{"id":107844,"date":"2009-09-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009"},"modified":"2015-04-29T17:33:02","modified_gmt":"2015-04-29T12:03:02","slug":"vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
WP No.7240\/2006\n\n: 2 :\nNADA KACHERI\nKAUJALAGI  \nTQ:CrOKAK, DIST:BELGAUM. ...RES1?~QN  A' \n\n{BY sR1.R.K.HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 AND 3,\nSRI.R.M.KULKARNI, ADV FOR R2)  p\n\nTHIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES' 226 AND 227.\nOF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FRAYING TC._Q--UASH_T.HE~._\nNOTICE DT.6.1.2006 PASSED BY' R3 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ,\nPAPER PUBLICATION DT.22.3.2.QO>-$ IN NO.NIL_ FUBLI'SHE'D IN *\nVIJAY KARNATAKA DAILY NEWS\"*1?APER IS'S.UEDEYv,R1 VIDE\nANNEX--}3 PURPORTEDLY ISSUED UNDER RULES (1)? OF THE\nSECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES, 200'2'IN SO FAR\nAS THE PE'I'I'I'IONER'S S'CHEDULE_'PRO_PERTY IS CONCERNED\nAT SL.NO.9 OF PUBLICATIONVIDE'AI\\INEX-E13348 AND ETC.,\n\nTHIS FE'Ifni1ON ccj._'IQ1'ING~V:ON'  PRELIMINARY HEARING\nIN 'B' GROUP, '1'H1S;;.DAY.,  COURT MADETHE FOLLOWING:\n\n1. i\"L\"iHS\"'V11\"C1\u00a3ifi'1'1 diff3put'e.,that thepetitioner has availed loan\nfrom the 21391'respOnder1_t;=..nijgpcording to petitioner, he has\n\nrepaid a stirn of  The respondents have initiated<\/pre>\n
 I prQc\u00e9:edi_rigs under.t.he\u00ab’Securitisation and Reconstruction of<\/p>\n
 ‘Fiin’ancia1*A’bSSetS_ and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,<\/p>\n
2’OU2;  ‘the Act’) for recovery of the said amount.<\/p>\n
 Thearesponhdients’ ciaim that they have issued a notice 11\/ s 13<\/p>\n
 (2)’ the Act and further since there was no reply they have<\/p>\n
 ‘initiated proceedings for recovery of the amount by bringing<\/p>\n
it “the property to Sale. It is noticed that this Court granted an<\/p>\n
\/’3\/<\/p>\n
WP N0.7240\/2006<\/p>\n
interim order subject to the petitioner depositing aV.suJn1,.Vof
\nRs.30,279\/–. Learned counsel for the
\nthat the said amount has already been deposit.ed:.’:~v._V V  in i it<\/p>\n
2. Another request made by  pe4ti.t’1o’r1eri..in–:
\npetition is that he has givenfan applica”tion\/.1’e’pVre:sentatiioniii’;
\nfor furnishing particulars.  loan
\ntransaction particulars   Counsel for the
\npetitioner furtherppsubmitgspthat  application to<\/p>\n
the respondent\u00a7l\u00a73’j3;nk for one’ .settlement.<\/p>\n
3. lVIri{Kull<iarnii,i?flearned co1i_tn'seil for the 2nd respondent
\nsubmitspthatithe'\u00abp'1*oper"pro,oedure as contemplated under<\/p>\n
the Act hasbeen  Hence, it is not open for the<\/p>\n
" <   new toi"covn..tend that notice has not been issued.<\/p>\n
 44;    is made available either by the petitioner<\/p>\n
or  thegiiiespiondents to show that before initiating action<\/p>\n
ix__for bringing the property to sale, proceedings have been<\/p>\n
'~ii:"initia\u00abted under the Act, notice has been issued and a reply<\/p>\n
has been given. Indeed, before bringing the property to sale,<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
WP No.7240\/2006<\/p>\n
the respondents are required to issue a noticeVV.Vtio:'the
\nborrower calling upon him to indicate as to
\npayable and in the event of non-payment.~o–fi..U_the:
\ndebts, the property would be broiipht\ufb02toiyp
\nborrower is also required to  t0iith:e"said
\n(2) of the Act as conternplatedivitiji\/'s l3  reply
\nthereof is required to t1._,{'1–3A {3Ai)Hand 13 (4) of
\nthe Act. Indeed no  to show that
\nsuch an exerci'se"fias  I am of the
\nView that    the property to sale
\n  provisions. Hence,
\nthe following   .\n<\/p>\n
V_’I_v’he petition ‘V–.isi”._alloiNed. The impugned proposed<\/p>\n
” *  _Aauction;_i:3 set aside;’*~—-*It”is open for the respondents to initiate<\/p>\n
 action \u00e9;f15E\u00a7’S:1i” they choose to do so. The respondents shall<\/p>\n
alsoi”conside”r the application \/ representation if any given by<\/p>\n
the petitioner for one time settlement. Petition stands<\/p>\n
C_”disp’osed of accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
WP N0.7240\/2006<\/p>\n
5. Mr.R.K.Hatti, I-ICGP is permitted to file rrv1V.c=:Va’a_1:c’)T._V0f<\/p>\n
appearance within four Weeks.\n<\/p>\n
Jm\/–\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       M’ x<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal WP No.7240\/2006 : 2 : NADA KACHERI KAUJALAGI TQ:CrOKAK, DIST:BELGAUM. …RES1?~QN A’ {BY sR1.R.K.HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 AND 3, SRI.R.M.KULKARNI, ADV FOR R2) p THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES’ 226 AND 227. OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FRAYING […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-107844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-29T12:03:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-29T12:03:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":444,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-29T12:03:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-29T12:03:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-29T12:03:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009"},"wordCount":444,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009","name":"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-29T12:03:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-vs-the-competent-officer-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vijaya vs The Competent Officer on 14 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107844\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}