{"id":103322,"date":"2010-01-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010"},"modified":"2016-04-21T01:41:54","modified_gmt":"2016-04-20T20:11:54","slug":"smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n
IN THE} HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 22\u00bb-A DAY OF JANUARY, 2010 V. \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HGNELE MR. 3USTICE V. JAc}ANNATE--AN_:AT\"*  V\n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NG.44ED\/QDDVTIQ: .\n\nC \/w MISCELLANEOUS EIRST\" APPEAL \u00bbIIQ.7'.f25_\/4200'? {WC};\n\nIN MFA NO.4460\/ 2007\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. SMT MAHADEVI, w\/0 LATE PARI\\2I'EVS_'RI IIGARGDI; ' \nAGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC: I~IV(IuS~E.I_IDL\u00bbD. '\n\n2. K1} MAR ERAPPA, S\/O L\/5I'F-F\u00a3:f'ARM ESEI U\"\u20ac'\u00a3f'uR.CObL,\nAGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, occ; NIE;.--.     ' --.\n\n3. MISS. PARVATI, D19 LATE 'PAR'LIESPIII..DGA.RGDL\nAGED ABOUT\"? '7--'3.'\\'RS, QCC: --I~I'IL.\"4. '  '\n\nAPPELLANT I\\%()4'vS.'fz_\"--AI:\\}'I\")\"3Ts__AREj{'RE'}7R_E\u00e93E'E'JTE.D BY\nAPPELLAINT\"1I\\ID..:1'L:IS ~NA'TD'R.AL G'UAR'DIAN\nMOTHER. _     . '\n\n4. SMT. SATY-AvvA._\\Iv,{D_PARAJIE.SHI UGARGOL,\nAGED AEDUT 25 YEARS; Vojcc: HOUSE HOLD.\n\n5. MISS S_OMAV\\\/ALAEV)\/'()' LATE PARMESHI UGARGOL,\n.AG.ED_AI3QUT 4 YEAR_S.\u00bb0CC: NIL.\n\n.6.' nKDMAR.NAI}AKAPPA, S \/0 LATE PARMESHI UGARGOL,\n\n AGEDI-.AEDUTf_:'s*yEARS, occ: NIL\n\n{APPELI.AN*I\\S\".jNG;=sV AND 6 ARE REPRESENTED BY\nPE'I'I.Ti'IONE3P. _N\u00a7;>.4, WHO ES THE NATURAL GUARDIAN\nMoTH:ER;=-- A\n\n--- V ALLARE RESIDENT' OF KADABI VILLAGE\n..f~EN SGUNDATTI TALUKA, NOW RESIDING AT\n'- ' SONAEWADI AT KHANAPUR TALUKA 591 302,\n.  DIST. EELGAUM. ....APPE)LLANTS\n\n' 'I ~~(SY SR1. SANJAY S. KATAGERI, ADV.)\n\n\n\n- ~. ,_ SETW-3.:EN:'\n\nid\n\nAND:\n\n1.. SI-IRI PARASHANT (':O\\\/INI') SAWANT,\nAGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,\nR\/O MAI-IAVIEZER NAGAR, KI-IANAPUR ROAD,\nAT NAD POST: PEERANWADI\n\nTAL AND DIST. E3I33I..GAUM 590 005.\n(OWNER OF' GOOD TRUCK BEARING\nNO.KA 22\/B8325)\n\n2. THE MANAGER,\n\nNEW INDIA INSURNACE CO. luff].-'\u20ac31'\nBHAVANI CHAMBERS, BEJLGAUM.\n\nCLUB ROAD, BELGAUIVI 590 002.\n\n3. SMT. DOOOAVA. w\/O i<LAREAPPA--I_UG.ARGO, A\n\nAGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: IIOUSI.=:R.OLI')\n\nR\/O KADAB1 VII,LAGE1,TQ. SOUNDATTJ,_"".._ ' _,  \nDIST. BELGAUM 590 .319.     _4 V  ...RESPONOENTS\n\n(BY SR1. RAVI G. SABHAHIT, AOy".'RO.R.I'R;2. NIOTICEITO RI DISPENSED\nWITH V\/O\/D E7\/'09\/V2069} I I *  .. \n\nTHIS AI?PE\ufb01AI;_IS 'I'ILI:D-LINDIER SECTION 30(1) OF WC ACT\nAGAINS THE ORDER"--1.T9_ATED'3[2\/2O--O.7'wPASSED IN WCA.NO.SR:20\/O6\nON TI\u00bbIEjI1'ILE'OE-'fI'HE iASS"r.*I,ABOuR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER\nFOR wGRII2NSAT1ON AND SEEKING\nENHANCEMENT OF COI.rII=z%:NS.ATION.\n\nIN MITA'NO..7725\/20G? III\/Iv)\"\n\nTI\u00bbIE.,MANAG,ER,' ' V\n\n NEW IN.D1A,_AS.SLI,RANCE CO. LTD,\n'BHAVANI\"'C,\u00a51\u00a7.AMBEES, BELGALINI,\n\nREPRESENT'E-D BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER\nAT, 2.33, UNITY jISIIII.I>ING ANNEX,\n\n. MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE 560 027. .. APPELLANT\n\n jay SRI. RAI\/I G. SAENAIIIT, ADV.)\n\n_  ANIIQ \n\n = PRASIIANT O-Ox\/INI) SAV\/--\\I'5T,\n\nMAJOR BY AGE. OCC: BUSINESS,\n\n\n\nJ\n\nR\/O MAl~iAVEE.CR NAG\/-'IR, KI-{ANA?UR ROAD,\nPEERANWADI POST, EBICLGAUIN\/E TO. AND DIST.\n\n2. SI'\/ET. MAHADEVI, W\/O PARAMEESI-II UGARGO,\nAGED 27 YEARS, EIOUSEHOLIJ WORK,\n\nO)\n\nKUMAR IRAPPA, Sff) I3'ARAMES'r{I UCIARGOL,\nAGD 5 YEARS MINOR,\n\n4. KUMARI PARVATI, D\/O PARAMESHI U_G\u00bbAvF\u20acG4OL,  I'\nAGED ABOUT 3 YARS, MINOR.  I .. \n\nNo.3 AND 4 MINORS, REPRESENTED SN T\"I-IDIR\nMOTHER, NATURAL GUARDIAN. 'R.--2 ABOVE?) \"\n\n5. SMT. SATYAVVA, W\/O RARAA\/1ESOI'I\"RI,If0ARGo,\"'   \nAGED 26 YEARS.   \u00ab-\n\n6. KUIVIARI SDMAWA, D \/C..415A-'RAIN-IESHIVSIUGARGOL,\nA0ED5YEARS,IvIINoR.  - a  .  \n\n'-I\n\nKUMAR NAYAKAPPA, S \/0'RAI2AMI\u00a7:S.II'I' _LIS'ARg\u00a7'o:,,'\nAGI:D4YEARS.,--NIIN_0R.;. _,     \n\nNo.6 AND 7 MINORSSREI-PRE.SE1\\I'F.ED'---E3Y:TH SIR\nMOTHER NATURAL'SIIAR--D.IAN--.R.5 ASD\\\/I3. \n\nNO. 2 TO 7 ARE ASLR}\/OVSO'NAW.AWA~Dl,\nKHANAPUR, TALUK, DE;L.0AI,IMA.DIST.\n\n8. SMT. DODDAVVA :<_AI'"PA'~UGAR00,\nAGED 50 YEARS,' HOUSEHOLD WORK.\nR4\/go KADABI \\7IL._LAGI:, SOUNDATTI TQ.,\nNow R\/AT S0NARw.A..DI'AT KHANAPUR TALUK,\n\n - I V 13RI'3:,GA.UM DI_STRIcT. ..RESPONDENTS\n\n _\u00a7B\\Ij SORT. A~S_fI:ATAGSRI, ADV. FOR R2;\n\n \"THIS A}T??PE\u00a7AL IS FILEIJ UNDER SECTION 30(1) OF w.c. ACT\nAGAI-SNT JUDGMENT DATED 03.02.2007 PASSED IN\nALOB\/WCA\/FC\/SR\/20\/2006(OLD WCA\/SR.148\/2005) ON THE) FILE\n\n WOF THELABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN\n\"._COMEENSATION, BELGAUM DIVISION, BELGAUM AWARDING\n_ ~._I:0IvIP~RNSATI0N 0;? RS.2,I4,69a\/W WITII INTEREST AT RATE OF 12%\n  \n\nTH}:-ISE3 APPEJALS ARE) COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,\n\nI  COURT DIEIJVISRIIZID TI--IE I-?OI,LOWING:\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
These two appeals arise out of one and the sarnebrder<\/p>\n
passed by the Workmen’s Compensation Cor1jirri’ispsi\u00bb:ii1ei\u00b0\u00abF<\/p>\n
Belgaum and first of the two appeals is by   <\/p>\n
seeking enhancement of the conipensation _.w_hereas*–:lth’e;<\/p>\n
appeal of the insurance company is cc-ncernirig the. <\/p>\n
interest granted by the Commis.sii’o.ner. . _  I V\n<\/p>\n
2. So far as the claimants\ufb01 appeal is concerned,<\/p>\n
submission made by  leg-iilrn\u00a7;dVil.’co’u_insel Sri. Sanjay S.<\/p>\n
Katagei’il;oAAf11at the’i’Cornrnis_s1oner erred in taking the
\nincome the deceaiseed”a._tllR,sl.Q,O64 \/ ~ per month whereas the<\/p>\n
evidence on; record isvhows that the deceased was paid<\/p>\n
per day’~b.},.I.\u00ab’the employer for the quarry Work.<\/p>\n
 Referririgl’to*the–._eVidence of the employer, learned counsel<\/p>\n
argiicld  income be taken at Rs.150\/~ per day and<\/p>\n
 also  reliance on a Division Bench ruling of this Court<\/p>\n
ll..\ufb02repo’:tedHin ILR 200? KAR 1289.\n<\/p>\n
}w<\/p>\n
,\u00bb=<\/p>\n
3. On the other hand Sri. Ravi G. Sabhahit,<\/p>\n
learned counsei for the insurance company argued tT:ia’tethe<\/p>\n
Commissioner was justified in taking the _.i17l.(:JO.Ifl’i(3i’V:”.i’ri.1″‘C,.<\/p>\n
Rs.2,064\/\u00bb based on the reievant notification  the-.;5ei~iod’i K <\/p>\n
concerned and as such in the absenee’ofl~do(:’onientv’being<\/p>\n
produced by the claimants indica.tifig_ the <\/p>\n
to the deceased, no error can bevtfound in’the’iVw_ia;ge”stb taken by
\nthe Commissioner.  far\ufb02asi t_:’int’orest is” concerned,<\/p>\n
submission made is thatlit’is7payablei’~.onei’ month after the<\/p>\n
date of death at .i;;>.%_.\n<\/p>\n
4%. ~ _ilr’1i5I;healiight–.oif~\u00abtVhe_above submission and having
\ngone throtigh\u00e9 the.V_evid–en’eel’131% record, I am of the View that<\/p>\n
the I’A.I”.f..’,OI’I’i\u20acii’i(;C)_:1i.1l’C\u00a7~.’il’1aii’C’B6611 taken at Rs.120\/– per day<\/p>\n
  6  _____ H.” W l {E _ ‘vv>cj1″\u00a3>”~3
\n ..beC’a.use.?ith’eA.& employer: 1&2}? jieyei-iw\u00e9fgrifmthough in the<\/p>\n
‘__\u20acX{3,Il’}1f1a’E1QIi~1i71~C’f1%.Cf,  +&%@\ufb02 is silent on this aspect. As<\/p>\n
stated abolve\ufb01tiiincome at Rs.120\/~ per day is taken\/as the<\/p>\n
lrnpwages ~pai’;d to the deceased employee, the compensation gets<\/p>\n
 out at Rs.3,74,364\/~ as against the amount of<\/p>\n
i  Rls.2,E4,698\/~ quantified by the Commissioner. Therefore,<\/p>\n
?%<\/p>\n
(}<\/p>\n
the order is modified and the compensation to which the
\nClaimants are entitied is Rs.3,74,36-4\/~. interest payable will
\nbe at 12% one month after the death and not as given by the<\/p>\n
Commissioner.\n<\/p>\n
Both the appeals stand disposed of in the  _<\/p>\n
In View of the amount being modified <\/p>\n
proportionate amount be deposited in;-rezsipeetiof”the’Vin_inerA<\/p>\n
Chiidren as per the order of -the Cor_n”missio’rIeV1′.__V Ifganiy <\/p>\n
P’<\/p>\n
amount in deposit before this Court, the same be transferred<\/p>\n
to the W.C. CommissioI1ie.r’;\u00ab.\n<\/p>\n
kmv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010 Author: V.Jagannathan IN THE} HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22\u00bb-A DAY OF JANUARY, 2010 V. BEFORE THE HGNELE MR. 3USTICE V. JAc}ANNATE–AN_:AT”* V MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NG.44ED\/QDDVTIQ: . C \/w MISCELLANEOUS EIRST” APPEAL \u00bbIIQ.7′.f25_\/4200′? {WC}; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-20T20:11:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-20T20:11:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":493,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-20T20:11:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-20T20:11:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-20T20:11:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010"},"wordCount":493,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010","name":"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-20T20:11:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-mahadevi-vs-shri-parashant-govind-shawant-on-22-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Mahadevi vs Shri Parashant Govind Shawant on 22 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103322"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103322\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}