{"id":107249,"date":"2009-03-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009"},"modified":"2016-10-11T20:46:09","modified_gmt":"2016-10-11T15:16:09","slug":"shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji … vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Shivashankar Swamiji … vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
-1..\n\nIN THE HIGH comm\" OF KARNATAKAT \n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARW5:3\":.:::.   L\n\nDATED THIS THE 4\"?\" DA? oF%Agx&A*aci4%2:3o9  '\n\nBEFORE =  \nHo:~:'32..E MRJUSTICE Mo;-\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01sH.ANAT*AMA\u00e9ouDAa\nwars\" PEFITICN.N\u00a7','$253}Z;OQ7;@C\/ST)\n\nBetween :       '\n\nShivas1;\u00a7\u00a71\ufb01%eir  'h'!x\u00e9}1;:;1_'\u00e9ev \n\nAgacfi ab:}ut~.5:?2.y\u20acafe:.AA ' _   ' -\n\nR\/0 Soumlat\ufb01  ._  \n\nTaluka Raiimg\u00e9 V ; _ \nDis1:z*ict_ViE3\u00a3:}ga:J.I;:1.    H Petitioner\n\n  $\u00a7{':':'3:\":'q\u00a7a3zakuIr\u00a7;\u00e9ir'*~S~.\u00ab'Pam, Sr\ufb01iouixsei far\n\n' \u00abSri Raviraj  Patii, Advocate 3\n\nH V' _ 1.  'f\u00e9illappa Kamble,\n\n Ag\u00e9 'majcr,\n\n AA Rfo Seundatti village\n .V'\u00a5'z\u00a7}uka Raibag,\n Ez\ufb01is\u00e9trici Belgaum.\n\n%  f_ ' ~ -2\u00b0--}'?he Tahsiidar,\n\nRagibag Taluk\nRaibag,\n_ \ufb01ismict Beigazlm.\n\n\n\n3. The Assistaxsi Cemmissiener,\n\u20ac3hi1<;:oci.i,\n{Dist B\u00e9lgaum.\n\n4, E16 Deputy' Cmmissi0m'~:1\u00b0,   -\nIli\u00e9st: Be.1gau3:}:>..   '~ ,. RcspQI;de'21\u00a7;\u00a7 \n\n{ By S161 '?;N.Raghupa:h\u00a77 f:>r'$3'\u00a7~;fi (1.1%.-gjadhaig  \nFadvoeatc far I'~i'~\u00bb I. and Sri. K;L\u00abB.?%<ihyapa_1<:, 'AT \nAGA for 8&2 to 4}   _\n\nThis Writ Petition is-\ufb01iedf{in\u00e9e_1:_ArtincEei}.tj_\" Deputy Commissioxmr,\nBelgaum, datcgd ;'[i29;..3.,:2S(}'? vidcf--\u00a3s1131\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9urc~E confuming tht\u00e9r\norder pa\ufb01s\ufb01\u00e9ci \"'3the\"---.:21s'\u00e9--t.,_C:>1iL:r1is3ioner, Chiko\ufb01i, dated\n22.?'.i2GC?6 v\u00e9;ie\u00bb..\ufb01.;imex11Ize~2?x.' ~  ?\n\nThizs 'Writ  bean hear\u00e9 \u00e9ifk\u00e9 I\"\u20acS\u20acI'Vf3\u20aci far\n\u20ac,>I'\u20ac\u00a7.\u20ac;\".I'S 011\"'i;?'?;?}.i2I;1*\u20ac3'\u20ac9'.a::3.d'..'*pron0unc\u20ac<i. the Qrrciers an this (iay\n{ha 4?? Pviar\u00e9i; 2639'; "\n\n'-'-5'1'1?:e '."\u00a33'\u20ac\u00a7iiii{m\u20ac=:\u00a7* is tha <3Wr}.6z' {sf the pwpert}-* i3&3ri3"1\u00a3\n\ng  395;\/3, measu:*i:':g "28 gmitas, s\u00e9tuate\u00e9 at\n\nV' V' V.:\u00a7oT:2\u00a7:Ada:\ufb01.i 'xfiiiaga of Eiafi\u00e9ag Taiiik. He gar: aha property by\n\n'  's%};{\u00b0\u00a7.t_:\u20ac 5}? {ha deems sf '{1}: Civi\u00e9 \ufb01ourt. 3%: is :13':\n\n\u00a7f){}SS\u00a3SS\u00a7{'3E: 9?" the property by "JiI'"Ei..\u00a76 Of' the saisi\n\n\u00e9kcree. T326: {'.E\u00a7}iI'i\u20acS am zgzutaieii in his \u00a7&V\u20ac}i%3"',\n\n\/W\n\n\n\n- 3 -\nAccording to him, he has improved the land b}-f.\u00abjs\u00a7j{i1":1'cEir1g\n\nconsidera\ufb01la amount of 2:z1.o11E:y.\n\n2. The Tahsiidar,  Tam,   '\n\nsubmiffied a report datedV.r'353~.6.520{}'6 to\n\nr1.\u20ac2._rf 1110f\u00bb the Karrzataka\nScheduled Castes 8svA.VSd}_1:e.d1-11'e.s_   (Prohibition of\n\n\"\u00a7'raI1$fer of     ufih\u00e9reinafter referred to\n\nas me     E\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9d 01:: the said report, the\nAssistarit C0:i2I:1\u00a7S;\u00e9_icr1er:LA\"isSued notice. ta the petitioner.\n\nS\u20acate:Ih.tr1: {Sf r\u00a7I3jve\u00a3:ti0r:asf ia..re \ufb02ied by me petitioner t0 the\n\n'  V:1c::'\ufb01c\u00e9...\u00e9 T\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9a\ufb01er, the impugned order Vida\n\n  passed on 22.7.2006 by the Assistant\n\nCa\ufb01rmissiet\u00e9\ufb01r directing 1316 petitioner to restore the Land\n\n  \u20acg1\u00a3?o'\u00a7_1r-- 5f respo\ufb01dent N811 herein 'und\u20acr S\u00e9ction 5 0f the\n\n . \u00ab?I_'V\u20ac33L--..\u00e9*'\u00e9Ac\u00a3. T116 said Grder is confxrme\u00e9 by the Deguty\n\n  Qisznmigsiazsar, Belgaum, Vid\ufb01 Anr1@xure-\"B' dateri\n\nM\n\n\n\n,..4.,\n\n29.3.2087. Both the erders are questioned \n\npetition.\n\n3. The recems nlaimtejrxed\ufb02 b3f..ih\u00a7:3 \"2,:;u;'i\ufb011f1efi1ies'_' Vbeirf-'vi? \"\n\nare made available by the,ie;_.~11\":1eti ._G0ve1TaIie1itj Adivoeatee.\n\nfor perusai of the Court.  S371  S. Patii,\nlearned counsel appee\ufb01gig e1'1__1;It1e petitioner, Sri\n'i'.N.Raghupathy3_ iear:1ed:_C;0uf;ee1  03:1 behalf of\n\nrespondent     learned AGA<\/pre>\n
 (): f~StateA  perused the nmteria} on<\/p>\n
record.  –. —\n<\/p>\n
  ‘ It”e-is aze\ufb01gti\u00e9\u00e9vby Sari Jayakumar S. Patil, learned<\/p>\n
 ..S:\u20ac,?jf.T\u00a7;iL*Z}i’ ::C,eiu’:\u20acSef_jappearing on behaif of petitioner ‘mat the<\/p>\n
ordefs pa\u00e9etsd by the authorities below are not justified,<\/p>\n
  “*i\u00a3;a7s:13\u00e9_1\u00bb:;}:: as, they are passed in violatien ef principles of<\/p>\n
 _ \u00a7:1ai:!;.ef5a\u00a7 justice. Be 3130 argued 0:1 merits ef the matter.<\/p>\n
Fer contra, Sri ‘i’,N.Ragh\u00a7,1paihy, learned eeuneel<\/p>\n
aggapeariiig 9;} behalf 0%’ reependent No.1 argueci in sueperez<\/p>\n
.. 5 –\n<\/p>\n
of tha orciers of the authorities belew. He contenclad that<\/p>\n
thare is no dispute that the iands are granted __a1*1d<\/p>\n
that the g1’a;m.:.ees are Haxijans. He further <\/p>\n
presumption arising under Section\ufb01i (3) (if th\u00e9i . <\/p>\n
not rebutted by the petiizioxigr.  .. \u00a7\u00a7ii:”,..tE;r:s\u20ac<\/p>\n
submissions, ha argueri for’:i_&S3:1issa;i.0I’%:11e;’$.=\u00a21″‘ifLmtition. <\/p>\n
Sri K.B.Adhyapa1;, 1ea1:f;3.e;i’ a.{\u00a7’p”eaJ:i11gE011 behaif<\/p>\n
of the Sate aiso -71 the orders pas\ufb01ed<\/p>\n
by the gaii\ufb01 I\u00e9je\ufb01dw<\/p>\n
53;] As af0:*\u20aca::mr1tidp,_e'<\u00a7., the Assistant Cammissioner<\/p>\n
has is sued :3.<}t'i::_eV 'f2:o '\u00a3f_1{1.'e*~* \ufb01etitianer after gettigzg the report<\/p>\n
 ' \u00ab..ff<)1;%:j """ "F115 repezrt of the Tahsiidar is data\u00e9<\/p>\n
 1\u00ab\u00a2,'\u00a7;2:jg\u00a7;  peiitio\ufb02\ufb01r herein has raga statement Gf<\/p>\n
O\u00a7j\u20ac:\u00a7 \ufb01{}\ufb02S'.2QU6. Thereafter, no 301': of enquiry i3<\/p>\n
 "'\u00bb-'4\u00ab___V'-held E\u00a7jg__ i,he Assistant Commissioner. Without further<\/p>\n
  ":,1{;~i:\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3:1<n=; Q\ufb02d wiikaaui hearing the peti\ufb01a\ufb01ar, {ha arder \u00a33<\/p>\n
  _;}\u00e9:\u00a7s$e\ufb01 as par Ax113;\u20acxure–\u00ab?'A' dated 22.17.2806 by the<\/p>\n
 Assistant Ciammiggiarzer against. the gaetitianer. T\ufb01e ardsr<\/p>\n
'S44;\n<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
of the Assistant Commissioner is in vi0Eation*pf\u00e91::;i_p}\u00a7:s<\/p>\n
of natmai justicte, inasmuch 33, ad, 15\u20ac_:zaS\u20ac)n\u00e9;’z’}:i1_\u00a2’ <\/p>\n
opportuzzity of being heard  Mgi’\u00e9?\u20ac:i1_ tr} <i:i"1\u00a2\u00a7_.';:\\\u00a7:t,jtii5<3V1f1\u00e9:r. '4<\/p>\n
Ruie 3 (4)(5} 0:" {ha Ka:ma_takaV4"S:ci\u00a71edu1{.\u00a7dL, <\/p>\n
Scheduied Tribes (Pmmb:r:o\u00a7:::%k%%of "'}i'if*z2f1 Sf\u00e9\u00a7'i"  Certain
\nLands} Rules, 1979,  cf being
\nhear\u00e9 shoulc} be give\ufb01    It is not in
\ndispute that   objectians in {hie
\nmatter  \ufb01;1'%11iSSi0\ufb01\u20acr_ But an
\napp01*ti;\u00a71itf\u00a7v'. 3 -'oraily is not given is the<\/p>\n
peii\u00e9ianer. In this C\u20ac:.:\u00a7i:::\u00a7\u00a7{:.the subnlission made at the B33"<\/p>\n
 by  ;}'ay*ai{{ii:3ai:'v S,\u00ab:Pa'r.i} that, had an oppariullitfg cf<\/p>\n
  3":;i\u00e9\u00e9.:fd4'VA.g\u00a7xfe:": is {he petitioner befcre the A$sis\u00a5;ant<\/p>\n
{'ie:xn':nis"\u00e9i.:%i1r:rg'f:e wouid hava place\u00e9 adequata materiai<\/p>\n
-Von ;’Vi”t cf the Tahaiidar is .inC01:’r\u20ac<:t, \u00e9eservas is 336<\/p>\n
-..[&’.;a\ufb01:1{‘;e:p :e\u20aci. The Assistant \u00e9jfommissicrzer has pmce\u00e9ide\ufb01<\/p>\n
‘%{\u00a2Ta\u00abg:;a;\u00a7;r and has not appiieci his mind to the facts; 9f the<\/p>\n
{‘\u00a7&S\u20ac .\n<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
6. Though the Daputy CoI1}:}1issio:1e1’A. \u00a71as;AT\u00a7i\u00a7}\u00e9\ufb01V_”$11i” <\/p>\n
opportunity of being heard to them gxe-‘rfi\ufb02tion  ‘ 7<\/p>\n
the Deputy C30mn1issi0I1er 11.3.3 pa\u00e9’se\u20aciVa detailg\u00e9d :3r\u20aci’:vf:\u00a3*;,\u20acf_;e<\/p>\n
39.1116 cannot be sustaineci Vt of’VVih’};1t ih\u00e9
\nDeputy Conzmissionef has a  mutatien
\nentries anci faatual  the conclusion
\nThe said fact\u00a719:1:’\u00ab\u00a3aSpe<\u00a3:A:s  ta tha netice of
\nthe gaeti\ufb01arkgr   \u00e9ifiler by him or by the
\n 'IfI"%– \u00e9VVVVi\u00a7<':p0rt of the Tahsildar is
\n:10': avegis\u00e9saiv\u00e9d A:-}\u20ac.\u00a7*\u00a7;e\u00a7_';3-\u00e9titiolaer. These are 'ih\u00e9 sun motto<\/p>\n
p1'ocaaeii;1g$"i\ufb01'iti3\u00a7\u20acd ' by the Assistaz\ufb01 Cammissioner<\/p>\n
 %).:~3,S eJd \u20ac}\u00a7ic:.fI'a?;s\u00e91<ia;"s m;)01"\u00a5.. Er; View {if the same, rules<\/p>\n
I V  fsquira that the repert of th\u00e9 Tahsildar<\/p>\n
shmig\u00e9isi .._\u00a7;%;\u00a2mi3' bean served on $316: petitiencr who is {he<\/p>\n
 . '\u00e9:\u00a7'fe;c_:@6g"';:;\u20ac:'sG\u00a7:. Tim factuai siater\ufb01erzts made during the<\/p>\n
  'C'<:%V:ii\u00a7'sfe 0:' the Qfd\ufb01f tzy the Deputy' COII1\u00a311iSSiG1E1\u20acI' coul\u00e9 not<\/p>\n
 ' 'E}:j.v'6: been apposed by {he pe\ufb01itiazaar as the said faazrts wsre<\/p>\n
A. 1'29: bmughf; to his rmiice \u00a7:::'io:* tar passing of tha impugried<\/p>\n
,!m<\/p>\n
[4\/~\u00ab\/'<\/p>\n
-3″\n<\/p>\n
order. In View of the same, the order 0f~~–*;}1c<\/p>\n
Comxnissianer also cannot be sustained..31j_&._fh e:’ same -.i.s'”V.__<\/p>\n
iiabie to be: quashed.\n<\/p>\n
7. Since the mazzegiijas :5″   “to me’
\nAssistant C0n1:11issiQ\u00a7::\u00a71′ for  Eli ‘ ;3.cc0rdance
\nwith law, this Court ;:i{)\u00a5:a\u00a7$’ Vt=\u00a7Ii:%:1:1 ‘V:\u00abt c::.v\u00a3:(;\u00a7_m:11eI:\u00a3 amzthizlg
\non merits of: this Cour: makes
\nmay obseIf;\u00e9it;\u00a7g}1:gT””\u00e9)f;__   may preju\u00e9ice the
\ncase 91”   time of hearing afresh.\n<\/p>\n
 to be urged by bath the<\/p>\n
parties, this Coxgiit Apr\u00e9f\u00e9rs to remanci the matter to the<\/p>\n
  Qomniissibiier by setting aside the ixnpugzed<\/p>\n
 ,__Q:*d\u00e9:’$.:::”4Ig: ‘:?i:?:3\u00a5*_j.of the aame, the fallowing Carder is made :<\/p>\n
  \u00e9if\ufb01ier Vida Axmexuzns-“A’ dated 22.?.i2006 \u00a7as$e\u00e9<\/p>\n
K ‘fikge Qissistant Ciommissioner, Chikodi, and U216: order<\/p>\n
–  }\u00a7r131exure\u00ab”B’ dated 29.3.2007′ passed by the Qeputy<\/p>\n
” C(}I’I1II1iSSiOI}\u20acI”, Beigaum, are set aside. The matter is<\/p>\n
renzitte\u00e9 to the Assistant Commissioner, Chikodi, for fresh<\/p>\n
X\/V\/\/Q?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri Shivashankar Swamiji … vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar -1.. IN THE HIGH comm” OF KARNATAKAT CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARW5:3″:.:::. L DATED THIS THE 4″?” DA? oF%Agx&A*aci4%2:3o9 ‘ BEFORE = Ho:~:’32..E MRJUSTICE Mo;-\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01sH.ANAT*AMA\u00e9ouDAa wars” PEFITICN.N\u00a7’,’$253}Z;OQ7;@C\/ST) Between : ‘ Shivas1;\u00a7\u00a71\ufb01%eir ‘h’!x\u00e9}1;:;1_’\u00e9ev Agacfi ab:}ut~.5:?2.y\u20acafe:.AA ‘ _ ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Shivashankar Swamiji ... vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji ... vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-11T15:16:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji … vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-11T15:16:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":872,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji ... vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-11T15:16:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji … vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji ... vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji ... vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-11T15:16:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji … vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-11T15:16:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009"},"wordCount":872,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009","name":"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji ... vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-11T15:16:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shivashankar-swamiji-vs-shri-laxman-yallappa-kamble-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Shivashankar Swamiji … vs Shri Laxman Yallappa Kamble on 4 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107249"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107249\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}