{"id":102485,"date":"2009-02-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-25T18:40:22","modified_gmt":"2017-10-25T13:10:22","slug":"k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
ur \u00ab.4:-mwnu-us.\u00bb ruuru uuuxl vr nugmlnlnnu r-nun Luuxr ur IV-\\Kl'%\ufb02lMiU~| rwu\ufb01 LUUKI ur IKAKNAIAIKII I-Hun LUUKI Ur KAKNAIAKA HIGH (0!\n\n1: rm mun comm': our mznmma. L1'  a V\nmmn mm mm 2:-rm may Fsanunxvzf\ufb01i\ufb01y ;\u00a3 [    ' --\nBEFWE V Q   M   ,\nms HomE m2.JII8'1\"\u00a733E     X\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nxqusmmn. V\nW] 0 mm.\n\nwe Mekm-ivi]lag6$\u00e9A;'Pcn\u00a7'g,:3-_A  \n\nldLa.diJsax'i'I'a11:t_1s:','   \nKomav. L \n\n[BY sm.n.s.\"s     \n\nAND:\n\n-nunumwlollllunlum\n\n%MARh_.J,\n\n_ V 819 14155:};  V\n 'Aged'-abn1.;t.A51. yams,'  \"\"\" \"\n R,IoVMa:.'~..a;;cig.\\z3:aS'-5.,\n\n % ~  \n\n % \n\n RE8P'C3NI)ER'I'\n\n'\u00bb  'T  canny. m mm 1313 397 C.R.P.C.. panama TC)\n\n B1\u00ab.:\"_1\"1\",.57I12}E': THE ORDER HATER 05.04.2606 I-\"-'A.38ED BY\n\n  ADDL. cxvn, JUDGE\n\n.\"VV{:uEJ6NDI#8l2G$# Am: conmmn BY 'rm'; CJRDER mt\n\n _ \"=a4.o9.2oas mssmn BY THE Lmmmn missmons JUIIBGE,\nV \" \" XQDAGU AT HADIIERI IN (3RL.A.4~\".?;\" 2006.\n\n[JR.D!i'.] , IJADHCERI IN\n\nTHIS CRL.R.P. COHWG OR FOR ORDER T\ufb01 DAY,\n\nTHE COURT HABE THE FOLLOWERG:\n\n\n\n. ........... V. ...--.....n..-.m-. Iuwri uuunl ur RHKIVAIAISA 11:5\" (:0;\n\n9..R.E.E.B\n\n'I. convicted accused is at revmnn against ~$\u00a7\u00a3\u00a71:3Jd \u00a7fr:ant 3    > \nas G*\u00a3.A.4'.3'I06 an me 330 of swans J:\u00a3:,jge,:.:i{(;1v_i$a\"gu'\u00a7;t'~\u00a7\u00a3as:\ufb01;\u00a7ri.,: '\ndated 94.09.2563 conflmkzg me 1;m9ynmi'%m\"'sc 4ar::ctj4 amA \"\n\n05.04.2095 on the as of ths mt. civ\u00a7_A%::;\u00a2m k(.st.\u00a7:m\u00a7) &V;Qkrc.,\nMadiicari convicung mm fcrf 't~!11a \u00a2ff\u00a7\u00a7a\u00a7.\u00e9'i4ps\\1:ha:tuabIo \u00a3i:SV}138 of\n2. Hear}: _tII$: i:cj'aami:__d_ A!?\u00ab;er\"t!;\u00a7:sI bfetitinIIar.\n\n3.     lg'   up far ma: agamx.\n\n4.   irisd and cmvictad for offence\n\n--  }dI\u00a3:'~--'\u00a3\u00a71\u00a7___;;o.:npla\"u:t of the respondent that ha had<\/pre>\n
  agrewg ta repay the same. He, an demand<\/p>\n
mL\u00a7e1\u00a7’ 1.’VbyV”‘:’\u00e9[ha__”~T\u00a7@mdsnt-coznplainant immf cheque for<\/p>\n
Z  .Rs.?0, G0ID1e.  mane was dated 13.1o.2cma. aut, an presenta\ufb02nn<\/p>\n
  % & 4.u”g’xV: :tise maxi: 15.19.2903 it was dislionuured. On the basis afths<\/p>\n
 ‘a\ufb01ewamant of msum\ufb01ancy cf funa, statutory notice dated<\/p>\n
V  %f zs.{a.2ae3 was issued which the mtitionar mcalved an
\n   “\u00e97.1a.2eo3, butram to campiy.\n<\/p>\n
5. The accusad resisted the prasecutim on the plea that
\nhe had repaid the mtirs amwni af Rs.?G.\u00a3IOB\u00e9’- to the cmuphinant<\/p>\n
(%V%%<\/p>\n
V’II\\JI” \\.\\.lIJl’\\F \\Il”‘ ‘\\l’\\l\\l’.l\u00a7IF|I’|J” l’Il\\JI” \\.\\I\\<\/p>\n
B<\/p>\n
and it was not caunted far. Haweva, ailing ma! on the
\nevidence tandorm wine etxnplainant as FWJ
\nace a:.s=.2.t:-aa cheque, tank arriarmrj1er:t,\u00bb\u00ab..lAega,’i.V
\naciawovdadgemant rm 1:-Ia! court found fizz <\/p>\n
Hwmer, ms ttial ceurt noticed auatl\ufb01faspusi\u00e9i $36  >tt!IAsA’5\u00bb:;r’a:.*!iava’ci
\ncppemznlty mar Inliaion ofprgscwxrtlnmxwvtg  a
\nsum of Rs.45,GOGi—. mu nag Qczaxcmougoa tho
\nsane. Keeping tlxfsssggect   accused,
\ntamed trial judge gent\u00e9nm mm to pay
\n\ufb01ns cf  .:\ufb013 carr1porIsation to the<\/p>\n
UP KAKNAIAIU3 HIDH LUUKI U!’ Kl-\\Vl_.\u20acBVl\ufb02ll-\\lU| WED” |..\\J|JK|’ U!’ EU-\\I\u00a7I’lI-\\EHlU-I HIV” Lsaulu ur nnnrununnn<\/p>\n
rmpnn1d<ent-can1pI\u00a7|h\u00a7h\u00a7;.*vVV  7 \u00ab _ v  ,<\/p>\n
6.     \ufb01iaf Eirdar he was in appmi in
\nc:ma,%47r2Vaj\u00e9s  was” ‘sis.-amsnlssed, awmea by men he is
\nmmn r\u00e9\ufb01ia!qnvva\u00a7aE:1\u00e9t{“Ehase twa pmmem.<\/p>\n
7′.  Tish’ counsel for the paulcivner snlaa\ufb01yappa<\/p>\n
. *  \u00e9\ufb01mm afthe ncaund and wauid also contend that\n<\/p>\n
 –\u00bbs:=\u00a7\u00a7t\u00a2Jct of the amassed in making payment sham his
\nV  mica: 13\u00bb bis! court shauld have csansmrw and ought to
\n had that the charge against the accused was not tenahie av<\/p>\n
S ‘htm\ufb02 the ma! com shouid haw rudazcod the amount of \ufb01ne<\/p>\n
krpesmd on the seamed. .\n<\/p>\n
 3..\n<\/p>\n
“‘ –‘I-v I-vv-In vn av-u\\I’11u~au\\;-q, nggn kw’<\/p>\n
-‘run-1—-rt-uw — wwurug-1: :-\n<\/p>\n
AL<\/p>\n
3. Ma’ hearlng the Iamad ccnunad 3 have .,
\nrecords. The chaf\ufb01a against the amused for
\nN.!.Act has hem may whatanuated by:the\u00bb::am;s! iu”1’_\u00a3;ij’V\u00a7.~’I!i\u00a7V\u00a7?\u00e9\u00a7u;g\u00a7f:
\ndocumentary evidence. The trial judge figs <\/p>\n
name and I \ufb01nd no reason ta ‘a1tatfoh\u00e9_jia%!xh thisaifx   <\/p>\n
9. simhrry, the’  ’tilv-{Le “Steamed
\nAwaiiate Judge is aisp just iavvthvii ;:H9ll’tt.tB, no can
\nis made out ta me\ufb02aegvmn t:>aenn\u00e9ing%&;\u00a7\u00a2arae%d%i6y both the charts.
\nHmmver, as   cwnaael for me
\npoliioner   prosecution class not
\nwaive me.\u00a2cm%u;s-m ofthe N.I.Act us he a
\nunwed vtav a   he has paid um amount to me<\/p>\n
‘i”:~:aI_1f1p!ai}’\u00a7i.i*.nt_ imhe  \u00abcase, out of Rs-?0,m9.f- the accused<\/p>\n
 ha\u00a7  af Rs.45,mn.<- tn are complainant
\n  bof'\u00a7r\u00a7 ti:\u00a7  meant! by the ma! court. This manna
\n dug %u;\ufb02\u00e9..Rs\u00a7;V25,eGGf~ Taking nota at these ctrwmstancas, I<\/p>\n
 A   that the artist regarding aantcncc pawn by the<\/p>\n
 % –1.Iea1\u00a7~;–g\u00a7&ti\u00a7aI page has to be set aside. Ancm\ufb01auy %t Is at \ufb02\ufb01d\ufb01.<\/p>\n
10. As regasm the order passed by the trai court to pay
\nzmrnponsativn, it mua ha noticed mat wnpansatim boczoraars
\npayabie Mm amount of tha \ufb01ne Impaaed by the trml cant! as
\npwmissiinle utS.35? of the Gr.P.C. The provision uI$.367(3) 0!’<\/p>\n
U!’ \ufb01AKNAlAK.A HIL:-H LUUKI ur IEAISNAIAIUI Hlu\ufb01 LUUKI Ur HHKNHEHRR niv\ufb01 Luau: ur l\\l-\\Kl’ll-U!-\\l’U| ruuru guu\ufb01: \\_;|’ nggwgggng nu,” ‘__u’<\/p>\n
S<\/p>\n
Ca-.P.c_ makes it clear tm aompenmton became:
\nwhen that \ufb01rm does not farm part oftna santerm. ThsrUf04%\u00a7I1%*_\u00a7;’r::N}’:\\\\i”‘   A ~
\nmstant cm, are tamer pawad bythe ma!   pkg    ‘
\nRs.5,caDOI- as \ufb01ne and awn Rs-35,000I~  :7 <\/p>\n
parnmna uJ8.35? of mo ems. \ufb01ajkjtnat c6i:icl__::a:..Vd\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7<:..is"
\nmat the accused in pay\ufb01na gut qrm\u00a7g\ufb01VAj%mm;xg1u\u00a7taan%
\npayable or vtitheut  pawmt. cf
\ncompensa\ufb01on cows!   are
\nuIS.138 ofthe   out of which<\/p>\n
 of this am, as am of
\nas.?u,cQe:~ aceukw.-:%k%AnasA  'many paid as.45,cm- to ma<\/p>\n
"  is \u00abri\u00a3\u00a7'e'c:~,\u00a7g\u00ab'Rs.25,Bw2)ni-, I wautd be appmpriate ta
\n 'ai!fe':.c?ffi1!rn'vtcipayii\ufb01ae of as.:so,aoo1-. men on recovery man he
\n  pai\ufb01\ufb01wr id"V\u00a5i:\u00a7f'\u00a7ompIah1ant as compensation as parmi\ufb01le<\/p>\n
 _ 135.35? {f\u00a3)"' aft\u00a7s\ufb01 cmc.\n<\/p>\n
V’   This thaii be the only mac\ufb01\ufb01catim of the wder pamd<\/p>\n
 fj guise ml court.\n<\/p>\n
13. The pwon is therefore akwad in part in terms cf<\/p>\n
mi: mar. A I
\nRM\/V<\/p>\n
L!
\nV<\/p>\n
v —twp-In qr: uurucuuit-lIl’1I\\l”l lIl\\7II \\.\\l|}|\\| ‘J1’   <\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
14. Order regarcanug ampmmemt pama by :\u00a7%g%k\ufb01\u00e9’I\u00e9’k:” .%
\nmud on me perm nar is at aside. Tha petitioner-as:4:::;f.iasQ41:V i\u20ac
\ngranted 4 xsaelm same to depw: the amm: mas; u%I;1lcf.i’4,”jiu.*\u00e9’4;siiav\u00a7,j’Q.  <\/p>\n
undergo with defuse! sentence of we   ” ‘<\/p>\n
 %%Tudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim ur \u00ab.4:-mwnu-us.\u00bb ruuru uuuxl vr nugmlnlnnu r-nun Luuxr ur IV-\\Kl’%\ufb02lMiU~| rwu\ufb01 LUUKI ur IKAKNAIAIKII I-Hun LUUKI Ur KAKNAIAKA HIGH (0! 1: rm mun comm’: our mznmma. L1′ a V mmn mm mm 2:-rm may Fsanunxvzf\ufb01i\ufb01y ;\u00a3 [ ‘ — BEFWE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nK A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-25T13:10:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-25T13:10:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":860,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009\",\"name\":\"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-25T13:10:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-25T13:10:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-25T13:10:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009"},"wordCount":860,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009","name":"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-25T13:10:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-a-anitha-vs-hemaraj-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K A Anitha vs Hemaraj on 27 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102485\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}