{"id":108812,"date":"2008-10-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008"},"modified":"2017-01-27T18:25:52","modified_gmt":"2017-01-27T12:55:52","slug":"gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008<\/div>\n
R.S.A. No.1677 of 2008                                             -1-\n\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                   AT CHANDIGARH\n                   ****\n                             R.S.A. No.1677 of 2008\n                            Date of Decision:23.10.2008\n\nGurjant Singh and another\n                                                             .....Appellants\n          Vs.\nSom Nath alias Jang Bahadur\n                                                             .....Respondent\n\nCORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARBANS LAL\n\nPresent:-     Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate for the appellants.\n                          ****\nHARBANS LAL, J.\n<\/pre>\n
              This second appeal is directed against the judgment\/ decree<\/p>\n
dated 21.11.2007 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Bathinda,<\/p>\n
whereby she dismissed the appeal preferred against the judgment\/ decree<\/p>\n
dated 27.1.2007 rendered by the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division),<\/p>\n
Bathinda whereby he decreed the suit of the plaintiff for the recovery of<\/p>\n
Rs.1,78,350\/- with costs together with pendente-lite interest at the rate of<\/p>\n
12% per annum and future interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the<\/p>\n
principal amount of Rs.1,23,000\/- till actual realisation.<\/p>\n
              The facts which led to the filing of the suit are that Harbans<\/p>\n
Singh, father of both the defendants borrowed a cash loan of Rs.1,23,000\/-<\/p>\n
from the plaintiff for domestic needs by executing a pronote and receipt<\/p>\n
dated 1.4.2001 in favour of the plaintiff. He had agreed to repay the same<\/p>\n
along with interest at the rate of 2% per month. He expired leaving behind<\/p>\n
the defendants as his legal heirs. His property has been inherited by these<\/p>\n
defendants.    Mutation No.10414 qua his alleged inheritance has been<\/p>\n
sanctioned in their favour. The plaintiff requested Harbans Singh during his
\n R.S.A. No.1677 of 2008                                         -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
life time to repay the above-mentioned amount along with interest. After<\/p>\n
his death, similar requests were made to the defendants to make the payment<\/p>\n
of the aforesaid amount together with interest, but of no avail. On 7.1.2003,<\/p>\n
the plaintiff got served a legal registered notice calling upon the defendants<\/p>\n
to repay the amount in question, but in vain. On these allegations, this suit<\/p>\n
has been filed for the recovery of      Rs.1,78,350\/- comprising principal<\/p>\n
amount Rs.1,23,000\/- and interest Rs.55,350\/- at the rate of 2% per month<\/p>\n
calculated upto 15.2.2003. In their written statement, the defendants denied<\/p>\n
obtaining of any loan from the plaintiff by their father Harbans Singh, since<\/p>\n
deceased. It has been alleged that there was no legal necessity for their<\/p>\n
father to borrow the loan amount and that the alleged pronote and receipt<\/p>\n
are forged and fabricated documents. It is further alleged that Harbans<\/p>\n
Singh never disclosed to the defendants regarding borrowing of loan<\/p>\n
amount by him from the plaintiff. That he was a patient of high blood<\/p>\n
pressure, tension and was not in a disposing state of mind and ultimately<\/p>\n
expired on 8.5.2001.     Lastly, it has been prayed that the suit may be<\/p>\n
dismissed with costs. The following issues were framed:-<\/p>\n
             1.    Whether for due consideration the defendant executed<\/p>\n
                   pronote and receipt in favour of plaintiff on 1.4.2001?<\/p>\n
                   OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             2.    Whether plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount<\/p>\n
                   claimed? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             3.    Whether plaintiff is entitled to interest. If so at what<\/p>\n
                   rate? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             4.    Whether suit is not maintainable in the present form?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                   OPD
\n R.S.A. No.1677 of 2008                                            -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             5.     Whether plaintiff has got no cause of action against the<\/p>\n
                    defendant? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             6.     Whether suit of the plaintiff is based on forged and<\/p>\n
                    fabricated documents? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
             7.     Relief.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and examining<\/p>\n
the evidence on record, the learned trial Court decreed the suit as noticed at<\/p>\n
the outset. Feeling aggrieved therewith, the defendants went up in appeal<\/p>\n
which also met failure as noticed at the outset.           Being undaunted and<\/p>\n
dissatisfied therewith, they have preferred this appeal.<\/p>\n
             I have heard learned counsel for the defendants- appellants,<\/p>\n
besides perusing the findings returned by both the Courts below with due<\/p>\n
care and circumspection.\n<\/p>\n
             Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate on behalf of the appellants<\/p>\n
canvassed at the bar that Harbans Singh, father of the defendants- appellants<\/p>\n
was about 80 years of age at the time of alleged loan amount and execution<\/p>\n
of the pronote and receipt and he had no legal necessity to borrow such a<\/p>\n
huge amount when he was in the evening of his life and furthermore, the<\/p>\n
plaintiff\/ respondent has failed to prove the source from which he had<\/p>\n
arranged the alleged amount for being paid to Harbans Singh- deceased and<\/p>\n
in these premises, both the Courts below were not justified in accepting the<\/p>\n
claim of the plaintiff. These contentions merit rejection for the discussion<\/p>\n
to follow hereunder.\n<\/p>\n
             Bogha Singh, Ex. Sarpanch PW.1 by tendering his affidavit<\/p>\n
Ex.PW1\/A had solemnly affirmed that on 1.4.2001 Harbans Singh, father of<\/p>\n
the defendants had borrowed a sum of Rs.1,23,000\/- in cash from the
\n R.S.A. No.1677 of 2008                                         -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
plaintiff in his presence and the marginal witnesses Ami`r Chand, Bhana<\/p>\n
Mal and Gurmit Singh with the promise to repay the same together with<\/p>\n
interest at the rate of 2% per month and that the pronote is Ex.P.1 and the<\/p>\n
receipt is Ex.P.2. Amar Chand, PW2 by tendering his affidavit PW2\/A has<\/p>\n
also proved the execution of the disputed pronote\/ receipt as well as passing<\/p>\n
of the consideration. As is borne out from the findings returned by both the<\/p>\n
Courts below, the credibility of the statements of these witnesses could not<\/p>\n
be impeached in any manner.        On appraising their evidence, it is well<\/p>\n
established that the disputed pronote and receipt were executed by Harbans<\/p>\n
Singh, deceased in favour of the plaintiff for consideration. Section 118-(a)<\/p>\n
of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 contemplates that if execution of<\/p>\n
the promissory note is proved by the plaintiff, the onus shifts on to the<\/p>\n
defendant to demonstrate that the same were executed without<\/p>\n
consideration. Here in this case, the presumption arising under this Section<\/p>\n
has gone unrebutted.     On careful delving into the concurrent findings<\/p>\n
returned by both the Courts below, it transpires that the same do not suffer<\/p>\n
from any infirmity and are not liable to be disturbed.       This apart, no<\/p>\n
substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court in this<\/p>\n
appeal. Sequelly, this appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
October 23, 2008                                  ( HARBANS LAL )\nrenu                                                   JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008 R.S.A. No.1677 of 2008 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** R.S.A. No.1677 of 2008 Date of Decision:23.10.2008 Gurjant Singh and another …..Appellants Vs. Som Nath alias Jang Bahadur …..Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-27T12:55:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-27T12:55:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":962,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-27T12:55:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-27T12:55:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-27T12:55:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008"},"wordCount":962,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008","name":"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-27T12:55:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gurjant-singh-and-another-vs-som-nath-alias-jang-bahadur-on-23-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gurjant Singh And Another vs Som Nath Alias Jang Bahadur on 23 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108812"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108812\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}