{"id":103924,"date":"2013-07-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2013-07-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013"},"modified":"2018-01-23T07:45:03","modified_gmt":"2018-01-23T02:15:03","slug":"gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013","title":{"rendered":"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>                              1\n\n     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\n           DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2013\n\n                           BEFORE\n     THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA\n\n             CRIMINAL PETITION No.2593\/2013\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nGangadhar,\nS\/o. Mayanna,\nAged about 29 years,\nResiding at No.95, 1st Main Road,\nFarm Road, Sannakki Bylu,\nVrushabhavathinagara,\nKamakshipalya,\nBangalore-560 079,\nNative of Mayannagowdanapalya Village,\nKothagere Hobli, Kunigal Taluk,\nTumkur District-572 124.                   ... Petitioner\n\n(By Smt.R.Radha, Advocate)\n\n\nAND:\n\n1.     State of Karnataka,\n       By Kamakshipalya Police Station,\n       Bangalore,\n       Represented by Public Prosecutor,\n       High Court Building,\n       Bangalore-560 001.\n\n2.     Smt.Deepu.H.J.,\n       Aged about 21 years,\n       W\/o. Gangadhar,\n       D\/o. Jagadeesh,\n       Handrangi Village,\n       Konanur Hobli,\n                                2\n\n     Arakalgud Taluk,\n     Hassan District-573 125.            ... Respondents\n\n(By Sri.B.Raja Subramanya Bhat, HCGP for R-1)\n\n      This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the\nCr.P.C praying to quash the FIR in Crime No.656\/2012 in the\nKamakshipalya        Police    Station,     Bangalore     now\nC.C.No.3132\/2013 file pending before the V Additional Chief\nMetropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore and all the subsequent\nproceedings arising there from in view of compromise arrived\nbetween the parties.\n\n     This Criminal Petition coming for admission on this day,\nthe Court made the following:\n\n                             ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>     In this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner arraigned as accused in C.C. No.3132\/2013<\/p>\n<p>pending on the file of the V-Additional C.M.M., Bangalore,<\/p>\n<p>has sought for quashing the prosecution launched against<\/p>\n<p>him for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 376,<\/p>\n<p>506 of IPC.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     2)       The 2nd respondent is the prosecutrix, on whose<\/p>\n<p>complaint, the 1st Respondent-Police registered the case in<\/p>\n<p>Crime No.656\/2012, investigated the matter and filed the<\/p>\n<p>charge sheet.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       3)   During   investigation,   the   petitioner   was<\/p>\n<p>arrested.   The application filed by him for grant of bail<\/p>\n<p>came to be rejected by the Sessions Court. However, in the<\/p>\n<p>petition, filed by him before this court in Criminal Petition<\/p>\n<p>No.104\/2013, when he was brought before this Court<\/p>\n<p>under a body warrant, he submitted that he is in love with<\/p>\n<p>the complainant and he is willing to marry her.          The<\/p>\n<p>complainant-Respondent No.2 was also present before this<\/p>\n<p>Court and made a submission that she is willing to marry<\/p>\n<p>him.    In the light of that submission, the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>granted interim bail for a period of 10 days on executing a<\/p>\n<p>bond and he was directed to surrender before the court on<\/p>\n<p>28.03.2013.    On 28.03.2013, the petitioner surrendered<\/p>\n<p>before this court. On that day, the 2nd respondent herein<\/p>\n<p>filed a memo with a copy of the Certificate of   Registration<\/p>\n<p>of Marriage between her and the petitioner, and the same<\/p>\n<p>was taken on record.      In the light of the subsequent<\/p>\n<p>development of the petitioner marrying the 2nd respondent-<\/p>\n<p>complainant, this court by order dated 28.03.2013, granted<\/p>\n<p>bail to the petitioner.     Thereafter, on completion of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>investigation, charge sheet came to be filed.      Before this<\/p>\n<p>court, the 2nd respondent has filed an affidavit to the effect<\/p>\n<p>that she had love affair with the petitioner, however, the<\/p>\n<p>parents of the petitioner did not immediately accept for<\/p>\n<p>their marriage, as a result, the petitioner was postponing<\/p>\n<p>the marriage, though she kept on forcing him for their<\/p>\n<p>marriage immediately.      She has further stated in her<\/p>\n<p>affidavit that the petitioner told her that, after convincing<\/p>\n<p>his parents, he would arrange for the marriage and since<\/p>\n<p>she was not happy with that representation, and in that<\/p>\n<p>temperament, she went to police station and informed the<\/p>\n<p>police requesting them to advise the petitioner to marry<\/p>\n<p>her,   however, the police obtained her signature on the<\/p>\n<p>complaint drafted by them.        She has further stated that,<\/p>\n<p>after lodging the complaint when the matter was pending<\/p>\n<p>before the Court, they married and their marriage was<\/p>\n<p>registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Kunigal Taluk<\/p>\n<p>and presently they are residing together and there is no<\/p>\n<p>dispute or misunderstanding between them. A copy of the<\/p>\n<p>marriage certificate is also produced along with this<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petition. The original Certificate of Registration of Marriage<\/p>\n<p>is also made available for perusal of this court. As could be<\/p>\n<p>seen from the certificate, the marriage of the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>the 2nd respondent was solemnized on 25.03.2013 and the<\/p>\n<p>same was registered on that day in the office of the<\/p>\n<p>Marriage Officer, Kunigal Taluk, Tumkur District.<\/p>\n<p>     4)      Both the petitioner and the 2nd respondents<\/p>\n<p>are present in person before this Court.             The 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent submitted that she has been residing with the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and that they have been residing as husband and<\/p>\n<p>wife for the last four months and there has been no dispute<\/p>\n<p>or misunderstanding between them since the date of<\/p>\n<p>marriage.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     5)     As noticed supra, according to Respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.2, on account of the petitioner&#8217;s refusal to marry her<\/p>\n<p>immediately, she requested the police to advise the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner properly to marry her immediately.         Having<\/p>\n<p>regard to the subsequent development and in view of the<\/p>\n<p>fact that the petitioner has married the 2nd respondent and<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>since they have been living happily as husband and wife,<\/p>\n<p>no purpose would be served by continuing the prosecution<\/p>\n<p>against the petitioner. The continuance of the prosecution<\/p>\n<p>would be waste of precious public time of the court and<\/p>\n<p>would also cause embarrassment        to the parties, which<\/p>\n<p>may also strain the marital relationship.     The trial of the<\/p>\n<p>case, for completion of the ritual, is not required to be<\/p>\n<p>completed.    In this view of the matter, the prosecution<\/p>\n<p>launched against the petitioner is required to be quashed in<\/p>\n<p>exercise of power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<p>       6)    In the result, the petition is allowed.        The<\/p>\n<p>prosecution    launched   against   the   petitioner   in   C.C.<\/p>\n<p>No.3132\/2013 on the file of the V-Additional C.M.M.,<\/p>\n<p>Bangalore, is hereby quashed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                       SD\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                       JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>KGR*\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2013 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2593\/2013 BETWEEN: Gangadhar, S\/o. Mayanna, Aged about 29 years, Residing at No.95, 1st Main [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103924","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-23T02:15:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-23T02:15:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013\"},\"wordCount\":755,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013\",\"name\":\"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-23T02:15:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2013-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-23T02:15:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013","datePublished":"2013-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-23T02:15:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013"},"wordCount":755,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013","name":"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-23T02:15:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gangadhar-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2013#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gangadhar vs State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2013"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103924"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103924\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}