{"id":106966,"date":"2009-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009"},"modified":"2015-07-26T12:06:44","modified_gmt":"2015-07-26T06:36:44","slug":"agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Agricultural Produce Market … vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Agricultural Produce Market … vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath And Malimath<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT MNGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 9?\" DAY or JULY 2009 \n\nPRESENT':\n\nTHE HOWBLE MR. }U$TICE K.L.MAN_JL},?v\u00a7i_;-Q3-\u00a7.A..::'  % \" 1  \n\nTHE HGWBLE MR. JUSTICE MAL1\u00a7\u00a7AT'H\"   %\nW.A. Na. 1929:\u00a73z= 2co2(%L\u00e9hr;\u00e9a)  \narzween:      \nAGRICULTURAL Pmivu\u00e9e i'\u00a3iA.RKET:'COMMI1TEE\nunupx svrrs SECRETARY\"  %  \n  % A APPELLANT\n\n(av sax, g,g,sa:oH;e.m,\"%%semaA ADV. ma MR.\nA.C.BAi!\\RA3,.a'1;l)\\{;{)       \n\nAND:\n\n9 ANAMDA POQJARY~~\"\n;wm.QArLI;TTLi,B. TALu:ww.%;% j\u00a7.s{.KaIsH~A, ADVL)\n\n%'Ms M 911.29 U\/SEC 4 or THE KARNATAKA HIGH\n\n '*\u00ab. C\u20ac}L3RT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE omen PASSED IN\n% % v%\u00ab*m;.=. wrm PETITION 949.294\/2002 DATED 21~1-2oe2, em,\n\n  \"THIS WRIT APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR FINAL\n\n -\u00ab.__ ' HE:ARING THIS my, MANJUNATHJ. eeuvaasm THE\n,  * FC:LLOwIP\u00e9G:--\n\n\n\nJUDGEMENT\n<\/pre>\n
The concurrent \ufb01ndings of the <\/p>\n
Labour Court, Mangaiore in Refere_r!ce.__I.D..’_'{LC\u00a7{‘\u00a7v\u00bb’\u00a7i.G..’_’_3V\/99 V<\/p>\n
ordering reinstatement of the respande_nt~ awe <\/p>\n
?O% hackwages from 164VQ4:;9S9a6′-  of’- <\/p>\n
reinstatement dated 18f08-Z\ufb01ez\ufb01wh\u00e9gh frets’ \u00abbeen; affirmed
\nby the iearned Sing\u00a5e smgg rnivvga. is-\u00a2j.%r 294\/2002 dated 2:.-<\/p>\n
01-2002, are cafied inquestiovn” court appeai
\nunder sectim 2; mag  mar cciurt Act, 1951.
\n  raised dispute befare the<\/p>\n
Governmerft;–.._V%% ThVVVe’-__(4V=’;03\u00e9er}iment in its order referred the<\/p>\n
 ‘_d\u00a7sp\u00a7:\u20ac\u00a5e.  th__e \u00a3\u00e9bca:r..Coun, Mangatore for its adjudication.<\/p>\n
 7__Af\u00a3\u00e9r –rece4ipt:v’:\u00a7f”the reference the Labour Court issued notice<\/p>\n
tr:”!\u00a7\u00a2trh  and both the parties \ufb02ied their cfaim<\/p>\n
‘.vstateri1a:.-\u00a7.r\u00a7t..: ‘V 4<\/p>\n
V’   The respondent, who was. the \ufb01rst party befora<\/p>\n
  Labour Court, contended that he has worked as driver of<\/p>\n
  .:~ l:he appeiiant Committee for more than four and a half years<\/p>\n
W4<\/p>\n
S. In order to establish the respective cieims the<\/p>\n
respondent got himseif examined as PW1 and throuatihijm 8<\/p>\n
documents were marked. On behaif of the a,ogoeiie_’itt;~<\/p>\n
evidence was iet in. After hearing the <\/p>\n
Court heid issues 1 and 2 in the affirrrietive”e_nci’ <\/p>\n
4 in the negative. Uitimateiy the’~cieirr: wes_iAAedjadi’oeteo’~..<\/p>\n
directing the appellant to reinetete the._V_res”poViitierit’V with<\/p>\n
continuity of service arscifurther’  toitpey ijeckwages
\nat 70% from 16-11-19S’\u00a76%  reinstatement.<\/p>\n
This order wae..cha;ii-engied  by filing the writ<\/p>\n
petition.\n<\/p>\n
6. it  Judge who heard the writ<\/p>\n
_ petition” s::onc:.iri’e\u00bb:V_i\ufb01ivith: the views of the Labour Court and<\/p>\n
  petition. Challenging these two orders,<\/p>\n
Ati1e”-.*irese\u00e9it~..,xa_;;.V;o’eie’i is fried.<\/p>\n
  ‘  have heard the teamed counsel for parties.<\/p>\n
 A.   s The main contention of the apoeiiant is that the<\/p>\n
  Court as weii as the ieerned Singie Judge did not<\/p>\n
  cohsider that the responcient did not produce any document<\/p>\n
\u00a7r’\/<\/p>\n
to show that he was app\u00e9inted by the APMC as driv \u00e9s*.Tand<\/p>\n
there exists reiationship of empfoyer and empioye\u00e9j<\/p>\n
reiief.\n<\/p>\n
9. Mr. B.G.Sr\u00a5dharan, zearnea;se\u00a7m$r.uah~.V:”<\/p>\n
Hoysaia Security Agergcy as sa{ary ‘\u00a7s by the
\nappellant to the respohde\ufb01t, the :\u00a7;sf1\u00a33\u00e9:r’L’j:3 \u00a7ss_e_d by the Labour
\nCourt as wen as the leaima\ufb01 jsingie\u00bb_J\u00a7\u00a76g\u00a7’.re\u00a7uires to be set<\/p>\n
aside and an to the appetlant to
\nlead eviii\u00e9\ufb01cegfr’  V’<\/p>\n
3.0.” \u00bb F5er   caunse! for respondent<\/p>\n
reiiedgfupon t\ufb01e’-\u00bbd\u00a7ct1:m\u00e9ntv..a produced by him at E:-:.P1 to P8<\/p>\n
 r\u00e9pandem has proved that he was an<\/p>\n
f\u00a7e.~:a:>pellant since he was appointrnent as a<\/p>\n
  _ dri\u00e9er a:\u00a7::f’=s~}\u00e9is transferred from one place to another and<\/p>\n
 “”=.V\u00a7ven_d<$ca;*r1ents would clearfy shew that salary was paid to<\/p>\n
A   the circumstances, he requests the court to dismiss<\/p>\n
  f_ ' uthi\ufb01 appeai.\n<\/p>\n
M.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
11. After hearing the learned counsel for parties
\nwhat is required to be considered in this appeal is elhether<\/p>\n
the Labour Court as well as the learned Single<\/p>\n
committed any error, which calls for lnterfereece_::lnv  K <\/p>\n
court appeal?\n<\/p>\n
12. Admittedly, except \ufb01lll1.9:”–..the lsta\u00a3enen\u00a3’lllofr..\u00bb<\/p>\n
objections the appellant heeled\/.;.ot  or’<\/p>\n
documentary evidence .  Court ‘toehow that<\/p>\n
the respondent was notlee appellant and<\/p>\n
salary  ‘elctuallilfi-3V lilrrl””tl;arough Hoysala Securlty
\nAgencylend.’_thatV’rlefwave.V_:not…uoder complete control of the<\/p>\n
appellant endl thet._ Ills: eervlce was operated by Hoysala<\/p>\n
 – o5ec::r’%tvcW\ufb01cy.       o A<\/p>\n
V  ..vlV;lie;’l’ra?ve seen the order sheet maintained by the<\/p>\n
 _ Labour C:ourt’;AWe have also seen the contentions of the<\/p>\n
ll.”4”=_eope_lle.nt–\u00ab 1′ to deny the claim of the rapondent. The<\/p>\n
 ‘olocuellents produced by the rwpondent would reveal that he<\/p>\n
 sees under complete control of the appellant. He was<\/p>\n
 ‘  directed to work under ‘fahslldar, Hebli. He was transferred<\/p>\n
3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
15. The reasons for not avaiiina the opportunity<\/p>\n
{granted by the Labour Court to the eppe\ufb02aot, has notutaeen<\/p>\n
satisfactorily expiafned by the appellant except ‘toot<\/p>\n
the Lawyer has not appeared before the Labou’r:Cot;rt;t:”‘  <\/p>\n
aopeifant is an institution. As and:-when. the jetipoetedr V<\/p>\n
before the Labour Court, it was ‘Se\u00e9ifetary\u00ab. <\/p>\n
other responsibie Officer to  before. th.ej’v!_,eEoVor’ Court” V<\/p>\n
and assist the court. when 5.uc#r..’prooeoure’Aisvnotfoifowed
\nby the appeilant and if there  “end lapse on the<\/p>\n
part of the appeifent, t;;\u00e9t’ap \u00a7es1a:\u00e9thas mama itsetf and<\/p>\n
not resoondent    of -time.\n<\/p>\n
16, Ewe vvhevve ‘e:lso~~’t’ seen the order sheet of the<\/p>\n
.*vV.4_fear31_ed ESing_fe ‘3oGg.e…othat when the matter is posted for<\/p>\n
 eppeiiant is directed to reinstate the<\/p>\n
atpmzant,’   same has not been complied with by the<\/p>\n
‘.Veppeiuier:f.A.:. Therefore, we do not find any case to come to<\/p>\n
 “‘..jt%1e’tconcfo5ion that an error has been committed by the<\/p>\n
 Sinofe Judge which ca\ufb01s for our interference.<\/p>\n
 ‘  “\u00e9irnileriy we are 31:50 of the opinion that the that the Labour<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
Court is wstiffed in granting re-Iief to the responde{nt.:’_i5asgd<\/p>\n
an the meacling and evidence iet in by the    <\/p>\n
:27. In the resuit, the apnea: Mi\u00a7:\u00a73’Is:1i\u00a7\u00abss9e’d*..:_’: \ufb01g
\nbear their costs. V’ 1 ‘ ‘ V A ‘<\/p>\n
 5<\/span><\/p>\n
 ;   :aage<\/p>\n
A \u00a7%\u00a753\u00a7\u00a7@Z<\/p>\n
VK<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Agricultural Produce Market … vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009 Author: K.L.Manjunath And Malimath IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT MNGALORE DATED THIS THE 9?” DAY or JULY 2009 PRESENT’: THE HOWBLE MR. }U$TICE K.L.MAN_JL},?v\u00a7i_;-Q3-\u00a7.A..::’ % ” 1 THE HGWBLE MR. JUSTICE MAL1\u00a7\u00a7AT’H” % W.A. Na. 1929:\u00a73z= 2co2(%L\u00e9hr;\u00e9a) arzween: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-106966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAgricultural Produce Market ... vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-26T06:36:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Agricultural Produce Market … vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-26T06:36:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":904,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-26T06:36:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Agricultural Produce Market … vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-26T06:36:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Agricultural Produce Market … vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-26T06:36:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009"},"wordCount":904,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009","name":"Agricultural Produce Market ... vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-26T06:36:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/agricultural-produce-market-vs-p-ananda-poojary-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Agricultural Produce Market … vs P Ananda Poojary on 9 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106966"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106966\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}