{"id":103450,"date":"2009-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-03-27T20:41:51","modified_gmt":"2016-03-27T15:11:51","slug":"beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 24900 of 2008(L)\n\n\n1. BEENA.V.I., 35 YEARS\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. REGISTRAR, KERALA GRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN,SC,KERALA AGRL.UTY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :15\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                             S. Siri Jagan, J.\n               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                     W. P (C) No. 24900 of 2008\n               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                   Dated this, the 15th July, 2009.\n\n                            J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      In this writ petition, the petitioner,    who is an aspirant for<\/p>\n<p>appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in the discipline of Soil<\/p>\n<p>Science and Agricultural Chemistry in the 1st respondent&#8217;s University,<\/p>\n<p>raises a grievance regarding violation of the principles of communal<\/p>\n<p>rotation by the University in making appointments pursuant to the<\/p>\n<p>selection for which the petitioner participated. Ext. P4 is the rank list<\/p>\n<p>prepared pursuant to the selection in which the petitioner is rank<\/p>\n<p>no. 3. There were 5 vacancies. However, only two vacancies have<\/p>\n<p>been filled up by open competition candidates. One candidate was<\/p>\n<p>appointed in the rotation applicable to Ezhava community.         Since<\/p>\n<p>other reservation community candidates were not available, the<\/p>\n<p>balance two vacancies were left unfilled in view of Rule 15(b) of<\/p>\n<p>Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, which stipulated that<\/p>\n<p>whenever candidates from the reservation community is not available<\/p>\n<p>those vacancies     should not be filled up and should be notified<\/p>\n<p>separately. The petitioner&#8217;s contention is that since there were five<\/p>\n<p>vacancies, if three vacancies are set apart for being filled up by<\/p>\n<p>communal rotation, that would violate the 50% Rule in Rule 15(d),<\/p>\n<p>which stipulates that in one selection year, the reservation category of<\/p>\n<p>posts shall not exceed 50% of the total number of vacancies for which<\/p>\n<p>selection is resorted to in a selection year. One selection year is<\/p>\n<p>defined to mean the period from the date on which the rank list of<\/p>\n<p>candidates comes into force to the date on which it expires.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, according to the petitioner, out of the five vacancies<\/p>\n<p>available for filling up,    only two could have been filled up by<\/p>\n<p>communal rotation lest it would violate the 50% rule. According to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, therefore, three of the five vacancies should have been<\/p>\n<p>filled up from open competition candidates, in which case, the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.C. No. 24900\/08                    -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner being rank no. 3 would be the one to be appointed.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;[i]   issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,<br \/>\n      order or direction, commanding the respondent to appoint the<br \/>\n      petitioner against the vacancies notified as per Ext. P2;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      [ii]   issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,<br \/>\n      order or direction, restraining the respondent from filling up all<br \/>\n      the available vacancies from Ext. P3 ranked list;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      [iii]  declare that the respondent is liable to fill the vacancies<br \/>\n      from Ext. P3 ranked list only to the extent of notified vacancies as<br \/>\n      per Ext. P1 and       the 5 vacancies notified as per Ext. P2<br \/>\n      notification are to be filled from Ext. P4 ranked list.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      2. A statement has been filed by the respondent-University in<\/p>\n<p>which the rotation as worked out by the University has been<\/p>\n<p>explained.    Going by the same, the rotation for this particular<\/p>\n<p>selection should start at the 18th point in the 100 point roster which<\/p>\n<p>goes to an Ezhava. The first Ezhava available in Ext. P4 rank list is<\/p>\n<p>Smt. Mini V, who has been appointed in that vacancy.                  The next<\/p>\n<p>vacancy goes to open competition candidate and the 1st rank holder<\/p>\n<p>was appointed to that post. The roster point 20 has to be filled up by<\/p>\n<p>a Viswakarma candidate.               Since no Viswakarma candidate is<\/p>\n<p>available, the said vacancy was left unfilled. Roster point 21 goes to<\/p>\n<p>open competition candidate.             The second rank holder, namely,<\/p>\n<p>Thulasi, V., was accommodated in that roster point and appointed.<\/p>\n<p>According to University, since the roster point 22 should go to a<\/p>\n<p>Latin Christian and no Latin Christian candidate was available, that<\/p>\n<p>vacancy was also left unfilled to be filled up by notification. According<\/p>\n<p>to the University, the rotation has been worked out strictly in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with Rule 15 and the roster prescribed thereunder.<\/p>\n<p>      3. I have considered the rival contentions in detail.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.C. No. 24900\/08                -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       4. Up to roster point 21, there is no infirmity in     the rotation<\/p>\n<p>adopted.     The question is whether the 5th vacancy could have been<\/p>\n<p>left unfilled as one to be filled up by a Latin Christian by separate<\/p>\n<p>notification or whether it should be filled up by an open competition<\/p>\n<p>candidate. Admittedly, for the selection year, there were only five<\/p>\n<p>vacancies. Therefore, if more than two vacancies are filled up by<\/p>\n<p>communal rotation, then that would violate the 50% Rule. Hence, the<\/p>\n<p>selection can be completed in respect of that selection year without<\/p>\n<p>violating 50% Rule only by filling up the 5th vacancy by an open<\/p>\n<p>competition candidate.       Admittedly, the petitioner is the next open<\/p>\n<p>competition candidate to be appointed. That being so, clearly, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is the one to be accommodated in the 5th vacancy available<\/p>\n<p>for filling up in the selection year.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In view of the above findings, I allow the writ petition and direct<\/p>\n<p>the respondent to appoint the petitioner in the 5th vacancy, which has<\/p>\n<p>been notified as per the notification pursuant to which Ext. P4 rank<\/p>\n<p>list has been prepared.       Orders in this regard shall be issued as<\/p>\n<p>expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date<\/p>\n<p>of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is allowed as<\/p>\n<p>above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                           Sd\/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>Tds\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 24900 of 2008(L) 1. BEENA.V.I., 35 YEARS &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. REGISTRAR, KERALA GRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.DANDAPANI (SR.) For Respondent :SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN,SC,KERALA AGRL.UTY The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN Dated :15\/07\/2009 O R [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-27T15:11:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-27T15:11:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":862,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-27T15:11:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-27T15:11:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-27T15:11:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009"},"wordCount":862,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009","name":"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-27T15:11:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/beena-v-i-vs-registrar-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Beena.V.I. vs Registrar on 15 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103450"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103450\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}