{"id":102387,"date":"2009-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-19T18:36:09","modified_gmt":"2015-12-19T13:06:09","slug":"c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 16132 of 2004(U)\n\n\n1. C.C.YACOB, S\/O.CHANDY, AGED 61 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :26\/11\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                      T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.\n                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                      W.P.(C) No. 16132 of 2004-U\n                   - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n            Dated this the 26th day of November, 2009.\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner retired from service as L.P.S.A. He is aggrieved by the<\/p>\n<p>denial of salary for the period from 1.11.1998 to 31.3.1999.<\/p>\n<p>      2. The main contention raised by the petitioner is that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was superannuated from service on 31.10.1998, but he was entitled for<\/p>\n<p>continuance in service upto 31.3.1999 in terms of Rule 60(c) of Part I<\/p>\n<p>K.S.R. This period is liable to be counted for all service benefits including<\/p>\n<p>pay revision benefits.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. The petitioner was compulsorily retired from service and the same<\/p>\n<p>was the subject matter of challenge in          O.P. No.364\/1998. Ext.P1 is the<\/p>\n<p>copy of the judgment rendered therein. Ext.P2 is the judgment wherein<\/p>\n<p>this Court directed the respondents to consider the grievance raised by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in the representation. By Ext.P3, a correction was entered in the<\/p>\n<p>remark column of the statement of fixation of pay by substituting the date<\/p>\n<p>31.3.1999 as 31.10.1998. The petitioner made a representation as Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>against the same which was directed to be disposed of by this Court as per<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5 judgment. Ext.P6 is the order passed by the Assistant Educational<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">wpc 16132\/2004                           2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Officer in the matter. This is under challenge in this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>       4.  The stand taken in Ext.P6 is that in the judgment in O.P.<\/p>\n<p>No.364\/1998, it is declared that he will be deemed to be in service upto the<\/p>\n<p>date of superannuation. Hence, the salary from 1.11.1998 to 31.3.1999<\/p>\n<p>cannot be disbursed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the right<\/p>\n<p>conferred under Rule 60(c) of Part I K.S.R. cannot be denied to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.  According to      the said provision, the teaching staff of all<\/p>\n<p>educational institutions who completed the age of 55 years during the<\/p>\n<p>course of an academic year shall continue in service till the last day of the<\/p>\n<p>month in which the academic year ends. Therefore, the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>entitled for continuance upto 31.3.1999 and consequential benefits ought to<\/p>\n<p>have been sanctioned.\n<\/p>\n<p>       6. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the first respondent, the<\/p>\n<p>stand taken is that the petitioner is eligible for pay and allowances only upto<\/p>\n<p>31.10.1998, the date of superannuation as per the judgment dated 14.3.2002<\/p>\n<p>in O.P. No.364\/1998.\n<\/p>\n<p>       7. Therefore, the question turns upon the findings rendered in Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>judgment itself. In the said writ petition, the validity of the disciplinary<\/p>\n<p>action taken against the petitioner was challenged.       On the conclusion of<\/p>\n<p>the disciplinary enquiry, a punishment of compulsory retirement was<\/p>\n<p>proposed against him. Ultimately, the Manager imposed a punishment of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">wpc 16132\/2004                         3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>compulsory retirement from service with effect from 31.7.1996 by Ext.P9<\/p>\n<p>order produced in the said writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8. This Court found that the enquiry under Rule 75 of Chapter XIV-<\/p>\n<p>A K.E.R. was not held and no report was obtained. Previous sanction of the<\/p>\n<p>District Educational Officer was also not obtained. In that view of the<\/p>\n<p>matter, it was held that the action taken against the petitioner is in gross<\/p>\n<p>violation of the rules governing the same.        It was declared that the<\/p>\n<p>impugned orders are ultra vires and therefore void. The operative portion of<\/p>\n<p>the judgment contained in para 7 reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;The petitioner will be entitled to all consequential benefits.<\/p>\n<p>       The petitioner has reached the age of superannuation during the<\/p>\n<p>       pendency of the Original Petition. So, he will be deemed to be in<\/p>\n<p>       service till the date of superannuation. After retirement, no action to<\/p>\n<p>       impose any punishment as contemplated under Rule 65 can be<\/p>\n<p>       imposed on him.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      9. Learned counsel for the petitioner laid emphasis on the finding<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner will be entitled for consequential benefits which will<\/p>\n<p>include the right for continuance in service in terms of Rule 60(c) and the<\/p>\n<p>monetary benefits flowing therefrom including the benefits of pay revision.<\/p>\n<p>This Court did not obviously allow the benefits of continuance upto the end<\/p>\n<p>of the academic year, namely, 31st of March of the year in which the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner superannuated from service. This Court declared that he will be<\/p>\n<p>deemed to be in service till the date of superannuation.         The date of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">wpc 16132\/2004                         4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>superannuation admittedly is 31.10.1998.       The judgment itself is dated<\/p>\n<p>14.3.2002, long after the date of superannuation and the end of the academic<\/p>\n<p>year. The petitioner never sought for a direction by this Court in the said<\/p>\n<p>writ petition, to treat the petitioner as retired from service on 31.3.1999.<\/p>\n<p>The said judgment has become final also. Therefore, it cannot be said that<\/p>\n<p>for the purpose of getting consequential benefits, he should be deemed to<\/p>\n<p>have been continued in service upto the end of March of next year, viz.<\/p>\n<p>31.3.1999.\n<\/p>\n<p>       10. The right of the petitioner for continuance under Rule 60(c) of<\/p>\n<p>Part I K.S.R. has not been declared by this Court in Ext.P1. The petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>at this stage, cannot contend for the position that he should be deemed to<\/p>\n<p>have been continued upto 31st March of the year 1999. Therefore, I find no<\/p>\n<p>infirmity in the impugned orders passed by the respondents.         The writ<\/p>\n<p>petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                     (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)<\/p>\n<p>kav\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 16132 of 2004(U) 1. C.C.YACOB, S\/O.CHANDY, AGED 61 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, For Petitioner :SRI.M.R.RAJENDRAN NAIR (SR.) For Respondent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-19T13:06:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-19T13:06:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":854,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009\",\"name\":\"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-19T13:06:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-19T13:06:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-19T13:06:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009"},"wordCount":854,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009","name":"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-19T13:06:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-c-yacob-vs-state-of-kerala-on-26-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C.C.Yacob vs State Of Kerala on 26 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}