{"id":104837,"date":"2008-07-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008"},"modified":"2019-01-12T13:49:29","modified_gmt":"2019-01-12T08:19:29","slug":"channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & Swamy<\/div>\n
IN THE E-EIGH COURT OF KARN.A'I'A.KA AT \n\nnAmEn: wars wan 25\"'nAy 0? JUL%f\"\u00e9\u00a7$3tf\\\nwas HO\u00a7'BLE MR.3Usf;c\u00a3~VLe}$A3SAHi\u00a5_':'\nwas HO\ufb02'BLE MR.JUsfI$$--;.HAkA\ufb01\u00a7uA}swAMY\n\nRER_R9.$57\ufb011$99_\nBETWEEN ,' ~.*J .'=fa =\n1 c\u00a7ANNAMMA_ ;j V j:_4a\ufb01._ v\nW70 3xN3mGawnA;;S9 YRS; \"~=\nR\/p\"v3pKA\u00a3aRA35bcps:;;'V;\nsn\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01a \"'. <} f"' E'\nxauaxancnsmnap"9KQ2zRrIgsaRA-m-*\naanaasogs "w-. *; _ %, .\ncnzxxarnyama .g_v._=,\u00bb\nW70 Mmnzsomnn, 52 Y3s,fu\nR\/G axneAnc\ufb01s@RAL}PRppEa2IEsAm&A\nMannvgntz. " "\n\n  3  ll  ' ..... .. 'V\n\n*\u00ab::2.:S.\u00a5z'c::w..=\u00bb\u00bb2~a::zx.  '.\n\nwxo.KaI3gHa&cEsraAL paopsnrxzsna\n46 x23; Rio g3maaAAnAM\n\naanaagoaz-._g APPELANTS\n\n - ~  BHU$\u00a7\u00a7A.'NIKtE\ufb02R, ADVZ}\n\n \u00a7 purmaswmmy\n_'sfc*LArz nonnzeowsa\n\n'\u00bbA "54 YRS, axe DAR QUARTERS\n"~aAsxAvznmRA concur\n\nC S TEAL PROBERTIESATNA\nBANGALORE\n\n\n\ntail\n\n2 SAROJAIIEGA.\n\ns\/o mas sown, zcAaIya:\u00abvw.s\u00a2*n.:-'.t :\u00a5\u00a7;o\u00e92R'\ufb01:I'Es\u00a7A E '\n\n46 ms, R\/O soema vI1gv9A:;s:\u00a7I'm1R;g '\nmammncmsmm. paopaarmsarzia   \n\n3 AFZAI.\ns\/0 MEER, mcroa  \nR\/O T RA  =  \n CEs :smLf- pRc}Pz:\u00a3;2rI'Esm11 _\n\n(By Sri 3"   190:5. " 2:1)\n\n :\/Vvnkspommms\n\n_;2\u00a751x"'~.3,?f:rI\u00a7'E.y;_ or C9: AGAINST THE\n\nazmcamesu um 19_ 3fQv9__E5A,SS\u00ab@'*-__II*T _O.S.NO. 126\/95 355\nwas cxvnz. atvo\u00e9z,' ..--~Jm'c,  ,\nnxaozzrssxne'-; :t*Hg"=._st:x1'   " yjakmrwxox AND SEPARME\npossmssxoufgv 'V  V"\n\n 5191125., :1e:=\u00a7_. .c:\u00a7\u00a3m_Ie on FOR pmznamny HEARING\n\n. THIS i3.a.ir,_- -J5; , MADE ma FOLLOWING:\n\nORIIER\n\n a\ufb01y\u00e9\u00e9al is filed by the plaintiffs 2\n\nE23 z~ro.126\/1995 on 'the file of the\n\n  "Senior Division, and JMFC,\n\n being aggrieved by the judgment\n\narid decree dated 19-8-3.999, dismissing the\n\nsuit: filed them for partition and separate\nxw\n\n\n\n\u20ac\n\nplaintiff uo.4. Since suit 1,tttedt1e\n\nproperties are the se1f--acqa:i.::ed \n\nDoddegowda, the plaintif\ufb01s   \n\n1\/6"' share each in  st;-itt;:'  and \n\nsought for division  'vand   '\n\nalso sought for an    znesne\nprofits frcm  suit till the\ndate of separg*a::t_   The suit\nprapertyw   of land and\na 1';*\u00a31.-'tax:     . 4 .\n\n3;'   resisted the suit by\n\u00a3ii1n\u00a7i=writttt;:statement. The relationship\n\nhgtwttn th\u00e9 patties is adittad. zt is also\n\n'  that Doddegowda died two years prior\n\n\"t5 the iiiing of the suit. It is stated that\n\nthe. ivetments made in the plaint that tha suit\n\n n_.-t\u00e9hedule properties are the self'-acaquired\n\nViproperties are false and the plaintiffs are\n\nsuppressing the true.\u00bb facts to make a wmngful\n\ngain at the csost of the defendant. It is\n\ngm}.\n\n\n\n2'?-4---1961 and her two daughters  was\n\nalso pezrfermed by Doddegewda.  -'-the\n\nfourth plaintiff is concVe;:ned,.*\"$i1e:j'_~v$\u00a2Fla:;,-9; \n\nin marriage at her 14*\" :=.yez;ree...:'  \n\nall the jewels and \"tiger   \n\ndowry. boddegewda ixfthe name\nof the    husband and\nconstructed._buiJ5c!.'\u00a3z:i9:f'V  a Sara\nof Rs. 8  raised a\nloan   eonstruction of the\nhou;-;'\u00a7!e,_! Z . fazmzsunt was spent by\naadegg\ufb01dat\ufb01\u00e9ete\ufb01ewc\u00e9nstructien of the heuse.\n\nT@e\"_foutth:\"\u00a71e1ntiff and her husband had\n\n\u00b0',ebetE\u00a7;fx_aver the first plaintiff and\n\nI   'V utilized the entire earning of\n\nthe   family. The fourth\n\n ..pt1ait::tiff'$ husband is a Policze Head\n\ntaecc5stab1e, it is he who am behind this\n\n.--tilitigation. The suggestion made regarding\n\nnon--payment of maintenanee and assault by him\n\nand his wife on the first plaintiff is denied.\n\nxsf' e\n\n\n\nIt is further averted that the plaintiffs\n\n2 to 4 and the second defendant are-_'\n\nand they are residing with \n\nsuch there is no reason  1.\n\nmanga garden. It is \n\nthere are 120 1;;-\u00e9\u00aes_   are-L'\n\nyielding fruits \u00a391:  tw.6' There\nwas no occasiozi   to stay in\nBukkasagara:\"t;o   and it is\nhis    igrasi   the mango\nP1a%ta\ufb01i\ufb01x\u00a2#%\u00a7 u\ufb01\u00a7$\u00abft#e plaintiffs. The\nusufifucfts   grcvxe is not 301:! he\n\nagybady \ufb01u:\ufb01\"ie$s the third defendant. It is\n\n  \"averted that the plaintiffs are not\n\n    any share as they wexe giver: money\n\nxtk:sre..__\" 'thin their share. In the event of\n\n\"'xp;xti\u00a31on, the plaintiffs 2 to 4 have to\n\nikjireimburse the amcsunt spent by Daddegowda for\n\nVitheiac marriage: and for the upbringing of their\n\nchildren. Mcmeover, the suit: properties are\n\nW'\n\n\n\nf . What Carder?\"\n\n5. iblaintiff KG. 1 cue-:1 d}.zx\u00a74:;$i:'g*s:4\"V;~ \n\npendency of the suit and sings\"-..::.hs;fs~\n\nrepresentatives are  r:ss\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7:\u00a7rgS.,V\"'V\"th\u00a3ey T.\n\nsuccmd to hex: estate.\n\n7. on behalf' of t;1;iV\u00e9f'\u00bbvp1V.au1ntif\u00a3.sA,V\ufb01ftaintiff\nno.1 was exaxninscti7as'--_P\u00a551F51'4;\"----Vj;>ia3,ntiff No.2, as\npm-2 and p.1ainti'ff- ij*;:'c>._:a.__ 'ale  plaintiff\n\nNo.4 a.s.4..i?W\u00ab-:'vV.\u00a3c$.\"2>_\u00a7\"\n\n\n\n13\n\nwauld be entitled for a share in the s\ufb01are of\n\ntheir mother also. In that View i\u00a7ff the\n\nmatter, tha trial court was not jmrtifi\u00e9d'i\u00a7tr\n\ndisxnissing the suit of  \n\n11. In reply ta this larrna\ufb02qt\u00e9ungal fart\n\nthe first respondent  \"th,z;;t'ft3:e suit<\/pre>\n
for partitian Vbg7rmarrie&*@\u00a7\u00a7ughters ia not
\nmaintainablaa V anwtzz\u00e9i.-j  has rightly<\/p>\n
held that t\ufb01\u00a7 suit aghe\u00e9\ufb01l\u00e9 \ufb01rqperties are the<\/p>\n
ancestral \u00e9\u00a2Q\u00a7\u00e9Eti\u00e9g’o\u00a3 bbdegowda, therefore
\nthe fihdihg \ufb01f the trial cart dismissing the<\/p>\n
suit of ‘lens p1v._ai~3’;Stif’fs 15 justified and it<\/p>\n
**,doe$5ngt gall far interference in this appeal.<\/p>\n
V’9_l2@% Hiring regard to the contentions<\/p>\n
tt_ urged by t\ufb01e learned counsel for the parties.<\/p>\n
w”r\u00a7heipoi\ufb01ts that arise for our cansideration<\/p>\n
(1) Whether, the finding of the trial
\naourt that the plaintiffs hava
\nfailed to pmova that the suit
\nschedule properties are the self-<\/p>\n
\\jM3<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
acquired properties af late<\/p>\n
Doddegawda is justified ox: aalls for<\/p>\n
interferance in this
\n(2) The finding af the <\/p>\n
the suit schedule
\nancestral propertieg
\nis ju.stif:i.edV’\u00bb.__ 102:’  .<\/p>\n
interferencit’ in   i<\/p>\n
(3) The trial co’ur:f:\u00abl.havi’ng’ irhtliltriait that<\/p>\n
suit .s.\u00a2hedule”Lv-preqpertiesa Care the<\/p>\n
ancestral.”   of Doddegawda.<\/p>\n
is 3ust_1Hgf_fm_4;1’t”__;L;-:1: \ufb01ititivssing the suit
\njar;  the \u00a7p1.\u00a7t’\u00a3hti.f V’ V<\/p>\n
 (4): ”  and decree cf
\n ‘ ‘the   court calls for<\/p>\n
  in this appeal’?\n<\/p>\n
‘   We “axnswerviiitiie above questions as follows:–<\/p>\n
2.’; finding cf the trial court that
\n ‘t’\u00a71e plaintiffs have failed to prove
\n3 that the suit schemle properties are
\nthe self-wacquired properties of late
\nDowegowda is justified and it does net
\ncall for interference in this appeal.
\n2} The finding of the trial court that
\nthe suit schedule properties are the
\nancestral properties of Doddegowda, is<\/p>\n
mt\u00bb<\/p>\n
E5<\/p>\n
justified and it does not for
\ninterfarence in this   . A’<\/p>\n
3) The trial court having hem: th\u00e9e <\/p>\n
scheaale properties\u00bb ..:,uf:e a\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9gtrai’ ; <\/p>\n
properties of   wast–..\u00e9 ‘*n_<::\u00bbt .
\njustified in di.e\u00a7mis$j._xig tnet"t'~.sa';t qt<\/p>\n
plaintiffs. The-{"'-rp1air:t_i\u00a3f_V$ V"<:gat:i\u00a71d he
\nentitled _.to 1V\/1-x:iF*?'\u00ab. "ssnare"' –ea.c;{ in the
\nsuit   defendant
\nNo.1Vand 2"  entitled for
\n1\/:1:;9?\u00a7'1- suit sczhadule
\n   __-rlefenant No.1 is<\/p>\n
  6\/10"' share aim: in
\nV """ H  ..\u00a7:c'~.:\u00a7_\u00a7Vad111r$VV'properties.
\n   finding on point No.3.\n<\/p>\n
go .3   ”  and decree passed by
\ntllxe” .. below is liable to be set<\/p>\n
  aside  the final order.\n<\/p>\n
” –ifa;  plaintiffs have claimed xfsth<\/p>\n
sh.a1:e=,-‘”  the suit schechzle properties on the<\/p>\n
 ..preu3:t.\u00a7\u00e9 that the suit schedule properties are<\/p>\n
t  tia\u00e9 selfwacquired properties of late<\/p>\n
\\\ufb01\u00abJ><\/p>\n
hp’<\/p>\n
16<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
15. The first plaintiff is examined as<\/p>\n
PW-1 and she has d%sed in her exm1:.:i.netion-<\/p>\n
:i.n–c:hief that the suit. schedule pe\u00e9gs\u00e9eihj\ufb01ies<\/p>\n
belong to her husband. Suit:  4′<\/p>\n
properties consists of.~~t1.0Q mmahlni’  <\/p>\n
Herself and her husband  ”\n<\/p>\n
plants in the suit:\n<\/p>\n
husband was looking ei-tear. he-he \u00e9feaihis <3: the
\nfamily during   'a,z:<i after his
\ndeath her  i.\u00ab=.{""iz:c';-3j;2.;:r:g':'V=–:;.\u00a3\u00a5:e.:.\u00a7"?che affairs of<\/p>\n
thei.V%'\u00a3a;:\u00bb.a.i\u00a7r…\u00ab\u00ab.._the death at her husband,
\nshe  re.sir.$.ihg~..  her daughter plaintiff<\/p>\n
3.~\u00a5gj.’4,e.. as heriyisoh drove her out cf the house.<\/p>\n
   prcperties were net divided<\/p>\n
 ._\u00e9hri’1i\u00a7i’_~v.,tr\u00a3.=e-‘iife-t:i.me of her husband. The yield<\/p>\n
 suit schedule properties is more than<\/p>\n
 he R3.1″‘J.a3ch. She is entitled for a share in the
\ni\ufb01iisuit schedule properties. she hag produced<\/p>\n
“:Ex.P-1\u00a7the death certificate of her husband.<\/p>\n
S:x.P—2 is the death ceremony card of her<\/p>\n
husband. Ex.P–3 is the certificate in that<\/p>\n
\\Q.J><\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
regard. Ex.P~4, P-5 and 9-6 are_tth\u00a2t,RTC<\/p>\n
extracts. Ex.P–7 is the khatng””\u00e9tttatt,<\/p>\n
Ex.P~8 and p~9 are the\u00bb d&man\u00a7} r\u00e9g1st\u00e9rlt<\/p>\n
extracts of the house.\n<\/p>\n
16. In her cto\u00e9\u00a7%ex\u00a7\ufb011n\u00a7ti\u00a2nEg$\ufb01\u00e9’ hat
\nstated that she  I.’:t\u00a2jtVVV'””t1;novtA–Vwh\u00e9ther her
\nhusband or1ginti;g’tt\u00a3\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7gg$t_ to Badnru
\nVarageraha1i;;ofJtt\u00e9nt\ufb01ttngm\ufb01tluk. She dnes
\nnot kn\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01iw\ufb02eth\u00e9\u00e9tm\ufb01ttt\u00bbhusbamd possessed
\nprqp\u00e9rt\ufb01tt gt B\u00e9t\ufb01trt\ufb01tr\u00e9garahalli She denied
\ntut w&tggett\u00a3\u00a7ttttttt\u00a7 her husband sold the
\nprqgetty.at $atdtrt\u00a2aregerahal1i and purchased<\/p>\n
t\ufb01tittit sthedaie prqperties. It is further<\/p>\n
‘t\ufb01t3ta\u00a7”th\u00a7t her son is employd in Maharashtra<\/p>\n
“a\ufb01a ht \u00a33 residing with his wife and children<\/p>\n
at Mt\ufb01atashtra. she has denied the suggestion<\/p>\n
Avf’tt\ufb02at hex husband performed the marriage of his<\/p>\n
tgrand. daughters. sha has also denied the<\/p>\n
suggestion that there are 200 nango trees in<\/p>\n
the suit schadule prqperties and that the are<\/p>\n
‘\\,n}\u00ab<\/p>\n
RI<\/p>\n
and settled down at atllatuppe Boddi ans hex<\/p>\n
uncle Doddegowda went and  :31;<\/p>\n
Bukkasagara.\n<\/p>\n
22 . From the appreft;:\u00a7.a:*t’i<rA}nA'tt\u00bbe;$f~  <\/p>\n
stated material on *j_1:'e.~gor:;.I',.. 2  <\/p>\n
found that the p1ainti_.__ff1\u00a7_  to pmve<\/p>\n
that the suit'  "";$t*:\u00a7parties are the<\/p>\n
se1f–acqnirad prettttigs'ttff\u00a7t\u00a7ddegowda and<\/p>\n
that ttgfgggge\ufb01tg trtatt\u00e9\u00e9 By the defendants
\nwoultmtugttgyrstttftttt}toddegowda had some
\n village and
\nthatitttltes  was sold. under Ex.D1,<\/p>\n
ti:-gereaft\u00e9r . fgaromrties under Ex.D2 and :33<\/p>\n
  at Bukkasagara.\n<\/p>\n
‘   re-appreciation of the evidence,<\/p>\n
we h-:;1d.’:’that the finding of the trial court is<\/p>\n
 .. j1;stified and it does not call for<\/p>\n
V’  Accordingly we answer paint<\/p>\n
17Nos.1 and 2.\n<\/p>\n
24. The trial court having rightly held.<\/p>\n
that the suit schedule properties are the<\/p>\n
\\5′-J’<\/p>\n
50% of the suit schedule propert:Les,_..___which<\/p>\n
would come to 1\/12″‘ share. It in<\/p>\n
dispute that the first plaintiff 4_<\/p>\n
during the pendency of the’ \u00bbs;1it H aieggrax\u00e9’ ; a<\/p>\n
hex 1\/12″” shame would <\/p>\n
children plaintiffs 47″ gnc1VV ‘c:1ei{e::’e:a\u00a7zts <\/p>\n
and 2. Thereforo tug $ignt;ffo and \u00e9efendant
\nHo. 2 would be  share in the
\nsuit schocf’.tt1.g=.f  tefandant No. 1<\/span>
\nwould     6\/10″‘ share in
\nthe!’ . The trial court
\nhas  the suit of the<\/p>\n
pgjaxzztirfs ..  holding that the plaintiffs are<\/p>\n
   to any shara.\n<\/p>\n
*   is submitted by the learned<\/p>\n
doun$al.’:”‘for the appellant that in View of the<\/p>\n
.. to the Act by Amenctnent Act<\/p>\n
“”._Vv\u00a7\u00a5o?.’39\/2005, the plaintiff should. be ciemod to<\/p>\n
 the co-parceners and would be entitled to<\/p>\n
equal share with the first deiendant. In<\/p>\n
support of this contention, the learned<\/p>\n
‘\\;.x.\/5*’<\/p>\n
24<\/span><\/p>\n
counsel has relied upon a decision  this<\/p>\n
Coart in mm 20a? KAR 4790 <suga.i';;1:}eiV;~ ,:"v_s.<\/p>\n
Gundappa Axnaracli & others) .   % <\/p>\n
settled in View of a eigklsien F<\/p>\n
of this court in RFA No… Athat <\/p>\n
of the Amendment:   "ls not
\nretrospective '_ woa'i\u00a7 \u00e9avgvipivlcable to
\npending    only in
\nrespect  or from the
\n   .$11.:e;*.e'\u00e9s1on Act , 2005 . In
\nvie}? Bench of this oourt,
\n learned single judge,<\/p>\n
eiF'3'd  ~.the'~_  counsel for the<\/p>\n
  ollants isnot help\ufb01ul to the appellants.<\/p>\n
'V  ..;FE't;.rther, there is no merit in the<\/p>\n
'l  of the learned counsel for the"<\/p>\n
first-Vt":.defendant that the suit for partition by<\/p>\n
 .v::~:ta'rriec1 daughters is not maintainable, as the<\/p>\n
l  'Epre.-sent suit filed by the plaintiff is not for<\/p>\n
partition of ancestral properties but it is<\/p>\n
for partition and possession of the separate<\/p>\n
Va}<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
To that extent the judgment and <\/p>\n
pass& by the court below dismissing  “” <\/p>\n
of the plaintiff is liable to  %<\/p>\n
The finding of the trig},  <\/p>\n
other respects ranains unait:-;g:ed–‘.”v-
\nIt is open to the
\nequitable partition’  tlje,  decree<\/p>\n
proceedings.    . if V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & Swamy IN THE E-EIGH COURT OF KARN.A’I’A.KA AT nAmEn: wars wan 25″‘nAy 0? JUL%f”\u00e9\u00a7$3tf\\ was HO\u00a7’BLE MR.3Usf;c\u00a3~VLe}$A3SAHi\u00a5_’:’ was HO\ufb02’BLE MR.JUsfI$$–;.HAkA\ufb01\u00a7uA}swAMY RER_R9.$57\ufb011$99_ BETWEEN ,’ ~.*J .’=fa = 1 c\u00a7ANNAMMA_ ;j V j:_4a\ufb01._ v W70 3xN3mGawnA;;S9 YRS; “~= R\/p”v3pKA\u00a3aRA35bcps:;;’V; sn\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01a “‘. <} f"' […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-104837","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nChannamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-12T08:19:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-12T08:19:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1222,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-12T08:19:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-12T08:19:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-12T08:19:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008"},"wordCount":1222,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008","name":"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-12T08:19:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/channamma-vs-d-puttaswamy-on-25-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Channamma vs D Puttaswamy on 25 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104837","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104837"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104837\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104837"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104837"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104837"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}