{"id":104871,"date":"2008-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-02-09T03:35:51","modified_gmt":"2018-02-08T22:05:51","slug":"sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue &#8230; on 24 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue &#8230; on 24 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIE-I COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  ~..\n\nomen mxs THE 24\"' my OF :mE,gooe%%% '  T ' \n\nBEFORE)\n\nme HON'8LE MRJUSTICE.MQHAAN._SHANTV.%'i%3\ufb01\u00a7$\u00a7\u00a7U\u00a7;)J2  * %\n\nws2;g;T PETITION No.3 g44%k{:_;--;2oc7*m,I2~s2:2+\u00a7uR)\n\n3E'1'WEEN:\n\nMariyarma.               \nS\/0 late M\u00e9ulijsgizxtappa '  '\nAggd 73V'yj:ai_$  .. ..\n\nR] a N6. 10 1\u00a7.1.,VT5Nes\u00a5 ':Extci1:3ion _\n\n P9521 7 T\u00e9ziegrzaph. _Q':3.a1\"tcrs\n\nHanging Boalti-Rtiaidg Na-gar Fest\n\nKava}bym5an.dr\u00a3i,-- B\u00a3:1\u00a7igaIi::{e~32. ..Petitioner\n\n(By gsri E. i{f.isimV;;:p\u00a7a,v'Adv.,}\n\n:4:--u----.-----.\n\n1 L' '-  ;\u00ab I '   . Karxlataka\n\n\" . 'I\u00a7cvcnu4:f_D-itpaxtmcnt\n S5 '!3'uj}(1i11g, Bangalore-G 1\nRap by its Principal Secretary.\n\n The fahs\ufb02dm\n Bangalore East Taiuk\nKR. Pumm, Bangalore.\n\n  :3. The Deputy Tahsildar\n\nNada Kachetti, Bidamhalii\n\n\n\nBangaiore East Taluk.\n\n4. The Assistant Clommi\ufb01ssiuiuer\nBangaiore North Sub-Diviaitm\nBangalore.\n\n5. Byrangna\nS] 0 late Munikuntappa\nAged 68 years\nR\/a NLM. Layout  \nAmbedkar Medical College  \nMain Road, Kava1by1\"asa11dra_*.._ V\nR31'. Nagar Post, IE\u00a7auixg_alc::\ufb01Ae--32.L*- _\n\n6. Smt. Poomima N.   1 ,\nW\/o KAI. Naiayanaswanjny '- \nAged 53 T g g   \" '\nR\/a No.4i?f7.2, fix'??? Cross _  V- V\nSa\u00e9asI1ivariaVg\u00e9ar,.._Ba31g\u00a7a1\u00a3;r(:;V_   _ ..Rcspondents\n\n{By Sri satyanar\u00e9yaszia \"{{\u00a7r'R1 to R4)\n\nThis writ petition is \ufb011e_da.1'nd\u00a7:i\" Articles 226 and 227 of\nthe Constitutifm Qf India,' prayirig to direcct the R2 and R3 to\ncompig\ufb01 Wifit\ufb01, the order\"  by the R4- Assistant\nCoiiimissio\ufb01\u00e9r,  North Sub--{}ivision_, Baxzgaiore\nVida c:L11_;1c:1\";{'1':ia':3fi*'3_ hy'&lt;:h\u00e9v  Authority in R.A.No.299[*2002--\n03 dated 5.510:-2Qo4&quot;and_i..in R.A.No.44&#039;2] 2006-07 dated 28-\n\n1j1;L\u00ab-2005 &#039;which  fzmarkcd as Anncxures-F and .1\n&#039;r\u00a7:xspeC\ufb01vely.\u00bb..&quot;_  A\n\n &#039; &quot;  This WIit&quot;p\u00a7-fition ceming ml for preiiminary heating in\n I3fQ&#039;}L&quot;&#039;t1&#039;1:3..i&#039;;1\u00a7,  day the Court; made the foIIowing:~\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;T V . _  :The:g,riz\u20ac:vaI1cc of the petitioner is that the (Z3I&#8217;d{-:I&#8221;&#8216;S<\/p>\n<p> by the Assistant Comlmssiener, Vida<\/p>\n<p>rx\/5<\/p>\n<p>,3.\n<\/p>\n<p>AI]Il\u20acX11E&#8217;\u20ac:S&#8217;-F and J, dated 5.10.2904 <\/p>\n<p>respectively, are not Compliecl with by   .. <\/p>\n<p>on this day.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The records  {hat <\/p>\n<p>Commissioner, B.mj;galQre&#8221;   &#8216;  A&#8217; A &#8216; Suhi\ufb01ivisian,<br \/>\nBangaiore, by his oygci\u00e9r&#8217;   directeci the<br \/>\nTahsiidar &#8216;L0;   notice 1:9 all the<br \/>\nCOI1{:\u20ac}.'&#8221;I&#8221;1f\u00a7\u20ac=3..     &#8216;vthe Tahsiltiar has not<br \/>\n  attgtortiance with the ordar<br \/>\nof  Subsv\ufb01iiuentlfi&#8217;. by the<\/p>\n<p>c2rd\u00a2_r_ dat\u00e9szi V28&#8242;,  1200-63, the Assistant Commis.3io11er<\/p>\n<p> v  _  \ufb01E\u00e9&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;T\u00e9hs\ufb02dar to obey the earlier cmtier<\/p>\n<p>    Even then, the Tahsiidar has; slept<\/p>\n<p>   \ufb01a\u00e9itter. The irlaction an the part of the<\/p>\n<p> Tahsii\ufb01\u00e9r is deprecated. The order of the Assistant<\/p>\n<p> hCiG_\u00a7missi0ner dated 5.10.2004 is not questiened by<\/p>\n<p>% &#8221;  The Tahs\ufb02dar being the irlferior O\ufb01icer to the<\/p>\n<p>Assistant Ciemmissicaner is duty bcund in obtity the<\/p>\n<p>it\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>.4.\n<\/p>\n<p>ordars csf th\u00e9 Assistant Commissioner. He  sl\u00e9ep<\/p>\n<p>over the matter. if such action is cQ:3ij;1u\u20act_i&#8217;~  Ztha &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>Tahsil\ufb01ar, than this Court mz\u00e9y  \u00e9i\ufb01ziiii\u00e9fs.  T<\/p>\n<p>the Tahsildar. Accordingly,  fo\ufb02Q1\u00a7\u00e9in_ g &#8216; &#8220;orC1\u00e9\u00a7i*~  *&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>3:I1ade:- n 2 &#8216; V<\/p>\n<p>The secand    to:\n<\/p>\n<p>comply with the   passed by the<br \/>\n4&#8243;&#8216;    V &#8216; &#8216; Ctsinmissioner, as<br \/>\n   later than the outer<br \/>\nIimiftof.  &#8221; the date of receipt of this<br \/>\n0rder. &#8216; 4&#8217; &#8216;V   <\/p>\n<p>..  &#8216;V Writ  disposed of accardiilgly.<\/p>\n<p>, Sd\/-9<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p>A  A.V&#8217;;C\u00a7I\u00a7:]bsx1-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue &#8230; on 24 June, 2008 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar IN THE HIE-I COURT OF KARNATAKA AT ~.. omen mxs THE 24&#8243;&#8216; my OF :mE,gooe%%% &#8216; T &#8216; BEFORE) me HON&#8217;8LE MRJUSTICE.MQHAAN._SHANTV.%&#8217;i%3\ufb01\u00a7$\u00a7\u00a7U\u00a7;)J2 * % ws2;g;T PETITION No.3 g44%k{:_;&#8211;;2oc7*m,I2~s2:2+\u00a7uR) 3E&#8217;1&#8217;WEEN: Mariyarma. S\/0 late M\u00e9ulijsgizxtappa &#8216; &#8216; Aggd [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-104871","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue ... on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue ... on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-08T22:05:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue &#8230; on 24 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-08T22:05:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":266,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue ... on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-08T22:05:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue &#8230; on 24 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue ... on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue ... on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-08T22:05:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue &#8230; on 24 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-08T22:05:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008"},"wordCount":266,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008","name":"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue ... on 24 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-08T22:05:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mariyanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-revenue-on-24-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue &#8230; on 24 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104871"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104871\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104871"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104871"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}