{"id":105623,"date":"2009-02-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009"},"modified":"2014-06-12T19:56:11","modified_gmt":"2014-06-12T14:26:11","slug":"siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 92 of 2009()\n\n\n1. SIVA PRASAD,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. NAZEEMUDHEEN , NEDIYAVILA VEEDU,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :19\/02\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                         K.T.SANKARAN, J.\n                 ---------------------------------------------\n                        C.R.P.No.92 of 2009\n                 ---------------------------------------------\n            Dated this the 19th day of February, 2009\n\n\n\n                                 ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>     The defendant in O.S.No.247\/00 on the file of the court of<\/p>\n<p>the Munsiff Magistrate of Paravur has filed this Revision<\/p>\n<p>challenging the concurrent decisions of the courts below<\/p>\n<p>decreeing the suit for money filed by the respondent.<\/p>\n<p>     2.    The case of the plaintiff is that the defendant agreed<\/p>\n<p>to sell the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff for a total<\/p>\n<p>consideration   of   Rs.3,75,000\/-.           Ext.A1       agreement dated<\/p>\n<p>19.6.2000 was executed between them and an advance amount<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.10,000\/- was paid to the defendant on the date of<\/p>\n<p>agreement. The period fixed in the agreement for completion of<\/p>\n<p>the transaction was two months from the date of the agreement.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiff says that the transaction could not be completed<\/p>\n<p>since the defendant was not ready and willing to perform his<\/p>\n<p>part of the contract. The plaintiff came to know that the property<\/p>\n<p>was attached in O.S.No.328\/97 pending before the Munsiff&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Court, Paravur. That was not revealed by the defendant at the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP No.92\/2009                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>time of entering into the agreement. Though the plaintiff made a<\/p>\n<p>demand to the defendant to discharge the liability and to execute<\/p>\n<p>the sale deed, the defendant failed to do so. Ext.A2 notice was<\/p>\n<p>issued by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff came to<\/p>\n<p>know that the defendant had entered into another agreement to<\/p>\n<p>sell the same property with one Rafi. The present suit was filed<\/p>\n<p>for recovery of the advanced amount paid by the plaintiff to the<\/p>\n<p>defendant.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    The defendant contested the suit and also preferred a<\/p>\n<p>counter    claim.  Though    the  defendant    admitted   Ext.A1<\/p>\n<p>agreement, he contended that the period fixed in the agreement<\/p>\n<p>was over by 18.8.2000.      The defendant issued notice dated<\/p>\n<p>14.8.2000 asking the plaintiff to pay the balance consideration<\/p>\n<p>and to get the document.      The plaintiff did not reply.   The<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform his part of the<\/p>\n<p>contract. The plaintiff said that he did not have enough money<\/p>\n<p>to pay the balance consideration. The plaintiff requested for<\/p>\n<p>granting further time to pay the balance consideration.<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter, he issued Ext.A2 notice dated 23.8.2000 making false<\/p>\n<p>statements. The defendant replied by notice dated 7.9.2000.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP No.92\/2009                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>There was no default on the part of the defendant. The plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>is not entitled to get refund of Rs.10,000\/- paid as advance. In<\/p>\n<p>the counter claim, the defendant claimed damages of Rs.10,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>from the plaintiff. The agreement for sale makes a provision that<\/p>\n<p>if on measurement of the property, the extent is found to be less,<\/p>\n<p>proportionate    reduction   should   be   made    in   the  sale<\/p>\n<p>consideration. There is also recital in the agreement that there<\/p>\n<p>is no encumbrance on the property and if any encumbrance is<\/p>\n<p>found, the defendant would discharge the same.<\/p>\n<p>      4.    On consideration of the evidence of PW1, the plaintiff,<\/p>\n<p>the evidence of DWs 1 and 2 and the documentary evidence in<\/p>\n<p>the case, the trial court came to the conclusion that at the time<\/p>\n<p>of execution of the agreement, the property was under<\/p>\n<p>attachment in another suit and that the defendant did not<\/p>\n<p>succeed in getting the attachment lifted. It was also found that<\/p>\n<p>the defendant committed breach of contract. Accordingly, the<\/p>\n<p>trial court decreed the suit and dismissed the counter claim.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    The appellate court also considered the oral and<\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence in detail and held that the breach of<\/p>\n<p>contract was committed by the defendant. A contention was put<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP No.92\/2009                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>forward by the defendant that in order to get the attachment<\/p>\n<p>lifted, the plaintiff had agreed to provide the sufficient amount<\/p>\n<p>and the parties agreed to execute the sale deed after releasing<\/p>\n<p>the attachment. This contention put forward by the defendant<\/p>\n<p>was not proved by him by any acceptable evidence.            It was<\/p>\n<p>admitted by the defendant in evidence that even at the time of<\/p>\n<p>entering into Ext.A1 agreement, the property was under<\/p>\n<p>attachment in another suit filed against the defendant. However,<\/p>\n<p>no mention was made about the same in the agreement. There is<\/p>\n<p>no explanation why it was not mentioned in the agreement. The<\/p>\n<p>defendant contended that the plaintiff was aware of the<\/p>\n<p>attachment. But, the court below did not accept that case put<\/p>\n<p>forward by the defendant, on a consideration of the evidence on<\/p>\n<p>record. The court below held that it is difficult to accept the oral<\/p>\n<p>agreement set up by the defendant. The court below also did not<\/p>\n<p>accept the case of the defendant that the plaintiff was aware of<\/p>\n<p>the attachment even at the time of entering into the agreement<\/p>\n<p>for sale. The court below found that the plaintiff was not duty<\/p>\n<p>bound to take       necessary steps for getting the attachment<\/p>\n<p>lifted.   The defendant was under an obligation to get the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CRP No.92\/2009                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>attachment lifted.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6.     The courts below arrived at the findings on the basis<\/p>\n<p>of appreciation of evidence. The findings rendered by the courts<\/p>\n<p>below are findings of fact. The petitioner has not made out any<\/p>\n<p>ground to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact. The<\/p>\n<p>decisions of the courts below do not suffer from infirmity and<\/p>\n<p>there is no error of jurisdiction.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Civil Revision Petition lacks merit and it is accordingly<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            K.T.SANKARAN,<br \/>\n                                                JUDGE<br \/>\ncsl<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 92 of 2009() 1. SIVA PRASAD, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. NAZEEMUDHEEN , NEDIYAVILA VEEDU, &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN Dated :19\/02\/2009 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-12T14:26:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-12T14:26:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":874,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-12T14:26:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-12T14:26:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-12T14:26:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009"},"wordCount":874,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009","name":"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-12T14:26:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/siva-prasad-vs-nazeemudheen-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Siva Prasad vs Nazeemudheen on 19 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105623\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}