{"id":104449,"date":"2010-01-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-18T15:30:02","modified_gmt":"2019-02-18T10:00:02","slug":"mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 27661 of 2009(O)\n\n\n1. MRS.ROSEBUD JOHNSON, W\/O.LATE HENRY\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. MRS.JASMIN RUBAI, AGED 57 YEARS\n3. MAJOR GENERAL SELVAKUMAR HENRY JOHNSON,\n4. SAMUEL VASANTHAKUMAR JOHNSON,\n5. NOEL JOHNSON, AGED 44 YEARS, NOW RESIDIN\n6. AARON BOBBY JOHNSON, AGED 39 YEARS,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. LILY LEYON, THAYE VILASOM, KATTU ROAD,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.SURESH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :06\/01\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n               S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n                   -------------------------------\n               W.P.(C).NO.27661 OF 2009 ()\n                 -----------------------------------\n          Dated this the 6th day of January, 2010\n\n                       J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
      The writ petition is filed seeking mainly the following<\/p>\n
reliefs:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        i. to grant a writ of certiorari or such other
\n        writ, order or direction as the court may
\n        consider appropriate calling for the records
\n        relating to Exts.P21 and P22 and quashing
\n        them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      2.  Petitioners are the additional decree holders in<\/p>\n
E.P.No.42 of 1993 in O.S.No.1096 of 1966 on the file of the<\/p>\n
Principal Munsiff Court, Thiruvananthapuram.           The order<\/p>\n
impugned arises in execution of the decree passed in the suit<\/p>\n
allowing redemption of the property.             In execution, the<\/p>\n
judgment debtor has claimed kudikidappu right in the<\/p>\n
mortgaged property, which has an extent of 20 cents. The<\/p>\n
claim of kudikidappu canvassed was referred to the Land<\/p>\n
WPC.27661\/09                    2<\/span><\/p>\n
Tribunal. Previously, the Land Tribunal on such reference<\/p>\n
after enquiry had negatived the claim of kudikidappu set up by<\/p>\n
the respondent.     The reference being returned with such<\/p>\n
finding, the execution court endorsing that finding, ordered<\/p>\n
for delivery. The order of the execution court was challenged<\/p>\n
in revision by the respondent, and this Court, setting aside the<\/p>\n
order passed by the Land Tribunal and vacating the final order<\/p>\n
passed by the execution court, directed that court to take back<\/p>\n
the execution petition and dispose the matter afresh in<\/p>\n
accordance with law. After such remission, reference was<\/p>\n
again made to the Land Tribunal to consider the claim of<\/p>\n
kudikidappu canvassed by the respondent. The Land Tribunal,<\/p>\n
on such reference, after enquiry, entered a finding that the<\/p>\n
respondent is entitled to kudikidappu over an extent of three<\/p>\n
cents of land in the suit property. Ext.P21 is the order passed<\/p>\n
by the Land Tribunal. The reference being answered with<\/p>\n
Ext.P21 order the execution court passed Ext.P22 order<\/p>\n
directing the decree holder to take steps to demarcate the<\/p>\n
three cents of land in the suit property in accordance with the<\/p>\n
finding of the Land Tribunal. Propriety and correctness of<\/p>\n
WPC.27661\/09                   3<\/span><\/p>\n
Ext.P22 order is challenged in the writ petition invoking the<\/p>\n
supervisory jurisdiction vested with this Court under Article<\/p>\n
227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     3.   I heard the counsel on both sides.       The finding<\/p>\n
entered by the Land Tribunal under Ext.P21 order that the<\/p>\n
respondent is entitled to the kudikidappu right over three<\/p>\n
cents in the suit property covered by the decree allowing<\/p>\n
redemption of the suit property, is sought to be assailed by the<\/p>\n
learned counsel for the petitioners on various grounds, both<\/p>\n
on disputed questions of fact and also under law. I find that<\/p>\n
none of the contentions canvassed by the counsel against<\/p>\n
Ext.P21 order of the Land Tribunal can be examined and<\/p>\n
considered at this stage in exercise of the supervisory<\/p>\n
jurisdiction vested with this Court under Article 227 of the<\/p>\n
Constitution of India. The order passed by the Land Tribunal<\/p>\n
passed on a reference from the civil curt has no independent<\/p>\n
status enabling any of the parties to the reference to impeach<\/p>\n
its correctness before any superior forum. The findings of the<\/p>\n
Land Tribunal made on a reference from the civil court is<\/p>\n
WPC.27661\/09                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
binding on the court which made reference and the<\/p>\n
correctness of that finding can be examined only in a<\/p>\n
challenge against the final order of the civil court endorsing<\/p>\n
such findings. In the present case, what is seen is that the<\/p>\n
execution court, after receiving the findings made on<\/p>\n
reference under Ext.P21 order by the Land Tribunal, without<\/p>\n
endorsing such finding as statutorily mandated, and then,<\/p>\n
passing final orders in the execution proceedings subject to<\/p>\n
Ext.P21 order, for delivery of the mortgage property, has<\/p>\n
passed Ext.P22 order directing the decree holder to take steps<\/p>\n
to demarcate the three cents in accordance with the finding of<\/p>\n
the Land Tribunal.         Demarcation of the three cents,<\/p>\n
presumably the kudikidappu holding of the respondent, lies<\/p>\n
within the jurisdiction of the Land Tribunal, and the civil court<\/p>\n
cannot usurp such jurisdiction.     The Land Tribunal under<\/p>\n
Ext.P21 order in answering the reference from the civil court<\/p>\n
has held that the respondent is entitled to three cents in the<\/p>\n
mortgage property as kudikidappu. In a reference made by<\/p>\n
the civil court, the Land Tribunal cannot demarcate the<\/p>\n
kudikidappu holding nor pass any order for issuing a purchase<\/p>\n
WPC.27661\/09                   5<\/span><\/p>\n
certificate to the kudikidappukaran, which has to be done in<\/p>\n
separate proceedings as envisaged under the Land Reforms<\/p>\n
Act. A civil court which has referred the claim of kudikidappu<\/p>\n
of a party to the Land Tribunal as mandated by the Statute,<\/p>\n
Land Reforms Act, has no jurisdiction to demarcate the<\/p>\n
kudikidappu holding in the suit property even when a<\/p>\n
reference is answered with a finding upholding the claim of<\/p>\n
kudikidappu.    Accepting and endorsing that finding in its<\/p>\n
order, the civil court, which referred such question to the<\/p>\n
Land Tribunal, has to pass appropriate orders in the suit or<\/p>\n
proceeding. Whatever be the challenges against the finding<\/p>\n
made by the Land Tribunal, a party aggrieved thereof, can<\/p>\n
challenge such finding only after it is endorsed by the civil<\/p>\n
court in its order, which has referred the question to the Land<\/p>\n
Tribunal. In other wards, the final order passed by the civil<\/p>\n
court endorsing the finding of the Land Tribunal alone can be<\/p>\n
challenged and not any other order of the civil court with<\/p>\n
reference to the finding of the Land Tribunal. Ext.P22 order<\/p>\n
passed by the court below directing the decree holder to take<\/p>\n
steps for demarcating the three cents in the suit property on<\/p>\n
WPC.27661\/09                   6<\/span><\/p>\n
the basis of the finding of the Land Tribunal is patently<\/p>\n
erroneous and unsustainable under law. The execution court<\/p>\n
has to endorse the finding of the Land Tribunal and pass<\/p>\n
appropriate final orders in the execution proceedings. That<\/p>\n
final order endorsing the finding of the Tribunal alone can be<\/p>\n
challenged by the petitioners if at all they are aggrieved by<\/p>\n
the finding made by the Land Tribunal on reference in the<\/p>\n
execution proceeding.     The writ petition is disposed as<\/p>\n
indicated above, directing the execution court to pass<\/p>\n
appropriate orders in the execution proceedings, taking note<\/p>\n
of the observations made above and in accordance with law.<\/p>\n
                          S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
\n                                      JUDGE<\/p>\n
prp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 27661 of 2009(O) 1. MRS.ROSEBUD JOHNSON, W\/O.LATE HENRY … Petitioner 2. MRS.JASMIN RUBAI, AGED 57 YEARS 3. MAJOR GENERAL SELVAKUMAR HENRY JOHNSON, 4. SAMUEL VASANTHAKUMAR JOHNSON, 5. NOEL JOHNSON, AGED 44 YEARS, NOW RESIDIN […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-104449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-18T10:00:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-18T10:00:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1032,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-18T10:00:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-18T10:00:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-18T10:00:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010"},"wordCount":1032,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010","name":"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-18T10:00:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-rosebud-johnson-vs-lily-leyon-on-6-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs.Rosebud Johnson vs Lily Leyon on 6 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104449"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104449\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}