{"id":102517,"date":"2010-08-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-05-14T19:43:15","modified_gmt":"2016-05-14T14:13:15","slug":"ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And … on 23 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And … on 23 August, 2010<\/div>\n
                    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                              CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000983\n                                                                                           Dated\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a023,\u00a02010\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                  :     Ms.\u00a0Poonam\u00a0Dabas\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                           :     M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&\u00a0Broadcasting,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                 \u00a0\nBackground<\/pre>\n
1.      The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a017.2.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0IRLA,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0I&B,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n
        seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0\u00a0information:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        i)        My\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0released\u00a0in\u00a0August\u00a02004\u00a0by\u00a0PAO\u00adIRLA,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0I&B,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0after\u00a0a\u00a0gap\u00a0of \u00a0<\/p>\n
        ten\u00a0months.\u00a0\u00a0Order\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0released\u00a0be\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n
        (ii)      Name\u00a0and\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer\u00a0who\u00a0ordered\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0be\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n
        (iii)     Date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0order\u00a0for\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0issued\u00a0be\u00a0intimated<\/p>\n
        (iv)      Reasons\u00a0for\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0in\u00a0August\u00a02004\u00a0be\u00a0provided<\/p>\n
        (v)       Copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0on\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0requisite\u00a0fees\u00a0be\u00a0provided<\/p>\n
        (vi)      A\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0for\u00a0file\u00a0inspection\u00a0be\u00a0intimated.<\/p>\n
2.      The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a025.3.10\u00a0stating\u00a0as\u00a0under:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        (i)       As\u00a0intimated\u00a0earlier,\u00a0salary\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0month\u00a0of\u00a0Nov.\u00a02003\u00a0to\u00a07\/04\u00a0was\u00a0with\u00a0held\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0non \u00a0<\/p>\n
        regularization \u00a0 of \u00a0 period \u00a0 of \u00a0 absence \u00a0 by \u00a0 Prasar \u00a0 Bharati, \u00a0 Broadcasting \u00a0 Corpn. \u00a0 of \u00a0 India, \u00a0 DG: \u00a0<\/p>\n
        Doordarshan.\u00a0\u00a0However\u00a0the\u00a0payment\u00a0was\u00a0released\u00a0by\u00a0PAR\u00a0(IRLA)                      vide \u00a0 cheque \u00a0 No. \u00a0 884173 \u00a0<\/p>\n
        dated\u00a0 5.8.04\u00a0 from\u00a0Rs.272\/\u00ad\u00a0after\u00a0adjusting\u00a0the\u00a0excess\u00a0salary\u00a0paid\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0dies\u00adnon\u00a0period\u00a0from \u00a0<\/p>\n
        12.2.03\u00a0to\u00a08.11.03\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0Prasar\u00a0Bharati\u00a0letter\u00a0No.17011\/2\/2004\u00adSV\u00a0dated\u00a023.7.04.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n\n\n        (ii)      Salary\u00a0was\u00a0released\u00a0on\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0letter\u00a0from\u00a0Prasar\u00a0Bharati\u00a0mentioning\u00a0the\u00a0leave\u00a0details\n\n\n        (iii)     \u00a0As\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0(ii)\u00a0above\n\n\n        (iv)      As\u00a0clarified\u00a0in\u00a0(i)\u00a0above\n      (v)       Copy\u00a0of\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a023.7.04\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0obtained\u00a0on\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0requisite\u00a0fee\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.2\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0page \u00a0\n\n     of\u00a0A4\u00a0size\u00a0amount\u00a0to\u00a0Rs.4\/\u00ad\n\n\n     (vi)      \u00a0You\u00a0may\u00a0visit\u00a0PAO\u00a0(IRLA)\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0record\u00a0on\u00a0any\u00a0working\u00a0day\u00a0after\u00a02\u00a0PM.\u00a0\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
3.   Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0her\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a026.3.10\u00a0wherein\u00a0she\u00a0stated\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
     following\u00a0:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n     Point \u00a0 No.1 \u00a0 : \u00a0 I \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 provided\u00a0 copy\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 order\u00a0 nor\u00a0 have\u00a0 I \u00a0 been\u00a0 informed\u00a0 as\u00a0 to \u00a0 why \u00a0<\/p>\n
     information\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\u00a0 \u00a0Neither\u00a0any\u00a0information \u00a0<\/p>\n
     regarding\u00a0availability\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0on\u00a0file\u00a0nor\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n
     Point\u00a0No.2\u00a0:         Sought\u00a0the\u00a0name\u00a0and\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer\u00a0who\u00a0ordered\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary. \u00a0<\/p>\n
     No\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0query.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0name\u00a0and\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer \u00a0<\/p>\n
     who\u00a0ordered\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided<\/p>\n
     Point\u00a0No.3:\u00a0Pertained\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0for\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0issued.\u00a0\u00a0I\u00a0wanted\u00a0to \u00a0<\/p>\n
     know\u00a0the\u00a0exact\u00a0date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0was\u00a0issued.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n
     Point\u00a0No.4:\u00a0         Pertained\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0which\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0released.\u00a0\u00a0I\u00a0have\u00a0sought\u00a0details \u00a0<\/p>\n
     of\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0finally\u00a0released\u00a0after\u00a0withholding\u00a0it\u00a0arbitrarily\u00a0for\u00a0ten\u00a0long \u00a0<\/p>\n
     months.\u00a0\u00a0No\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n     Point\u00a0No.5:\u00a0Clearly\u00a0sought\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0released.\u00a0 \u00a0Copy\u00a0of\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n
     order\u00a0as\u00a0sought\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0nor\u00a0any\u00a0reason\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided \u00a0<\/p>\n
     despite\u00a0a\u00a0lapse\u00a0of\u00a0almost\u00a0six\u00a0years.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n     Point\u00a0No.6:\u00a0No\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0time\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0for\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0relevant \u00a0<\/p>\n
     files\u00a0as\u00a0sought.\u00a0\u00a0No\u00a0date\u00a0and\u00a0time\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0intimated\u00a0for\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0relevant\u00a0files\u00a0pertaining\u00a0to \u00a0<\/p>\n
     release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n     It\u00a0is\u00a0clearly\u00a0both\u00a0suppression\u00a0and\u00a0subversion\u00a0of\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0very\u00a0premise\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0act\u00a0is\u00a0‘to\u00a0secure \u00a0<\/p>\n
     and\u00a0access\u00a0information\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0control\u00a0of\u00a0public\u00a0authorities,\u00a0in\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0promote\u00a0transparency\u00a0and \u00a0<\/p>\n
     accountability\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0working\u00a0of\u00a0every\u00a0public\u00a0authority…”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
 Also\u00a0Section\u00a07(8)\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0complied\u00a0with.\u00a0 \u00a0“Where\u00a0a\u00a0request\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0rejected\u00a0under\u00a0sub\u00ad<\/p>\n
section\u00a0(1),\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0or\u00a0SPIO\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0may\u00a0be,\u00a0shall\u00a0communicate\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0person\u00a0making\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n
request,<\/p>\n
           (a)     the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0such\u00a0rejection<\/p>\n
           (b)     the\u00a0period\u00a0wihin\u00a0which\u00a0as\u00a0appeal\u00a0against\u00a0such\u00a0rejection\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0preferred;\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
           (c)     the\u00a0particulars\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0appellate\u00a0authority<\/p>\n
No\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0forthcoming\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0application\u00a0and\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0appeal\u00a0is \u00a0<\/p>\n
being\u00a0filed.\n<\/p>\n
\nArbitrary\u00a0denial\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a0issues\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0putting\u00a0my\u00a0professional \u00a0<\/p>\n
career\u00a0at\u00a0a\u00a0disadvantage\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0tenable\u00a0and\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0needs\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0RTI \u00a0<\/p>\n
Act\u00a02005.\u00a0\u00a0Denial\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0resulted\u00a0in\u00a0undue\u00a0dis\u00adadvantage\u00a0to\u00a0me\u00a0where\u00a0service\u00a0promotions \u00a0<\/p>\n
are\u00a0concerned.\u00a0\u00a0Photocopy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0on\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0specified\u00a0charges\u00a0also\u00a0needs\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n
Arbitrary\u00a0stoppage\u00a0and\u00a0subsequent\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary,\u00a0thus\u00a0affecting\u00a0my\u00a0annual\u00a0increment\u00a0and \u00a0<\/p>\n
consequently\u00a0my\u00a0seniority,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0clear\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0done\u00a0verbally\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0phone\u00a0as\u00a0I\u00a0moved\u00a0the\u00a0Principal \u00a0<\/p>\n
Bench\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Administrative\u00a0Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
\nThe\u00a0PAO,\u00a0IRLS,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0I&B\u00a0has\u00a0gone\u00a0out\u00a0of\u00a0its\u00a0way\u00a0to\u00a0collude\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Indian\u00a0Information\u00a0Service\u00a0to \u00a0<\/p>\n
promote\u00a0a\u00a0certain\u00a0cadre.\u00a0\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0clear\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0malafied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0intent\u00a0to\u00a0put\u00a0me\u00a0at\u00a0a\u00a0disadvantage\u00a0in \u00a0<\/p>\n
my\u00a0career\u00a0progression.\n<\/p>\n
\nCorrect\u00a0information\u00a0needs\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0who\u00a0ordered\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0from\u00a0August\u00a02004 \u00a0<\/p>\n
onwards\u00a0after\u00a0being\u00a0withheld\u00a0from\u00a0October\u00a02003\u00adJuly\u00a02004\u00a0needs\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n
On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0 \u00a0filed\u00a0her\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
19..5.10\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0grounds\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0denial\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0for\u00a0ten\u00a0months\u00a0has\u00a0affected\u00a0her\u00a0survival\u00a0and\u00a0those\u00a0<\/p>\n
dependent\u00a0on\u00a0her\u00a0causing\u00a0serious\u00a0financial,\u00a0mental\u00a0and\u00a0social\u00a0harm.\u00a0\u00a0She\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0single\u00a0<\/p>\n
parent\u00a0with\u00a0two\u00a0children\u00a0to\u00a0support.\u00a0\u00a0Also\u00a0her\u00a0career\u00a0progression\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0tempered\u00a0with\u00a0affecting\u00a0<\/p>\n
her\u00a0seniority\u00a0and\u00a0promotion.\u00a0 \u00a0She\u00a0also\u00a0complained\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0laid\u00a0down\u00a0procedure\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0followed\u00a0<\/p>\n
before\u00a0withholding\u00a0her\u00a0salary\u00a0without\u00a0any\u00a0written\u00a0orders.\u00a0 \u00a0She\u00a0questioned\u00a0whether\u00a0salary\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
stopped \u00a0 without \u00a0 following \u00a0 any \u00a0 laid\u00a0 down\u00a0 procedure\u00a0 and\u00a0 whether\u00a0 major\u00a0 penalty\u00a0 can\u00a0 be\u00a0 imposed\u00a0<\/p>\n
without\u00a0issuing\u00a0Charge\u00a0sheet\u00a0and\u00a0providing\u00a0reasonable\u00a0opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0charges.\u00a0\u00a0Also,\u00a0the\u00a0
\n        name\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 officer\u00a0 who\u00a0 issued\u00a0verbal\u00a0orders\u00a0to\u00a0PSO,\u00a0IRLA\u00a0to\u00a0release\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
       provided.          \u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0at\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed \u00a0 a \u00a0 second\u00a0 appeal\u00a0 before\u00a0 the\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a019.5.10\u00a0stating\u00a0 that\u00a0 no\u00a0 pertinent\u00a0<\/p>\n
       information\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0forthcoming\u00a0both\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0application\u00a0and\u00a0her\u00a0first\u00a0appeal.\u00a0\u00a0She\u00a0reiterated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       PAO,\u00a0IRLA\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0I&B\u00a0had\u00a0suddenly\u00a0released\u00a0her\u00a0salary\u00a0after\u00a0arbitrarily\u00a0withholding\u00a0\u00a0it\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
       ten\u00a0months,\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0salary\u00a0release\u00a0according\u00a0her\u00a0coincided\u00a0with\u00a0her\u00a0moving\u00a0the\u00a0CAT,\u00a0Principal\u00a0Bench\u00a0<\/p>\n
       for\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0salary.\u00a0She\u00a0contended\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0are\u00a0laid\u00a0down\u00a0GOI\u00a0rules\u00a0 \u00a0in\u00a0connection\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
       withholding\u00a0or\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0major\u00a0penalty\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0without\u00a0following\u00a0the\u00a0laid\u00a0<\/p>\n
       don\u00a0procedure.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.     The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0August\u00a023,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       2010.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.     Ms.\u00a0Sunita\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Anirudh\u00a0Meena,\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0<\/p>\n
4.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
5.     After\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0after\u00a0noting\u00a0that\u00a0contents\u00a0of\u00a0an\u00a0earlier\u00a0appeal\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
       regarding\u00a0stoppage\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0salary\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0and\u00a0on\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0submissions\u00a0on\u00a0record,\u00a0\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       considered\u00a0opinion\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Commission\u00a0that\u00a0proper\u00a0procedures\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0followed\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       either\u00a0stoppage\u00a0or\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0therefore\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0IRLA,\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
       provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a025.9.10\u00a0providing\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0submitted\u00a0during\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0once\u00a0again\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0released\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       basis\u00a0of\u00a0only\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0them\u00a0,\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0<\/p>\n
       The\u00a0PAO\u00a0to\u00a0clearly\u00a0state\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0other\u00a0order\u00a0asking\u00a0IRLA\u00a0to\u00a0release\u00a0the\u00a0salary.\u00a0\u00a0Name\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0date.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0reasons\u00a0<\/p>\n
       for\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0in\u00a0August,\u00a02004,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a023.7.04\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0<\/p>\n
       to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0while\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0except\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a0\u00a023.7.04,\u00a0\u00a0no\u00a0other\u00a0<\/p>\n
       reasons\u00a0are\u00a0available\u00a0on\u00a0record.\u00a0 \u00a0This\u00a0information\u00a0too\u00a0may\u00a0also\u00a0be\u00a0included\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0affidavit.\u00a0With\u00a0<\/p>\n
       regard\u00a0to\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0files,\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0be\u00a0completed\u00a0on\u00a03rd\u00a0September,\u00a02010\u00a0during\u00a0<\/p>\n
       working\u00a0hours,\u00a0starting\u00a0from\u00a011\u00a0AM.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0file\u00a0<\/p>\n
       notings\u00a0and\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0she\u00a0requires.\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0JS,\u00a0Dr.\u00a0D.P.\u00a0Reddy\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
       look\u00a0into\u00a0whether\u00a0IRLA\u00a0 is\u00a0 competent\u00a0enough\u00a0to\u00a0release\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0
\n          Information\u00a0&\u00a0Broadcasting\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0hereby\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n
         copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0separate\u00a0written\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0IRLA\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
         I&B\u00a0 \u00a0either\u00a0to\u00a0release\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0or\u00a0stop\u00a0the\u00a0salary\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0This\u00a0affidavit\u00a0too\u00a0\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
         provided\u00a0by\u00a025th\u00a0September,\u00a02010.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                            (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<\/p>\n
                                                                                   Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Ms.\u00a0Poonam\u00a0Dabas
\n         Doordarshan\u00a0Bhawan
\n         Room\u00a0No.510,\u00a0Mandi\u00a0House
\n         Tower\u00adB,\u00a0Copernicus\u00a0Marg
\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0PIO
\n         M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&\u00a0Broadcasting
\n         Pay\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Office\u00a0(IRLA)
\n         AGCR\u00a0building,\u00a0IP\u00a0Estate
\n         New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n         M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&\u00a0Broadcasting
\n         Pay\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0Office\u00a0(IRLA)
\n         AGCR\u00a0building,\u00a0IP\u00a0Estate
\n         New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0<\/p>\n
4.       Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And … on 23 August, 2010 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000983 Dated\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a023,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Ms.\u00a0Poonam\u00a0Dabas Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : M\/o\u00a0Information\u00a0&\u00a0Broadcasting,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi \u00a0 Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a017.2.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0IRLA,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0I&B,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0 seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0\u00a0information: i) My\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0released\u00a0in\u00a0August\u00a02004\u00a0by\u00a0PAO\u00adIRLA,\u00a0M\/o\u00a0I&B,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0after\u00a0a\u00a0gap\u00a0of \u00a0 ten\u00a0months.\u00a0\u00a0Order\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0released\u00a0be\u00a0provided. (ii) Name\u00a0and\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer\u00a0who\u00a0ordered\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0my\u00a0salary\u00a0be\u00a0provided. (iii) Date\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0order\u00a0for\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0was\u00a0issued\u00a0be\u00a0intimated (iv) Reasons\u00a0for\u00a0release\u00a0of\u00a0salary\u00a0in\u00a0August\u00a02004\u00a0be\u00a0provided (v) Copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0on\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0requisite\u00a0fees\u00a0be\u00a0provided (vi) A\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\u00a0for\u00a0file\u00a0inspection\u00a0be\u00a0intimated. 2. The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a025.3.10\u00a0stating\u00a0as\u00a0under: (i) As\u00a0intimated\u00a0earlier,\u00a0salary\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0month\u00a0of\u00a0Nov.\u00a02003\u00a0to\u00a07\/04\u00a0was\u00a0with\u00a0held\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0non \u00a0 regularization \u00a0 of \u00a0 period \u00a0 of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-102517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMs.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-14T14:13:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And … on 23 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-14T14:13:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1450,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-14T14:13:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And … on 23 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-14T14:13:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And … on 23 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-14T14:13:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010"},"wordCount":1450,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010","name":"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-14T14:13:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-poonam-dabas-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Poonam Dabas vs Ministry Of Information And … on 23 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=102517"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102517\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=102517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=102517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=102517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}