{"id":103660,"date":"2010-08-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010"},"modified":"2014-03-23T19:18:22","modified_gmt":"2014-03-23T13:48:22","slug":"smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>V  Bavnga,i_ore}S'outh.\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 26?\" DAY OF AUGUST, 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. vENuGOPALA.G'O*it.i.i3--Af.  _\n\nWRIT PETITION i\\iO.22858_\/M2&gt;01O     \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmt. Rajamma, W\/o. Sunda'rarajan,=._ ' V\nAged about 64 years,   \nNo.iO3, 21\"' Cross,\nYuvachethana Colony,' \nVenkatapura,  \nBangalore - 560 034.  \n\n  --_ v_   PETITIONER\n(By Sri D.R.S.u\u00abndaresili_a &amp; Sri S.NOj_VaV Bethania,Advs.)\n\nAND:.~ TTTT  E _ ,\n Naray'a'mjppa,,  A\n\ni\"!\"\"\"\n\nMr. N..Manju',_ M'aj'or,'*--..'\n\nS\/o. Nia\u00abrayanapp'a, \n\nBoth are residing at 3\"' Cross,\n \"Raimaiah Re't'idy...Layout,\n Near Vii'\u00a7\u00aba_ge Panchayat Road,\n\n\" ~B_e'lvanid_'u~r, Post, Befandur,\n\nA, E. c  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>(By. Sri__&#8217;H.-S&#8217;;Chandraiah, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; Ttiis writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;of=i:_he Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  ord\ufb01r dated 7.6.2010 on I.A.4 Annexure -~ A in<\/p>\n<p>  20.8.4288\/2007 on the file of XXIV Addl. City Civil Judge,<br \/>\n , __Banga|ore.\n<\/p>\n<p>This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court<br \/>\nmade the foilowing:\n<\/p>\n<p>QRDER<\/p>\n<p>Plaintiff is the petitioner. Defendants&#8212;.&#8217;_atr.e:&#8221;&#8216;.j&#8217;t.h&#8217;e.<\/p>\n<p>respondents. The suit is for relief of dec.|arat.iVonl.::&#8217;of title.<\/p>\n<p>and permanent injunction. The pia:i4ntiff&#8217;s <\/p>\n<p>property is based on alleged agreement  <\/p>\n<p>26.10.1987, general power ofiattorney&#8221;dated&#8217;: 26.10.1987,<br \/>\nexecuted by 15&#8242; defe&#8217;n:d&#8217;\u00a2;.nt&#8217;s.i&#8217;VAVfat,h&#8221;e!tV_rintfavourliiof plaintiff&#8217;s<br \/>\nfather and anAggalieged_co.nfi&#8217;rmfati&#8211;o&#8217;n.'&#8221;o.f.saie agreement<\/p>\n<p>dated 22.o82,i27o:;.V 2:&#8221;? %iefen;dafnt&#8217;ivhae* filed the written<\/p>\n<p>statement&#8217;on:rV?.1v9.&#8221;6&#8217;9&#8242;;2,608&#8242; and&#8217;._&#8217;ha&#8217;s&#8217;V contested the suit claim.<br \/>\nAll the&#8211;ayerment&#8217;sAj_ijniad_\u00e9&#8221;~ih.~~ the iliaint have been denied,<\/p>\n<p>including the&#8217; teX~eci3_tio&#8217;nV of the said documents and<\/p>\n<p>  of alielged&#8221;&#8216;consideration amount. Plaintiff filed<\/p>\n<p> 1.gi\u00e9,&#8217;:\\ac\u00a7&#8217;.v4iVfen*i..r1s,,,o6.2o1o under Order 6 rule 17 of C.P.C,<\/p>\n<p>seeking. .permission of the court to amend the plaint. The<\/p>\n<p> application was opposed by filing the statement of<\/p>\n<p> objections. The trial court has rejected I.A No.4 by noticing<\/p>\n<p>N that, the suit which is for the relief of declaration and<\/p>\n<p>i\/<\/p>\n<p>I n<\/p>\n<p>injunction, is now being sought to be converted into a suit<br \/>\nfor specific performance without showing that the plaintiff<br \/>\nwas ready and willing to perform her part of the contract<\/p>\n<p>and had given notice calling upon the defendant <\/p>\n<p>the sale deed and it has not been made clea&#8217;-fast.:t&#8217;o::wh,e&#8221;n <\/p>\n<p>the cause of action arose to seek\u00bb-the lxspecifiic if<\/p>\n<p>performance. According to it, <\/p>\n<p>allowed, would alter the cause::of_%action.,_ cha1ri.g\u00e9&#8217;~._fh&#8217;errnature&#8221;&#8217; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>of suit and snatch the,valua}3ieir_igiii:-._of iirmtation accrued<\/p>\n<p>to the defendant.\n<\/p>\n<p>   learned advocate<br \/>\nappearing for th:e&#8217;.&#8217;petiti..o&#8217;i&#8217;ie:&#8217;r.&#8212;contended that, the impugned<\/p>\n<p>orderis pl\u00e9&#8217;rve&#8217;rse&#8217;,&#8211;.an&#8217;cl ii&#8217;legal. He further contended that,<\/p>\n<p>  ifythe A.ame&#8217;n&#8217;d&#8217;rn&#8217;ent is barred by time, is not a ground<\/p>\n<p>  and that, there is wrong exercise of<\/p>\n<p>j&#8217;ur_i&#8217;sdiction,&#8211;.V_which has resulted in miscarriage of justice<\/p>\n<p> and hence interference is called for.<\/p>\n<p> 3. Sri H.S.Chandraiah, learned advocate<\/p>\n<p>  _.appearing for the respondents, on the ot er hand, by<\/p>\n<p>\/,7<\/p>\n<p>taking me through the record of the writ petition made<br \/>\nsubmissions in support of the findings and conciu_s_i_on of<\/p>\n<p>the trial court in the impugned order and submitted&#8221;-\u00abtg}*a&#8211;a&#8217;t,<\/p>\n<p>there being no irrationality or iiiegality comn*}&#8211;itteAd&#8221;v:&#8217;i&#8217;ni\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>matter of consideration of I.A i.\\io\u00bb.4.4andwpva&#8221;ss&#8217;ing&#8221;&#8216;ofgtiweuu&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>impugned order, no interference ilsycadied for.  <\/p>\n<p>4. Indisputedly, &#8216;issues &#8220;weretgf_:fr\u00e9arn&#8217;e&#8217;d&#8217;V&#8217; on<\/p>\n<p>19.09.2008. The issues_stru.ci&lt;&#039;<br \/>\n1&#039;) Whether piaintrrr-s.,\u00ab5r\u00a2v\u00a2s7she is in<br \/>\npossessionof&#039; suit .sc[iedLi!e\u00absite ?<\/p>\n<p>I7)  proves the<\/p>\n<p>V ~ .  the defendant?\n<\/p>\n<p>diff) = &#8216;  proves that she is<br \/>\nit  enhtitledthg&#8217;  relief of permanent<br \/>\nat &#8221; j&#8217;urzc7tiori ? A s<br \/>\n   Whats-ra&#8217;er or decree?\n<\/p>\n<p>it  s.  \u00bbv4&#8243;I:.:A_:.,No.4 was filed subsequent to framing of the<\/p>\n<p>issides.v. .Th&#8211;\u00a7:r&#8217;i::piaintiff has based his ciaim to suit property<\/p>\n<p> on theyhasis of an alleged agreement of sale and a general<\/p>\n<p>vpoyii.er of attorney dated 26.10.1987 said to have been<\/p>\n<p> executed by the 15&#8243; defendant&#8217;s father in favour of<\/p>\n<p>X.\n<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>I I<\/p>\n<p>piaintiff&#8217;s father, who is said to have died on 20.03.1999.<\/p>\n<p>By filing I.A No.4, the plaintiff sought additional prayers as<\/p>\n<p>follows: ht<br \/>\n&#8220;PRAYER VI: Pass a judgment and<br \/>\ndirecting the defendants to convey the &#8220;schedule<br \/>\nproperty by executing a sale _.dee.c_1&#8242; in .fayo&#8217;ur.fof tl1eA.p<br \/>\nplaintiff in pursuance  dorgurrientf &#8216;dated_  if<br \/>\n26.10.1987 and marked as d&#8217;ocument_A.;n,ne:{&#8216;ure.<br \/>\nNo.1 to meets the ends efjizstieey. V   if<br \/>\nPRAYER VII: In _.the  of-othe if defendants<br \/>\nfailure to execute \u00ablithe: psalev  this Hon&#8217;b1e<br \/>\nCourt may executethe  deed Vinjpvfavour of the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs &#8216;through its .Offieersj_&#8217;-top the ends of<\/p>\n<p> other order\/ orders in the<\/p>\n<p>int&#8221;e&#8217;r_est_of justice . and equity&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;reason assigned in the affidavit in support<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;of&#8211;pra.yerf-.fo&#8217;r&#8211;._amendment ls, &#8220;omission by oversight.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Havingv &#8216;g&#8217;o.jne&#8217;.1&#8217;tnrough the amendment application carefully,<\/p>\n<p> I do not&#8217; find any explanation whatsoever offered in<\/p>\n<p>A  Afjufstiyfication of prayer for allowing of amendment.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>7. In the case of DONDAPATI NARAYANA _R__EDDY<br \/>\nVS. DUGGIREDDY VENKATANARAYANA REDDY, rejp&#8217;orfted&#8217;.,Ain<\/p>\n<p>2001 (8) SCC 115, it has been held that<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The amendment should, generally,  uhleisstf<\/p>\n<p>it is shown that perrnittingV&#8217;\u00bbthe:_.&#8217;aIh&#8217;e\ufb01&#8217;c1:r1e\ufb01t she<\/p>\n<p>unjust and result inggrejudice&#8217;hagainst&#8217;-M. the &#8220;op7posite&#8217;g<\/p>\n<p>side which cannot be c&#8217;or:i&#8221;p.ensateri by \u00a2os:\u00absi\u00a2&#8217;r would<\/p>\n<p>deprive him of a_ right which has accrued  him with<\/p>\n<p>the lapse of time-.&#8211;.._ <\/p>\n<p> H   suppiied)<\/p>\n<p>8.    suit is filed Eong<br \/>\nafter the..1(jfq&#8217;AVt?\u00a73ireement of sate dated<br \/>\n 2_()&#8217;&#8230;&#8217;M{\/tevars and the ciaim now<\/p>\n<p>soughtis the one for spe&#8217;cifi&#8221;&lt;: performance, is cieariy barred<\/p>\n<p>by ..EimiAtati&#039;on..V&quot;Under&#039;  circumstances, the time barred<\/p>\n<p> .cia*irn for specific oerformance under the peculiar facts and<\/p>\n<p> ci_rrcumTsta&quot;nce.sV.1~~of the case, cannot be aiiowed to be<\/p>\n<p>introd_uce.d.i;~&#039; The decision of the triai court in rejecting LA<\/p>\n<p> .AI\\io.4z,-tiiough for different reasons is justified.<\/p>\n<p>9. It is not a case wherein there is an irrationai<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;approach to the matter by the triai court and a case of<\/p>\n<p>\\e\u00bb\/\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>K<\/p>\n<p>appiying wrong principies of law, white passing the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order. I do not find any illegaiity\ufb01&#8230;a_s.:_:&#8217;st:ch<\/p>\n<p>committed by the trial court in the matter  <\/p>\n<p>of prayer for amendment and ingAA&#8217;Vpassirtg&#8221;&#8216;thie_wV:in&#8221;ipugried&#8217;*~ <\/p>\n<p>order.\n<\/p>\n<p>In the resuit, the writiipetigtioniivs idevoiidiiofmerit ancit&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>shail stand dismissed,gHoweyver&#8217;,&#8217;v.i_t&#8221;isg&#8217;mad&#8217;e.oEea_r\u00a7 that, the<br \/>\ntrial court shatl decide-Rth-ei_n View the case<br \/>\nput forth by the which may be<br \/>\nbrought  of the observations<br \/>\n &#8220;a.&#8217;i~a(:_:V1iim&#8217;E&#8217;te&#8217;ci&#8217;;for consideration of the<br \/>\ngrounds  passed on LA No.4 and shail<\/p>\n<p>not be construed &#8216;as&#8217;~ex&#8217;priession of opinion on the merits of<\/p>\n<p>  theicaisge of eith&#8217;\u00e9rvof&#8211;At&#8217;he parties.<\/p>\n<p>  _  \u00abaccordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>, . V _ Sd\/Hg<br \/>\nEt\u00e9g\ufb01<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda V Bavnga,i_ore}S&#8217;outh. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26?&#8221; DAY OF AUGUST, 2010 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. vENuGOPALA.G&#8217;O*it.i.i3&#8211;Af. _ WRIT PETITION i\\iO.22858_\/M2&gt;01O BETWEEN: Smt. Rajamma, W\/o. Sunda&#8217;rarajan,=._ &#8216; V Aged about 64 years, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-03-23T13:48:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-23T13:48:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1088,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-03-23T13:48:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-03-23T13:48:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-23T13:48:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010"},"wordCount":1088,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010","name":"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-03-23T13:48:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-rajamma-vs-mr-narayanappa-on-26-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Rajamma vs Mr Narayanappa on 26 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103660\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}