{"id":107250,"date":"2010-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-04-09T02:25:09","modified_gmt":"2018-04-08T20:55:09","slug":"sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n<pre>3'\n\nEN THE HIGH QQURT 01? KARNATAKA AT BAN::;A:.._;;)RE \nDated tht\"-: 25'-\"31 day of August 12:} 10 V '\n:BEF0RB:\n\nI~\u00a7&lt;i)N&#039;BLE MR.JU$*m&#039;:E ; V.JAGANNAT}\u00e9\u00a7N  ._,  M  &#039;\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL.}\u00e9e.._2&#039;GtI)\u00a7\u00a73    &#039;\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p>. Sri Sha11karar1a11da. 2 .\n<\/p>\n<p>S\/\u00ab:3 Late Blzeemagowda,<br \/>\nAged about 72 yaeilxs.   _4 V<br \/>\nR f 5 Panjiganaha\ufb02y Vi11&amp;_g\u20ac;;_b &#8216;I\u00a7Ia&#8217;3a&#8217;i\u00a7a&#8217; Hobli,<br \/>\nSi1*aTaiuk&#8211;\u00a7&#8217;?2 140.  V   -.  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Sri zviaha:ie&lt;;a;;~<\/p>\n<p>S\/(:2 Late &#039;Bh\u00e9\u00a7f.=;meg\u00a7wcEg;,  it<\/p>\n<p>Aged 2iI:_)(}1.;&#039;t&#039;_\u20ac!~7   :\n<\/p>\n<p>R ga   &#8220;x\u00a7\u00a7llag\u00a7:,VVV&#8217;I{asaba Haibi,<br \/>\nSira Taiuk-g537 2L_1=~*\u00a7O&#8217;.=.._ &#8221; __<\/p>\n<p>. . .;&#8217;\u00a71pp\u20ac1}a11tS<\/p>\n<p>  {By ig\u00a7%ana,T<\/p>\n<p>SfQ&#8217;\u00a3)0ddaha:1uma:1th\u20ac Gcwda, Bead \u00a333; LES.<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  H Gangmnma,<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; W\/9 Lam JuI1ja:&#8217;1:1a, Major.\n<\/p>\n<p>T  &#8221; ifij} Puttarajtz,<\/p>\n<p>S\/&lt;3 Late Junjaxma, Major, Dead by LE3.<\/p>\n<p>}ji;3{1) J aya:1m1a,<br \/>\nW\/0 Puttaraju, Agni about 42 years.<\/p>\n<p>ca:x&#039; .\n<\/p>\n<p>113(2) maadhu.\n<\/p>\n<p>13\/ (3 Late Putsaraju, Aged abaut 23 years, &#8216; *&#8217;  L. <\/p>\n<p>113(3) Bharath,<\/p>\n<p>S\/&lt;3 Futfaraju, Aged abaut 21; y\u20ac3_:&#039;s_.  .y  b\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>life) Palvathamnaa, :\n<\/p>\n<p>Dfo Lam Juinjanxla, W&#8217;f&#8221;o_ &#8216;N_agaraja, V<br \/>\nAged about :39 years.  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>1({i} Malladevarnnaa, .  &#8216;_ _.  _4 V<br \/>\nI3,&#8217; :2\u00bb Late Junj arma, \u00abf 0<br \/>\nAged about 3&#8217;7 y&#8217;ears.&#8217;~ _  1 ~   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>1(3) I\\z{ahe:1dI::a:;}_:\u00a7.*;\u00a7};&#8217; _ ._  . A<br \/>\nS] 0 Lats &#8216;\u00bbJ4fi_1&#8217;\u00a7A1V.iv\u00a3;3TI11?-3;&#8217;,  .._z:1}::j-:&gt;11t 35 years.<\/p>\n<p>1(f) BI&#8217;:::r:1:1_:;i;u*1 I*1a;&lt;.:;::__ __<br \/>\n&#039; Sit; Late .;E13I1jia:;i3.4 &quot;Aged .a&quot;t7a&#039;:)ut 33 3=&#039;t:&#039;i8I&quot;S.<\/p>\n<p>Hg} Ve1;1:1gepa1a., &quot;   &quot;  . =<br \/>\n8\/&#039; 0 I;2;a._t;tA J ur&quot;1j_ar;t1a, Eaged about 3 1 jgcarrs.<\/p>\n<p> A &quot;\/&#039;R3;ma:1naV,M2\u00a7ged: Majar.\n<\/p>\n<p>,<br \/>\n&#8220;-53\/0 &#8216;L:\u00e9&#8217;.\u00a3\u00a7:A&#8217;\u00a7%ama:ma, rep. by Marzjuziatha.<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; Q4. 44P,.I\u00e9&#8217;;Tl\u00a7j\u00a33peswamy,<\/p>\n<p>n j S\/Late Ramaxma, Agr\u00e9d: Major,<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;   P. \u00a53.BheeInegs:;wda,<br \/>\nDead by LES:\n<\/p>\n<p>{ 3) Junjaznma,<br \/>\nW\/&#8217; 0 Late Bheemegawda,<br \/>\nAged about 72 years.\n<\/p>\n<p>{:2} Shivananda.\n<\/p>\n<p>S\/0 Late Bhasmegowda,<br \/>\nAged about 50 years.\n<\/p>\n<p>{3} Gopaia Krishna.\n<\/p>\n<p>S \/ 0 Latc: Bhcemegowda;\n<\/p>\n<p>Aged abeut 312 years. V<\/p>\n<p>{4} Sm;11it&#8217;;hra,<br \/>\n13\/ G Late B1*1eemeg:3_&#8217;\u00a7f&lt;%_&amp;3.,<br \/>\nAged about 36 yea1&quot;s.&quot;=._ <\/p>\n<p>{5} Yeshoda, _ VA _ -_  V,<br \/>\n13\/ 0 Late. Bh\u20ac\u20ac1\u00a7:L::~gm\u00a5fC\u00a7a,<br \/>\nAged about 38..y\u00a3:ars.,A  &#039; &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>ii&#8217;-7)<br \/>\nIZ}fc\u00a73;{3hc:::&#8211;I11\u20ac:g\u00a73&#8217;iV(i:%\u00a74,  &#8216;<br \/>\nAgni. . 2:1i*)oz3t&#8217;4~{)&#8221;j;.t:a:&#8217;S;<br \/>\n{&#8216;7_L__ }1ar:&#8217;\u00e93:i&#8217;21\u00a311:1  &#8216; &#8216;V&#8212; ., &#8216;<\/p>\n<p> D \/&#8217; 0 I4ai:i_L&#8217;B}1e\u00a2in.ag0$2*da,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Aged about 34&#8243;&#8216; &#8216;;rears.\n<\/p>\n<p>,,  are 13\/ \u00e91&#8217;~E%\u00a7i1jig\u00a7111ahaliy Viliage.<br \/>\n&#8216;-  Eglaas-{aha Elobli; &#8220;Si1*a &#8216;I&#8217;ali:\u00a3k&#8211;5&#8242;?2 140.<br \/>\n2 -.  &#8230;E&lt;&#039;:\u20ac:sp{)1&quot;1der1t$<\/p>\n<p>   Pate} iT).Kar(=:g0Wda, Advocate<br \/>\n&quot; &#039; far C\/}?%- 1(3) 55 R-2. )<\/p>\n<p> x  R\u00e9giiiar Secomi Appeal} filed under Section 18%&quot;) of<\/p>\n<p>&#039;     agai:i1s&#039;t the judgllmnt amt} decree dated<br \/>\n _%&#039;\u00ab;25.;7.:201,o passed in R.A.Nc:. 1264\/2008 on the \u00a3113 0f the<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&#039; &#8212;-   &#8220;(if th\u00e9e V<\/p>\n<p>d\ufb01ffi\ufb02tia\ufb02f\ufb01 and. as; such, 1f;\u00a71(f&#8217;; &#8216;iT;&#8217;.(V&#8217;;i&#8217;i,&#8221;I&#8221;{&#8216;:3 iixztlcise&#8221;-V-Zcciigld not<br \/>\nhave decreed the s1.2i&#8217;t. ofthe p_i ai;1\ufb01ff*;; :f6&#8217;I?&#8217;.d6c1aVJ.&#8217;9af\u00a7i0n and<br \/>\npermanent; injurigtiorx. 1$_JIV_;\u00a7r\u00a7::x&#8217;\u00e9i&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7:ir&#8217;;: reii\u00e931f:g&#8217;3__\u00a7}aced on the<br \/>\njudgnmnt renii\u00e9figzfi iii:   l936~3&#8242;? also<br \/>\n0p\u20acI&#8217;at\u20ac:Vi\u00a7.  as at; 3 the plajn\ufb01\ufb01s have not<\/p>\n<p>included ali,__the_1\u00a7Vi;z)3gir;;?;&#8217;\ufb01x\u00a7$*LVxi?\u00a7:1i1r: ciaiming the relief and,<\/p>\n<p> as  bf; viI&#8217;\ufb01;1c3 Qf Order 2 E1116 2 of the C.P,C._, every<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;!\u00a5\ufb02\u00a7..\u00a71;3Vsi*.,_{G__iI1{:IL1de Whole of the Claim to which the<\/p>\n<p>})1\u00ab&#8217;4iii.3&#8217;\u00a33&#8217;ff::;?..v(&#8216;V:A\u00a7i;1V1VZg'{t1\u20ac\u20aci1 to make arid, in the iI1S'{LaI1t case,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;the: &#8216;have ccan\ufb01ilritci only to two items 1.6., 24 arlci<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;T S .&#8217;i\\\u00a70.22j3. and. for this reason aiso, the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; \u00ab &#8216;si:?3$t\ufb0111tVial question sf law raised in the appeal,<\/p>\n<p> *,theref(}re, 1&#8217;\u20ac3QL1i&#8217;.\u00a3&#8221;\u20acS to be: censider\ufb01d.<\/p>\n<p>Ev<\/p>\n<p>pal<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;%;3V1;&#8221;i&#8221;:1-.1_4\u00e9i:&gt;&lt;3:;9&#039;:&#039;&lt;;zz\u00a7 in <\/p>\n<p>AIR SSW 4:53 and 2(309 AIR  958,v..:1~;s.Ts;;?a::~;\u00a7ii&#039;ssi\u00a2n<br \/>\nmade is that the \ufb01xldirsg 8iT\u00a7V\u00e9\u00a7i&#039; git.  c0\ufb02Si&#039;dei&#039;*ii1g that<\/p>\n<p>reisvant fact or by H011-ConSAid&#039;6:&#039;eii&quot;t1o:1. i}f&#039;__I&#039;\u20aci\u20acVaI1IL fact<\/p>\n<p>4. I;&#8221;)1\ufb01&#8221;.1\ufb01:Iie:_  Earned counsei for R-132)<\/p>\n<p>and  rc:f\u00e9=;\u00a3&#8217;t&#8217;\u00a7;r1g_tVo tiii\u00e9jiidginents of the courts below,<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217; cQnt;z?ifidc;d mat, iiigufar as tha plaizltiffs&#8217; (iI1ti\ufb02\u20ac2I&#8221;i1\u20ac:fi'{, in<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;1&#8217;_(&#8216;:SfV){_-ECE &#8216;\u20ac:5:?.&#8221;_2\u00bb,\/&#8221;.E*&#8217;;3f_?i &#8220;Shara is concerned, \u00a3116 said issue has<\/p>\n<p>m%:n_ &#8216; aecidegg&#8217; iinaily in the aarli\ufb01r suit &lt;::x.s.:x:o.<\/p>\n<p> 19&quot;E\u00a75\u00b0-1.37 which led to R.A.I&#039;~E&lt;:;. 115\/1938-3? 311:1<\/p>\n<p>   R.S.A.N0. :37\/1940-41 and the dacree obtain:-ad<\/p>\n<p>  the piaizztiffs, therefare, had. attaineci fmaiity<\/p>\n<p> . fc}\u00a7i{)wi13.g the c::&lt;::L1:\u20actf.s having heid that the S316 d\ufb01i\ufb01d<\/p>\n<p>\u20acX\u20acC1.&#039;t&#039;{(&#039;:{i in favour of the \ufb01f\ufb01t ciafendant in raspect cf<\/p>\n<p>E\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>(.3<\/p>\n<p>2\/ 3rd Shara of tbs piaintjffs is net i:3i1:1dir1g on the<\/p>\n<p>piaimjffs. it is. th\u00e93I&#039;\u20ac3f\u20ac)}&#039;\u20ac, submitted by &#039;the <\/p>\n<p>C\u20ac}U.Z(1S\u20aci for the raspcndants that, pursuarlt to&quot; <\/p>\n<p>pmce\ufb01dings. ihf: piamtjffs \ufb02ied Execution  <\/p>\n<p>606} i\u00a743&#8211;44 and aim deposited   <\/p>\n<p>din-::c&#039;ti0Ii:s :31&quot; this court in R.E\u00a7..4_A.NO;._ 137\/  <\/p>\n<p>thereaftei&#039;, {he plaintiffs were  in p&lt;\u00a7$s&lt;;-issioi\ufb01of the<br \/>\nsuit scheduie prope1tie&#039;$4_.i\u00a7\u00abrhic&#8211;f!i1  &#039;1.;13{:it3r 2\/ 3rd share: of<br \/>\nthe plaintiffs. Th(iZ&#039;ef0I&#039;\u20ac,_ V_t\u00a7&#039;1e_c;\u20ac\u00a7\ufb01.:Ets&#039;%\u00a5{;\u00a7g5V\ufb01cxmzlzitted I18<\/p>\n<p>array in accept\u00e9f\u00e9d  <\/p>\n<p>5. As  as  for f\ufb02i11g the Suit: fer<\/p>\n<p>daciaxat\u00e9on a\u00a7jd i1;j.u112ad%::- by-5\u00bb-.i.}&#8217;1e&#8217;V&#8217;1\u00a2a1med&#8221;&#8216;\u00e9\u00e9misel far the mspondents is that,<\/p>\n<p>ZZ.::S;;;it\u20ac:   pI'{){:\u20ac\u20acC1i1&#8217;1gS ending in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>  p1ajI;tfffs_.~inf\u00a7t3f%\u00a7r as 12\/ 3rd share of the piaintiffs is<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8220;-__VC01;;*1t:\u20ac1&#8217;I&#8221;1t3dt; yet, the pretsem: a.ppe1iants having \ufb01led a suit<\/p>\n<p>A  ; fi3r&#8221;f9z:1&#8217;1n?:&#8221;titj0n in which they have also inciutled the ;2j3fd<\/p>\n<p>  sf the present plaigmri\ufb01s anti in the said suit, the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; Vpmsent piair:ti\ufb01&#8217;s are 31:50 not 1118116 parties and itis this<\/p>\n<p>act an tha part Gf fh\ufb01 defendants that has p1&#8243;*r;:13f1ptE:.d the<\/p>\n<p>3\/<\/p>\n<p>II<\/p>\n<p>present p1ai11t:iffs to \ufb01ie the suit. far deciaratjori <\/p>\n<p>p\u20ac:r111a.ne1&#8217;1t: injm&#8217;1ct\u00a7.a:)11. As such, the apps:-3.1 aga:i1&#8217;1:s\u00a71;V.\u20acff1\u00a7\u00a3&#8217;,.A4<\/p>\n<p>concurrent \ufb01l1di;&#8217;\u00a31gS of fact of the ccmrts b\u20aci{}s\u00a7.}f.&#8221;isA.if;\u00a7.;1\u00a3\u00a7ic. &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Having thus heard both &#8216;:1i:(if3S&#8221;i:E1&#8243;&#8216;1V'(i  v.r1pt\u00a23 \u00a7afM<\/p>\n<p>the contentioxxs put farward. de\u00e9isigiis cited by<br \/>\nthe iearned counsczi for :&#8221;.;i;:;e&#8217;&#8211;_ 3\u00a7_)p\u20acL&#8217;9Vgf.I.iS~ ._ai1d on gcsirig<br \/>\nthmugh the judgment-,:~;.~&#8217;uf\u00bbf11e ::g:u1*t\u00e9v_ t\u00a7\u00e9i\u00a5\u00a7i\u00a7, it is clear<\/p>\n<p>that the pi&#8221;:&#8217;:.::.=t\u00a7;-331&#8242;:  _VW\u20ac:__}&#8217;\u00e9;&#8217;  possassion of<\/p>\n<p>:2] 3%&#8217;  &#8216; =  V? diI&#8217;\u20acC1ZiOI&#8221;1S given in<br \/>\n1?i.S.A.N&lt;$.v J3&#039;? .-&#039;fbllowing the: depssit made<\/p>\n<p>23}! them.  &#039;fact &#039;is \u00e9._1so pmved by pmducizlg the<\/p>\n<p>&quot;dr);:11r:i%ar:1&quot;m,..w.1E\u00a7&#039;,xs.P~8&#039;;&quot;&quot;P\u00ab9 and P42, possession was<\/p>\n<p> &#039;i?e2ii1gi&#039;\u00e9:5&lt;i fg;s}e;%&quot; the piajlztiffs as per Ex.P&#8211;1.3 and,<\/p>\n<p>  ti1ef::f0:&#039;\u00a7,  fi11dir1g of the courts b\u20aci(}W that the<\/p>\n<p> Lara in posssssien 032&quot; the suit pmperties<\/p>\n<p> _\u20ac;.9m.p:\u20ac1sing of S.N&#039;os.i2.4 and 2:3 is_i1&#039;1 co:r1s911a11&lt;:e with<\/p>\n<p>   .ma!;&lt;-:::&#039;iai piaced befem the trial 901114,.<\/p>\n<p>&quot; &#039;Y. So far as the appelia1&quot;;t.s. \ufb01ling 3. $e_pa1*ate suit: fbr<\/p>\n<p>partitiorz. insofar as &#039;t:i&#039;1&lt;3 &#039;,2\/3I&quot;\u20aci share of th\ufb01 p1*\u20acs\u20ac1&#039;1I:<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>G&quot;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010 Author: V.Jagannathan 3&#8242; EN THE HIGH QQURT 01? KARNATAKA AT BAN::;A:.._;;)RE Dated tht&#8221;-: 25&#8242;-&#8220;31 day of August 12:} 10 V &#8216; :BEF0RB: I~\u00a7&lt;i)N&#039;BLE MR.JU$*m&#039;:E ; V.JAGANNAT}\u00e9\u00a7N ._, M &#039; REGULAR SECOND APPEAL.}\u00e9e.._2&#039;GtI)\u00a7\u00a73 &#039; BETWEEN : 1. . Sri Sha11karar1a11da. 2 . S\/\u00ab:3 Late [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-08T20:55:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-08T20:55:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1248,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-08T20:55:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-08T20:55:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-08T20:55:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010"},"wordCount":1248,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010","name":"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-08T20:55:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-shankarananda-vs-sri-junjana-on-25-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Shankarananda vs Sri Junjana on 25 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107250\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}