{"id":103108,"date":"2009-03-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-12T02:59:54","modified_gmt":"2017-01-11T21:29:54","slug":"dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                  Criminal Misc. No.M-23575 of 2006.\n                             -1-\n\nIn the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.\n\n                           Criminal Misc.No.M-23575 of 2006.\n                           Date of decision:23-3-2009.\n\nDr.Gurdev Singh and another.\n\n                                                       ...Petitioners.\n\n            Versus\n\nState of Punjab and others.\n\n                                                       ...Respondents.\n\nCoram:      Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. C. Puri.\n\n            ...\n\nPresent:    Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.\n            Mr. P.S.Bajwa, AAG Punjab.\n            Mr. P.P.S. Duggal, Advocate for respondent No.2.\n\nK. C. Puri, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>Judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Through the present petition filed under Section 482<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.11 dated<\/p>\n<p>10.1.2005, under Section 15\/61\/85 of NDPS Act, Police Station<\/p>\n<p>Lambi, Annexure P-1, challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C dated<\/p>\n<p>4.5.2005, Annexure P-13 and subsequent proceedings conducted<\/p>\n<p>therein before Special Judge, Muktsar qua the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p>            Brief facts of the case are that on 10.1.2005, ASI<\/p>\n<p>Darshan Singh, along with police party was going for checking of<br \/>\n              Criminal Misc. No.M-23575 of 2006.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                        -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>suspected persons. One Maruti car bearing registration No.DBD-<\/p>\n<p>2653 was coming. The ASI gave a signal to stop the Maruti car.<\/p>\n<p>One occupant of the car told his name as Kapur Chand @ Kapuri<\/p>\n<p>and the other person disclosed his name as Sardara Singh @ Kaka.<\/p>\n<p>The ASI expressed his suspicion that they were carrying some<\/p>\n<p>narcotic substance in their car. He gave option to the accused<\/p>\n<p>persons to get their car searched from the Magistrate or the<\/p>\n<p>Gazetted Officer. Both the accused expressed their desire to get<\/p>\n<p>their car searched before some Gazetted Officer. A memo was<\/p>\n<p>prepared and wireless was sent for sending some Gazetted Officer.<\/p>\n<p>At about 9.45 AM, DSP Malout Hargobind Singh reached at the<\/p>\n<p>spot who told to both the accused that he was a DSP at Malout and<\/p>\n<p>was a Gazetted Officer. He also told both the accused that they<\/p>\n<p>have a legal right to get the search of the car before him or<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer. Both the accused told that they<\/p>\n<p>wanted to get their car searched before him. Consent memo was<\/p>\n<p>prepared and Kapur Chand accused signed the same whereas<\/p>\n<p>Sardara Singh accused put his thumb impression on the same. Then<\/p>\n<p>under the directions of the DSP, the ASI took the search and found<\/p>\n<p>three bags of poppy husk on the rear seat and two bags of poppy<\/p>\n<p>in the dicky.250 grams each was taken as sample from the bags.\n<\/p>\n<p>               Criminal Misc. No.M-23575 of 2006.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                         -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The bags were weighed which were found to contain 29 kilo and<\/p>\n<p>500 grams of poppy husk in each bag. Samples were taken and<\/p>\n<p>sealed. Sample seal was given to HC Gurdeep Singh.<\/p>\n<p>           During the interrogation of accused Kapur Chand and<\/p>\n<p>Sardara Singh, they told that Jaswinder Singh @ Chhinda, his<\/p>\n<p>father Gurdev Singh and Pawan Kumar were the owners.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C was also filed<\/p>\n<p>against the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>           Quashing has been sought on different grounds which<\/p>\n<p>will be discussed in the later part of judgment.<\/p>\n<p>           The main plank of the counsel for the petitioners for<\/p>\n<p>quashing the proceedings is that the petitioners have been involved<\/p>\n<p>on the basis of testimony of Jagsir Singh and Rabbi Singh. It is<\/p>\n<p>contended that both these witnesses have given affidavits that they<\/p>\n<p>have not made any statement against the petitioners. It is further<\/p>\n<p>contended that since the other accused Sardara Singh and<\/p>\n<p>Jaswinder Singh have been acquitted and the case of petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>similar to their case so no useful purpose would be served by<\/p>\n<p>continuing the proceedings in the FIR in question.<\/p>\n<p>           It is further contended that petitioner has been wrongly<\/p>\n<p>declared as a Proclaimed Offender. He was not properly served and<br \/>\n               Criminal Misc. No.M-23575 of 2006.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                         -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>as such the impugned order declaring him as a Proclaimed<\/p>\n<p>Offender is liable to be set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>           The learned State counsel has submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is seeking relief under Section 482 Cr.P.C. He has been<\/p>\n<p>declared as a Proclaimed Offender. It cannot be said that he has<\/p>\n<p>been wrongly declared as a Proclaimed Offender, more so, when<\/p>\n<p>his son has appeared before the trial Court. It cannot be pre-judged<\/p>\n<p>that the case of petitioner is similar to that of Sardara Singh and<\/p>\n<p>Jaswinder Singh. The fact that Kapur Chand, one of the accused,<\/p>\n<p>has been convicted goes a long way to prove that it is only the trial<\/p>\n<p>Court which can adjudicate upon the question whether the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is guilty of any offence or not. By procuring affidavits of<\/p>\n<p>the witnesses further prove the fact that the petitioner is trying to<\/p>\n<p>win over the witnesses.\n<\/p>\n<p>           It is further contended that the petitioner is a habitual<\/p>\n<p>offender as he has faced trial in nine cases. Most of those cases are<\/p>\n<p>of similar nature as that of present case, as detailed in written reply.<\/p>\n<p>           So, no ground for invoking provisions of Section 482<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C is made out.\n<\/p>\n<p>           Admittedly, petitioner Dr. Gurdev Singh has been<\/p>\n<p>declared Proclaimed Offender by the trial Court. The counsel for<br \/>\n               Criminal Misc. No.M-23575 of 2006.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                         -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the petitioner has submitted that he has been wrongly declared as a<\/p>\n<p>Proclaimed Offender and was not duly served but that contention<\/p>\n<p>cannot accepted as his son Jaswinder Singh has appeared before<\/p>\n<p>the trial Court. It cannot be said that he had no knowledge of the<\/p>\n<p>pendency of the case and he has been wrongly declared as a<\/p>\n<p>Proclaimed Offender. From the written reply, it is clear that as<\/p>\n<p>many as nine First Information Reports, most of which are<\/p>\n<p>regarding possession of opium, were registered against the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. No relief under Section 482 Cr.P.C can be given to a<\/p>\n<p>person who has hoodwinked the Court. Otherwise also, his conduct<\/p>\n<p>of procuring affidavits from the witnesses shows that he is trying<\/p>\n<p>to win over the witnesses. Whether the case of petitioner is similar<\/p>\n<p>to that of Kapur Chand who has been convicted in the present FIR<\/p>\n<p>or that of Sardara Singh and Jaswinder Singh, who have been<\/p>\n<p>acquitted, is a matter of appreciation of evidence. Otherwise also,<\/p>\n<p>proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C can only be invoked if there<\/p>\n<p>is clear abuse of the process of the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>           From the facts on the record, a prima-facie case against<\/p>\n<p>the accused is made out. Consequently, no ground for invoking<\/p>\n<p>provisions of Section 482 Cr.P.C is made out. The petition is<\/p>\n<p>accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Criminal Misc. No.M-23575 of 2006.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                        -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          However, it is made clear that nothing observed above<\/p>\n<p>shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the<\/p>\n<p>case.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\nMarch 23rd ,2009.                         (K. C. Puri )\nJaggi                                        Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009 Criminal Misc. No.M-23575 of 2006. -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Criminal Misc.No.M-23575 of 2006. Date of decision:23-3-2009. Dr.Gurdev Singh and another. &#8230;Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others. &#8230;Respondents. Coram: Hon&#8217;ble Mr. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-11T21:29:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-11T21:29:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1034,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-11T21:29:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-11T21:29:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-11T21:29:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009"},"wordCount":1034,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009","name":"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-11T21:29:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-gurdev-singh-and-another-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-23-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.Gurdev Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 23 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103108"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103108\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}