respondent and deceased plaintiff No.1, their predecessor got title<\/p>\n<p>and possession over the suit property.         In Ext.A1, A schedule is<\/p>\n<p>R.S.A. No.983 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>allotted to the predecessor of respondent and deceased plaintiff No.1<\/p>\n<p>and property is described as Kaikkottu Thodika Nilam, Tank and other<\/p>\n<p>improvements.        It is said to be in 52 cents in R.S. No.19\/1 lying in<\/p>\n<p>two taks. Same description is given in Ext.A2, document in favour of<\/p>\n<p>respondent and deceased plaintiff No.1 executed by other legal heirs<\/p>\n<p>of Venkata Hassan.       Item    No.4 in Exhibit A2 is the suit property.<\/p>\n<p>Description in the plaint schedule is in accordance with Exts.A1 and<\/p>\n<p>A2.   Western boundary of suit property is Nariyan Chola Parambu<\/p>\n<p>which is now in the possession of appellants. Commissioner found that<\/p>\n<p>the disputed Tank is situated in        Kaikkottu Thodika Nilam and that<\/p>\n<p>Nariyan Chola Parambu which admittedly belong to appellants             is<\/p>\n<p>situated on a higher level and between two properties, there is a ridge<\/p>\n<p>having sufficient width which is used by the public.        Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>also found another Tank in the suit property but trial court found that it<\/p>\n<p>is not a Tank but only a small pit.        Further finding entered by the<\/p>\n<p>courts below on evidence is that in the Paramba belonging to<\/p>\n<p>appellants they have constructed a Tank which is 10 metres away<\/p>\n<p>from the disputed Tank in the suit property. Courts below observed<\/p>\n<p>that if really appellants were using the disputed Tank there was no<\/p>\n<p>necessity for them to construct a separate Tank which is 10 metres<\/p>\n<p>R.S.A. No.983 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>away from the disputed Tank.         Courts below also found that the<\/p>\n<p>physical boundary separating the property belonging to respondent<\/p>\n<p>and deceased plaintiff No.1 and Nariyan Chola Pramba belonging to<\/p>\n<p>appellants is the ridge. It is true that Commissioner noticed a canal<\/p>\n<p>towards east of the disputed Tank but appellants have no case that the<\/p>\n<p>said canal is their eastern boundary. It has come in evidence that in<\/p>\n<p>the documents of title      of appellants (Exts.B1 to B3) there is no<\/p>\n<p>mention about the Tank. On the other hand, Exts.A1 and A2 relied on<\/p>\n<p>by respondent and deceased plaintiff No.1 refer to the Kaikkottu<\/p>\n<p>Thodika Nilam and Tank.      Suit property is Nilam as seen from the<\/p>\n<p>report of Commissioner. As per Exts.B1 to B3, property of appellants is<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Paramba&#8221;. It is in the above circumstances that trial court found that<\/p>\n<p>possession of the suit property is with respondent and deceased<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff No.1 as on the date of suit. First appellate court concurred<\/p>\n<p>with that finding after consideration of the evidence.        Finding of<\/p>\n<p>courts below rests on a proper appreciation of the evidence on record.<\/p>\n<p>This Court can interfere with the finding of fact entered by the first<\/p>\n<p>appellate court which concurred with the finding of trial court only<\/p>\n<p>when the finding is not supported by any evidence or the finding is<\/p>\n<p>perverse.     Neither of that situation arises in this case. As such the<\/p>\n<p>R.S.A. No.983 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>substantial question of law raised by appellants do not really arise for<\/p>\n<p>consideration. Second Appeal is without merit and it is only to be<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Second Appeal is dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                           THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nvsv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 983 of 2008() 1. ABDUL SAMAD, S\/O. ABDURAHIMAN &#8230; Petitioner 2. ABDUL LATHEEF DO&#8230;..DO&#8230;.. 3. ABDUL GAFFOOR, DO&#8230;DO&#8230;. 4. LIYAKKATHALI, DO&#8230;.DO&#8230;. 5. AYISHUMMA, DO&#8230;.DO&#8230;. 6. NOORJAHAR DO&#8230;.DO&#8230;.. 7. BRIYA HAJJUMMA,W\/O. ABDURAHIMAN Vs 1. PATHUMMA, D\/O. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-17T20:10:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T20:10:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":947,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T20:10:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-17T20:10:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T20:10:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009"},"wordCount":947,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009","name":"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T20:10:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-samad-vs-pathumma-on-6-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abdul Samad vs Pathumma on 6 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101316"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101316\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}