{"id":103213,"date":"2009-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-20T00:04:25","modified_gmt":"2017-09-19T18:34:25","slug":"sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n<pre> in I\n\nMFA No.20813 of 2008\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA \nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD I\n\nDATED THIS THE 24TH DAY op' NOVEMBERIAC %\nBEFORE %Mif.;%II'I'\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.s.9_4\u00e9;Tig,    \u00ab\nMISCELLANEOUS FiRST APPEAL No';\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri Ramesh, \n\nS\/o Smt. Gangamma,__\"~ .   \nAge: 27 years, Occ: Hanialig f\nR\/o: Vinobnagar, H\" I V\nChikkaj antkai. post, ji\n\nTq: .Gangava:hi,;;1jf\/&amp; ; '1Koipp\"a1.\":e\"   \"  ...APPELLAN'I'\n\n(By Sri. \n\nA N 1).: I I I\n\n1. The bivisioria! iNia;;.\u00a7\u00a7ge\"r\",\nM \/is. New Iridia-_ Assurance Co. Ltd.,\nB_\u00a7e1la1'y, bi\"s\u20ac::._Be11a:7y.\n\n;.  ecgsrinivas,\nV S \/n_  }--Iamii11anthappa,\n\n . C'Age:'iM.aj_oi;\"Owner of lorry\n\n' .._Bearin_gj;No.MEI{ 4572,\nR\/o:\"_17th Ward, Ukkadakeri,\n\n AA Taospet, Dist: Bellary. ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>A   i&#8211;,,(VBy  V.R.Datar, Advocate for R1)<\/p>\n<p>This miscellaneous first appeal is filed under<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Section 30(1) of the Workmen&#8217;s&#8217; Compensation Act<\/p>\n<p>MFA N0.208l3 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>against the order dated 28.03.2008 passed in<br \/>\nW.C.No.3&#8217;73\/2005 on the file of the Labour Officer and<br \/>\nCommissioner for Workmen&#8217;s Compensation, Koppel,&#8217;<br \/>\nThis miscellaneous first appeal CO1&#8217;1_&#8217;_1.i&#8217;f1&#8217;gl<br \/>\nadmission this day, the Court delivered the &#8211;fo11ow.ir1-gzl &#8212;<br \/>\nJUDGMEQT &#8220;-\u00ab ~<br \/>\nThis appeal is \ufb01led  iiirije11red4elrripioyee<br \/>\naggrieved by the quantumi&#8217;of&#8217;-comipenlsationlaigvarded <\/p>\n<p>the Commissioner _for Wo&#8217;rk_me_n&#8217;s it &#8216;Compensation,<\/p>\n<p>Koppal, and seeking   same.\n<\/p>\n<p>  i:ithe,j&#8221;rriatterwis\ufb01 listed for admission,<br \/>\nhavingA&#8217;reg&#8221;ard&#8217; to lthewnature of the controversy raised,<\/p>\n<p>which fallslin-.a&#8217;short compass, the same is taken up for<\/p>\n<p>.  &#8216;I   &#8230; _ . . . . ..\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8221; 3,i\ufb01 ah acddentthatcmcuned on 24IXi2005,<\/p>\n<p>l\u00a5__VVh\u20ac1&#8217;1&#8243;  appellant was discharging his duties as a<\/p>\n<p> under the 15* respondent in the lorry owned by<\/p>\n<p> the 1st respondent, he met with an accident and<\/p>\n<p>MFA No.20813 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>suffered fracture in his left leg and other injuries The<br \/>\nCommissioner, on the basis of the evidence<br \/>\nhas found that the accident arose out of<br \/>\ncourse of employment and thait&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;thet if<br \/>\nwas earning Rs.3,000\/~ per   of<br \/>\ncapacity resulting from  has&#8217;<br \/>\nbeen assessed at relex\ufb02rant factor viz.,<br \/>\n219.95, a total sum awarded as<\/p>\n<p>compensation;&#8221;~\u00ab;.Vp:y1&#8243; ._\n<\/p>\n<p>4.  coun&#8217;sel  for the appellant has<\/p>\n<p>canvassed&#8217; two&#8221;:poi11t\u00a7;_&#8217;.i}.. that the Commissioner has<\/p>\n<p>erred in ure,strictin,&lt;\u00a7Atheiikvages earned by the injured to<\/p>\n<p> p_  and iii)&quot;ch.a.tiinterest awarded at the rate of 12%<\/p>\n<p>  effect from expiry of 30 days from the<\/p>\n<p>deter&#039; of is illegal in the light of the judgment<\/p>\n<p>rendered lay the Apex Court in the case of Oriental<\/p>\n<p>A &quot;:i&quot;_I1isit_rance Co. Ltd. vs. Mohd. Nasir &amp; another<\/p>\n<p>  reported in 2009 AIR sew 3717.\n<\/p>\n<p>5 ..\n<\/p>\n<p>MFA No.20813 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-<br \/>\ninsurance Company has supported the <\/p>\n<p>recorded and the compensation awarcled  <\/p>\n<p>Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Having heard the learn\u00e9_d&#8221;&#8216;:coiiniselV<br \/>\nparties, the substantial  of law for&#8221; C<\/p>\n<p>consideration are:\n<\/p>\n<p>1) Whether the  right and<br \/>\njustified in rievstriictirig &#8216;:the&#8217;V.Wagels earned<\/p>\n<p>by     &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>  awarded by the<br \/>\n the rate of 12% with<br \/>\nC it effect&#8217; from eicpiry of 30 days from the date<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;order is illegal?\n<\/p>\n<p>   contended by the learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V theiilappelliant, in the absence of any material elicited in<\/p>\n<p> the&#8217;u.cross&#8211;examination of the claimant or by any other<\/p>\n<p> independent evidence by the appellant-insurance<\/p>\n<p>company, the Commissioner was not justified in<\/p>\n<p>MFA E\\Eo.20813 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>restricting the wages earned by the ciairnant to 26,_days.<br \/>\nIt is not shown by leading any evidence<br \/>\nclaimant was paid only for 26 days in a<br \/>\nallowed to rest for the reInaining&#8221;perioo&#8217;d5.LHit_::.isV.iaiso  he<br \/>\nnoticed here that the wage<br \/>\nalso the minimum amounitithiat a   forth<br \/>\nthe nature of the   to<br \/>\nhave discharged at the  as a hamai.<br \/>\nTherefore,  pas.sedVAihy.&#8221;&#8216;t1i1eV.fiCommissioner to<br \/>\nthat extent:  If the amount is<br \/>\n  at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; without<br \/>\nrestriCtin_:g&#8217;itV  compensation payabie will<\/p>\n<p>come -to Rst},  \u00a3564. &#8211;.\n<\/p>\n<p>     the interest awarded, as rightly<\/p>\n<p>  counsel for the appellant, even in<\/p>\n<p>respect&#8221;of.&lt;persona1 injury, the claimant is entitied for<\/p>\n<p>  payment of interest from the date of petition as held by<\/p>\n<p>&quot;thie &#039;Apex Court in the decision in Oriental Insurance Co.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil in I MFA No.20813 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD I DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY op&#8217; NOVEMBERIAC % BEFORE %Mif.;%II&#8217;I&#8217; THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE B.s.9_4\u00e9;Tig, \u00ab MISCELLANEOUS FiRST APPEAL No&#8217;; BETWEEN: Sri Ramesh, S\/o [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-19T18:34:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-19T18:34:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":563,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-19T18:34:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-19T18:34:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-19T18:34:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009"},"wordCount":563,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009","name":"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-19T18:34:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-vs-the-divisional-manager-on-24-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Ramesh vs The Divisional Manager on 24 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}