{"id":10711,"date":"2009-08-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-11T23:10:48","modified_gmt":"2017-10-11T17:40:48","slug":"harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>C.R. No. 622 of 2009 (O&amp;M)                                                  1\n\n\nIN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT\n              CHANDIGARH\n\n                              C.R. No. 622 of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n                              Date of Decision : 31.8.2009\n\nHarish Chander\n                                                         .......... Petitioner\n                              Versus\n\nPurshotam Lal &amp; others\n                                                         ...... Respondents\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA\n\nPresent :   Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate\n            for the petitioner.\n\n            Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate\n            for respondent No.3.\n\n            Ms. Maninder Kaur , Advocate\n            for respondent No. 4.\n\n\n                  ****\n\nVINOD K. SHARMA, J. (ORAL)\n<\/pre>\n<p>            This order shall dispose of Civil Revision No. 622 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>titled Harish Chander Vs. Purshotam Lal &amp; others and Civil Revision No.<\/p>\n<p>652 of 2009 titled Kamlesh Rani &amp; others Vs. Purshotam Lal &amp; others.<\/p>\n<p>            By way of these revision petitions the petitioners have<\/p>\n<p>challenged the order passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p>Kurukshetra vide which application moved by the petitioners for release of<\/p>\n<p>the compensation awarded, has been declined, for the reason that the<\/p>\n<p>amount can only be withdrawn after the security is given by the owner to<\/p>\n<p>the insurance company for refund of the amount.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.R. No. 622 of 2009 (O&amp;M)                                               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            In view of the liberty granted to the Insurance Company in<\/p>\n<p>main award to recover the amount from the owner of the offending vehicle,<\/p>\n<p>the impugned order has been passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The impugned order reads as under :-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                  &#8220;MACT Case No. 33 of 2004 titled<br \/>\n                  Harish Chand Versus Purshotam Lal<br \/>\n                  was      decided         by      my        learned<br \/>\n                  Predecessor           by       award         dated<br \/>\n                  14.3.2005. Two other cases bearing<br \/>\n                  No. 34 of 2004 titled Harish Chand<br \/>\n                  Versus Purshotam Lal and No. 35 of<br \/>\n                  2004     titled       Kamlesh         Rani      etc.<br \/>\n                  Versus Purshotam Lal etc. of the<br \/>\n                  same occurrence were also pending<br \/>\n                  which    were     also      decided        by    the<br \/>\n                  same award.. Application has been<br \/>\n                  made for release of amount in MACT<br \/>\n                  Case No. 33 of 2004 titled Harish<br \/>\n                  Chander Versus Purshotam Lal and<br \/>\n                  MACT Case No. 34 of 2004 titled<br \/>\n                  Harish     Chander         Versus      Purshotam<br \/>\n                  Lal.      The       application                  be<br \/>\n                  registered.           Amounts          of        Rs.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                  10,000\/-        and        Rs.        1,36,360\/-<br \/>\n                  respectively were awarded in said<br \/>\n                  cases.     It    was       further        directed<br \/>\n                  that amounts shall be payable by<br \/>\n                  respondent No.3 National Insurance<br \/>\n                  Company Limited and it shall be<br \/>\n                  entitled to recover the same from<br \/>\n                  respondent        No.1        and     2      namely<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.R. No. 622 of 2009 (O&amp;M)                                               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                  Purshotam Lal and Leveleen Kaur.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>                  It    was       further       directed          that\n                  unless security w as furnished by\n                  the driver and owner. The amount\n                  shall     not      be    disbursed        to    the\n                  petitioner.\n                  No    security          has    so    far        been\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>                  furnished. Learned counsel for the<br \/>\n                  applicant has contended that the<br \/>\n                  amount      was      put      in    the        fixed<br \/>\n                  deposit and the FDR has matured.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>                  Be   that     as    it     may,     this       Court\n                  cannot go beyond the order passed\n                  by   my     learned        Predecessor.          The\n                  amount      cannot      be    disbursed         till\n                  security is furnished as ordered\n                  by     him.       The      application           for\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>                  release of the amount is therefore<br \/>\n                  rejected.         However,     to    save        the<br \/>\n                  petitioner from financial loss, it<br \/>\n                  is directed that the FDR be got<br \/>\n                  renewed for further period of one<br \/>\n                  year. File be consigned.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order is patently without jurisdiction, as the learned Motor<\/p>\n<p>Accident Claims Tribunal has no such jurisdiction to withhold the decretal<\/p>\n<p>amount. The decree-holder is entitled to recover under the award. Once the<\/p>\n<p>liability was fixed on the Insurance Company with liberty to recover the<\/p>\n<p>same from the owner it could not in any way affect the rights of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners, who have absolute right to recover the amount deposited for<\/p>\n<p>payment with the executing Court.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.R. No. 622 of 2009 (O&amp;M)                                                4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            I find force in the contention raised. The Tribunal was bound to<\/p>\n<p>release the amount deposited by the Insurance Company to the petitioners in<\/p>\n<p>execution of the award. The learned Tribunal could not withhold the amount<\/p>\n<p>merely` for want of security by the owner to the insurance company for<\/p>\n<p>refund of the amount. The amount is to be recovered by the Insurance<\/p>\n<p>Company from the owner, in which the petitioners i.e. the claimants have no<\/p>\n<p>roll whatsoever.\n<\/p>\n<p>            For the reasons stated above, both the revision petitions are<\/p>\n<p>allowed. The impugned order is set aside. The learned Motor Accident<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra is directed to release the awarded amount to<\/p>\n<p>the claimants \/ petitioners immediately.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>31.8.2009                                      ( VINOD K. SHARMA )\n  'sp'                                              JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009 C.R. No. 622 of 2009 (O&amp;M) 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH C.R. No. 622 of 2009 (O&amp;M) Date of Decision : 31.8.2009 Harish Chander &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. Petitioner Versus Purshotam Lal &amp; others &#8230;&#8230; Respondents CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-11T17:40:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-11T17:40:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":575,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-11T17:40:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-11T17:40:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-11T17:40:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009"},"wordCount":575,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009","name":"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-11T17:40:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/harish-chander-vs-purshotam-lal-others-on-31-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Harish Chander vs Purshotam Lal &amp; Others on 31 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10711"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10711\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}