{"id":108730,"date":"2011-08-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011"},"modified":"2018-08-30T21:33:12","modified_gmt":"2018-08-30T16:03:12","slug":"mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                          Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                             File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000336\u00adSM\n                     Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0hearing                         :                                       8\u00a0August\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0decision                        :                                       8\u00a0August\u00a02011\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant                   :    Shri\u00a0Dipak\u00a0Bhattacharyya\n                                             Chamber\u00a0No.\u00a0233,\u00a0Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0Lawyer's\u00a0\n                                             Chambers,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0          :    CPIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Commission,\n                                             Satarkta\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0GPO\u00a0Complex,\n                                             Block\u00a0A,\u00a0INA,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0023.\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Tusar\u00a0Mahapatra.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Keshav\u00a0Rao,\u00a0Director\u00a0was\u00a0present.<\/pre>\n<p>Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner                    :       Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra<\/p>\n<p>2.      Both \u00a0 the \u00a0 parties \u00a0 were \u00a0 present \u00a0 during \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing. \u00a0 We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 their\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>submissions.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0raised\u00a0a\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0queries\u00a0and\u00a0sought\u00a0a\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>information\u00a0regarding\u00a0a\u00a0representation\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CVC\u00a0pursuant\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>orders\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0High\u00a0Court\u00a0dated\u00a020\u00a0November\u00a02002.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0had\u00a0informed\u00a0him\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>that\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0representation\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Steel\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>further\u00a0necessary\u00a0action\u00a0and,\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0handling\u00a0policy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CVC,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>no \u00a0 report \u00a0 was \u00a0 required \u00a0 to \u00a0 be \u00a0 obtained \u00a0 in \u00a0 such \u00a0 cases. \u00a0 The \u00a0 first \u00a0 Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Authority\u00a0had\u00a0endorsed\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      During\u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing,\u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 submitted\u00a0 that\u00a0 the \u00a0 High\u00a0 Court\u00a0 had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>given \u00a0 a \u00a0 categorical \u00a0 direction \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 CVC \u00a0 would \u00a0 consider \u00a0 and \u00a0 decide \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000336\u00adSM<br \/>\n representation\u00a0filed\u00a0before\u00a0it.\u00a0Instead,\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0was\u00a0merely\u00a0forwarded\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>to\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Steel.\u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0given\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>documentary\u00a0evidence\u00a0in\u00a0support\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CVC\u00a0to\u00a0transfer\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>representation; \u00a0 what \u00a0 had \u00a0 been \u00a0 given \u00a0 to \u00a0 him \u00a0 did \u00a0 not \u00a0 relate \u00a0 to \u00a0 his \u00a0 2003\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>representation.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0while\u00a0he\u00a0would\u00a0try\u00a0to\u00a0find\u00a0out\u00a0if\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0relevant\u00a0records\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02003\u00a0were\u00a0still\u00a0available\u00a0or\u00a0not,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0possible\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>that\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0might\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0destroyed\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0policy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CVC.<\/p>\n<p>5.      Whatever\u00a0be\u00a0the\u00a0position\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0availability\u00a0of\u00a0these\u00a0records,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>we\u00a0think\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0must\u00a0clarify\u00a0in\u00a0some\u00a0greater\u00a0detail\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0CVC\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0in\u00a02003\u00a0as\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>application.\u00a0Therefore,\u00a0we\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0within\u00a010\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>working\u00a0days\u00a0of\u00a0receiving\u00a0this\u00a0order,\u00a0the\u00a0photocopy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0file\u00a0noting\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>which\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0decided\u00a0to\u00a0forward\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0representation\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Steel\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>and, \u00a0 in \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 relevant \u00a0 records \u00a0 are \u00a0 no \u00a0 longer \u00a0 available, \u00a0 having \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>destroyed,\u00a0he\u00a0shall\u00a0clearly\u00a0state\u00a0so.\u00a0In\u00a0case\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0records\u00a0are\u00a0no\u00a0longer\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>available,\u00a0he\u00a0shall\u00a0forward\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0entry\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Complaints\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Register\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0representation\u00a0had\u00a0indeed\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Steel.\u00a0Besides,\u00a0we\u00a0also\u00a0direct\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>relevant\u00a0complaint\u00a0handling\u00a0policy\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0CVC\u00a0had\u00a0decided\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>send \u00a0 the \u00a0 representation \u00a0 only \u00a0 for \u00a0 necessary \u00a0 action \u00a0 and \u00a0 had \u00a0 not \u00a0 deemed \u00a0 it\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>necessary\u00a0to\u00a0make\u00a0further\u00a0investigations\u00a0into\u00a0it.<\/p>\n<p>6.      The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                  (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)<br \/>\n                                                   Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000336\u00adSM<br \/>\n          Authenticated \u00a0 true \u00a0 copy. \u00a0 \u00a0 Additional \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of \u00a0 orders \u00a0 shall \u00a0 be \u00a0 supplied \u00a0 against\u00a0<br \/>\napplication \u00a0 and \u00a0 payment \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 charges \u00a0 prescribed \u00a0 under \u00a0 the \u00a0 Act \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 of \u00a0 this\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                              (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)<br \/>\n                                                                                         Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000336\u00adSM\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2010\/000336\u00adSM Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing : 8\u00a0August\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0decision : 8\u00a0August\u00a02011 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant : Shri\u00a0Dipak\u00a0Bhattacharyya Chamber\u00a0No.\u00a0233,\u00a0Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0Lawyer&#8217;s\u00a0 Chambers,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Commission, Satarkta\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0GPO\u00a0Complex, Block\u00a0A,\u00a0INA,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110\u00a0023. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Tusar\u00a0Mahapatra. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Keshav\u00a0Rao,\u00a0Director\u00a0was\u00a0present. Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner : Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra 2. Both \u00a0 the \u00a0 parties \u00a0 were \u00a0 present \u00a0 during \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing. \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-30T16:03:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-30T16:03:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":484,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-30T16:03:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-30T16:03:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-30T16:03:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011"},"wordCount":484,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011","name":"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-30T16:03:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dipak-bhattacharyya-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-8-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Dipak Bhattacharyya vs Central Vigilance Commission on 8 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108730"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108730\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}