{"id":10727,"date":"2008-03-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-07-07T07:25:23","modified_gmt":"2018-07-07T01:55:23","slug":"reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 5417 of 2008(T)\n\n\n1. RELIANCE GENERATORS PVT. LTD.,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. CHIEF ENGINEER (E), BHARAT SANCHAR\n\n3. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E),\n\n4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.V.LAKSHMANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.KESAVANKUTTY, SC, BSNL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :18\/03\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.\n                      ===============\n             W.P.(C) NOs. 5417, 5418 &amp; 3755 OF 2008\n            ===========================\n\n              Dated this the 18th day of March, 2008\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The issues raised in these writ petitions being similar, the<\/p>\n<p>cases are disposed of by this common judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.    In these writ petitions, petitioner contends they were<\/p>\n<p>awarded a contract for supplying, installation, testing and<\/p>\n<p>commissioning of diesel generator sets to various telephone<\/p>\n<p>exchanges of the Department of Telecom and Ext.P1 is a specimen<\/p>\n<p>copy of the contract. It is stated that the parties understood the<\/p>\n<p>transaction as an interstate transaction and according to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, D Forms prescribed under the Central Sales Tax Act were<\/p>\n<p>also issued by the respondents. Exts. P2 to P4 are the assessment<\/p>\n<p>orders issued by the Sales Tax Authority of Tamil Nadu assessing<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner under the CST Act for the assessment years 1995-96,<\/p>\n<p>1996-97 and 1997-98. It is stated that the same transactions came<\/p>\n<p>to be assessed under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act and Exts.P5,<\/p>\n<p>P6 and P7 are the assessment orders.       It is contended that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has taken all available steps for questioning the<\/p>\n<p>WPC 5417, 5418 &amp; 3755\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   :2 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>assessment under the KGST Act and to avoid the additional<\/p>\n<p>monetary liability.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    According to the petitioner, in terms of Ext.P1 contract,<\/p>\n<p>if there is a liability on account of the transaction being treated as a<\/p>\n<p>works contract, the respondents should bear the said liability. On<\/p>\n<p>the strength of this contractual provision, petitioner claimed<\/p>\n<p>settlement of this additional liability and submitted Exts.P16 to P18<\/p>\n<p>in these writ petitions. Subsequently, Exts. P19 and P20 were also<\/p>\n<p>issued claiming interest on the amount claimed under Exts.P16 to<\/p>\n<p>P18.   On receipt of the request so made by the petitioner, the<\/p>\n<p>respondents issued Ext.P21 in WP(C) No.5417\/2008 rejecting the<\/p>\n<p>claim. In the other two writ petitions, though similar requests have<\/p>\n<p>been received by the respondents, there is no reply similar to<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P21. It is in this background, the writ petitions have been filed<\/p>\n<p>praying for directing the respondents to pay the petitioner the sales<\/p>\n<p>tax liability relatable to the works contract executed by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner during 1995-96, 1996-97 and 1997-98.<\/p>\n<p>      4.    Counsel for the petitioner contends that the contract<\/p>\n<p>which they had was with the Department of Telecommunications,<\/p>\n<p>WPC 5417, 5418 &amp; 3755\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   :3 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>which has now become a Company. It was contended that being an<\/p>\n<p>authority under Article 12 of the Constitution, amenable to the writ<\/p>\n<p>jurisdiction of this court, the respondent has a duty to act fairly and<\/p>\n<p>reasonably even in contractual matters. According to the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel, though the claim raised by the petitioners in these writ<\/p>\n<p>petitions is a monetary claim arising under a contract, in view of its<\/p>\n<p>constitutional obligation to be fair and reasonable in its dealings<\/p>\n<p>and since the refusal to bear the additional monetary liability<\/p>\n<p>reflects unfairness on its part, a writ petition is maintainable and<\/p>\n<p>this court will be justified in issuing a writ of mandamus directing<\/p>\n<p>the respondents to pay the petitioner the tax liability relatable to the<\/p>\n<p>works contract executed by them during the aforesaid years.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    In order to appreciate the contentions of the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner, it is necessary to refer to the stand taken<\/p>\n<p>by the respondents in Ext.P21 produced in WP(C) No.5417\/2008. It<\/p>\n<p>is the stand of the respondents that though the transaction between<\/p>\n<p>them is an interstate transaction with the liability to pay tax under<\/p>\n<p>the Central Sales Tax Act, the liability of the petitioner to pay tax<\/p>\n<p>under the KGST Act arose out of the order of the Kerala Sales Tax<\/p>\n<p>WPC 5417, 5418 &amp; 3755\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   :4 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, which was based on the request made<\/p>\n<p>by the petitioner to consider the transaction between them and the<\/p>\n<p>Department as a local works contract. They have also extracted the<\/p>\n<p>relevant portion of the order of the Tribunal, in Ext.P21. It is stated<\/p>\n<p>that the Kerala Telecom Circle was not a party in the case and the<\/p>\n<p>Department is not responsible for any liability due to the petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>wrong interpretation of the rules\/deviation from the tender<\/p>\n<p>conditions. It is stated that the BSNL is not bound to meet the tax<\/p>\n<p>liabilities of the petitioner under the KGST Act. Therefore, according<\/p>\n<p>to the respondents, the tax liability arose only in view of the case<\/p>\n<p>set up by the petitioner before the Appellate Tribunal on a wrong<\/p>\n<p>interpretation of the contract and the rules.\n<\/p>\n<p>       6.    Necessarily, therefore in order to adjudicate the<\/p>\n<p>correctness of the stand taken by the respondents in Ext.P21<\/p>\n<p>referred to above, interpretation of the relevant clause of the<\/p>\n<p>contract, appreciation of the stand taken by the petitioner before<\/p>\n<p>the Appellate Tribunal and such other questions of fact is necessary.<\/p>\n<p>In my view, this adjudication is not possible in a proceedings under<\/p>\n<p>Article 226 of the Constitution of India and therefore, if at all the<\/p>\n<p>WPC 5417, 5418 &amp; 3755\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  :5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner has a claim against the respondents, petitioner has to<\/p>\n<p>pursue the same before the appropriate Civil Court by filing a suit.<\/p>\n<p>      7.    It is true that in several cases, Supreme Court and also<\/p>\n<p>this court have taken the view that even in contractual matters, a<\/p>\n<p>State or an authority under Article 12 of the Constitution has a duty<\/p>\n<p>to act fairly and reasonably. In this case, I am not prepared to<\/p>\n<p>accept the contention of the petitioner that Ext.P21 is vitiated by<\/p>\n<p>unreasonableness or unfairness. A reading of Ext.P21 shows that<\/p>\n<p>the respondents have their reasons why they cannot be fastened<\/p>\n<p>with the liability to pay tax under the KGST Act and the correctness<\/p>\n<p>of which can be decided only in a regular suit. This does not spell<\/p>\n<p>out any unreasonable or arbitrariness on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8.    In so far as WP(C) Nos. 5418 and 3755\/08 are<\/p>\n<p>concerned, there is no order similar to Ext.P21 produced in WP(C)<\/p>\n<p>5417\/08. But then, facts being similar and the contention of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents being one of denial of its liability, I do not think it<\/p>\n<p>necessary to require the respondents to pass an order dealing with<\/p>\n<p>the claim raised by the petitioner by Exts.P16 to P18 or the interest<\/p>\n<p>WPC 5417, 5418 &amp; 3755\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                :6 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>claimed in Exts. P19 and P20 therein.\n<\/p>\n<p>     In the result, without prejudice to the contentions raised in<\/p>\n<p>these writ petitions and also reserving liberty to the petitioner to<\/p>\n<p>seek appropriate reliefs before the Civil Court, these writ petitions<\/p>\n<p>are dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>Rp<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 5417 of 2008(T) 1. RELIANCE GENERATORS PVT. LTD., &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS &#8230; Respondent 2. CHIEF ENGINEER (E), BHARAT SANCHAR 3. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E), [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-07T01:55:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-07T01:55:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1066,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-07T01:55:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-07T01:55:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-07T01:55:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008"},"wordCount":1066,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008","name":"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-07T01:55:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/reliance-generators-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india-on-18-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 18 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10727\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}