{"id":10890,"date":"2010-09-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010"},"modified":"2017-10-06T03:55:34","modified_gmt":"2017-10-05T22:25:34","slug":"sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O &#8230; vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O &#8230; vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Lok Adalath<\/div>\n<pre>HIGH CQ\ufb01RT LEQAL SERVECES QGMMIYTEE, $AE&lt;s\u00a7$AL$RE\n$\u00a7FQRE &quot;\u00a7&quot;\u00a7&#039;\u20acE LQK AQALA?\n\nm &quot;rag :-{ma mum $1: \u00a7&lt;mm&quot;rm<A>A,\n\nAGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,\n\nRESIDING M \u00a7\\1Qa30,\n\n3*\" CROSS,\ufb01\u00e9AHA\u00a3AKSHM1iJiWOL\u00a7T, _    \" ,\nBAN@A:..QRE-- 560 086' '  v_ V'   ._-\"HAPFELLANT\n\n(av mgs'; \u00ab:v1:3.aHE\u00e9;_H 3; RAG}. A'\ufb01va\u00a2\u00a7jirEs)\n\n1: NEW zrxsozxx At-ZSURANCE? &lt;,\nC;1uRC:\u00bb~i_RO&quot;;s.D, &quot; ._\n\n,\u00ab&#039;&#039;&#039;C\u00a7:i\u00a7E\u00a7&#039;JN._i%\u00a7&#039;&#039;:&#039;&amp;T$\\\u00a7_z3.&#039;   ..... \n\n2, &#039;:i:;R:;$;+\u00bb\u00a7zv;A:&lt;.:;MA:~2,..%  _\nS\/Q,\u00a7~;g\u00a74u;v!A\u00a74f\u00a7&quot;s~\u00e9AI2*:\u00a7~&quot;\u00e9g,.\nAGED f&#039;v&quot;;;\u20ac%f3{f}R;\u00ab   \n\n $ANDr~%I\u00a7\\iAGAR,  \n8Jv\u00a7,ROi5\u00ab\u00a3},  ~&#039;\n ;F1.ilaM,&amp;\u00a7\\\u00a3AG+&quot;gR,a,\n&quot; &quot; --\u00ab :f&quot; &quot;5%&#039;?-3GALQREv.$ISTRICT. ...RESPGNBEN&quot;E&#039;$\n\n{BY SR1\u00bb \u00a7_?v&#039;!\ufb01aE**iES\u00a7&#039;i, \u00a7..\u00a7VGC\ufb01\u20ac\u00a7&quot;E $QR Rwi}\n\n &#039; &#039;mzsgm\ufb01ga FELEQ L3,fS.1&#039;?3 {1} QF MV ACT AGMNST THE JU$\u00a7ME:&quot;~.ET ma\n ,\u00e9&amp;:&#039;s\u00a7ixf3,E\u00a7wV\u00a73.I\u00a7\\7TED 21:4-2395 PASSED ms \u00a7&#039;4&#039;~\u00ab.\/C N{3.7646,\u00ab&#039;20\u00a74 Q\ufb01\u00e9 &quot;WEE ma (3? X121\n V,\u00a3?aE?,D%_.&quot;&#039;;?UDC3E, E\u00a7x\u00e9$A\"E'W\u00a7G\u00a7\\J M50 SEEKING ErsHM\u00bb:cEMEN? 09 C@M\u00a5?EE!'%\u00a7S;\ufb01aTE\u20acf3F:\u00a7.\n\n\/'\n\n9%,\/'\"\n\n\n\n?.-J\n\nTH\u00a3$ QPPEAL C{}\u00a5'4If's\u00a7'C5 ON \u00a70R C\u00a3}\u00a7\"5CELE\ufb01%TEO\u00a7*J BEFGRE L\u20acI}%&lt;l \ufb01&#039;%\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7.AT eeree\nBEENG REFERRED VEQE QRITEER \u00aeATE\u00a7 1};-G\u00a7--2G\u00a7tG, &#039;?&quot;t&quot;iE FQLLGQJIEQG C0\u00a5&#039;iCIL\u00a3\ufb01TEO%\\\u00a3\nQRDQR IS PA$$EE--*.\n\nCGNCILIATIGN QRQER\n\nTtz\u00e9s eeeeet ttee Seen eett\u00e9ee between ttze pett\u00e9ee teV.--the Lek\n\nAdaiet held er&#039;: 2e~e9~2e:e, On the Said eay, efter theV.tt\u00a7&quot;eVtte&quot;t&#039;Vee.me\n\nte be settied since it wee noticed that the eppe&#039;E\u00a5:er:t&#039;t~.:ti&#039;e&#039;et\u00bbEftc\u00e9tt&#039;\n\nincereeratee the proper reseeneent -- inst}tettt:et_C\u00abQm&#039;Q.e:n&#039;;;&#039; ;._5e&quot;.; New 1&#039;.\n\nMeta Aesetetzee Cettd, Therefete, he _weev4&#039;t:E.ite~Ctee fte_;t\u00e9A&#039;!e :*teee&#039;eveety\n\nappiicetieta seeking fer emendment e&#039;fa\u00a7az.Jse t:&quot;t.i.e&quot;&#039;e\u00a7;n1 it\u00e9vgzettpotat\u00e9e\ufb01g\nttew indie Aeseraeee Cempenees tt$?e&quot;&#039;test:et\u00a7tie.nt Eethe eepeai, ae\nthe eaid insurance Cempany heVdHV&#039;t&#039;t:.ee&#039;h;_VVE\u00a7ice&#039;:.\u00a7\u00a7Gt_E:ted as respondent<\/pre>\n<p>before the Tribtmet. it &#8216;{i:rd&#8217;er:eeV&#8221;t%3.awtA, if each application<\/p>\n<p>is \ufb02ied, office  &#8216;same for passing the suitable<\/p>\n<p>erders after :*&#8217;2eticeV&#8221;tr3_ theVV&#8217;reee.o&#8221;::r;\u00a3&#8217;ent&#8217;s ceunsei.<br \/>\ntn puijsgttence efVt_\u00a7*1&#8217;e etder datee 2&amp;9-2010,. the teamed<\/p>\n<p>eeeeee\u00e9 ,Ah&#8217;e.e&#8217;efEE_et\u00a7_ e%\u00a7;\u00ab-._Vee;:2E\u00e9t:et\u00a7&lt;&#039;):\u00b0: seeking; fer amendment :3? the<\/p>\n<p>1eeeee-t%t&#039;%e eeeeyx&#039;e\u00a7&#039;the~ti;;&#039;Seme has been Served on the ctmtsset fet the<\/p>\n<p>teepertdeet  &quot;&#039;1&#039;.t1s&#039;titance Cettzpeegg, Tee same E3 eut-t:e for<\/p>\n<p> neeeVe:,et.v&quot; {&#039;..\u00e9\u00a7&quot;-\ufb01e re;\n<\/p>\n<p>SRBERS QM 2\\~&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7SC,136?5f2G1G<br \/>\n8;; E533 agpfisatisn, the a;;3\u00a7e\u00a7\u00a5a:&#8217;:&#8217;a has 3659?}? far amen\u00e9ing 33$<\/p>\n<p>CEEESE t\u00e9tie as fa\u00e9iawgr<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; \u00a33 i\ufb01carssrate \u00a7*\u00a3ew Im\u00e9\u00e9a Assgasrargae Lim\u00e9te\u00e9 and &#8216;::&#8217;<i>}AEA&gt;EVr:j&#8217;a&#8221;::&#8217;%:;sr*s.T,_ ii: \u00bb::i:\u00a7:a1;Ve:ijVV&#8217;E&#8217;E\u00a7.a&#8217;\u00a3 7.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7na\ufb01verter:EE&#8217;~; in the appea! meme instead {3f \u00a7mp\u00a5ea\u00bb&#8217;\u20aci&#8217;.im&#8217;Q&#8217; \u00a7&#8217;%\u00a3e=.:w &#8216;J:&#8217;v:&lt;&#039;:&#039;;rj%&#039;\u00e9*aL<\/p>\n<p>Assurance Company a5 the resp0&#039;kiid.,::eih%: th\u00e9ga &quot;&#039;%2c::\u00a7-::e.&quot;;:i;2;\u00a7@Eeaded<br \/>\nNat\u00e9anai Insurance Cczmpany &#039;\u00a7;4_i.\u00a7&quot;i71ite\ufb01  yx?VEjL&#039;\u00e9:iz}.,. vE&#039;i:%,;&#039;:oi: \ufb01 c\ufb01:r9frv&#039;\u00e9c:t. Eefore<br \/>\nthe Tribunaig New India Assuranwc\u00e9CVo:;:9:_Vb;\u00a7:&quot;:33&quot;~E\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7.&#039;j}:i&lt;:*ert impleaded as<\/p>\n<p>the reSp0ndent{}- :_n_\u00e9;Au&#039;.T;\u00a7m;_\u00e94(:c;:ff:&#039;p.&#039;anygTherefore, the appi\u00e9cation be<br \/>\nanewed am thegzp&#039;pe:z\u00a7an\u00a3V :.4\u00a73&#039;e:&#039;::f&#039;s*:t&#039;E.tted 1:0 amend the cause titie<br \/>\naccergiingiy.  &quot; &#039;<\/p>\n<p> wT\u00a7&quot;\u00a7:V\u00e9 \u00ab\u00a7..g 5aTrnf\u00e9:\u00a7A c:\u00a7&#039;u,_n5ei appearing for the ReSpo:&quot;:dent~Zn5uran\u00a3:e<\/p>\n<p>;f::Qr:&quot;span\u00a7,%._%&#039;;-\u20ac3_._,TA  Assurance Co.\u00a7_td.{ fairiy submitted an<\/p>\n<p> .thrau\u00a7&#039;h t\ufb01\u00e9&quot;;9\u00e9c0r\u00e9$ of the Traif Court that the New Endia<\/p>\n<p> \u20ac:7&#039;;Q_:&#039;:z$any Lim\u00e9tec\u00e9 ES we \u00e9&quot;8SQ\u20ac&#039;;\u00a53\u00a78f&#039;\u00a7i before the Yr\u00e9\ufb01unai,<\/p>\n<p>a&#039;.g\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7&#039;E&#039;c:\u00e9\u20ac:\u00e9\u00a75&#039;n f\u00e9igzd by the apge\ufb01fant $9 a\u00e9iawed and he be<\/p>\n<p> &#039;_ggmfm&#039;%\u00a7iVV\u00e9&#039;\u00a7&quot;%0 amerz\ufb01 me cause i\u00e9iie accerdmgiy.<\/p>\n<p>.4&#039;<\/p>\n<p>f&quot;?&#039;&quot;?10usas*:1-:&#039;&#8211;  Gfif:iy}~.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a3123 ig\u00e9za cia\u00e9mant \u00a7*:a$ \u00e9mp\u00e9aad\u00e9d \ufb01ew Ea\u00e9ia \ufb01ggurame Csmgany<br \/>\nLim\u00e9te\u00e9 33 the regpoadent befare i?&#8217;:E Tfibagnaig far the reagi\u00e9na<br \/>\ngtaie\u00e9 \u00e9zx am aff\u00e9\u00e9av\u00e9\u00e9 am in mam; 9? {ha gubm\u00e9gg\u00e9m madgby the<br \/>\nCQL\u00a3f&#8217;\u00a7S9\u00a7 far ihe respmdem: &#8211; insurance Cemgangg. we  E0<\/p>\n<p>pasg the fa\u00e9iowing om\u00e9ergg<\/p>\n<p>ORDER ,w-_<\/p>\n<p>The apgfication is aibwed. &#8220;\ufb02ee &#8220;&#8216;E\u00abea\u00a7* %_\u00e9\u00e9d T\u00a5z:&#8217;a:&gt;_:V;:&#8217;;&#8221;f:.\u00a7;Ve:\u00ab\u00a7 &#8220;\u00a7t3\u00ab:_j t}3e<\/p>\n<p>agpe\u00e9\ufb01ani is perm\u00e9tte\u00e9 to amend the V\u00e9aljiiae t\u00e9tif\u00e9 ajCC\u20acf}A\u00a7:'{\u00a7:\u00a7f}:i;E:v\u00a74&#8242;}&#8217;L&#8221;&#8216;<br \/>\nTh\u00e9s ig a Case of persanVa&#8217;!..jmjury&#8217;;&#8221;&#8216;\u00a5;\u00a7j&#8217;e T:%\u00a7.bu:\u00a3E&#8221;E&#8221;sAa:-{awarded a<\/p>\n<p>sum of Rs.1;G6n0OO\/W with inter\u00a7ieV:s.t&#8221;aitL-v&#8211;tV:\u00a7%e\u00a7  {-3\u00b0\/o p.a, frem the<\/p>\n<p>date of petitiontiE-\u00a7\u00bb:*.e\u00e9&#8221;l,i$\u00e9E;I:m as. c0&#8217;n&#8221;\u00e9;:&gt;&#8217;ev:?&#8217;2.sa\u00a7t\u00a7orL1<\/p>\n<p>Before the &#8216;;\u20ac135dal%at&#8217;af?:\u00a7\u20ac:&lt;_pTdEE:E::b&#039;er&#039;:ations, the {earned Couns\u00e9i far<br \/>\nthe :*as9e\u20ac:i:Ev\u00a7::-\u00ab &#8211;v;3artE&#039;\u00e9&#039;s.. \u00a5&#039;}a&#039;v.~.%3 \u00e9&#039;gr\u00e9ed $20 settie the dam in M} and<\/p>\n<p>fima\u00a7&#039; 3.\u00e9Ei:\u00a7eti*te&quot;;n{:-&quot;ff&#039;s3:%gg suv:;\u00a79\u00a7&#039;1&#039;\u00abAof Rs.35,SOO\/* (Rzi\ufb01ees Th\ufb01rtv Five<\/p>\n<p>  \u00e9:&#039;r:\u00a7&#039;E:,\u00a7;\u00a7;-=;s\u00ab\u00e9 9? interest. \ufb01xccardingiy, they have f\u00e9ie\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>;.;f1b?:.&#039;iAAE;\u00a7V&#039;ai&#039;VE?&#039;*&#039;_Ee{1&quot;\u00b0\u00a7\u00a7: &#039;:%..u%y..__&#039;S:g\u00a7&#039;%5eA\u00a7 by them.<\/p>\n<p>i4&quot;. \u00a3\ufb01V \u00a7&#039;i@Vva{ 0f&#039;=%:%\u00e9@ setz\u00e9ammi arr\u00e9ase\u00e9 gm Jami fv\u00e9ema fiie\u00e9f aff\u00e9ae<\/p>\n<p> &#039;-\ufb01g.\u00a7\u00a7z&#039;\u00e9_\u00a7:\u00a7;\u00e9:\u00a7 io\u00e9raw {he award in terms as&#039; ihe Eoifzi Mama:<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb&#039;\/EV<\/p>\n<p>\/\/\/<br \/>\n5&quot; \/&#039;<br \/>\n&quot;* EV<\/p>\n<p>Yhe Rasgoa\ufb01ant-En5uranCe Cegxgany s\ufb01a\ufb01 \u00a7e\u00a7Gs\ufb01:ihe &amp;\ufb01\u00e9<br \/>\nanmxw\ufb01 \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 iha ?\ufb01buna\u00a7aw\ufb01hwsf\u00a7ur WEQKS \ufb01e\ufb01\u00e9ihe \ufb01ate sf<br \/>\nre:8g\ufb02:\u00a7\ufb01 CGQV Qf\u00e9\ufb01\ufb02af\ufb01, \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01ag m\ufb01nch the Saki anwount sha\ufb01 carry<br \/>\nEniere3te\ufb01:i\u00a7e rate 9? 9%@ a.a {form the date cf defau\u00e9n Biii\ufb01g date<\/p>\n<p>afde\u00a7Gs%.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7R<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O &#8230; vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010 Author: Lok Adalath HIGH CQ\ufb01RT LEQAL SERVECES QGMMIYTEE, $AE&lt;s\u00a7$AL$RE $\u00a7FQRE &quot;\u00a7&quot;\u00a7&#039;\u20acE LQK AQALA? m &quot;rag :-{ma mum $1: \u00a7&lt;mm&quot;rmA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING M \u00a7\\1Qa30, 3*&#8221; CROSS,\ufb01\u00e9AHA\u00a3AKSHM1iJiWOL\u00a7T, _ &#8221; , BAN@A:..QRE&#8211; 560 086&#8242; &#8216; v_ V&#8217; ._-&#8220;HAPFELLANT [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O ... vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O ... vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-05T22:25:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Hanumanthappa S\\\/O &#8230; vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-05T22:25:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":695,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Hanumanthappa S\\\/O ... vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-05T22:25:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Hanumanthappa S\\\/O &#8230; vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O ... vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O ... vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-05T22:25:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O &#8230; vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-05T22:25:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010"},"wordCount":695,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010","name":"Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O ... vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-05T22:25:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hanumanthappa-so-vs-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-on-28-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Hanumanthappa S\/O &#8230; vs New India Assurance Co Ltd on 28 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}