{"id":105817,"date":"2011-11-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011"},"modified":"2016-06-26T14:13:53","modified_gmt":"2016-06-26T08:43:53","slug":"mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                     at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002011\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a016,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a016,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri.\u00a0C.T.Adsule\n           796\/C\n           Railway\u00a0Colony\u00a0(West)\n           Valsad\u00a0396\u00a0001\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Valsad\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Western\u00a0Railway\n           General\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Churchgate\n           Mumbai\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri.\u00a0S.M.Meena,\u00a0PIO\n                                     Shri.\u00a0B.\u00a0Mahapatra,\u00a0SPO\n                                     \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n\n\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                      In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002011\n\n\n\n                                                   ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.13.3.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0against\u00a0six\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0reference\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0representation\u00a0dt.2.3.11\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0seniority\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Group\u00a0&#8216;B&#8217;\u00a0officers\u00a0of\u00a0Civil\u00a0Engineering\u00a0Department\u00a0addressed\u00a0to\u00a0GM(E)\u00a0CCG.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.Kademani,\u00a0PIO\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       replied\u00a0on\u00a015.4.11\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0asked\u00a0for\u00a0any\u00a0specific\u00a0recorded\u00a0information\u00a0but\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       has\u00a0requested\u00a0for\u00a0redressal\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0grievance\u00a0regarding\u00a0seniority\u00a0 \u00a0of\u00a0Group\u00a0&#8216;B&#8217;\u00a0officers\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       relief\u00a0sought\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0dt.2.3.11\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0fall\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0ambit\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.6.5.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       application\u00a0solicits\u00a0specific\u00a0material\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0seeking\u00a0grievance\u00a0redressal.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Subodh\u00a0Jain,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0order\u00a0dt.16.6.11\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0got\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0examined\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0dt.2.3.11\u00a0is\u00a0still\u00a0under\u00a0examination.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0as\u00a0soon\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       is\u00a0taken\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0matter\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0communicated\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       appeal\u00a0dt.2.8.11\u00a0 before\u00a0CIC\u00a0 \u00a0requesting\u00a0for\u00a0 \u00a0certified\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0notings,\u00a0correspondence,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       remarks\u00a0etc.\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0representation\u00a0dt.2.3.11.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       disposed\u00a0off\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0\u00a0conveyed\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0who\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       on\u00a012.11.11.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0part\u00a0while\u00a0admitting\u00a0to\u00a0having\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0decision,\u00a0\u00a0still\u00a0insisted\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       on\u00a0being\u00a0provided\u00a0with\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0and\u00a0other\u00a0correspondence\u00a0etc.\u00a0indicating\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       representation,\u00a0starting\u00a0 \u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0its\u00a0receipt\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0also\u00a0admitted\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       having\u00a0inspected\u00a0related\u00a0records\u00a0on\u00a014.10.11\u00a0and\u00a0complained\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0127\u00a0pages\u00a0identified\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       ,\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0only\u00a015\u00a0were\u00a0provided\u00a0and\u00a0sought\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0remaining\u00a0documents.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.       The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 \u00a0 accordingly \u00a0 directs \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of \u00a0 file \u00a0 notings\/correspondence\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         indicating \u00a0 movement \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 representation \u00a0 dt.2.3.11 \u00a0 from\u00a0 the \u00a0 date \u00a0 of \u00a0 its \u00a0 receipt \u00a0 till \u00a0 the \u00a0 date \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         disposal.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0missing\u00a0documents\u00a0requested\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Appellant\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0 \u00a0on\u00a014.10.11.\u00a0This\u00a0exercise\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0completed\u00a0by\u00a016.12.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a023.12.11.<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri.\u00a0C.T.Adsule<br \/>\n         796\/C<br \/>\n         Railway\u00a0Colony\u00a0(West)<br \/>\n         Valsad\u00a0396\u00a0001<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         General\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Churchgate<br \/>\n         Mumbai<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         General\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Churchgate<br \/>\n         Mumbai<\/p>\n<p>4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<br \/>\n Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0<br \/>\nconsiders\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0<br \/>\ninformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002011 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a016,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0November\u00a016,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri.\u00a0C.T.Adsule 796\/C Railway\u00a0Colony\u00a0(West) Valsad\u00a0396\u00a0001 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Valsad Respondents Western\u00a0Railway General\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office Churchgate Mumbai Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri.\u00a0S.M.Meena,\u00a0PIO Shri.\u00a0B.\u00a0Mahapatra,\u00a0SPO \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/002011 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.13.3.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0 information\u00a0against\u00a0six\u00a0points\u00a0with\u00a0reference\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0representation\u00a0dt.2.3.11\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0seniority\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0 Group\u00a0&#8216;B&#8217;\u00a0officers\u00a0of\u00a0Civil\u00a0Engineering\u00a0Department\u00a0addressed\u00a0to\u00a0GM(E)\u00a0CCG.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.Kademani,\u00a0PIO\u00a0 replied\u00a0on\u00a015.4.11\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0asked\u00a0for\u00a0any\u00a0specific\u00a0recorded\u00a0information\u00a0but\u00a0 has\u00a0requested\u00a0for\u00a0redressal\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0grievance\u00a0regarding\u00a0seniority\u00a0 \u00a0of\u00a0Group\u00a0&#8216;B&#8217;\u00a0officers\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0 relief\u00a0sought\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0dt.2.3.11\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0fall\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0ambit\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-26T08:43:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-26T08:43:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":528,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-26T08:43:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-26T08:43:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-26T08:43:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011"},"wordCount":528,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011","name":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-26T08:43:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-c-t-adsule-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.C T Adsule vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105817"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105817\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}