{"id":107009,"date":"2010-02-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010"},"modified":"2017-01-28T05:12:31","modified_gmt":"2017-01-27T23:42:31","slug":"national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">National Insurance Company &#8230; vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE IIIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT\nDHARWAD. \n\nDATED THIS THE 1813* DAY OF FEBRUARY 2&lt;);o.&#039; \nPRESENT : III I\n&#039;1&#039;1~~1E HON&#039;BLE MR.JUSTIQ13&quot;N.--K,PAIIIIIIII if \n\nAND I I _ I I  _\n\nTHE 1~~1o1\\z&#039;ELE MR.  \nMiscellaneous First Apt)?-&#039;,E%I \nMFA CROSS DB3 \n\nEETWEENQ\n\nNATIONAL 41NsURA.N.cIE&#039;_CQM.?ANY\nLIMITED,&quot;VBYAA 1&#039;1&quot;s&#039;=D1&quot;vI SIGNAL MANAGER,\nDIv1s10NAL~.OI\u00ab&#039;I?f1C..E,&#039;-. &quot; &quot;\nV 17&#039;32,RAMDEVG_ALLI,B&#039;\ufb01JLGAUM\n&quot; &quot;  _ HERE1N,REPREsEE&#039;rED BY ITS\nI EEGIDNAI, OFFICE\n NO&quot;144..,sHm3EARAM COMPLEX\n  RGAD, BANGALORE\nBY ITS A1333\/IINISTRATIVE OFFICER  APPELLANT.\n\n(BY sE\u00a7.::H&#039;.T.JAGADEEsH FOR SR1. A.M.VENKA&#039;i&#039;ESH, ADV.)\n\n  \n\n  ASRIISHARANAYYA \n\n5,\/5\n ,,,,,,,,,, \n\n5&#039;,\n\n\n\nIx.)\n\nSHARANABASAAYYA\n\nMAJOR S \/O. CHANDRASHEKHARAYYA\nMETI, OCC SERVICE IN H.E.C.O.M.,\n\nR \/O RADHAPURPETH\n\nTQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELG-AUM\n\n2. SMTSAVITRI\n\nMAJOR W\/0. SHARANAYYA   -\n SHARANABASAYYA \nOCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK\n\nR\/O. RADHAPURPETH,\n\nTQ: RAMDURG,\n\nDIST: BELGAUM\n\n3. SRISHIVANAND  5 _ 2,\nS \/O. BASAVARAJ SAGASEETTII 2. j.\nAGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, &#039;- _  :\nOCC: BUSINESS&quot;    - \nR\/O_YANAMRE&#039;m_-&#039; _   \nTQ: RAMDURG, DfI_S\u00a7T:&#039;B41:_LGAU.Ni if; . &#039;\n\n_ ....   &#039; =:.,,_ _ ~. _ _ I.    RESRONDENTS\n(BY SR1. JAICwADIS1&#039;ij&quot;I&#039;PA&quot;1&#039;1.L, AD_v;}&quot;\n\nTHIS MI&#039;S(:ELLPINEOU;3&quot;&#039;--FIIQST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER\n\nSECTION _173(1)&quot;~VOF._MV7ACT&#039; AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND\nAWARD.I\u00a7;)A&#039;I&#039;E3D SE13\/06 PASSED IN MVC NO.1S7;OA OR THE\n\n  TEE..E&#039;cIv1L~.;UDGE (SRDN), MEMBER, ADDL.IvIAcT,\n\nSAUNDATTI;  _STf1TING AT RAMDURG, AWARDING A\nCOMPE3NSAT1_ON&quot;~Q&#039;F. RS.8,85,OO0\/M WITH FUTURE INTEREST AT\nTHE&#039;.RAjT&#039;E&quot;*0E&#039;T_t3%.*&#039;P.A. EROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL\n\n&#039; &quot; &#039;-.,_REAL1SATION.&#039; -- I. \n\n5&#039;\n\n\n\n&#039;\\JJ\n\nEN MFA CROS OBJECTEON NO.3()2 OF 2006\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. SRLSHARANAYYA  SHARANABASAAYYA,\nS\/O. CHANDRASHEKHARAYYA MET},\nAGE ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC SERVI__C.E3,__\nR\/O. RADHAPURPETH  A &#039;\nTQ: RAIVIDURC: DEBT: BELGAUM &#039;\n\nE&#039;-J\n\nSMTSAVITRI, w\/O. SHARANAY&#039;I--&#039;A @ SRARAI\\:AISAiS.A_yfyA\nAGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,     \nOCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, \n\nR\/O. RADHPURPETH   * \n\nTQ: RAMDURG, DIST: I3}3lL{}A_Uh:e;I&quot; 1  \n\n  _  OBJECTORS.\n(BY SRI.JAGA.DI\u00abS_HPAi:IL\u00a5A&#039;Dv,) &#039; \n\nAND\n\nI. SR1. SIv:IIVAI\\EA&#039;N\u00a3)_S;&#039;(3. &#039;BA~S_A&#039;f_A_&#039;RAJ SAGASHETTI\nAGED ABOUT 35   _\nOcc:BUSI,N&#039;ESS,-,_R\/O. IIANAMRETH\nRAMDURQE E.LGA_U:IrI &quot;DIST\n\n THE5:D1V1SEONA1;&#039;MANAGER,\n&quot;NATIONAL INSRUANOE CO. LTD.,\n &#039; DWISIONAL.._OE_FIcE,\n&#039;  1&quot;;&amp;32,* RAMDEIJOALLI,\nB&#039;i\u20ac&quot;.L--CrAU&#039;M&quot;_;&#039;~..  &#039;  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>; (R5-NO~TICE DISRENSED WITH, SR1. HEJAGADEESH FOR<br \/>\n SRI.A[M_,VE3N\u00a7{ATESH, ADV FOR R2).\n<\/p>\n<p> l&#8221;&#8216;VI&#8221;IA\u00a7I1&#8243;&#8216;S MFACROSS OBJECTION IN MFA 6952\/2006 FILED<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;UN_D_E\u00a7R ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>\/,2<\/p>\n<p>AND AWARD DATED 31\/3\/O6 PASSED IN MVC No.18?\/O4 ON<br \/>\nTHE FELE OF THE CML JUDGE (SRDN), MEMEBER,<br \/>\nADDLMACT, SAUNDATTI, SITTING AT RAMDURG,..&#8221;&#8216;PA\u00abR&#8217;F.[,Y<\/p>\n<p>ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETmoN FOR COMPENE&#8211;AT;Q}.I.;~<br \/>\nSEEKING FURTHER ENHANCEMENT OF&#8217; COMPENSAfI&#8217;iON,V&#8217;*\u00abi  A-<\/p>\n<p>THE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALAND&#8217;_1v;.EALC.rI\u20acO.SS<\/p>\n<p>OBJECTION ARE COMING ON FOR HEARING TN1%S1.DAY__:&#8221;&#8216;~SR1.K._<\/p>\n<p>N.K.PA&#8217;E&#8217;IL J., DELIVERED THE EOLLOWENGE <\/p>\n<p>JUDGMEN\u00e9\u00a7_&#8221;p&#8217; V<br \/>\nThis is an appeal  mg crOsAs&#8211;objector On<br \/>\naccount of the death of the   @ Anand in a<br \/>\nroad traffic accident  judgment and<br \/>\naward dated   18.7\/2004 on the \ufb01ie of<br \/>\nAdd}. MACfr;&#8217;,&#8221;&#8221;Sa\ufb01;:gda\u00a3\u00a3\u00a7&#8221;&#8216; \u00a7t~\u00bb.f.}f2a1&#8211;\ufb01\u00a7i_i&#8217;;&#8217;14g:: The Tribunal in its<br \/>\nimpugned  has awarded a Sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.8,85,OQQV\/&#8211; vvfth 8&#8242;?\/aaVVp&#8217;v:erA&#8217;r;1nni;1m. The compensation awarded is<\/p>\n<p>;_d&#8217;iSprOpO&#8217;ijt1onate, aI]dHE&#8217;}{C\u20ac:SSiV(i and it requires reduction as<\/p>\n<p>conter&#8217;tdedeAb3\u00a7\u00abth&#8217;eeinsurer, whereas the crosS&#8211;Objector contended<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; V7-.___,that the&#8217;cOrnp\u00aben5sj_atiOn awarded by the Tribunal is inadequate and<\/p>\n<p>h*~..__i4t&#8217;vrec1uires. enhancernent and hence this appeal and cross-<\/p>\n<p>*    ob;\u00e9.:\u00a7c;ion~.._ \/A\/<\/p>\n<p>2. The brief facts of the case are ~<\/p>\n<p>The cross-objectors\/the claimants are parents&#8230;Vofui&#8217;t.the<\/p>\n<p>deceased Sri. Anandayya  Anand, contending that, <\/p>\n<p>was an electrician aged about 22 years doing electri&#8211;cal&#8217;:&#8221;&#8216;at;&#8217;or.I:&lt;: under&#8211;\u00ab.. <\/p>\n<p>the KPTCL after obtaining necessary licenisefrozniijurisdicotional<\/p>\n<p>competent authority of the StateV.i&#039;Govern&#039;n&#039;_1e&#039;i:t aI1VC1&#039;ii&quot;&#039;8t]:SiO.Oi;l;,t\ufb01.iiI&#039;lg.&quot;&#039;.&#039;<\/p>\n<p>agricultural land he is a bread earneriiiin&#039; the farnilyraiid  account<br \/>\nof the death of the deceased,  clairnaints\/cross\u00bb.<br \/>\nobjectors has been jeopardiseidatheir&#039;_hrii:)e.5.:atidinsecurity has been<br \/>\ndeprived. On the  at  on 26\/11\/2003,<br \/>\nthe accident has  road, due to the<br \/>\nrash and    vehicle the deceased<br \/>\nsustained grieviousi  to the injuries. On<\/p>\n<p>account of the  of&#039;V&#8211;the._ideciieased the appellants No. 1 and 2,<\/p>\n<p>:ai1~..\u00a2r a&#039;Jt1_(3f&#039;I1T_iQAtl&#039;if:r have \ufb01led a claim petition under Section 166 of<\/p>\n<p>Mo&#039;to1&#039;=i\\ifehic&#039;les&#039;:&#039;5tct:cl~airning total compensation of Rs. 37,30,000\/~<\/p>\n<p>i iii&#039;-._agains&#039;t   insured and offending owner of the vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>ii\u20ac__The_&#039;said rnatter had come up for consideration before the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p> &#039;IA_&#039;he_&quot;Triibu.na.l after critical evaluation of the oral and documentary<\/p>\n<p> _e&#039;Vider;\u00a7ee and other relevant material on the file has allowed the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>same in part awarding a sum of Rs. 8,833,000\/~ with interest at the<br \/>\nrate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till of<\/p>\n<p>realisation.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The said compensation awai=,ded:&#8230;by <\/p>\n<p>disproportionate and excessive and liable\u00b0&#8217;to be&#8221;i- reduced Vas\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>contended by the insurer, whereas thieliclairnan-tscontended that<\/p>\n<p>the compensation  and it<br \/>\nrequires enhancement  have thought<br \/>\nfit to file cross&#8211;objee&#8217;tioi\u00a7.t:tiseel&lt;i1i_ngi the insurer and the<br \/>\nclaimant felt  ijresent appeal and cross-<\/p>\n<p>objection.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Weiihave  tlieriearned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>appeiiantsiand cros\u00bbs_-objectors for a considerable lcI&#8217;1gEl&#8217;1 of time.<\/p>\n<p>after&#8217; caI5eful&#8221;&#8221;e&#8217;\u00bb&#8217;al&#8217;uation of the entire original records available on<\/p>\n<p>theiile   of the impugned judgment and award, what<\/p>\n<p>n&#8221;lernerges&#8217;&#8212;.tis thatilit is not in dispute on account of the injuries<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;:)s&#8217;u_sta_ined i&#8217;ri.V__t*ne accident the said Anandayya succumbed to the<\/p>\n<p>   deceased was aged about 22 years was young,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;e-nergeitic and enterprising doing electrical contract work in<\/p>\n<p>K<br \/>\n:5<\/p>\n<p>different places after having qualified and obtaining necessary<\/p>\n<p>license. The Tribunal has committed an error in assessisil\u00e9gthe<\/p>\n<p>income of the deceased at Rs.l0,000\/\u00bb per I1&#8217;1()&#8221;IfV1:f}&#8217;]&#8221;&#8216;~.($&amp;f-i.t\ufb01C1llt\ufb01iN&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>assigning any valid reasons nor the appellants  a. <\/p>\n<p>authenticated documents to establish that   i:ico;:?ie:.p.oi&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Rs.l0,000\/&#8211; per month from different sources&#8217;. Exceptiprodiiieirigii\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>Ex.1:\u00bb9, io, 11 and Ex.P&#8211;12 to 20  he&#8221;&#8216;wa_\u00a7:td&#8217;\u00a2inig\u00a7 electrical<br \/>\nwork in different places j,i_iI-lavingvvire\u00e9vard to his<br \/>\nage, occupation, with referenceiitoi we can safely<br \/>\nassess the income of  \/ &#8212; per month<br \/>\nto meet the    1\/3?&#8221; (i.e. a sum of<br \/>\nRs.l,666\/i-  towards personal<br \/>\nexpense of  deceasediincome comes to Rs.3,334\/&#8211;, the<\/p>\n<p>younger age of the Vparpe-nts&#8211;._nia3iz be taken into consideration, the<\/p>\n<p>iniotcher  .abo1it&#8217;42&#8230;g;ears as on the date of accident. The<\/p>\n<p>ap&#8217;propriate applicable is 14. In the light of the<\/p>\n<p>  judgrrientlof  Court in case of (Sarala Verma and others Vs.<\/p>\n<p>4\u00b07.__pe.zVm&#8217; Trdnsporiiborporation and another) reported in 2009 ACJ<\/p>\n<p> and accordingly we redeterrnine the loss of dependency at<\/p>\n<p>_Rs: S&#8217;,\u00a7eo,&#8221;1_12 (Rs.3,334 x 12 x i4}. Further, the Tribunal has<\/p>\n<p>M &#8221;__,..w&#8221;&#8221;<br \/>\n&#8230;~\u00bb-r~&#8221;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii)<\/p>\n<p>(iv)<\/p>\n<p>{0}<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Out of the compensation awarded Rs. 6,05, 1 12\/ <\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,00,000\/&#8211; with proportionate interest shall be<\/p>\n<p>deposited in the name of 2&#8243;&#8221; claimant in a..___<br \/>\nNationalised Bank\/ Scheduled Bank for a <\/p>\n<p>of five years renewable for another periodof :&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>years.\n<\/p>\n<p>The 2&#8243;&#8221;-&#8216; respondent\/ claimant;&#8217;No.   pe:\u00a2rnitted&#8217;lta&#8221;&#8211;..\u00a2 79 &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>withdraw the interest <\/p>\n<p>Further a suni of   with<br \/>\nproportionate invterzest&#8217;  ib\u00e9v&#8211;_ldAepo.sited in the<br \/>\nname of. V I3&#8242;  in a<\/p>\n<p>INationalised:5f5&#8217;a.nk,{;&#8217;Schedaled Bank for a period<\/p>\n<p>ofjive lyearsV&#8221;r'&lt;enewal3lVe for another period of five<\/p>\n<p>_ years&#8230; The&#039;v.15?*-respondenvclaimant is permitted<\/p>\n<p>V i  withdraw V  interest periodically.<\/p>\n<p>  vi???) _<\/p>\n<p> amount of Rs. 1,05,112\/ &#8212; with<\/p>\n<p>i proporaonate interest shall be released in equal<\/p>\n<p>l , proportion in the name of respondents No. 1 and<\/p>\n<p>immediately on depositing the remaining<\/p>\n<p>I up\/&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>hnm\/<\/p>\n<p>compensation amount by the appeZEanf~In.surance<br \/>\nCompany.\n<\/p>\n<p>Draw the award accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>&amp;\ufb02\u00a7 {%%<br \/>\n  %<\/p>\n<p>.JuDeE <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court National Insurance Company &#8230; vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010 Author: N.K.Patil And A.S.Pachhapure IN THE IIIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD. DATED THIS THE 1813* DAY OF FEBRUARY 2&lt;);o.&#039; PRESENT : III I &#039;1&#039;1~~1E HON&#039;BLE MR.JUSTIQ13&quot;N.&#8211;K,PAIIIIIIII if AND I I _ I I _ THE 1~~1o1\\z&#039;ELE MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>National Insurance Company ... vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"National Insurance Company ... vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-27T23:42:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-27T23:42:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":960,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010\",\"name\":\"National Insurance Company ... vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-27T23:42:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"National Insurance Company ... vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"National Insurance Company ... vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-27T23:42:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-27T23:42:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010"},"wordCount":960,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010","name":"National Insurance Company ... vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-27T23:42:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-sharanayya-sharanabasaayya-on-18-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs Sharanayya @ Sharanabasaayya on 18 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107009"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107009\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}