{"id":104873,"date":"2009-05-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-23T07:44:01","modified_gmt":"2018-09-23T02:14:01","slug":"harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Kailash Gambhir<\/div>\n
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n                             FAO NO.364\/99\n\n\n                                 Judgment reserved on:17.1.2008\n                                 Judgment delivered on:4.5.2009\n\nHarish Kumar                                             ......Appellant\n\n                             Through Mr.O.P.Goyal, Adv\n\nVersus\n\nAshok Kumar Tyagi                                ........ Respondents\n\n                             Through: Nemo\n\n\nCORAM:\nHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR\n\n\n\n1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the\njudgment?                                                      NO\n\n2. To be referred to Reporter or not?                          NO\n\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO\n\nKAILASH GAMBHIR, J.\n<\/pre>\n
1          The present appeal arises out of the award of compensation<\/p>\n
passed by the Learned Motor Accident Claim Tribunal on 28\/4\/99 for<\/p>\n
    FAO NO. 364\/99                                                  Page 1 of 8<\/span>
\n enhancement of compensation. The learned Tribunal awarded a total<\/p>\n
amount of Rs. 8,500\/- with an interest @ 12% PA for the injuries<\/p>\n
caused to the claimant appellant in the motor accident.<\/p>\n
2.    The brief conspectus of facts is as under:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.    On 29.12.86 appellant was crossing ring road near General Store,<\/p>\n
Punjabi Bagh, Delhi where he was hit by motorcycle no. CHU 5992<\/p>\n
driven by respondent no.1 Ashok Kumar Tyagi . After accident he was<\/p>\n
removed to ESI Hospital. The left leg of the appellant was got fractured<\/p>\n
in the accident.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.    A claim petition was filed on 29\/6\/87 and an award was passed on<\/p>\n
28\/4\/99. Aggrieved with the said award enhancement is claimed by<\/p>\n
way of the present appeal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.    Sh. O.P. Goyal counsel for the appellant claimant urged that the<\/p>\n
tribunal awarded inadequate amount towards conveyance expenses,<\/p>\n
special diet expenses, mental pain and sufferings etc. The counsel also<\/p>\n
contended that the tribunal erred in not awarding compensation<\/p>\n
towards permanent disability, loss of income during treatment and loss<\/p>\n
of amenities to the appellant. Further, the counsel submitted that the<\/p>\n
tribunal erred in awarding an interest of 12% pa instead of 15% pa.<\/p>\n
 FAO NO. 364\/99                                                 Page 2 of 8<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 6.    Nobody appeared for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.    I have heard the counsel for the appellant and perused the<\/p>\n
award.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8.    In a plethora of cases the Hon’ble Apex Court and various High<\/p>\n
Courts have held that the emphasis of the courts in personal injury<\/p>\n
cases should be on awarding substantial, just and fair damages and<\/p>\n
not mere token amount. In cases of personal injuries the general<\/p>\n
principle is that such sum of compensation should be awarded which<\/p>\n
puts the injured in the same position as he would have been had<\/p>\n
accident not taken place. In examining the question of damages for<\/p>\n
personal injury, it is axiomatic that pecuniary and non-pecuniary heads<\/p>\n
of damages are required to be taken in to account. In this regard the<\/p>\n
Supreme Court in Divisional Controller, KSRTC v. Mahadeva<\/p>\n
Shetty,<\/a> (2003) 7 SCC 197, has classified pecuniary and non-<\/p>\n
pecuniary damages as under:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
             “16. This Court in R.D. Hattangadi v. Pest Control
\n      (India) (P) Ltd.<\/a> 9 laying the principles posited: (SCC p.
\n      556, para 9)<\/p>\n
            ” 9 . Broadly speaking while fixing an amount of
\n      compensation payable to a victim of an accident, the
\n      damages have to be assessed separately as pecuniary
\n      damages and special damages. Pecuniary damages are
\n      those which the victim has actually incurred and which are
\n FAO NO. 364\/99                                                    Page 3 of 8<\/span>
\n       capable of being calculated in terms of money; whereas
\n      non-pecuniary damages are those which are incapable of
\n      being assessed by arithmetical calculations. In order to
\n      appreciate two concepts pecuniary damages may include
\n      expenses incurred by the claimant:(i) medical attendance;
\n      ( ii ) loss of earning of profit up to the date of trial; ( iii )
\n      other material loss. So far as non-pecuniary damages are
\n      concerned, they may include ( i ) damages for mental and
\n      physical shock, pain and suffering, already suffered or
\n      likely to be suffered in future; ( ii ) damages to
\n      compensate for the loss of amenities of life which may
\n      include a variety of matters i.e. on account of injury the
\n      claimant may not be able to walk, run or sit; ( iii )
\n      damages for the loss of expectation of life i.e. on account
\n      of injury the normal longevity of the person concerned is
\n      shortened; ( iv ) inconvenience, hardship, discomfort,
\n      disappointment, frustration and mental stress in life.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
9.    In the instant case the tribunal has awarded Rs. 2,500\/- for<\/p>\n
expenses towards medicines; Rs. 2,500\/- for special diet; Rs. 1,000\/-<\/p>\n
for conveyance expenses; and Rs. 2,500\/- for mental pain and<\/p>\n
sufferings.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
10.   On perusal of the award, it is manifest that the appellant received<\/p>\n
fracture in his left leg, a cut wound in his right leg and stitches were<\/p>\n
applied on the same. He also sustained injuries on the head and other<\/p>\n
parts of the body. It has come on record that the treatment of the<\/p>\n
appellant at the ESI hospital and the Safdurjung hospital was free of<\/p>\n
charge. But still he must have purchased some medicines, considering<\/p>\n
the same, the tribunal awarded Rs. 2,500\/- towards medical expenses.<\/p>\n
 FAO NO. 364\/99                                                           Page 4 of 8<\/span>
\n I do not find any infirmity in the order in this regard and the same is<\/p>\n
not interfered with.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
11.   As regards conveyance expenses, nothing has been brought on<\/p>\n
record. The appellant received fracture in his left leg, a cut wound in<\/p>\n
his right leg and stitches were applied on the same. He also sustained<\/p>\n
injuries on the head and other parts of the body. The tribunal after<\/p>\n
taking notice of this fact and in the absence of any cogent evidence<\/p>\n
awarded Rs. 1,000\/- for conveyance expenses. I do not find any<\/p>\n
infirmity in the order in this regard and the same is not interfered with.<\/p>\n
12.   As regards special diet expenses, although nothing was brought<\/p>\n
on record by the appellant to prove the expenses incurred by him<\/p>\n
towards special diet but still the tribunal took notice of the fact that<\/p>\n
since the appellant received fracture in his left leg, a cut wound in his<\/p>\n
right leg and stitches were applied on the same. He also sustained<\/p>\n
injuries on the head and other parts of the body. Thus he must have<\/p>\n
also consumed protein-rich\/special diet for his early recovery and<\/p>\n
awarded Rs. 2,500\/- for special diet expenses. I do not find any<\/p>\n
infirmity in the order in this regard and the same is not interfered with.<\/p>\n
13.   As regards mental pain & suffering, the tribunal awarded Rs.<\/p>\n
2,500\/- to the appellant. The appellant received fracture in his left leg,<\/p>\n
 FAO NO. 364\/99                                                   Page 5 of 8<\/span>
\n a cut wound in his right leg and stitches were applied on the same. He<\/p>\n
also sustained injuries on the head and other parts of the body. At the<\/p>\n
time of the accident, appellant was of 17 years of age and was<\/p>\n
studying in XII standard. In such circumstance, I feel that the<\/p>\n
compensation towards mental pain & suffering should be enhanced to<\/p>\n
Rs. 15,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
14.   As regards the compensation towards permanent disability, I feel<\/p>\n
that the tribunal has not erred in not awarding the same. No disability<\/p>\n
certificate has been brought on record to award compensation under<\/p>\n
this head to the appellant. Thus, no interference is made in the award<\/p>\n
in this regard.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
15.   As regards medical attendants, I feel that the tribunal has not<\/p>\n
erred in not awarding the same. No evidence has been brought on<\/p>\n
record to award compensation under this head to the appellant. Thus,<\/p>\n
no interference is made in the award in this regard.<\/p>\n
16.   As regards loss of amenities, resulting from the defendant’s<\/p>\n
negligence, which affects the injured person’s ability to participate in<\/p>\n
and derive pleasure from the normal activities of daily life, and the<\/p>\n
individual’s inability to pursue his talents, recreational interests,<\/p>\n
hobbies or avocations. Considering that the appellant suffered
\n FAO NO. 364\/99                                                 Page 6 of 8<\/span>
\n amputation of his toe, I feel that the tribunal erred in not awarding<\/p>\n
compensation under this head and in the circumstances of the case<\/p>\n
same is allowed to the extent of Rs. 25,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
17.   As regards loss of earnings, I feel that the tribunal has not erred<\/p>\n
in not awarding the same. At the time of the accident, appellant was of<\/p>\n
17 years of age and was studying in XII standard. Since nothing has<\/p>\n
come on record to award compensation under this head, therefore, no<\/p>\n
interference is made in the award in this regard.<\/p>\n
18.   As regards the issue of interest that the rate of interest of 12%<\/p>\n
p.a. awarded by the tribunal is on the lower side, I feel that the rate of<\/p>\n
interest awarded by the tribunal is just and fair and requires no<\/p>\n
interference. No rate of interest is fixed under Section 171 of the Motor<\/p>\n
Vehicles Act, 1988. The Interest is compensation for forbearance or<\/p>\n
detention of money and that interest is awarded to a party only for<\/p>\n
being kept out of the money, which ought to have been paid to him.<\/p>\n
Time and again the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the rate of<\/p>\n
interest to be awarded should be just and fair depending upon the<\/p>\n
facts and circumstances of the case and taking in to consideration<\/p>\n
relevant factors including inflation, policy being adopted by Reserve<\/p>\n
Bank of India from time to time and other economic factors. In the<\/p>\n
 FAO NO. 364\/99                                                   Page 7 of 8<\/span>
\n facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any infirmity in the<\/p>\n
award regarding award of interest @ 12% pa by the tribunal and the<\/p>\n
same is not interfered with.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
19.   In view of the foregoing, Rs. 2,500\/- is awarded for expenses<\/p>\n
towards medicines; Rs. 2,500\/- for special diet; Rs. 1,000\/- for<\/p>\n
conveyance expenses; Rs. 15,000\/- for mental pain and sufferings; and<\/p>\n
Rs. 25,000\/- towards loss of amenities.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
20.   In view of the above discussion, the total compensation is<\/p>\n
enhanced to Rs. 46,000\/- from Rs. 8,500\/- along with interest on the<\/p>\n
differential amount @ 7.5% per annum from the date of institution of<\/p>\n
the petition till realisation of the award and the same shall be paid to<\/p>\n
the appellant by the respondents as directed by the tribunal within 30<\/p>\n
days of this order.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
21.   With the above directions, the present appeal is disposed of.<\/p>\n
May 04,2009                                 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J\n\n\n\n\n FAO NO. 364\/99                                                  Page 8 of 8<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009 Author: Kailash Gambhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO NO.364\/99 Judgment reserved on:17.1.2008 Judgment delivered on:4.5.2009 Harish Kumar ……Appellant Through Mr.O.P.Goyal, Adv Versus Ashok Kumar Tyagi …….. Respondents Through: Nemo CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR 1. Whether […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-104873","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHarish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-23T02:14:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-23T02:14:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1547,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-23T02:14:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-23T02:14:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-23T02:14:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009"},"wordCount":1547,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009","name":"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-23T02:14:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-tyagi-on-4-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Harish Kumar vs Ashok Kumar Tyagi on 4 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104873","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104873"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104873\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104873"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104873"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104873"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}