{"id":106313,"date":"2009-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-07-29T15:26:49","modified_gmt":"2017-07-29T09:56:49","slug":"surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008                     1\n\n\nIN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                                         Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008\n                                         Date of decision: 11.8.2009\nSurjit Kaur and others\n                                                         Petitioner\n                         vs\nDhanwant Singh and others\n                                                         Respondent\n\n\nPresent     Dr. Balram Gupta, Sr.Advocate with\n            Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate.\n            Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate\n            Mr. As Saini, Advocate.\n\n\nM.M.S.BEDI,J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>            This order will dispose of the instant revision petition filed by<\/p>\n<p>the defendant- petitioners against order dated 19.9.2008 passed by the<\/p>\n<p>trial court dismissing the application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC filed by<\/p>\n<p>the defendants for amendment of the written statement claiming that the<\/p>\n<p>defendant- petitioners had engaged a counsel, who had taken their<\/p>\n<p>signatures on some blank papers for the purpose of preparation of written<\/p>\n<p>statement and reply to the application.         He did not draft the written<\/p>\n<p>statement as per the defence of the defendant- petitioners and had not<\/p>\n<p>read over the contents of the same before filing it in the court. It was only<\/p>\n<p>on 17.4.2008 that the defendant- petitioners came to know about a foul<\/p>\n<p>play, being played against them by their counsel in connivance with the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff, when the plaintiff started proclaiming that he will get decreed the<\/p>\n<p>suit in his favour. It is claimed by the defendant- petitioners that after<\/p>\n<p>engaging another counsel and inspecting the file, it was revealed that a<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>wrong admission had been made in the written statement. Vide the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order dated 19.9.2008 the application for amendment has been<\/p>\n<p>declined.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent No.1 has<\/p>\n<p>vehemently contended that the petitioners cannot be permitted to withdraw<\/p>\n<p>the admission made in the written statement. In support of his contention,<\/p>\n<p>he has relied upon Heera Lal vs Kalyan Mal &amp; Ors 1998(1) Civil Court<\/p>\n<p>Cases 1 (S.C.), wherein it was observed that by amendment, admission<\/p>\n<p>cannot be allowed to be withdrawn if such withdrawal would amount to<\/p>\n<p>totally displacing the case of plaintiff and which would cause him<\/p>\n<p>irretrievable prejudice. He has also relied upon <a href=\"\/doc\/697894\/\">Smt. Vidya Wanti vs Gopi<\/p>\n<p>Chand and others Vol CXXI-<\/a>(1991-1) Punjab Law Reporter 546, to<\/p>\n<p>contend that when the defendants have admitted the claim of the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>in categorical<\/p>\n<p>terms and have also made statements, which were duly signed by them,<\/p>\n<p>they cannot be permitted to withdraw unless the same is shown to be<\/p>\n<p>erroneously or patently wrong. He has further relied upon <a href=\"\/doc\/1381144\/\">Gurdial Singh<\/p>\n<p>and others vs Raj Kumar Aneja and others<\/a> (2202) 2 Supreme Court<\/p>\n<p>Cases 445, to contend that the application for amendment must set out<\/p>\n<p>exactly what is proposed to be omitted from, or substituted in or altered or<\/p>\n<p>added to the original pleadings, otherwise the court cannot exercise its<\/p>\n<p>power and discretion of permitting amendment effectively.<\/p>\n<p>             I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through<\/p>\n<p>the facts and circumstances of the case. The plaintiff- respondents had, in<\/p>\n<p>this case, filed a suit for declaration   to the effect that the plaintiff is<\/p>\n<p>absolute owner and in possession of the suit property, on which a house<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>has been constructed. Besides that he had sought a declaration to the<\/p>\n<p>effect that the sale deed dated 20.7.1998 executed by defendant No.2 in<\/p>\n<p>favour of defendant No.4 and sale deed dated 18.1.2005 executed by<\/p>\n<p>defendant No.3 in favour of defendant No.5 are null and void being illegal<\/p>\n<p>transactions as these were forged and fabricated. The plaintiff-respondents<\/p>\n<p>have also sought a declaration pertaining to Will dated 26.1.1981, alleged<\/p>\n<p>to have been executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendants 6,7 and<\/p>\n<p>8. There also appears to be a dispute regarding another Will dated<\/p>\n<p>14.9.1990 as per the pleading of the plaintiff-respondents. The plaintiff had<\/p>\n<p>also sought a decree for mandatory injunction directing defendants 3 and 5<\/p>\n<p>for removing the construction made on a particular portion of the suit<\/p>\n<p>property. By way of amendment, no doubt the defendant- petitioners want<\/p>\n<p>to withdraw some admissions regarding the registered documents. The<\/p>\n<p>provisions of Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, read as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;17. Amendment of pleadings- The Court may at any stage<br \/>\n            of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his<br \/>\n            pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just,<br \/>\n            and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary<br \/>\n            for the purpose of determining          the real questions in<br \/>\n            controversy between the parties:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            Provided that no application for amendment shall be allowed<br \/>\n            after the trial has commenced, unless the court comes to the<br \/>\n            conclusion that in spite of due diligence, the party could not<br \/>\n            have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            The claim of the plaintiff-respondents is that on the basis of<\/p>\n<p>admissions made in the written statement, a right has accrued to them to<\/p>\n<p>get a decree in their favour but on the other hand a perusal of the<\/p>\n<p>application, moved under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC indicates that the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008                      4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>defendant- petitioners claims that a fraud has been played upon them. In<\/p>\n<p>case the said fraud has been detected at the very initial stage of the trial,<\/p>\n<p>the defendants cannot be deprived of an opportunity to contest the case on<\/p>\n<p>merits. Learned counsel for plaintiff- respondents has contended that there<\/p>\n<p>has been a compromise between the plaintiff and defendants and on the<\/p>\n<p>basis of that compromise, the admission had been made by the<\/p>\n<p>defendants. I have also taken into consideration the said contention but in<\/p>\n<p>view of the stage of the suit i.e where the pleadings are being completed<\/p>\n<p>and issues have not even been framed, it seems that it is necessary for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of determining the real question of controversy between the<\/p>\n<p>parties, by permitting the defendants to amend the written statement. The<\/p>\n<p>trial does not seem to have commenced as yet. The rules are hand maiden<\/p>\n<p>of justice. In case the defendants, by way of amendment, at initial stage,<\/p>\n<p>seek to withdraw an admission by explaining the circumstances as to how<\/p>\n<p>the admissions were made in the pleadings, I do not find any reason not to<\/p>\n<p>permit the amendment of the written statement. The inconvenience caused<\/p>\n<p>to the plaintiff- petitioners can be compensated by costs.<\/p>\n<p>            In view of the above circumstances, the revision petition is<\/p>\n<p>allowed, impugned order dated 19.9.2008 is hereby set aside, the<\/p>\n<p>application of the defendants for amendment is allowed and they are<\/p>\n<p>permitted to amend the written statement subject to payment of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.20,000\/- as costs, to be paid to the plaintiff on the next date of hearing<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court at the time of filing the amended written statement.<\/p>\n<pre>August 11 ,2009                                     ( M.M.S.BEDI )\nTSM                                                      JUDGE\n Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008   5\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009 Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH Civil Rev. 5654 of 2008 Date of decision: 11.8.2009 Surjit Kaur and others Petitioner vs Dhanwant Singh and others Respondent Present Dr. Balram Gupta, Sr.Advocate [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-106313","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-29T09:56:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-29T09:56:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1041,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-29T09:56:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-29T09:56:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-29T09:56:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009"},"wordCount":1041,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009","name":"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-29T09:56:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surjit-kaur-and-others-vs-dhanwant-singh-and-others-on-11-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Surjit Kaur And Others vs Dhanwant Singh And Others on 11 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106313"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106313\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106313"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}