{"id":107136,"date":"2011-08-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011"},"modified":"2016-02-26T16:19:40","modified_gmt":"2016-02-26T10:49:40","slug":"mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                     at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                 File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001490\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a016,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a016,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Ajitendra\u00a0Deo\u00a0Gaharana\n           H.No.39\u00adC,\u00a0Anupam\u00a0Nagar\u00a0Extension\n           Near\u00a0Jiwaji\u00a0University\n           Gwalior\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0audio\u00a0conferencing.\n\n\n\n           Respondents\n\n           The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n           North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Agra\u00a0Division\n           Agra\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Mudit\u00a0Chandra,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Sr.DPO\n                                    Shri\u00a0Anand\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Sr.DCM\n                                    Shri\u00a0C.M.Sharma,\u00a0CLA\n\n\n\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                              at\n                                                      New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                            File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001490\n\n\n\n                                                           ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.28.9.10\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0information:<\/p>\n
        i)         Reservation\u00a0chart\u00a0from\u00a0Agra\u00a0to\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0for\u00a021\u00a0to\u00a023\u00a0July\u00a02009\u00a0of\u00a0AP\u00a0 Express                          \u00a0   and\u00a0<\/p>\n
Southern\u00a0Express<\/p>\n
        ii)        Reservation\u00a0chart\u00a0from\u00a0Agra\u00a0to\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0for\u00a04th\u00a0and\u00a05th\u00a0June\u00a02010\u00a0of\u00a0AP\u00a0                            express\u00a0<\/p>\n
and\u00a0Southern\u00a0Express.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a06.10.10\u00a0directing\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0to\u00a0deposit\u00a0the\u00a0IPO\u00a0in\u00a0favour\u00a0of\u00a0Sr.DFM,\u00a0NCR,\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Agra.\u00a0 \u00a0In\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0Applicant’s\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.15.10.10,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Mudit\u00a0Chandra,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10\u00a0<\/p>\n
        enclosing \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 dt.25.10.10 \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 by \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Anand \u00a0 Kumar, \u00a0 Sr.DCM \u00a0 \u00a0 including \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Commercial\u00a0Circular\u00a0No.40\u00a0of\u00a02010\u00a0issued\u00a0by\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.31.8.10\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Rs.750\/\u00ad\u00a0has\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0realized\u00a0per\u00a0PNR\u00a0for\u00a0verifying\u00a0journey\u00a0details\u00a0irrespective\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0whether\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
        for \u00a0 LTC \u00a0 verification \u00a0 or \u00a0 otherwise. \u00a0 \u00a0 Not \u00a0 satisfied \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 reply, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n
        dt.12.11.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a013.12.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        information\u00a0dt.9.12.10\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Anand\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Sr.DCM\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0<\/p>\n
        been\u00a0asked\u00a0to\u00a0deposit\u00a0Rs.750\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0PNR\u00a0vide\u00a0circular\u00a040\/2010.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0quoted\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0Decision\u00a0<\/p>\n
        No.CIC\/AD\/A\/2009\/001654\u00a0dt.16.3.10\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.\u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0<\/p>\n
        filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.31.5.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0required\u00a0urgently,\u00a0<\/p>\n
        the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.750\/\u00ad\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0but\u00a0instead\u00a0of\u00a0giving\u00a0information\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0had\u00a0asked\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0contact\u00a0<\/p>\n
        CCM(IT)IRCA\u00a0Building\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0and\u00a0Rs.750\/\u00ad\u00a0was\u00a0returned\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.21.1.11.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0matter\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n
        further \u00a0 taken \u00a0 up \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 vide \u00a0 letter \u00a0 dt.31.1.11 \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 Sr.DCM \u00a0 vide \u00a0 letter\u00a0<\/p>\n
        dt.17.2.11\u00a0had\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0of\u00a0reservation\u00a0are\u00a0retained\u00a0only\u00a0for\u00a0six\u00a0months\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0therefore\u00a0<\/p>\n
        information\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0 \u00a0available\u00a0at\u00a0Agra\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0were\u00a0called\u00a0\u00a0for\u00a0from\u00a0CCM(IT)\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0
\n        dt.11.2.11\u00a0.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0two\u00a0information\u00a0were\u00a0required\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0–\u00a0one\u00a0was\u00a0for\u00a0more\u00a0than\u00a0six\u00a0months\u00a0<\/p>\n
       period \u00a0 while \u00a0 the \u00a0 other \u00a0 was \u00a0 less\u00a0 than\u00a0 six \u00a0 months\u00a0 period\u00a0 but\u00a0 none\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 information\u00a0 was\u00a0 made\u00a0<\/p>\n
       available\u00a0on\u00a0one\u00a0or\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0ground\u00a0each\u00a0time.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0was\u00a0taken\u00a0up\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 on \u00a0 28.2.11 \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Sr.DCM \u00a0 had \u00a0 replied \u00a0 on \u00a0 15.3.11 \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that\u00a0<\/p>\n
       information\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0\u00a0provided\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0absence\u00a0of\u00a0name,\u00a0age,\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0journey,\u00a0PNR\u00a0No.\u00a0etc.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0train\u00a0reservation\u00a0charts\u00a0are\u00a0retained\u00a0only\u00a0for\u00a0six\u00a0<\/p>\n
       months. \u00a0 According \u00a0 to \u00a0 them \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 has\u00a0 sought\u00a0 two\u00a0 pieces\u00a0 of \u00a0 \u00a0 information\u00a0 (copies\u00a0 of\u00a0 two\u00a0<\/p>\n
       reservation\u00a0charts)\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0while\u00a0 \u00a0one\u00a0had\u00a0already\u00a0exceeded\u00a0six\u00a0month\u00a0time\u00a0limit,\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0had\u00a0<\/p>\n
       exceeded\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0limit\u00a0only\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0of\u00a0appeal.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       making\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00a0fees\u00a0,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0made\u00a0a\u00a0change\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0and\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0<\/p>\n
       specific\u00a0information\u00a0about\u00a0\u00a0travel\u00a0of\u00a0two\u00a0individuals\u00a0.\u00a0They\u00a0further\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
       receipt\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.750\/\u00ad,\u00a0a\u00a0person\u00a0was\u00a0deputed\u00a0to\u00a0collect\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0CCM\u00a0office\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a0<\/p>\n
       1\u00a0\u00a0after\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CCM\u00a0vide\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.11.2.11\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a017.2.11.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0who\u00a0admitted\u00a0to\u00a0having\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0information,\u00a0requested\u00a0<\/p>\n
       for\u00a0the\u00a0missing\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a0\u00a0ii.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.     The\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a0review\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0on\u00a0record\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0 \u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       PIO\u00a0 to \u00a0 provide\u00a0 complete\u00a0 information\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a0(ii)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost,\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Appellant\u00a0for\u00a0reasons\u00a0explained\u00a0already\u00a0(the\u00a0six\u00a0month\u00a0time\u00a0period\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0crossed\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0because\u00a0of\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0could\u00a0have\u00a0easily\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0<\/p>\n
       by\u00a0photocopying\u00a0the\u00a0reservation\u00a0chart\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0still\u00a0available\u00a0and\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0at\u00a0Rs.2\/\u00ad\u00a0<\/p>\n
       –\u00a0the\u00a0Rs.750\/\u00ad\u00a0is\u00a0therefore\u00a0being\u00a0waived\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission)\u00a0)\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0reaches\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n
       16.9.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a023.9.11.<\/p>\n
4.     The\u00a0Commission\u00a0also\u00a0\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a0(ii)\u00a0<\/p>\n
       which\u00a0was\u00a0well\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0six\u00a0month\u00a0retention\u00a0period\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0provided\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0mandatory\u00a0period.\u00a0<\/p>\n
       He\u00a0may\u00a0submit\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a023.9.11.<\/p>\n
5.     The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\n<\/p>\n
                                                         (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                               Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Ajitendra\u00a0Deo\u00a0Gaharana
\n         H.No.39\u00adC,\u00a0Anupam\u00a0Nagar\u00a0Extension
\n         Near\u00a0Jiwaji\u00a0University
\n         Gwalior<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n         Agra\u00a0Division
\n         Agra<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n         North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n         Agra\u00a0Division
\n         Agra<\/p>\n
4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC
\n Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission’s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0
\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0
\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0
\nconsiders\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0
\ninformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001490 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a016,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a016,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Ajitendra\u00a0Deo\u00a0Gaharana H.No.39\u00adC,\u00a0Anupam\u00a0Nagar\u00a0Extension Near\u00a0Jiwaji\u00a0University Gwalior The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0audio\u00a0conferencing. Respondents The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office Agra\u00a0Division Agra Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Mudit\u00a0Chandra,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0Sr.DPO Shri\u00a0Anand\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Sr.DCM Shri\u00a0C.M.Sharma,\u00a0CLA Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001490 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.28.9.10\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0information: i) Reservation\u00a0chart\u00a0from\u00a0Agra\u00a0to\u00a0Hyderabad\u00a0for\u00a021\u00a0to\u00a023\u00a0July\u00a02009\u00a0of\u00a0AP\u00a0 Express \u00a0 and\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-26T10:49:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-26T10:49:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":843,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-26T10:49:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-26T10:49:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-26T10:49:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011"},"wordCount":843,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011","name":"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-26T10:49:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajitendra-deo-gaharana-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Ajitendra Deo Gaharana vs Ministry Of Railways on 16 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107136\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}