{"id":102351,"date":"2011-05-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011"},"modified":"2015-09-12T03:48:39","modified_gmt":"2015-09-11T22:18:39","slug":"mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                    Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                  Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                         Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                            Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000268\/SG\/12382\n                                                    Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000268\/SG\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging from the Appeal:\n<\/p>\n<pre>Appellant:                 :     Shri Tarsem Lal\n                                 42-C, DDA Flats, Gulabi Bagh,\n                                 Delhi --110007       .\n\nRespondent:            :         Mr. A. K. Mishra,\n                                 CPIO &amp; US,\n                                 Union Public Service Commission,\n                                 Dholpur House,\n                                 Shahjahan Road, New Delhi\n\nRTI application:               05\/07\/2010\nPIO reply:                     02\/08\/2010\nFirst appeal                   09\/08\/2010\nFAA order                      27\/08\/2010\nSecond appeal                  10\/09\/2010\n\nInformation sought:\n<\/pre>\n<p>&#8220;(i) Please provide a copy of the minutes of the Commission&#8217;s meeting held on 240<br \/>\nJune, 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii) Under what circumstances Shri Biresh Kumar, Additional Secretary<br \/>\npresented\/presided over the meeting when he is complainant in some cases viz.<br \/>\nShri Tarsem Lal, Deputy Secretary.\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii) What safeguards were adopted to ensure Shri Biresh Kumar, IAS does not influence<br \/>\nthe proceedings of the Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(iv) Please provide copies of the notings of the Commission&#8217;s relevant file pertaining to<br \/>\nthe processing of the disciplinary case of Shri Tarsem Lal, Deputy Secretary leading to<br \/>\nthe issue of the Commission&#8217;s advice to DOP&amp;T.\n<\/p>\n<p>(v) Also allow to inspect the relevant file of the Commission and vigilance file No.<br \/>\nC13019\/2\/2006-Vigilance, F25\/41\/2005-(RC&amp;P)\/SPC-i and 1\/346(80)\/2004-R-<br \/>\n1\/SPC-I,\n<\/p>\n<p>(vi) A copy of the reference dated 9.11.2009 made by DOP&amp;T seeking advice of the<br \/>\nCommission in the said disciplinary case.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>PIO&#8217;s reply:\n<\/p>\n<p>(i) As regards point No. (i). it is stated that minutes of the Commission&#8217;s meeting, contain<br \/>\ndecisions of the Commission regarding the advice of the Commission to be tendered to<br \/>\nthe President of India. in your own disciplinary case. The said disciplinary case is<br \/>\npending with DOP&amp;T and is yet to be concluded, in view of this. The minute of the<br \/>\nmeeting of the Commission are covered by the exemption provided under Section 8(1)(h)<br \/>\nof the RTI Act, 2005. In any case as per Rule 32 of CCS (CCA) Rules 1965, a copy of<br \/>\nthe advice of the Commission alongwith a copy of the order passed in the case by the<br \/>\nDisciplinary Authority, will be communicated to you.\n<\/p>\n<p> (ii) As regards point No. (ii). &#8220;In so far as the CPIO is aware meeting was held under the<br \/>\nChairmanship of Chairman, UPSC; as per normal procedure.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii) As regards point No. (iii). the query is hypothetical and realm of conjecture and;<br \/>\nCPIO is not expected to comment on the same.\n<\/p>\n<p>(iv) As regards point No. (iv). your request for providing copies of notings of the<br \/>\nCommission&#8217;s file pertaining to the processing of your own disciplinary case leading to<br \/>\nthe issue of the Commission&#8217;s advice to DOP&amp;T has been examined in the light of<br \/>\nprovisions of RTI Act, 2005 and decision of CIC in such similar cases. The files relate to<br \/>\ndisciplinary case instituted not only against you but another official also. The said<br \/>\ndisciplinary case is pending with DOP&amp;T and is yet to he concluded. Hence the request is<br \/>\ncovered by the exemption provided under Section 8(1 )( h) of the RTI Act. 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>(v) As regard point No. (v). regarding your request for the inspection of file in which<br \/>\nproceedings of the disciplinary ease was discussed by the Commission, Vigilance File<br \/>\nNo.C130 9\/2\/2006- Vigilance. F.25\/4 I \/2005-(RC&amp;P)\/SPC-I and I \/346(80)\/2004-R-<br \/>\nl\/SPC-l is concerned, these files relate to the records in the disciplinary case of Shri<br \/>\nTarsem Lal which is still pending with DOP&amp;T, being the Cadre Controlling Authority in<br \/>\nthe case, and is yet to be concluded. Hence, the request for inspection of these files<br \/>\ncannot be acceded to in terms of exemption provided under Section 8(l)(h) of the RTI<br \/>\nAct, 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>(vi) As regards point no. (vi), your request has since been transferred to CPIO, DOP&amp;T<br \/>\nvide letter of even number dated 9.7.2010, under Section 6(3) of RTI Act, 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for First appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Denial of information was not justified.\n<\/p>\n<p>FAA order:\n<\/p>\n<p>I have perused the records and carefully considered the matter in appeal, and the<br \/>\ncomments of the CPIO therein. In this regard, it is to mention that the information as<br \/>\navailable with the CPIO, has already been furnished to the Appellant and there is no<br \/>\nground for further direction to the CPIO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Grounds for Second appeal:\n<\/p>\n<p>Information not provided.\n<\/p>\n<p>Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mr. Tarsem Lal;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondents: Mr. A. K. Mishra, CPIO &amp; US, Mr. K. M. Sasidharam, CPIO &amp; US<br \/>\n(Admin), Mr. N. Mukherjee, CPIO &amp; US (SPC) and Mr. R. C. Sharma, Section Officer<br \/>\n(SPC).\n<\/p>\n<p>The PIO has refused to give information on query 1, 4 and 5 on the grounds that the<br \/>\ninformation sought was exempted under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The Commission<br \/>\nasked the Respondent to justify the denial of information on the basis of Section 8(1)(h)<br \/>\nof the RTI Act. The PIO states that disciplinary proceedings were being conducted<br \/>\nagainst the Appellant when the RTI application had been filed and hence, exemption was<br \/>\nclaimed under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. By the PIO&#8217;s admission, there was neither<br \/>\nany investigation nor any justification to claim an impediment on investigation, and the<br \/>\nPIO appears to have frivolously invoked the exemption of Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act<br \/>\nto deny the information.\n<\/p>\n<p> Queries 2 and 3 do not really seek information as defined under Section 2(f) of the RTI<br \/>\nAct. The Appellant states that he has received information on query 6.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent states that the person responsible for denying the information under<br \/>\nSection 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act was Mr. Y. P. Gupta, the then PIO.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal is allowed. Mr. A. K. Mishra, CPIO &amp; US is directed to provide the<br \/>\ninformation as available on record on queries 1, 4 and 5 to the Appellant before May 30,<br \/>\n2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>The issue before the Commission is of refusing information on queries 1, 4 and 5<br \/>\nwithout any proper reasons.\n<\/p>\n<p>From the facts before the Commission it appears that the PIO is guilty of not furnishing<br \/>\ninformation on queries 1, 4 and 5 without any proper reasons. It appears that the PIO&#8217;s<br \/>\nactions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause notice is being issued<br \/>\nto him, and he is directed give his reasons to the Commission to show cause why penalty<br \/>\nshould not be levied on him.\n<\/p>\n<p>He will present himself before the Commission at the above address on June 1, 2011 at<br \/>\n11:30 am alongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be<br \/>\nimposed on him as mandated under Section 20 (1). He will also submit proof of having<br \/>\ngiven the information to the Appellant. If there are other persons responsible for the delay<br \/>\nin providing the information to the Appellant the PIO is directed to inform such persons<br \/>\nof the show cause hearing and direct them to appear before the Commission with him.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                      Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                   May 13, 2011<\/p>\n<p>(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(SG)<\/p>\n<p>CC:       Mr. Y. P. Gupta, the then PIO (through Mr. A. K. Mishra, CPIO &amp; US).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000268\/SG\/12382 Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000268\/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant: : Shri Tarsem Lal 42-C, DDA Flats, Gulabi Bagh, Delhi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-11T22:18:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-11T22:18:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1143,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-11T22:18:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-11T22:18:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-11T22:18:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011"},"wordCount":1143,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011","name":"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-11T22:18:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-tarsem-lal-vs-union-public-service-commission-on-13-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Tarsem Lal vs Union Public Service Commission on 13 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102351","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102351"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102351\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}