{"id":108451,"date":"2008-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008"},"modified":"2018-01-25T23:14:27","modified_gmt":"2018-01-25T17:44:27","slug":"neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum … on 9 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum … on 9 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
A i  \"(B'?'$.\u00a3Ri='E},N'.\u00a7\u00a7ULKA\u00a7f\u20aci, I-ICGP)\n\n : 'KQPPAL--- \" DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED BY THE\n1 \"'-V'_P_Ej'lTIONER HEREIN U\/S 114 or CPC FOR RECALLING\nA  THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC No.114\/95\n\nT  '\"l\u00a7ATED 3.4.96\n\nNo.2\/03 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUI)GE(SR.DN)\nKOPPAL DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED BY_.._'\u00a7'HE\nPEFITIONER HEREIN ms 114 OF CPC FOR RECAALIENG\nTHE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC NO'.\"}.(_)1\/96\nDATED 23.9.96.  j \u00bb .   , '1.\n\nIN QRP N0.709I2005:\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSm HULIGEVVA,\n\nW\/0 TIPPANNA YELIGAAR, A A\n\nAGE 49 YEARS, occ: AGR1L.,  \"\n\nR\/0 ARAKERI, TQ. YELBURGA, A % -. \u00e9  \nms? KOPPAL.   _  ..pE'-m'1QNER\n\n(BY SR1 LAXMAN T. MA'Ni4AGAEi\u00a7--,'gxDV{j'_;.  _\n\n5-\"-9-5 9 \u00a5} _ \n\n1. THE As:\u00a71EifAa~j'r'   '\nCUM LANE) ;%C$QUISfPIOi\\\u00a5 DFFIQER,\nKOPPAL,-TQ AND \"D1'E1f';---KDPPAL.\n\n2. THEV\"\ufb013S13'FANT\"F3XECUfF'IVE ENGINEER,\n\nT.R.DD11sION 'R03. Nl\"'LI\u00a7\u00a7IRA3AD,\nTQ. HOSPET, DI~S'T'.._KO,PPAL.\n   ~ ..RESPONDEN'I'S\n\n\" \"i';E\u00a7EA,..1s FILED UNDER SECTION 151 01:' cm\nAGA3'NSr.m_E1' ORDER DATED 5.8.05 PASSED IN msc.\nNo.21\/9;; 'Du THE FILE on' THE cmr. ..IuDGE{sR.Dn)\n\n \n\n\n\nIN CRP NCLTOOIQOOS:\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n \n\nSm' SHIVAWWA   \n\nw\/0 HANUMAPPA I\n\nAGE 44 YEARS, occ: AGRIL.,\n\nRIO ARAKERI,TQ.YELBURCi'sA,    ' \nDIST 'KOPPAL. '   V .I1?EI'I'I*I;3:\u00ab..I.E,I:z=\n\n(BY SR1 LAXMAN T. !~IIl_\\_If3'1'AG$.l*J_IVV;A' IADII.) \n\n1. THE AS$I$TA3\u00a7*i'_--_C0\u00a7v\ufb01h;i:If.\u00a7Si{\u00a7}NEf\u00a7 \" \nCUM LAND_..AcQU.1sI'P1j0N-- OFFICER,\nKOI\u00a7P{\u00a7L,\"\u00bbTQ- $30 r)_IsIf'.- \n\n2. THE ASSIST}'\u00a7H.T'EXF4CU'F!VE ENGINEER,\n\nT.R;I)IvIsIo.N NO. I\u00bb,_NII1NI_RABAD,\nTQ. H{)SPET,*~DIST. _I?'AL.\n - -_   ..RESPONDEN'I'S\n\n =  _ (I=I*If'sI\u00a7I:'D.I~I.I IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC\n\n 'AI:-.AIIIs*It.V*rIII3.I~~oRDER DATED 5.3.05 PASSED IN MISC\n\n'II0;3I\/\u20acI3'j----o'II THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JuI:)GE(sR.I)N)\nKC}!-\"PA..L~ IIISMISSING THE PETITION FILED BY THE\n\nPETFFIQNER HEREIN UIS 114 OF CPO FOR RECALLING\n\n THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC NO.12]96\n DEITED 11.10.96.\n\n  _ fin CRP N0.71OI2_0O5:\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n \n\nYELLAREDAPPA RAMAREDAR\nSINCE DECEASED. BY HIS L.RS.\n\nA) PARVATAMMA,\n\nW,' 0 YELLI\"'\u00a7RE'JP.P?A -.P.l'.{RED.%R,\n\n\n\n , A_ IN V1sio.f7oS(':2-t2o__5__\u00bb_;\u00a2 ,\n   .,\n\n1%NI\u00a7SASP;i\"1NAi\u00a7ASAPPA BAGANAL\n\n  ' u,DISI' KQBPAL. ..PETITIONER\n'5\"(Ss:r S\u00a7zI LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADV. )\n  A \u00a5%lD:\n\n\" 1. THE ASSISTANT COMIVHSSIONER\n\n(BY SR1 LAXMAN T. MANTAGAN I, ADV. )\n\nA__.P.iD.=. \n\n1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER T T\ncum LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,'---_\nKOPPAL, TQ AND DIST. KGPLPAL. ' *\n\n2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE\"E._NGINEER,._ \nT.R.DWZSi0N NO.I, MUNIRABAD,  \nTQ. HOSPET, I)IS'I'.'KOPPAL. _,    \n S ; ..'izSSPQNDSmS\n\n(BY SR! D.N.KUI._{KARNI%_\"HC\u00e91?   V\n\nTHIS__CRP \u00a7S_g3.<'ILEI) win-ER SECTION 115 OF CPC\nAGAINST THE..-'ORDER 'DATE--1D_~ S'.=3.'O5 PASSED IN MISC\nNo.25\/Q3" on "-Tm; V FILE_ '01? ____'I'HE crvn, JUDGE(SR.m:)\nKOPPAL D'iSae11SsIi\u00e9wG_ 'THE PETFTION FILED BY THE\nPETYFKJNER HER-Eliit U-,I_S~-.114\u00bb OF CPC FOR RECALLING\nTHE JUDGMENT AND'AW'--ARD PASSED IN LAC NO.53[96\nDATED 31,1337.   S  '\n\nAGE" 40 YEARS, occ: AGRIL.,\nR\/O "ARAi{ERI, TQ. YELBURGA,\n\nCUM LAND ACQU!SI'I'I()N OFFICER,\nKOPPAL, TQ AN D DIST. KOPPAL.\n\n2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,\nT.R.DIVISIOI'.' N511, ML'NIRABP.D,\n\n\n\n12\n\nmarket value. The said Execution Petition was \n\nthe Executing Court, by its order dated,  *\n\nAggrieveci by this order, the_,appe}]aIif "?\u00a71ee'i "C..R.R\n\nNo.3923\/2002. T131.-3' Court, by its  (mie'1_',e :%at\u00e9dee'2s}h \n\n2003 disposed of the  '*n  pe\ufb01ti}e'\ufb02,i._'v19Izit,hE anff\n\nobservation that it is ogen to    \napplication before  % for appropriate\norders. Pursuant therem-,..et_i1e  Misce\ufb02aneous\nNo.32\/2003 _ Code of Civil\nProcedure.     rejected by the\n   05\/08\/2005. Impuwing\n\nthese ozeciers,  '  presented.\n\n..     'I'.Mamagam', the learned counsel for\n\n ethe.  eubzrnits that the g;ranting of interest on\n\n  market value is automatic and\n\nV Vv _  According to him, as per the scheme of the\n\n" H "  mi2.'l'Z1\u00a7i A\u00e9xziuisi\ufb02ion Act 1894, the land loser is entitled to\n\n  ieteieet on the dehayed payment of solatium and additional\n\n  value as a matter of course. In support of tin\n\nV submissions, he has :re}ied on an order, dated 05\/12\/2007\n\npassed by this Court in C.R.P No.3402[20D\u00a7 wherein it is\n\nheld that if a part of the azwanied amount remains unpaid, it\n\n9:3!-I.\n\n\n\nx V?  amount, is de\ufb01nitely not tenab 1e and is aceozvdm gly\n\nmeans that the award is not fully satis\ufb01ed. The \nportion of the said older is extracw herein  \u00abd    A' \n\n"8.   ...If either the entire \ndetermined inclusive of the angioujif \n\nSection 23{1--A) of the Act is ndtvpeiii' 'or int\u00e9ms2\u00ab\u00a2giede,e,"e\n\nthe entire amount \ufb01*d:_n~.._the '-date of  R\npossession till the date of  \nand paid, then it \u00e9~..*x_;ou1:t;t\u00a7 Vdthe  5.33 not\nfully satis\ufb01ed  * xjthe person in\nWhose favour:   made\ncan \ufb01ne ;e._xe::u.\ufb01in'gV \nthe     1' the ' earlier execution\npc+_i1:'uo;i\ufb01$r   Rang as it is permitted\nfer dredd execute the decree before\nthe mm  the perkad of limitation\nplcs\u00e9fi\ufb01\ufb01d \n\n_ V   execution petition not having\nV    on the gnound of limitation, but on\n\n  the  that the judgment was not explicit in\n\n  the solatium and additional market value\n also for awarding interest on the entire\n\n set aside and the matter remanded to the executing\ncourt to enable the respondents to deposit the<\/pre>\n
balance deexetal amount before the execu\ufb01tmg court,
\nby eomputing the amount as indicated by the
\nSupreme Court in Stmdefs (Supna). Deposit to be
\nmade within eight weeks from this day, failing
\nwhich,itisopentothexevisionpe\ufb01tionerton;1ove<\/p>\n
HBH.\n<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
the executing court to take action for realization 95%’: <\/p>\n
the balance amount as indicated in this ordcr.”__ ‘      <\/p>\n
5. Nextly, he has also  j. that: {;
\nBench Judgment of this Court in % the  of  <\/p>\n
zmmaz-m .maLvx mm
\nAwram
\nreported in am 2004 ms  that :4;
\nis the duty of the  to grant
\ninterest on  “valucg once the
\nconditions   34 of the Act an:\n<\/p>\n
satiskd) to me    am.-:.~1 of that relief to fm
\nowners of th\u00e9  be totally unjust, illegal
\nand vinlat\ufb01\ufb01 91′  34 of the Land Aoqu1s:t:o’ ‘ ‘ 11<\/p>\n
6*.’  Sxi  also sought to draw the support<\/p>\n
 Couzfs judgment in the case of
\nA  mm or mm, reported in max 413 saw
\n   ;’l’h\u00a2 relevant poxtions of the judgment are extracted<\/p>\n
  A  } % <\/p>\n
’14. Question of payment of intemst would misc
\nonly when the compensation is not paid or
\ndcmsited on or before the date of taking<\/p>\n
REH.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
12. Each of the principies hid down or <\/p>\n
prescribed henzin above are to be applied to the  _<\/p>\n
case on hand. 30 flat as the principle (a)  gigs  A <\/p>\n
not see in the Reference Court’s <\/p>\n
the chin; for interest was exptesslf”     *’<\/p>\n
Applying’ the Principle (b). as t\ufb01e:”<:.a1m' f   not
\nbeen made and   for the<\/p>\n
Executing Court to apply  cfftf  case.\n<\/p>\n
13. Althqi1g._11 t\ufb01e’ V’  7 Qoixxt states that<\/p>\n
satisfaction;  to be more
\nformal    say so because the
\nExecutiyg ._   ~’ dismissing the Exzecuiion
\nPetition  -mas.  I hold mt them is no<\/p>\n
mexfitg\u00e9  the  ofthe DH, the EP is dismissed, with<\/p>\n
 tt:1e.__DH to \ufb01le fresh EP, in case, they are stilt<\/p>\n
I  of intemst on solatium and additional<\/p>\n
market faialzte’.’A’ The reservation of such a liberty clearly<\/p>\n
    the issue relatmg’ to interest on solatium and<\/p>\n
A    market value was kept open.\n<\/p>\n
14. In the next round of execution pmoeedjngs, the<\/p>\n
‘4 Executing Court closed the proceedings without resexviag<\/p>\n
FIE!-I.\n<\/p>\n
21<\/span><\/p>\n
matter to the Executing Court for the purpose of qnani\ufb01ying<\/p>\n
the amounts, if any, payahk: by the 1vcspond_\u00e9jits’A\u00bb  _
\npetitioners. Both the pcthmners and the    <\/p>\n
\ufb01le their fresh memos of calculations  <\/p>\n
on solatium and additional  vain: ~:;m:’ cut = L’<\/p>\n
oifdatc Le. 19\/09\/2oo1V%.\n<\/p>\n
17. Appt’13ac:v1″a1:i11g”””:.t\u00a7:i.f=1t ”   land
\nacquisition      ago, I also deem
\nit   cam to dispose of the
\n  out\ufb01t limit of 2 months from
\ntoday. ‘Fur’ther,’,  and the respondents<\/p>\n
shall;   memos of oaiculationsbcforc the<\/p>\n
. V. ‘”AR\u00a2f’e1t{:.n\u00e9\u00a7e  dn””3’1\/07\/2008 without waiting for any<\/p>\n
‘  .   , Iigxwu\ufb01on Court.\n<\/p>\n
A  No.o1\u00a7_d\u00a7.2rTVas to costs.<\/p>\n
Sd\/”%’
\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum … on 9 July, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri A i “(B’?’$.\u00a3Ri=’E},N’.\u00a7\u00a7ULKA\u00a7f\u20aci, I-ICGP) : ‘KQPPAL— ” DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED BY THE 1 “‘-V’_P_Ej’lTIONER HEREIN U\/S 114 or CPC FOR RECALLING A THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC No.114\/95 T ‘”l\u00a7ATED 3.4.96 No.2\/03 ON THE FILE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNeelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum ... on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum ... on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-25T17:44:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum … on 9 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-25T17:44:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":465,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum ... on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-25T17:44:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum … on 9 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum ... on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum ... on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-25T17:44:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum … on 9 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-25T17:44:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008"},"wordCount":465,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008","name":"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum ... on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-25T17:44:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/neelawwa-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-cum-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Neelawwa vs The Assistant Commissioner Cum … on 9 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108451"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108451\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}