{"id":107818,"date":"2009-10-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009"},"modified":"2018-01-26T06:40:29","modified_gmt":"2018-01-26T01:10:29","slug":"the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 21501 of 2009(G)\n\n\n1. THE POLICE STAFF CO-OPERATIVE\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SUNIL KUMAR,\n\n3. DEEPA S.NAIR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU S. NAIR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :26\/10\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                             S.SIRI JAGAN, J.\n\n                     ==================\n\n                       W.P(C).No.21501 of 2009\n\n                     ==================\n\n              Dated this the 26th day of October, 2009\n\n                             J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
     The management in I.D.No.27\/2009 before the Industrial<\/p>\n
Tribunal, Kollam, is the petitioner herein. The petitioner is the<\/p>\n
President of a co-operative society. He is challenging Ext.P4 award<\/p>\n
passed by the Tribunal in that I.D.\n<\/p>\n
     2.    The issue referred for adjudication was:\n<\/p>\n
           “Whether    the   following nine  employees   are eligible for
\n     reinstatement in service.\n<\/p>\n
           (1)   T.Rajendrakumar, Santhinilayam,
\n                 Maruthenkuzhy, Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (2)   P.K.Shajan, Raheela Manzhil, Kumarapuram,
\n                 Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (3)   S.Mohandas, T.C.10\/556, Peroorkada P.O.,
\n                 Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (4)   Mohanakumar, Thazhathuvila Veedu,
\n                 Chengal, Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (5)   S.Pradeepan, Plavila Veedu, Venniyoor,
\n                 Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (6)   Sunilkumar, Sunil Nivas, Goureesapattom,
\n                 Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (7)   Radhikakumari, Ponnu Nivas, Mettukada,
\n                 Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (8)   Sreekala, K.P.No.8\/38, Kudappanakkunnu,
\n                 Thiruvananthapuram.\n<\/p>\n
           (9)   Deepa.S.Nair, Sukumara Bhavan, Pottayil,
\n                 Thiruvananthapuram.”\n<\/p>\n
                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n
      3.    Out of the nine employees involved, only two employees<\/p>\n
actively participated in the dispute. Therefore, the Tribunal considered<\/p>\n
their case only in the dispute. The Tribunal came to the conclusion that<\/p>\n
those two employees were illegally terminated from service. On that<\/p>\n
finding, the Tribunal, by the impugned award, directed the petitioner-<\/p>\n
management to reinstate the two workers with continuity of service<\/p>\n
within three months from the notification of the award without<\/p>\n
backwages. That award is under challenge in this writ petition.<\/p>\n
      4.    The petitioner raises three contentions. The first is that the<\/p>\n
employees were not regularly appointed and, therefore, they have no<\/p>\n
right to be reinstated in service. The second is that as is evidenced by<\/p>\n
Exts.M1 and W1 marked in the Industrial Dispute, the workers were<\/p>\n
engaged as temporary workers and by the award, the workers have<\/p>\n
been directed to be regualarised in service, which is patently illegal.<\/p>\n
The third is that the workers have not sufficiently proved that they<\/p>\n
have completed 240 days in an year so as to become entitled to the<\/p>\n
benefits under the Industrial Disputes Act.<\/p>\n
      5.    I have considered the contentions of the petitioner.<\/p>\n
      6.    Regarding the first contention of the management, the<\/p>\n
management witnesses themselves admitted before the Tribunal that<\/p>\n
the appointments were made from among the names forwarded by the<\/p>\n
State Co-operative Union, which is the mode prescribed by the<\/p>\n
                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n
Government for filling up temporary vacancies. Therefore,             the<\/p>\n
petitioner cannot be heard to contend that the workers were not<\/p>\n
appointed legally. Regarding the second contention to the effect that<\/p>\n
temporary employees are not entitled to the benefits of the Industrial<\/p>\n
Disputes Act, the benefits of the Industrial Disputes Act are applicale to<\/p>\n
‘workmen’ as defined under the Act whether temporary or on daily<\/p>\n
wages or permanent. That being so, because the workers are<\/p>\n
temporary workers, they cannot be denied the benefits of the<\/p>\n
Industrial Disputes Act provided the conditions in the Act are satisfied.<\/p>\n
Further, the management witnesses themselves admitted before the<\/p>\n
Tribunal that the workers were doing the day to day work of the<\/p>\n
society and since the permanent workers are not sufficient, at least 4<\/p>\n
more employees are necessary to do the day to day work of the<\/p>\n
society. That being so, I am not inclined to countenance the contention<\/p>\n
of the petitioner that the work done by the workmen in question is<\/p>\n
temporary in nature. Regarding the last contention, the workmen have<\/p>\n
gone to the box and deposed that they have completed 240 days work<\/p>\n
in an year. They had sought production of the records kept by the<\/p>\n
society for five years to further prove their contention. However, the<\/p>\n
management produced records only for two months viz., May, 1998<\/p>\n
and June 1998 instead of five years, for which the reason given by the<\/p>\n
management is that remaining books are with the Vigilance<\/p>\n
                                         4<\/span><\/p>\n
Department in connection with the case of WW2. The very same<\/p>\n
witness admitted before the Tribunal in the cross examination that in<\/p>\n
respect of the two workers involved, there were absolutely no<\/p>\n
allegations whatsoever. It is also admitted that the society has no<\/p>\n
complaints against them. Apart from that, the question as to whether<\/p>\n
the workers completed 240 days in an year is a question of fact, which<\/p>\n
has been decided in favour of the workmen by the Tribunal. This Court<\/p>\n
cannot overturn that finding unless the same is perverse. I do not find<\/p>\n
anything perverse in the finding of the Tribunal. Lastly, the petitioner<\/p>\n
would contend that the Tribunal has directed regularisation of the<\/p>\n
services of the two workmen, which is not permissible in law. I do not<\/p>\n
find even the word “regularisation” in the award. What has been stated<\/p>\n
in the award is as follows:\n<\/p>\n
            “In the result I hold that Sri.Sunil Kumar and Smt.Deepa.S.Nair
\n      are entitled to reinstatement in the establishment of management with
\n      continuity of service. I am directing the management to reinstate the
\n      above workers with continuity of service with (sic) 3 months from the
\n      date of notification of this award.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Therefore, I do not find any merit in that contention also.<\/p>\n
      In the above circumstances, I do not find any merit in the<\/p>\n
contentions of the petitioner and accordingly, the writ petition is<\/p>\n
dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
                                                           Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
sdk+                                                S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE\n         \/\/\/True copy\/\/\/\n                                   P.A. to Judge\n\n5<\/span>\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 21501 of 2009(G) 1. THE POLICE STAFF CO-OPERATIVE … Petitioner Vs 1. THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, … Respondent 2. SUNIL KUMAR, 3. DEEPA S.NAIR, For Petitioner :SRI.BABU S. NAIR For Respondent : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-26T01:10:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-26T01:10:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":831,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009\",\"name\":\"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-26T01:10:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-26T01:10:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-26T01:10:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009"},"wordCount":831,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009","name":"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-26T01:10:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-police-staff-co-operative-vs-the-industrial-tribunal-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Police Staff Co-Operative vs The Industrial Tribunal on 26 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107818"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107818\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}