{"id":107758,"date":"2010-05-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-19T08:17:33","modified_gmt":"2016-06-19T02:47:33","slug":"bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/5262\/2010\t 5\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 5262 of 2010\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nBHARUCH\nDISTRICT PANCHAYAT & 1 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nMANSING\nSHIVABHAI PARMAR - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nHS MUNSHAW for\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 2. \nNone for Respondent(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 12\/05\/2010 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
\tHeard
\nlearned advocate Mr. H.S. Munshaw appearing on behalf of petitioners.\n<\/p>\n
\tThe
\npetitioner   Panchayat has challenged award passed by Labour Court,
\nBharuch in Reference No.239 of 2004 Ex.24 dated 23rd
\nNovember 2009. The Labour Court has come to conclusion that order of
\ntermination is bad as violated the provisions of Section 25F of the
\nIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947. But, instead of reinstatement and back
\nwages, only Rs.25,000\/- has been awarded by Labour Court being a
\nlump-sum amount of compensation in favour of workman.\n<\/p>\n
\tLearned
\nadvocate Mr. Munshaw submitted that respondent was appointed as daily
\nwager driver to drive the second vehicle of Taluka Panchayat w.e.f.
\nAugust 1988. The jeep car driven by respondent was not in running
\ncondition and inoperative, hence, the respondent was not provided
\nwork w.e.f. May, 1999. The respondent has raised industrial dispute
\nagainst termination after period of five years being Reference No.239
\nof 2004, wherein, detailed reply was filed by petitioner pointing out
\nthat appointment was made as daily wager and now, the vehicle was not
\nin running condition and petitioner was not able to provide work to
\nrespondent, even though, this aspect has been ignored by Labour Court
\nand awarded compensation of Rs.25,000\/- in its award which is under
\nchallenge.\n<\/p>\n
\tI
\nhave considered submissions made by learned advocate Mr. Munshaw and
\nI have also considered statement of claim filed by workman on 20th
\nOctober 2004. I have also considered reply\/explanation dated 14th
\nJuly 2004 given by workman for raising dispute after period of five
\nyears. I have also perused award passed by Labour Court, Bharuch. The
\nstatement of claim was filed by workman at Ex.4 and he was in service
\nfrom August, 1988 to May, 1999 i.e. more than ten years and completed
\n240 days service in each years, which fact has been denied by
\npetitioner while filing reply at Ex.6. On behalf of petitioner, one
\nNaginbhai Velabhai Patel was examined at Ex.19 and workman was
\nexamined at Ex.11. Both have been cross-examined by respective
\nparties. Thereafter, their evidence has been closed and after
\nconsidering submissions made by both learned advocates before Labour
\nCourt, issues have been framed by Labour Court whether the reference
\nof petitioner is barred by limitation ? The Labour Court has come to
\nconclusion that there is no provision made in Sec.10 which requires
\nto raise industrial dispute within some period of limitation.
\nTherefore, that contention raised by petitioner has been rejected.\n<\/p>\n
\tThereafter,
\nLabour Court has considered and appreciated oral evidence of workman
\nas well as evidence of witness of petitioner. The details of presence
\nproduced by petitioner before Labour Court by letter dated 1st
\nJune 2004. That letter has been considered by Labour Court, Bharuch
\nfor deciding the fact whether workman has completed continue service
\nof 240 days in a calender year or not ? According to aforesaid letter
\ndated 1st June 2004, in the year of 1990, workman has
\ncompleted continuous service of 271 days, in the year of 1991,
\nworkman has completed continuous service of 230 days, in the year of
\n1992, workman has completed continuous service of 276 days, in the
\nyear of 1993, workman has completed continuous service of 264 days,
\nin the year of 1994, workman has completed continuous service of 277
\ndays, in the year of 1995, workman has completed continuous service
\nof 287 days and in the year of 1996, workman has completed continuous
\nservice of 213 days. For rest of period, no details have been
\nsupplied by petitioner before Labour Court. Therefore, considering
\naforesaid letter dated 1st June 2004 of petitioner, the
\ntermination of workman is covered by Sec.2(oo) of the Industrial
\nDisputes Act, 1947 as retrenchment and considering date of
\ntermination 9th July 1999 which amounts to retrenchment
\nand Sec.25F admittedly not followed or complied by petitioner,
\ntherefore, Labour Court has in terms come to conclusion that
\ntermination of workman violating mandatory provisions of Section 25F
\nis required to be set aside and workman is entitled reinstatement in
\nservice.\n<\/p>\n
\tThe
\nLabour Court has considered one decision of Apex Court in case of UP
\nState Electricity Board v. Laxmikant Gupta<\/a> reported in 2009 LLR Page
\n1, where, following observation has been made by Apex Court which is
\nquoted as under :\n<\/p>\n
 Thus,
\nit is evident that there has been a shift in the legal position which
\nhas been modified by this Court and now there is no hard and fast
\nprinciple now that on the termination of service being found to be
\nillegal, the normal rule is re-instatement with back-wages.
\nCompensation can be awarded instead, at the discretion of the Labour
\nCourt, depending on the facts and circumstances of the case.\n<\/p>\n
\tTherefore,
\naforesaid observation made by Apex Court has been considered as well
\nas delay aspect has also taken into account and keeping in mind that
\nrespondent was a daily wager driver and vehicle was not in running
\ncondition and there was no work available with petitioner, therefore,
\na lump-sum amount of Rs.25,000\/- has been awarded to respondent
\nworkman.\n<\/p>\n
\tI
\nhave considered the contentions raised by learned advocate Mr.
\nMunshaw and I have also considered reasoning given by Labour Court.
\nAccording to my opinion, termination of workman is illegal, because,
\nSection 25F has been violated by petitioner, therefore, workman is
\nentitled the relief of reinstatement, but, that relief has not been
\ngranted considering relevant factors as decided by Apex Court in
\naforesaid decision of UP State Electricity Board (supra) and also
\nconsidering delay aspect in raising dispute after a period of five
\nyears, daily wager not appointed by due process of selection and no
\nwork is available with petitioner and vehicle was not in running
\ncondition, therefore, according to my opinion, Labour Court has
\nrightly examined matter on the basis of evidence. For that, Labour
\nCourt has not committed any error which requires interference by this
\nCourt under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
\tHence,
\nthere is no substance in present petition, accordingly, present
\npetition is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
[H.K.\n<\/p>\n
RATHOD, J.]<\/p>\n
#Dave<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010 Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/5262\/2010 5\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5262 of 2010 ========================================================= BHARUCH DISTRICT PANCHAYAT & 1 – Petitioner(s) Versus MANSING SHIVABHAI PARMAR – Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-19T02:47:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-19T02:47:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":986,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-19T02:47:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-19T02:47:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-19T02:47:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010"},"wordCount":986,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010","name":"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-19T02:47:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharuch-vs-mansing-on-12-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bharuch vs Mansing on 12 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107758"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107758\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}