{"id":10496,"date":"2007-07-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007"},"modified":"2014-02-22T21:20:29","modified_gmt":"2014-02-22T15:50:29","slug":"muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007","title":{"rendered":"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP No. 374 of 2007()\n\n\n1. MUTHAWALLI, MADEENA MASJID, PULLEPPADY\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KERALA JAMA ATH ISLAMI HIND,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. BASHEER MUHIYIDHEEN, S\/O MOIDU MOULAVI,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :05\/07\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                                                                         C.R.\n\n      KURIAN JOSEPH &amp;  T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,  JJ.\n\n                 ----------------------------------------------\n\n                         C.R.P.No.374  of 2007\n\n                 ----------------------------------------------\n\n                        Dated  5th   July,  2007.\n\n\n                                 O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>Kurian Joseph, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>             Whether   a   suit   or   other   legal   proceedings   can   be<\/p>\n<p>maintained on behalf of an unregistered Wakf for enforcement of<\/p>\n<p>any of its rights before the Wakf Tribunal, is the crucial question<\/p>\n<p>arising for consideration in this case.   Petitioner is the plaintiff in<\/p>\n<p>W.O.S.18\/07   on   the   file   of   the   Wakf   Tribunal,   Ernakulam.     The<\/p>\n<p>defendants   are   the   respondents   herein.     The   suit   is   one   for<\/p>\n<p>permanent prohibitory injunction.  Petitioner is the Chairman of a<\/p>\n<p>Trust   managing   Madeena   Mazjid,   Pullepady.     One   Abdul   Sathar<\/p>\n<p>Moulavi was appointed by the Muthavalli as  Imam and Khathib of<\/p>\n<p>the Mosque as per the Wakf deed.  However, the first respondent<\/p>\n<p>organization and the second respondent claimed that the second<\/p>\n<p>respondent   is   the   Imam   and   Khathib   of   the   Mosque,   as   usually<\/p>\n<p>nominated by the first respondent organization.  On their attempt<\/p>\n<p>to interfere with the control and management of the affairs of the<\/p>\n<p>Mosque the suit was filed.  Along with the suit, I.A.74\/07 was filed<\/p>\n<p>for   temporary   injunction.     The   suit   and   the   application   were<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07                                 2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>contested by  the respondents.    The application  was disposed   of<\/p>\n<p>by the order under revision dated 14.5.2007 of the Wakf Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>holding that the suit itself is not maintainable, in view of the bar<\/p>\n<p>under   Section   87   of   the   Wakf   Act,   1995,   since   the   Wakf   is   not<\/p>\n<p>registered with the Wakf Board under Section 36 of the Wakf Act.<\/p>\n<p>Consequently,   the   application   was   also   held   to   be   not<\/p>\n<p>maintainable.  However, partial relief was granted in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent to continue as the Imam of the Mosque till the<\/p>\n<p>disposal   of   the   suit.     It   is   the   main   contention   of   the   revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner that the suit is one filed by the mutawalli of Madeena<\/p>\n<p>Mazjid and the same is maintainable under Section 83(2)  of the<\/p>\n<p>Wakf Act, 1995.   It is also contended that the bar provided under<\/p>\n<p>Section 87 of the Act will not apply for maintaining a suit before<\/p>\n<p>the   Wakf   Tribunal   since   the   same   is   applicable   only   to   the   civil<\/p>\n<p>court.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>              2.   In order to appreciate the contentions taken by the<\/p>\n<p>parties,   it   is   necessary   to   refer   to   three   relevant   portions,   (i)<\/p>\n<p>Section 83 (1) and (2), (ii) Section 85 and (iii), Section 87 of the<\/p>\n<p>Wakf Act, which read as follows :-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                8<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                     3. Constitution of Tribunals, etc.-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              (1)   The   State   Government   shall,   by   notification   in   the   Official<\/p>\n<p>              Gazette, constitute as many Tribunals as it may think fit, for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            determination of any dispute,  question or other matter relating<\/p>\n<p>            to a wakf or wakf or wakf property under this Act and define the<\/p>\n<p>            local   limits   and   jurisdiction   under   this   Act   of   each   of   such<\/p>\n<p>            Tribunals.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            (2)  Any   mutawalli,   person   interested   in   a   wakf   or   any   other<\/p>\n<p>            person   aggrieved   by   an   order   made   under   this   Act,   or   rules<\/p>\n<p>            made   thereunder,   may   make   an   application  within   the   time<\/p>\n<p>            specified in this  Act or where  no such time  has been specified,<\/p>\n<p>            within   such   time   as may   be   prescribed,  to  the   Tribunal  for   the<\/p>\n<p>            determination of any dispute,  question or other matter relating<\/p>\n<p>            to the wakf.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\n            &#8220;85.Bar   of   jurisdiction   of   civil   courts:-  No   suit   or   other   legal<\/p>\n<p>            proceeding shall lie in any civil court in respect of any dispute,<\/p>\n<p>            question or other matter relating to any wakf, wakf property or<\/p>\n<p>            other   matter   which   is   required   by   or   under   this   Act   to   be<\/p>\n<p>            determined by a Tribunal.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            87.  Bar to  the  enforcement  of  right  on behalf  of  unreggistered<\/p>\n<p>            wakfs:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\n            (1)  Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the<\/p>\n<p>            time being in force, no suit, appeal or other legal proceeding for<\/p>\n<p>            the   enforcement   of   any   right  on   behalf   of   any   wakf   which  has<\/p>\n<p>            not   been   registered   in   accordance   with   the   provisions   of   this<\/p>\n<p>            Act, shall be instituted or commenced or heard, tried or decided<\/p>\n<p>            by any court after the commencement of this Act, or where any<\/p>\n<p>            such suit, appeal or other  legal  proceeding had been instituted<\/p>\n<p>            or   commenced   before   such   commencement,   no   such   suit,<\/p>\n<p>            appeal or other legal proceeding shall be continued, heard, tried<\/p>\n<p>            or decided by any court after such commencement unless such<\/p>\n<p>            wakf has been registered,  in  accordance  with  the provisions  of<\/p>\n<p>            this Act.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\n            (2)   The   provisions   of   sub-section   (1)   shall   apply   as   far   as   may<\/p>\n<p>            be, to the claim for set off or any other claim made on behalf of<\/p>\n<p>            any wakf which has not been registered in accordance with the<\/p>\n<p>            provisions of this Act.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>As far as the jurisdiction of the Tribunal is concerned, the law is<\/p>\n<p>well settled by a bench decision of this Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/444168\/\">Pookoya Haji v.<\/p>\n<p>Cheriyakoya<\/a>  (2003(3)   KLT   32)   that   &#8220;The   words   any   dispute,<\/p>\n<p>question   or   other   matters   relating   to   Wakf   or   Wakf   property<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07                             4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>under S.85 are wide enough to take in within its sweep not only<\/p>\n<p>matters   which   are   specifically   conferred   on   the   Tribunal   by   the<\/p>\n<p>various provisions of the Act but also any dispute, question or any<\/p>\n<p>other  matter   relating   to   any  Wakf   or   Wakf   property   since   those<\/p>\n<p>powers have also been conferred on the Tribunal by the Wakf Act<\/p>\n<p>itself.     On   examining   the   scheme   of   the   Act   and   various<\/p>\n<p>provisions we are of the view that the intention of the Legislature<\/p>\n<p>is to resolve all disputes by one machinery and forum provided in<\/p>\n<p>the   Act   itself,   that   is,   the   Wakf   Tribunal   and   not   by   the   Civil<\/p>\n<p>Courts in the State&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>              3.     Under   Section   83(2),   (1)any   mutawally   or   (2)<\/p>\n<p>person   interested   in   a   Wakf   or   (3)   any   person   aggrieved   by   an<\/p>\n<p>order  made   under  this  Act  is   entitled  to   make   an  application  to<\/p>\n<p>the   Tribunal   for   the   determination   of   any   dispute,   question   or<\/p>\n<p>other matter relating to the Wakf.  For thus approaching the Wakf<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal there is no precondition regarding the registration of the<\/p>\n<p>Wakf   in   question;   the   only   jurisdictional   factor   is   that   the<\/p>\n<p>application by any of the three enumerated categories should be<\/p>\n<p>for   the   determination   of   any   dispute,   question   or   other   matters<\/p>\n<p>relating to Wakf.   In this context, it is also profitable to note that<\/p>\n<p>the &#8220;person interested in a wakf&#8221; is given a wide interpretation in<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07                                5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the Act itself, which reads as follows :-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              3(k)  &#8220;person  interested  in a wakf&#8221;,  means  any person  who  is<\/p>\n<p>              entitled   to   receive   any   pecuniary   or   other   benefits   from   the<\/p>\n<p>              wakf and includes-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              (i)  any   person   who   has   a   right   to   worship  or   to  perform   any<\/p>\n<p>              religious rite in a mosque, idgah, imambara, dargah, khangah,<\/p>\n<p>              maqbara,   graveyard   or   any   other   religious   institutions<\/p>\n<p>              connected   with   the   wakf   or   to   participate   in   any   religious   or<\/p>\n<p>              charitable institution under the wakf;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              (ii)   the   wakf   and   any   descendant   of   the   wakf   and   the<\/p>\n<p>              mutawalli&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>              4.     A   close   look   at   Section   87   would   indicate   that<\/p>\n<p>notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time<\/p>\n<p>being   in   force   (and   notwithstanding   anything   contained   in   the<\/p>\n<p>Wakf   Act)   no   suit   or   appeal   or   other   legal   proceeding   for   the<\/p>\n<p>enforcement of any right on behalf of any Wakf shall be instituted<\/p>\n<p>or   commenced   or   heard,   tried   or   decided   by   any   court,   if   the<\/p>\n<p>Wakf is not registered with the Wakf  Board  under Section 36  of<\/p>\n<p>the Act, after the commencement of the Wakf  Act.   The second<\/p>\n<p>limb of the provision clearly stipulates that no such suit, appeal or<\/p>\n<p>legal proceeding instituted prior to the commencement of the Act<\/p>\n<p>shall   be   continued   by   any   court   unless   the   Wakf   has   been<\/p>\n<p>registered   in   accordance   with   the   provisions   of   this   Act.     It   is<\/p>\n<p>significant   to   note   that   the   Wakf   Act,   1995   has   used   both<\/p>\n<p>expressions,   &#8220;Court&#8221;   and   &#8220;Tribunal&#8221;   in   many   places.     For<\/p>\n<p>example, under Section 90(1) it is provided that &#8220;In every suit or<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07                             6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>proceeding relating to a title or possession of a Wakf property or<\/p>\n<p>the   right   of   mutawalli   or   beneficiary,  the   court   or   Tribunal  shall<\/p>\n<p>issue notice to the Board at the cost of the party instituting such<\/p>\n<p>suit   or   proceeding&#8221;.     If   the   provisions   are   given   a   purposive<\/p>\n<p>interpretation,   it is clear that in respect of the rights of a Wakf<\/p>\n<p>which are not enumerated under Section 83(1) and (2), a suit is<\/p>\n<p>still   maintainable   before   the   civil   court,   in   case   the   Wakf   is<\/p>\n<p>registered.  Whether  registered  or  not,  for  determination  of    any<\/p>\n<p>dispute,   question   or   any   other   matter   relating   to   any   Wakf   or<\/p>\n<p>Wakf property, the exclusive jurisdiction is on the Wakf Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>constituted under Section 83 of the Act and not on the civil court.<\/p>\n<p>The bar under Section 87 applies only to the civil court and not to<\/p>\n<p>the   Tribunal.     A   joint   reading   of   Sections   83,   85   and   87   would<\/p>\n<p>clearly show that the civil court has no jurisdiction to adjudicate<\/p>\n<p>on any dispute, question or other matter relating to any Wakf and<\/p>\n<p>Wakf  property,  or   other  matters   which  are  to   be   determined  by<\/p>\n<p>the  Tribunal  constituted  under  Section  83   of  the  Act.    However,<\/p>\n<p>under Section 87, an additional privilege is granted to registered<\/p>\n<p>Wakfs   to   institute   a   suit   or   appeal   or   other   legal   proceedings<\/p>\n<p>before the civil court for the enforcement of any right on behalf of<\/p>\n<p>such Wakf which is not related to the Wakf.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07                             7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>              5.   In the instant case, the Wakf Tribunal also has not<\/p>\n<p>taken note of the fact that the plaintiff is styled as the mutawalli<\/p>\n<p>of Madeena Mazjid.  Under Section 83(2) any mutawalli is entitled<\/p>\n<p>to make an application before the Tribunal for the determination<\/p>\n<p>of   any   dispute,   question   or   other   matters   relating   to   the   Wakf.<\/p>\n<p>Since   the   suit   is   one   instituted   by   a   person   claiming   to   be   the<\/p>\n<p>mutawalli   of   a   Wakf   and   since   the   questions   apparently   are<\/p>\n<p>relating   to   the   Wakf,   for   the   only   reason   that   the   Wakf   is   not<\/p>\n<p>registered with the Wakf Board under Section 36 of the Wakf Act,<\/p>\n<p>it cannot be said that the suit is not maintainable before the Wakf<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.   The bar under Section 87 will not apply to the instant<\/p>\n<p>case.    The   suit   is   plainly   maintainable   before   the   Wakf   Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>under Section 83 read with Section 85 of the Wakf Act.<\/p>\n<p>              6.   In the result, the order in I.A.74\/07 in W.O.S.18\/07<\/p>\n<p>of   the   Wakf   Tribunal,   Ernakulam   is   set   aside.     During   the<\/p>\n<p>pendency   of   the   revision   petition,   regarding   Juma   prayer   in<\/p>\n<p>Madeena Mazjid on Fridays, this Court has ordered that the Juma<\/p>\n<p>prayer will be led by Shri.Abdul Sathar Moulavi.  Kutuba (sermon)<\/p>\n<p>during   the   Juma   prayers   will   be   delivered   by   the   second<\/p>\n<p>respondent   herein.     The   said   interim   arrangement   will   continue<\/p>\n<p>till the disposal of the suit.   There will be a direction to the Wakf<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07                              8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Tribunal to dispose of the suit expeditiously.<\/p>\n<p>              7.   In   respect   of   several   matters,   it   has   come   to   the<\/p>\n<p>notice   of   this   Court   that   the   Wakf   Board   is   not   made   a   party<\/p>\n<p>either   before   this   Court   or   the   Tribunal.   In   view   of   the   clear<\/p>\n<p>mandate under Section 90 of the Act, in every suit or proceeding<\/p>\n<p>relating  to  title  or  possession of  a  Wakf  property  or  the  right of<\/p>\n<p>mutawalli   or   beneficiary,   the   court   or   Tribunal   shall   make   the<\/p>\n<p>Wakf Board a party, at the cost of the party instituting such suit<\/p>\n<p>or proceedings.  There will be a direction to the Wakf Tribunals in<\/p>\n<p>the   State   to   issue   notice   to   the   Wakf   Board   at   the   cost   of   the<\/p>\n<p>party instituting the suit or proceedings, in case the same relates<\/p>\n<p>to   title   or   possession   of   a   Wakf   property   or   the   right   of   the<\/p>\n<p>mutawalli or beneficiary, if the Board is not already on the party<\/p>\n<p>array.     A   copy   of   this   judgment   will   be   sent   to   all   the   Wakf<\/p>\n<p>Tribunals in the State.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                   KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                   T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\ntgs<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP NO.374\/07     9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                    KURIAN JOSEPH &amp;<\/p>\n<p>     T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>          L.A.A. NO.  OF  2004<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>          Dated     July, 2007.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP No. 374 of 2007() 1. MUTHAWALLI, MADEENA MASJID, PULLEPPADY &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. KERALA JAMA ATH ISLAMI HIND, &#8230; Respondent 2. BASHEER MUHIYIDHEEN, S\/O MOIDU MOULAVI, For Petitioner :SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI For Respondent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-22T15:50:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-22T15:50:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1915,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007\",\"name\":\"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-22T15:50:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-07-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-22T15:50:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007","datePublished":"2007-07-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-22T15:50:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007"},"wordCount":1915,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007","name":"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-22T15:50:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/muthawalli-vs-kerala-jama-ath-islami-hind-on-5-july-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Muthawalli vs Kerala Jama Ath Islami Hind on 5 July, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10496"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10496\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}