{"id":101570,"date":"2009-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-05-15T16:32:07","modified_gmt":"2016-05-15T11:02:07","slug":"shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Manmohan Singh<\/div>\n
*           HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI\n\n\n+           I.A. No. 14136\/2009 in CS (OS) No. 1251\/2008\n\n%\n\nShri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr.                                ...Plaintiffs\n                     Through : Mr. R.S. Tomar, Adv. for plaintiff\n                               No.2\n\n                        Versus\n\nShri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors.                         ...Defendants\n                   Through : Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Adv. for\n                              defendant No.1\n                              Mr. Aditya Sharma, Adv. for defendant\n                              No. 2\n                              Mr. R.C. Gupta, Adv. for defendant\n                              Nos. 3-4\n\nDecided on: November 19, 2009\n\nCoram:\n\nHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH\n\n1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may\n   be allowed to see the judgment?                         No\n\n2. To be referred to Reporter or not?                      No\n\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported\n   in the Digest?                                          No\n\nMANMOHAN SINGH, J.\n<\/pre>\n
1.          The     application        under   consideration    being   I.A.<\/p>\n
No.14136\/2009 has been filed on behalf of plaintiff No.1 for passing the<\/p>\n
preliminary decree in the suit filed by the plaintiffs for partition in<\/p>\n
respect of suit property bearing No.1638-1639, Krishna Gali, Sohan<\/p>\n
Ganj, Subzi Mandi, Delhi-110 007 measuring 240 sq. yds. (hereinafter<\/p>\n
referred to as the ‘suit property’).\n<\/p>\n
CS (OS) No. 1251\/2008                                               Page 1 of 5<\/span><\/p>\n
 2.           The plaintiffs No.1 and 2 and defendants No.1 and 2 are sons<\/p>\n
of late Sh. Suraj Bal. Defendants No.3 and 4 are daughters of late Sh.<\/p>\n
Suraj Bal. Sh. Suraj Bal died intestate on 25th March, 1976 and was the<\/p>\n
absolute owner of the suit property. The suit property thus devolved on<\/p>\n
all the legal heirs of Shri Suraj Bal in 1\/7th share each. The parties to the<\/p>\n
suit i.e. the sons and daughters of Sh. Suraj Bal relinquished their rights<\/p>\n
in the suit property in favour of their mother Smt. Parmeshwari after the<\/p>\n
death of Sh. Suraj Bal, who therefore became the exclusive owner of the<\/p>\n
suit property. Smt. Parmeshwari died intestate on 3rd February, 1996.<\/p>\n
On her death, each of the plaintiffs and defendants succeeded to 1\/6th<\/p>\n
share in the suit property.\n<\/p>\n
3.           Defendants No.3 and 4 relinquished their 1\/6th share in favour<\/p>\n
of their four brothers i.e. plaintiffs No.1 & 2 and defendants No.1 & 2<\/p>\n
vide Relinquishment Deed dated 16th July, 2002 registered as document<\/p>\n
No.3567, Addl. Book No.1, Volume No.580, Pages 141 to 144 on 5th<\/p>\n
August, 2002.       Defendants No.3 and 4 are therefore, proforma<\/p>\n
defendants and no relief is claimed against them in the suit. Plaintiff<\/p>\n
No.1 submits that the suit property is in possession of defendant No.2.<\/p>\n
Defendant No.1 has also admitted the case of the plaintiffs in his written<\/p>\n
statement.\n<\/p>\n
4.           The property was mutated in the records of Municipal<\/p>\n
Corporation of Delhi jointly in the names of plaintiffs no. 1 and 2 and<\/p>\n
defendants no. 1 and 2.\n<\/p>\n
5.           Defendant No.2 during the mediation stated that the property<\/p>\n
CS (OS) No. 1251\/2008                                               Page 2 of 5<\/span>
\n is divisible and submitted a proposed division plan of the property.<\/p>\n
Plaintiff No.1 stated that the division plan given by the defendant No.2<\/p>\n
divides the suit property only East-West, North-South giving 54 Sq. yds.<\/p>\n
to each. The division plan contains two shares at the front and two at the<\/p>\n
back, leaving 3 yards passage in the middle.\n<\/p>\n
6.          The plaintiff No.1 states that the suit property is not divisible<\/p>\n
by metes and bounds and the proposed partition plan filed by defendant<\/p>\n
No.2 is not a lawful division of property. It is further stated that the<\/p>\n
division plan filed by defendant No.2 would demolish the existing<\/p>\n
constructed structure and would not divide the suit property in four equal<\/p>\n
shares. There is also wastage of common land in the form of the afore-<\/p>\n
mentioned passage.      It is, therefore, prayed that a proper mode of<\/p>\n
partition of the suit property be found out by appointing a Local<\/p>\n
Commissioner or in the alternative the suit property be sold and the sale<\/p>\n
proceeds distributed equally, as they all have an equal share in the<\/p>\n
property.\n<\/p>\n
7.          The plaintiffs and defendant No.1 are agreeable to the sale of<\/p>\n
the suit property but defendant No.2 does not agree with the proposal as<\/p>\n
he is in the exclusive possession of the entire suit property and proposed<\/p>\n
a partition plan to divide the property by metes and bounds.            The<\/p>\n
defendant No.2 is admittedly entitled to only one fourth share in the suit<\/p>\n
property.\n<\/p>\n
8.          Defendant No.2 has admitted all the material facts and the<\/p>\n
rights of the plaintiffs. Defendants No.3 and 4 also do not claim any<\/p>\n
CS (OS) No. 1251\/2008                                               Page 3 of 5<\/span>
\n right in the suit property. All the parties involved in the present suit are<\/p>\n
senior citizens and prayed that the matter be decided expeditiously.<\/p>\n
9.         The plaintiffs are therefore, the co-sharers and joint owners of<\/p>\n
undivided half share i.e. they have one-fourth share each in the suit<\/p>\n
property. The defendant no. 2 is holding the possession of the suit<\/p>\n
property in trust for plaintiffs no. 1 and 2 and defendant no. 1. The<\/p>\n
plaintiff no. 2 vide notice dated 19th January, 2008 requested the<\/p>\n
defendants no. 1 and 2 and plaintiff no. 1 for partition of the suit<\/p>\n
property but no reply came forward to divide the property.<\/p>\n
10.        The defendant no. 1 in the written statement admitted the<\/p>\n
case of the plaintiffs and stated clearly that the plaintiffs no. 1 and 2 and<\/p>\n
defendants no. 1 and 2 have one-fourth share each in the suit property.<\/p>\n
He agreed for sale of the suit property as the suit property cannot be<\/p>\n
partitioned by metes and bounds, as is clear from the site plan annexed<\/p>\n
with the application.\n<\/p>\n
11.        The defendants no. 3 and 4 also in their written statement<\/p>\n
stated that they relinquished their shares in favour of plaintiffs 1 and 2<\/p>\n
and defendant no. 1 and 2 vide relinquishment deed dated 16th July, 2002<\/p>\n
and does not claim any share in the suit property.\n<\/p>\n
12.         The written statement was stated to be filed by the defendant<\/p>\n
no. 2. The defendant no. 2 only appeared on 20th July, 2009 before the<\/p>\n
Mediation Cell and proposed a division plan of the suit property.<\/p>\n
Thereafter, the defendant no. 2 never appeared before the Court or<\/p>\n
before the Mediation Centre.\n<\/p>\n
\nCS (OS) No. 1251\/2008                                               Page 4 of 5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 13.         As the case in hand relates to partition of the suit property<\/p>\n
wherein the shares of plaintiffs no.1 and 2 and defendants no. 1 and 2 are<\/p>\n
admitted by all the parties, prima facie, I am of the view that each party<\/p>\n
to the suit is entitled to one-fourth share, therefore, the mode of partition<\/p>\n
of the suit property be suggested by the Local Commissioner .<\/p>\n
14.        Accordingly Mr. Balram Chopra, Advocate, (Chamber<\/p>\n
No.175, Chambers Block-II, Delhi High Court, Ph. No. 9868908717), be<\/p>\n
appointed as Local Commissioner who will visit the site after serving<\/p>\n
notice to the parties in advance and after careful inspection of the suit<\/p>\n
property, he will suggest the mode of partition of the suit property<\/p>\n
bearing no. 1638-1639, Krishna Gali, Sohan Ganj, Subzi Mandi, Delhi-<\/p>\n
110 007. The fees of the Local Commissioner is fixed at Rs.30,000\/-.<\/p>\n
The Local Commissioner shall file his report within two months from<\/p>\n
the date of this order. List on 8th February, 2010 for directions and<\/p>\n
awaiting the report of Local Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                              MANMOHAN SINGH, J.\n<\/p>\n
NOVEMBER 19, 2009<\/p>\n
CS (OS) No. 1251\/2008                                               Page 5 of 5<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009 Author: Manmohan Singh * HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI + I.A. No. 14136\/2009 in CS (OS) No. 1251\/2008 % Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. …Plaintiffs Through : Mr. R.S. Tomar, Adv. for plaintiff No.2 Versus […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-101570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-15T11:02:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-15T11:02:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1039,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-15T11:02:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-15T11:02:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-15T11:02:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009"},"wordCount":1039,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009","name":"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-15T11:02:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rajesh-kaushik-anr-vs-shri-yogeshwar-kaushik-ors-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Rajesh Kaushik & Anr. vs Shri Yogeshwar Kaushik & Ors. on 19 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101570\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}