{"id":103941,"date":"2010-09-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-01T10:42:38","modified_gmt":"2019-02-01T05:12:38","slug":"k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 17361 of 2010(U)\n\n\n1. K.NARAYANANKUTTY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. K.REKHA, W\/O.K.NARAYANANKUTTY,\n3. K.REMADEVI, KUNDIL HOUSE,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK,\n\n3. P.A.SALAVUDEEN, M\/S.FASHION MAGIC,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.A.CHACKO\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.P.SUDHEER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM\n\n Dated :27\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                   C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J\n                 ---------------------------------\n                W.P(C) No.17361 of 2010-U\n                ------------------------------------\n        Dated this the 27th day of September, 2010.\n\n                       J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>     The petitioners are the guarantors with respect to a<\/p>\n<p>working capital loan availed by the third respondent, from<\/p>\n<p>the second respondent Bank, in the year 2008. Consequent<\/p>\n<p>to default committed by the third respondent, immovable<\/p>\n<p>properties belonging to the petitioners, which were<\/p>\n<p>mortgaged for securing the loan in question, were<\/p>\n<p>proceeded against. On invoking Section 14(1) of the Act<\/p>\n<p>Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and<\/p>\n<p>Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act).<\/p>\n<p>respondents 1 and 2 had approached the Chief Judicial<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate Court and an Advocate Commissioner was<\/p>\n<p>already been appointed to take over possession of the<\/p>\n<p>immovable properties. Ext.P2 is the notice issued by the<\/p>\n<p>Advocate Commissioner requesting to handover possession<\/p>\n<p>of the immovable properties. The proceedings is impugned<\/p>\n<p>on various grounds.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P(C) No.17361 of 2010-U     2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     2.    In a counter affidavit filed on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents 1 and 2 it is alleged that the third respondent,<\/p>\n<p>in collusion with the petitioners, had diverted the funds and<\/p>\n<p>closed down the business.         It is contended that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are now adopting delaying tactics in collusion<\/p>\n<p>with the third respondent. With respect to the request of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners to permit regularisation of the loan account,<\/p>\n<p>it is mentioned that, since there is diversion of funds and<\/p>\n<p>closing down of the business the loan account could not be<\/p>\n<p>regularised. It is mentioned that, as on 30.8.2010, a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.11,95,000\/- is the outstanding dues.<\/p>\n<p>     3.    It is pertinent to note that the proceedings<\/p>\n<p>initiated under the SARFAESI Act is at the stage of Section<\/p>\n<p>14(1). The petitioners had not chosen to object the demand<\/p>\n<p>raised under Section 13(2) nor they have approached the<\/p>\n<p>appellate authority invoking Section 17(1). Fact being so, I<\/p>\n<p>am not at all inclined to interfere with the proceedings by<\/p>\n<p>invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of<\/p>\n<p>India. Hence the writ petition is not sustainable and the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P(C) No.17361 of 2010-U     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>same is liable to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.    However, learned counsel for the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>made an appeal to this Court to permit payment of the<\/p>\n<p>entire balance within a reasonable time in instalments. It is<\/p>\n<p>submitted that the petitioners are not intending to peruse<\/p>\n<p>any statutory remedy and that they are ready to<\/p>\n<p>relinquishing all challenges with respect to proceedings<\/p>\n<p>now initiated.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.    On the basis of an interim order issued by this<\/p>\n<p>Court on 4.6.2010, the petitioners had remitted a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2,00,000\/-.     Considering the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n<p>attendant in this case, eventhough interference on merits is<\/p>\n<p>not at all possible, I am inclined to show indulgence in<\/p>\n<p>permitting the petitioners to pay off the balance amount<\/p>\n<p>within a reasonable time, in instalments.<\/p>\n<p>     6.    In the result, the writ petition is disposed of<\/p>\n<p>directing the respondents to keep in abeyance further<\/p>\n<p>coercive steps for dispossession and sale of the secured<\/p>\n<p>assets, provided the petitioners remit the entire balance in 7<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P(C) No.17361 of 2010-U       4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(seven) equal monthly instalments, falling due on or before<\/p>\n<p>15.11.2010 and on or before the 15th day of succeeding<\/p>\n<p>months.\n<\/p>\n<p>     7.    It is made clear that on the event of default in<\/p>\n<p>payment of any of the instalments, the respondents will be<\/p>\n<p>free to proceed with further steps based on the notice<\/p>\n<p>already issued and on such event, the petitioners are<\/p>\n<p>precluded from raising any subsequent challenge against<\/p>\n<p>such proceedings, either before this Court or before any<\/p>\n<p>other forum.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                 C.K.ABDUL REHIM<br \/>\n                                      JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                          \/\/True Copy\/\/<\/p>\n<p>                                      P.A to Judge<br \/>\nab<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 17361 of 2010(U) 1. K.NARAYANANKUTTY, &#8230; Petitioner 2. K.REKHA, W\/O.K.NARAYANANKUTTY, 3. K.REMADEVI, KUNDIL HOUSE, Vs 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, 3. P.A.SALAVUDEEN, M\/S.FASHION MAGIC, For Petitioner :SRI.C.A.CHACKO [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-01T05:12:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-01T05:12:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":580,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010\",\"name\":\"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-01T05:12:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-01T05:12:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-01T05:12:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010"},"wordCount":580,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010","name":"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-01T05:12:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-narayanankutty-vs-the-authorized-officer-on-27-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.Narayanankutty vs The Authorized Officer on 27 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103941\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}