{"id":101411,"date":"2008-06-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-29T05:10:39","modified_gmt":"2017-05-28T23:40:39","slug":"shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri &#8230; on 4 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri &#8230; on 4 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT 0}?' KARNATAKA, BANGALORQWT\n\nDATED THIS THE 4% DAY OF JUNE 2003A&amp;%%a  V\n\nBEFORE   .\nma 1~10m3LE MR. JUSTICER.'B. NAEC:    \u00ab\n\nBETWEEN\n\nShaina Rae Shakale,\n\nS \/ 0 S1.:bbojiRao,\n\nAged about 40 years,  s _   ;\nRfat N0.1'78, Nagade:vanaha1Ii,~l V  \"\nGrananbharathi Post,  V  - \nBangaiore.    \n(By M13 13 &amp; s  Aasio\u00e9meg   %\n\n V . . . .    ll  ~_  '\n\nState of   bggf  I\" .\nKcngcri Traf\ufb01c  ' __  \"  : Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>(By.Sri.  )<\/p>\n<p>  V  Revision Peti\ufb01on is filed under Section<br \/>\n397 ffw-[&#8216;401-C:?,F.\u00bbCi.=13rayi11g to set aside the Judgnlent and<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217;-.__()IV&#8217;dCI&#8217; of 1116: Cityf&#8217;E&#8217;ai$t &#8216;Prack{Se-ssions) Judge, Bangalore City<\/p>\n<p> (F.&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;.C.Nd;&#8211;VI).-._&#8217;ii1-.Cr1.A.No.311\/2005 Dated 18.11.2005 and<\/p>\n<p>.__j;.I.uudg;ncnt and order of the 13.0., Sp1., Court for Economic<\/p>\n<p> _  Ot&#8217;fence$,__ Bangalore City in C.C.No.134\/&#8217;2004(O1d<br \/>\n  _1:2&#8217;*:~37\/ 2.997) Dated 24.02.2005.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   Tizis petiticn coming on for hearing, this day the Court,<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216; &#8216;T . . _ _  the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>CRIMINAL REWSION PE&#8217;I&#8217;I&#8217;I&#8217;ION 1s:Q;.m3 <\/p>\n<p> i$$u:.:\u00a71$a;v 0:&#8217; 1%.-&#8216;\u00a7LE&#8217;\u00a3&#8217;\u00a7&amp;I1&#8242;{L, &#8220;325: i\u00e9f\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9fii\ufb02\ufb01 G1&#8221; P&#8217;%?\u20ac&#8217;Se. I 82, 2<br \/>\n  \u00a7&amp;Cu1&#8243;&#8216;\u00e9:\u20aci bfjf\ufb02f\ufb01 {\u00a316 Coast 3116: \ufb02&#8217;}.{&#8216;E3e&#8217; 31% net.<br \/>\n $3 &lt;:\u00a7*&lt;}$S~=\u20ac}:a;:i\u00a7Ii\u00a3a\u20aciG11 E33: 3&#039;16 c&#039;1\u00e9:f\u00a3::&quot;i$\u00e9;: and ?;h{iI&quot;\u20ac\ufb01f(}E&#039;\u20aci,<\/p>\n<p> is {:5 \u20ac};1&lt;&#8211;: &lt;::&lt;::&#039;1$i\u00a3i\ufb01:t*i\u00e9{&#039;: visa? 33.3: f3i?\u00a7{\u00a7\u20ac\u00a7&#039;1\u20ac3\u20ac &lt;32&#039; ?WS.E,<\/p>\n<p>b arzii 2 13:5 \ufb01yi\u00e9vz-&#039;i{.21e\u20acs$ {&lt;3 %.E&#039;zt&#039;: ailziigi\u00e9d acaiizi\ufb01ili Wili hav\ufb01 {G be:<\/p>\n<p>the acctig\u00e9dupetiticn\ufb01r submitted that PWS. 1 8; 2, aft\ufb01zj<br \/>\n&amp;xami\u00a7;1atix311\u00abi11\u00abchi\u20acf W\u20aci&#039;\u20ac subjected to \u00ab:.:r&lt;::ss&#8211;~\u20acXa.1\u00a7\u00a7ii:\ufb01\u00e9t%\u00a7\ufb01,r.-i<br \/>\nthan thereaffzer, an application was \ufb011\u00a7d&#8230;t\u00a7&#039; reac\u00e9iii  {$33  &#039;<br \/>\nwiiiiesseg for fur&#039;\u20acE1\u20ac1* crosswaxanaiilaiiignij &quot;i}.;\u00a7e  ij<br \/>\na\ufb02awa\u00e9 in 831133 Gf issuasace of Sn\u00a3:\u00a7i:1\u00a2\ufb02\u00a7   .{hE\u20acf}-&#039;<br \/>\ndid 320*; appear bafare fh\ufb01  f&#039;G.;&quot;&#039; .i;i1i*&#039;i;&#039;\ufb017L.\u00a21*_ \u00a7::1*&lt;:vs3~<br \/>\ne:xa111iz1ation an\u00e9 as such,   fsiav\u00e9r {G &#039;:36<br \/>\n\u20ac${:hew\u20acd, since  .\u00a7&quot;;aV\u00a7;&quot;&quot;:i0&#039;-5: seiv\u00e9g fair<br \/>\n&lt;:1*{:$s\u00abexan1iI1ati&lt;\u00a71*L &quot;       the svicienczs<br \/>\nadduced by ,:Ef:   \u00a7&#8217;1::%&#8230;$::ii\ufb01Ci\u20ac11t ta: gjvrcva {ha<\/p>\n<p>Ii\ufb01g\ufb01gifi\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01 {ER th\u00e9  *\u20ac:&#8217;:Vf:3\u00a7&#8217;Vtlfg\u00e9=:g.\u00e9i,*\u00a71S\u20acd=}3\ufb01tiii@:161&#8242; anc} ;:rra3\u00a3a:*:{E<\/p>\n<p>far geiti\ufb01g a$id \u00e9L\u00ab\u00ab..t_}&#8221;1:3 J\u00a7:s:ig:1:i&lt;:1j_.:li; Cut&#039; {Z&#039;IOi&quot;\u00a7.&#039;\u00a7?\u00a7;{;&#039;E&#039;{;iGi&quot;i pasgad &#039;:C}\u00a7&quot; the<\/p>\n<p>&lt;:C.&#039;~&#039;L::?7.&#039;5,%    &quot;  &#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>ESL  Q1: {f:;&#8217;\u00a7i_1&#8242;{&#8220;ff&#8217;Li} \u00a7cru{:ii13-* Gf 131$ 1&#8243;\u20acC{JI&#8221;dS it is: Seen that<\/p>\n<p>\/QL,Q;.Lr~.,\u00a3r.A:LL&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>bus on the date of accident or not, Ex.P.-4 notice issued to<\/p>\n<p>the Traffic Inspector and the reply given by him ve&#8217;\u00bb_&#8221;Wou1d<\/p>\n<p>assume importance. On perusal of Ex.P.4  an<\/p>\n<p>the C0h.l1I}.I}.S of the said notice are kept  1  <\/p>\n<p>the name Inspector (I&#8217;-&#8216;W.5) of  d<\/p>\n<p>to the notice as per Ex.P.5 and   ef ,<\/p>\n<p>the driver of the offending bus&#8217; 17 to be<br \/>\nShayama Rae Shakle _   This<br \/>\ndocument] reply notice   to have been<br \/>\nprepared on ._   _    _shect\/leg sheet.\n<\/p>\n<p>From the __1&lt;_)\u00a7   the learned counsel<br \/>\nthat   has been entered in the log<\/p>\n<p>sheet as St1e::fnRa6  token No. 6344. The name<\/p>\n<p>.. of the }l_diiV&#039;er   token number is mentioned in a<\/p>\n<p>  is also pointed out that the vehicle number<\/p>\n<p>  as 40 and the same has been scored<\/p>\n<p> &#039; o\ufb02&#039;   it is mentioned as F-617. Likewise, the<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab   &#039;nunibcr of the driver was initially mentioned as 66<\/p>\n<p>   same has been seared off and has been re~&#8211;entered<\/p>\n<p>V&#039;   &quot; the route number. according to the proswution is<\/p>\n<p>224~\u00bbD Whereas, the route number mentioned , is<\/p>\n<p>220\/} and as such, the learned counsel forfiie&#039; <\/p>\n<p>submitted that the prosecution  <\/p>\n<p>marked as at Ex.P.5 &amp; 6 to falsely   %<\/p>\n<p>herein, the &#039;I&#039;ra\ufb01&#039;1c     <\/p>\n<p>document Ex.P.6, tllongh    petitioner<br \/>\nwas not at all involved    arguxnent of<br \/>\nthe learned eounselfor  a doubt, it<br \/>\ndoes not    the bus driven<br \/>\nby the   in the accident, since,<br \/>\nthe evidez_1ce;oi;   of the bus who was<\/p>\n<p>conducting  uifetmi\u00e9tinvgs  has stated in his evidence that<\/p>\n<p>&quot; he  the  and later on, he got _doWn from the<\/p>\n<p>  {me motor cycle and the person had fallen on<\/p>\n<p>   the rn   and another person also had fallen on<\/p>\n<p>the  However, on careful reading of the evidence of<\/p>\n<p>  Rhe conductor of the bus does not reveal that<\/p>\n<p>V.   herein was driving the said bus in a rash and<\/p>\n<p>   negligent manner. X5 U\\_\u00a3LL&#039;|;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7. The spot mahazar Ex.P.fZ reveals that the place<br \/>\nWhere the accident in question has oocurrw is a  road<\/p>\n<p>and the width of the road is mentioned as 4  _lt.&#8217;1c<\/p>\n<p>road being a curved road and &#8216;down   <\/p>\n<p>of the motor cyclist should have  :.t@&#8217;he 1<\/p>\n<p>bus to passthrough, instead; the  of  <\/p>\n<p>has taken the risk in the  and  to have<br \/>\nlost control and hit  Siclg.  to this,<br \/>\non perusal of the lgf\u00e9port Ex.P.9 it is<br \/>\nseen that    petrol tank of the<br \/>\nmotor    the right side head<br \/>\nlight of&#8217;%tnc  and the right Sigdc=bumpe1_&#8217; is<br \/>\npushed    would reveal that motor<\/p>\n<p>__. Vcyc1ist.\u00a5j}i\u00a3as~d1iv\u00a2\u00a7r1 gaid meter cyck: in a  gspccd and<\/p>\n<p> were engaged in talzdng  in the curve<\/p>\n<p>m %_1;%%%%k*::%&#8217;\u00e9;Ippea  they collided with each _ot11c1_&#8217;,_\\wI1ich<\/p>\n<p> rg&#8217;;:s11l1;&#8221;\u00e9d_..   death of motomyc1ist(Shn_&#8217;1&#8217;a_m 1. % Even the<\/p>\n<p>%   qrmms PW.16 also has not stated that the driver<\/p>\n<p> th&gt;\u00e9 bus was driving the bus in aurash and negligent<\/p>\n<p> er. As there is no speci\ufb01c, cogent and reliabic<\/p>\n<p>\/mt <\/p>\n<p>pumsitgsbie U\/S&#8221;;  &amp;J:304-A IPC. The material on record<\/p>\n<p>in  suspicion of the accused being guilty of<\/p>\n<p> V  &#8216;tstifficient to hold the petitioner guilty. The<br \/>\nA    should prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p>  \u00a3116 order of conviction and sentence passed by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>evidence to establish the fact  P\u20ac.titionm&#8217;_ herein was<br \/>\ndriving the bus in a rash and_neg1igexit mm,1i1er,_o&#8217;:&#8221;\u00a31ie11e1y<br \/>\nbecause there is an impact and the motoztzyolisti.&#8217;<br \/>\ndied at the spot and another suffered<br \/>\nnegligence cannot be attributed  die 7.<br \/>\nbus. Besides, the prosecutioniigs  to<br \/>\nreport marked as Ex.P.9,  and as<br \/>\nsuch, there remains a    tile accident<br \/>\noccurred. The  that he saw the<br \/>\naccident     of the matter<br \/>\nhave not__    w\ufb01iourts below and the<br \/>\nCourts lselowi &#8216;.~at- a wrong conclusion that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner   of  committed the offences<\/p>\n<p>tlie suspicion however strong would not by<\/p>\n<p>2: E.5&#8212;-&amp;.\u00ab&#8217;N.C_K..;L Low.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri &#8230; on 4 June, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik IN THE HIGH COURT 0}?&#8217; KARNATAKA, BANGALORQWT DATED THIS THE 4% DAY OF JUNE 2003A&amp;%%a V BEFORE . ma 1~10m3LE MR. JUSTICER.&#8217;B. NAEC: \u00ab BETWEEN Shaina Rae Shakale, S \/ 0 S1.:bbojiRao, Aged about 40 years, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri ... on 4 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri ... on 4 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-28T23:40:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri &#8230; on 4 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-28T23:40:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1025,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri ... on 4 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-28T23:40:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri &#8230; on 4 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri ... on 4 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri ... on 4 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-28T23:40:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri &#8230; on 4 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-28T23:40:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008"},"wordCount":1025,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008","name":"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri ... on 4 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-28T23:40:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shama-rao-shakale-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-kengeri-on-4-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shama Rao Shakale vs State Of Karnataka By Kengeri &#8230; on 4 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101411\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}