{"id":107584,"date":"2007-07-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007"},"modified":"2018-03-13T14:32:01","modified_gmt":"2018-03-13T09:02:01","slug":"mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007","title":{"rendered":"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA No. 396 of 2007()\n\n\n1. MAMMU, S\/O.LATE SEEDIKUNHI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. AISAMMA, D\/O.LATE SEEDIKUNHI,\n3. MARIYAMMA, D\/O.LATE SEEDIKUNHI,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. MOHAMMAD @ S.A.AMOO HAJI,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. KHADEEJAMMA, W\/O.LATE ABDULLA,\n\n3. ISMAIL, S\/O.LATE ABDULLA,\n\n4. ABBAS, S\/O.LATE ABDULLA,\n\n5. ABDULRAHIMAN, S\/O.LATE ABDULLA,\n\n6. AISHA, W\/O.MOHAMMED, MAIPPADY,\n\n7. NABEEZA, W\/O.ABDULLA,\n\n8. MUSTAFA, S\/O.LATE ABDULLA,\n\n9. SHAFI, S\/O.LATE ABDULLA, MAIPPAY,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.V.ASOKAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :16\/07\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                   M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n                    ...........................................\n                    R.S.A.No. 396              OF 2007\n                    ............................................\n          DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF JULY, 2007\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
      Plaintiffs in O.S.136 of 2000 on the file of Munsiff Court,<\/p>\n
Kasargod are the appellants.                 Defendants are respondents.<\/p>\n
Appellants instituted the suit seeking a decree for recovery of<\/p>\n
possession of the plaint schedule property contending that they<\/p>\n
have title to the property under Ext.A1 patta whereunder title<\/p>\n
was assigned by the Government in their favour and respondents<\/p>\n
have no manner of right over the same and therefore they are<\/p>\n
entitled to recover possession of the same on the strength of<\/p>\n
title. Respondents in their written statement contended that<\/p>\n
they got assigned the property in their possession under Ext.B1<\/p>\n
and the disputed portion of the property forms part of the<\/p>\n
property which was enclosed in a compound wall constructed in<\/p>\n
1980 and they have title to the property and even if appellants<\/p>\n
have title to the property it is barred by adverse possession and<\/p>\n
limitation.\n<\/p>\n
      2. Learned Munsiff on the evidence of PW1 and Dws 1 and<\/p>\n
2 and Exts.A1 to A4, Exts.B1 & B2 and Exts.C1 and C2,<\/p>\n
dismissed the suit holding that though the disputed property<\/p>\n
RSA 396\/2007                     2<\/span><\/p>\n
forms part of the property assigned to the appellants under<\/p>\n
Ext.A1, their title has been lost by adverse possession and<\/p>\n
respondents have established that they have perfected their title<\/p>\n
by adverse possession.      The suit was dismissed. Appellants<\/p>\n
challenged the decree and judgment before Sub Court, Kasargod<\/p>\n
in A.S. 118 of 2002. Learned Sub Judge, on reappreciation of<\/p>\n
evidence, confirmed the findings of learned Munsiff and<\/p>\n
dismissed the appeal. It is challenged in the second appeal.<\/p>\n
     3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant was heard.<\/p>\n
Learned counsel, relying on the written statement filed by<\/p>\n
respondents where they admitted that they did not claim any<\/p>\n
right over the property in Survey No.162\/4 and 161\/2 of Kannur<\/p>\n
Village, argued that as seen from Ext.C2 plan submitted by the<\/p>\n
Commissioner, the disputed portion of the property falls in<\/p>\n
Survey No.162\/4 and as per the written statement respondents<\/p>\n
did not claim any right to that property and as courts below<\/p>\n
found that appellants have title to that property under Ext.A1 a<\/p>\n
decree for recovery of possession should have been granted. It<\/p>\n
was argued that a plea of adverse possession is not sustainable<\/p>\n
when respondents did not recognise the right of appellants. It<\/p>\n
was also argued that when in the written statement it was<\/p>\n
RSA 396\/2007                      3<\/span><\/p>\n
contended that they have been in possession of the property<\/p>\n
from 1980, what was deposed by DW1 was that they have been<\/p>\n
in possession of the property from 1967 onwards and this<\/p>\n
inconsistent case should not have been accepted by the courts<\/p>\n
below. Relying on the decision of Apex Court in Karnataka<\/p>\n
Board of Wakf V. Government of India and others<\/a> (2004<\/p>\n
SAR Civil 535) learned counsel argued that without establishing<\/p>\n
from which date onwards respondents have been in possession of<\/p>\n
the property and that too adverse to the true owner, they are not<\/p>\n
entitled to claim a title perfected by adverse possession and<\/p>\n
findings of the courts below are unsustainable.<\/p>\n
      4. On hearing learned counsel appearing for appellants<\/p>\n
and going through the judgments of the courts below and in the<\/p>\n
light of the factual finding of the courts below, I do not find any<\/p>\n
substantial question of law involved in the appeal. True, in order<\/p>\n
to succeed the plea of adverse possession, as declared by the<\/p>\n
Apex Court in Karnataka Board of Wakf’s case (supra)<\/p>\n
defendants have to prove when their possession started adverse<\/p>\n
to the true owner. The plea of adverse possession is not a pure<\/p>\n
question of law but a blended one of fact and law. A person<\/p>\n
pleading adverse possession has no equities in his favour and<\/p>\n
RSA 396\/2007                   4<\/span><\/p>\n
has to establish that he has been in possession of the property<\/p>\n
for the requisite period with the animus possidanti adverse to<\/p>\n
the owner and that too open and exclusive possession, hostile to<\/p>\n
the true owner.\n<\/p>\n
     5. Though learned counsel appearing for appellants argued<\/p>\n
that as respondents did not claim any right or title to the<\/p>\n
property in Survey No.162\/4 and the disputed property is in<\/p>\n
Survey No.162\/4, the plea of adverse possession is not<\/p>\n
sustainable. The written statement has to be read as above. The<\/p>\n
contention raised in the written statement is that the property<\/p>\n
assigned in favour of the defendants, which lies to the east and<\/p>\n
the property belonging to the appellants which lies to the west<\/p>\n
were all government lands and were assigned in favour of<\/p>\n
appellants and respondents in 1980 respectively. The specific<\/p>\n
contention in the written statement was that plaint B schedule<\/p>\n
property which is the disputed portion, has been in their<\/p>\n
possession and enclosed by a compound wall constructed in<\/p>\n
1980 and they have effected improvements and planted<\/p>\n
cashewnut and coconut plants and they have been in possession<\/p>\n
of the property asserting hostile title to the knowledge of the<\/p>\n
plaintiffs openly, uninterruptedly and peacefully and thereby<\/p>\n
RSA 396\/2007                     5<\/span><\/p>\n
they have perfected the title. Therefore what was contended by<\/p>\n
defendants was that they have been in uninterrupted and<\/p>\n
peaceful possession of the plroperty which lies to the east of the<\/p>\n
compound wall from 1980 onwards and it is to the knowledge of<\/p>\n
the appellants and that too asserting hostile title to their<\/p>\n
knowledge and thereby they have perfected their title. Ext.C1<\/p>\n
report and C2 plan show that there is a compound wall<\/p>\n
separating the disputed property which is marked as 162\/4A and<\/p>\n
the remaining property which admittedly is in the possession of<\/p>\n
the appellants, marked 162\/4 and separating the two plots there<\/p>\n
is an old mud bund. The report also shows that the property to<\/p>\n
the east of the said old mud bund was being enjoyed along with<\/p>\n
the remaining property which lies to the east of the disputed<\/p>\n
plot.   Therefore a reading of the written statement would<\/p>\n
establish that, what was claimed by respondents was that they<\/p>\n
have been in possession of the disputed property from 1980<\/p>\n
onwards openly and peacefully and to the knowledge of the<\/p>\n
appellants and that too adverse to the appellants and thereby<\/p>\n
they have perfected their title by adverse possession.<\/p>\n
     6.    The trial court as well as first appellate court on<\/p>\n
appreciation of evidence found that respondents have been in<\/p>\n
RSA 396\/2007                    6<\/span><\/p>\n
possession of the disputed plot for more than the requisite<\/p>\n
period and it was with the required animus and asserting the<\/p>\n
hostile title. In such circumstances, that factual finding cannot<\/p>\n
be interfered in exercise of the powers of this court under<\/p>\n
Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure.\n<\/p>\n
     Appeal is dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                           M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE<\/p>\n
lgk\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA No. 396 of 2007() 1. MAMMU, S\/O.LATE SEEDIKUNHI, … Petitioner 2. AISAMMA, D\/O.LATE SEEDIKUNHI, 3. MARIYAMMA, D\/O.LATE SEEDIKUNHI, Vs 1. MOHAMMAD @ S.A.AMOO HAJI, … Respondent 2. KHADEEJAMMA, W\/O.LATE ABDULLA, 3. ISMAIL, S\/O.LATE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-13T09:02:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-13T09:02:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1099,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007\",\"name\":\"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-13T09:02:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-13T09:02:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007","datePublished":"2007-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-13T09:02:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007"},"wordCount":1099,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007","name":"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-13T09:02:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mammu-vs-mohammad-s-a-amoo-haji-on-16-july-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mammu vs Mohammad @ S.A.Amoo Haji on 16 July, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}