{"id":108904,"date":"2008-07-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008"},"modified":"2016-11-03T22:53:06","modified_gmt":"2016-11-03T17:23:06","slug":"p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
IN THE ma:-1 comm or KARHATAKA,   ~\n\nDATED THIS THE aw DAYVOF 4    \n\nBEFORE Q\nTHE }~ION'BLE MR. JUs'r1\u00a2Ei%fFj\nWRIT PETITION  1786  2993 a;B;RE\u00e9)\n\nBETWEEN ;\n\nP BHEEMANNA \n\nS\/O. OBAEAH   1.  \nAGED ABou:r\"45.__YE.e\u00a7Rs  . \nPROP. OF MAHAiL\u00a3\u00a7_!(SE!&1.I  \u00ab  \nCHITRA,MAN_B\u00b0iRA:;;:,.  ~ Y ' \nPAVAGAD ROAEL \nCHALLEKERE. \"  .A   ' '\nCHITRABURGA lZ)ISI'I'\u00a7i(3'I'--~.._ \" \n\n PETITIONER\n\n _ (BY  -A NAGA'R.qFQAP'\u00a7'A 85 1' H NARAYANA, ADV)\n\n A15\"? %=\n\n1. \"  THE\"sTATE'oF KARNATAKA\n* , VREP,B\u00a5_ rrs SECRETARY\n DEP'r:. 012* URBAN DEVELOPMENT\nM s;_BUILD11~zG, VIDHANA SOUDHA,\n\n +.  BANGALORE\u00bb 1.\n\n   Ema CHIEF OFFICER\n\nOWN MUNICIPALITY\nCI-{ALLAKERE TOWN,\n\nCHITRABURGA DISTRICI'.\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(BY SR1. R DEVADAS, AGA FOR R1)
\n(BY SR}. G KRISHNA MURTHY, ADV FOR R2)D<\/p>\n
mi<\/p>\n
2  ._<\/p>\n
‘I’HiS WRIT PETITIGN IS FILED UNDER ARTICLI_43S:’22\u20aci..’4
\nANE) 227 01:’ THE CONSTITUTION or INDIA PRA’f\u00a7N\u00a72~..__*FQ__ <\/p>\n
QUASH ANNEXURIELF ISSUED BY R1 DTD. 3.1.2QG3.v <\/p>\n
THIS PETITION, comma ONFOR C’sI\u00a7i\u00a7VEie?S, ‘TH1S  M’ ‘<\/p>\n
DAY THE comm’ MADE gig ]\u00a7<\u00a7L;,ow1:\u20aco~:_eTj =   * V<\/p>\n
The petitioner claiming $9" 9: r.':i1;:\u00a2.21_x1\u00b0:\u00e9UtA:'E:1_ea1:x7c?–V; at<\/p>\n
Challakerc Town having reque;_;tLeici,V'_\ufb013.e  'hespog\ufb01dent –\n<\/p>\n
Town Municipality for    167 feet by<\/p>\n
147  when conceded, a proposal<\/p>\n
was sent  ‘the Sfa\ufb01e-.  Go’vei*oment who in turn by order<\/p>\n
V Dt(i.]f\u00a3f\u00bb.’G1\u00a2.199;7 — ‘A’ it is stated, pezn\ufb01tted the<\/p>\n
 :\u20ac.’.oI’31:;<;iI to alienate the pmperty at the rate of<\/p>\n
 in favour of the petitioner, followed by<\/p>\n
Z  the AeKcCt1}.iox1;A a sale certi\ufb01cate dtd.28.06. 1997 Annexuxe —<\/p>\n
  and  assessment of Tax coupled with the payment of<\/p>\n
'  'toAX'h}7j'A.i'eceipts Azmexuxes — 'C1' to 'C4'.<\/p>\n
2. It appears that a public spirited person invoked the<\/p>\n
“”V.Vx}\u00a7k;itjuz~isc1ics;ion of this court in W.P.No.34862]97, caliing in<\/p>\n
question the Government Order dtd. 18.01.1997 to declare<\/p>\n
the Sale Certi\ufb01cate Dtd.28.()6.19’97 as null and 11\/;<\/p>\n
a mandamus directing the petitioner to vacate  .   ‘<\/p>\n
possession of the property in questioii,”whe\u00a7Itce_.   <\/p>\n
Bench by Order (ltd. 28.91.1993 9- 452” <\/p>\n
interfere.\n<\/p>\n
3. It is the a]1egatieoit;A\u00ab.of    the State
\nGovernment without notiee  withoi’1V:i._’extending an<\/p>\n
opportunity of ;to   by Order dtci.\n<\/p>\n
03.01.2603 ‘  the 2113 Iespondent –\n<\/p>\n
Town   the petitioner the value of<\/p>\n
the immovable ghopertyt-io..’t1ues\ufb01on at the rate of Rs. 100\/–<\/p>\n
 V.    addi\ufb01o\ufb01 to 20% of the said sum, together<\/p>\n
 per annum from the petitioner. Hence<\/p>\n
mas? Ewe… –\n<\/p>\n
V A. ‘_-4.  The petition is opposed by \ufb01ling statement of<\/p>\n
ohiee\ufb01ons dtd. 22.02.2003 of the 2″‘ respondent inter alia<\/p>\n
Vt  ” ceotendmg that the petitioner obtained a sale Certi\ufb01cate by .<\/p>\n
” playing fraud on the 2*” Iesms\ufb01ent and on the Govemment,<\/p>\n
in collusion, with the then Chief O\ufb01cer MLV. Thippaiah and<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
another Mr.Umapa\ufb01:1y, against whom ‘4 <\/p>\n
proceedings have been initiated and eliqujry is_peegdi;1g_:i;.::’       <\/p>\n
further stated that the so called <\/p>\n
name H.V.Na.garaja was a fricndof   ii<\/p>\n
to the same political party and  pctiiCi\u00a2e’_1ii’,e
\nof public interest 1itigati<j:1i~,\u00ab_wa_\u00a7.iii_1e<i:<"order ieaeeiet the
\npetitioner. According to Elie   the order<\/p>\n
impugned is   that, the price<\/p>\n
\ufb01xed b_\\;*"ti1e index dtd. 18.01.1997
\nAnnexuif: -? :_'A"  RS.100\/- per sq.ft. and not<\/p>\n
Rs.1{)0\/-  records maintained by the<\/p>\n
 \u00ab_Fina1xi*;e  the State of Karnataka, it is said,<\/p>\n
  price \ufb01xed by the Government was<\/p>\n
 and not Rs.100\/- per sq.mtr. It is further<\/p>\n
–V stateii  ptirsuant to the Oxder dtd. 03.01.2003 Annexure<\/p>\n
ii ‘Fa’e.of tiie State Govt. the matter was placed in the meeting<\/p>\n
.i  of ifhe:Municipal Council, whence the petitioner was absent,<\/p>\n
   it was resolved to make a demand and recover the<\/p>\n
money \ufb01om the petitioner, followed by a notice<\/p>\n
dtd.13.01.20()3 Annexure— RS duly acknowledged by the<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
considered was postponed and by resolution dtd. 21.655. <\/p>\n
Annexure – ‘R9′, the gxnund rent was enhanced.   _<\/p>\n
of the aforesaid resolutions, it is contended:  V”   i <\/p>\n
Municipal Council did not pass a Ie$elu1;_iojnj;.d”td.’:   <\/p>\n
xecommending a pmposal to_.*i”h’e Stnt4eii”Govt,?V,.f4\u00a2o   V<\/p>\n
property to the petitioner. It  anega\ufb01mi of 2’13
\nrespondent that the    was<\/p>\n
R3416\/– per sq.\ufb02:. and durixxigl\ufb01\u00e9gi tit w\u00a7s.*’.Rsi.350\/ – to 400\/ –<\/p>\n
per.      property at the rate of
\nRs.100\/  isms\u00bb  away price. According to<\/p>\n
the 211*’ reepoizdelzt, tiriepeii\ufb01iioner having not approached the<\/p>\n
 v   more appmpriately in the light of the<\/p>\n
  a fraud played upon the Municipal<\/p>\n
cannon  State Govt, the petitioner is not entitled to<\/p>\n
[any  {fie Writ pe\ufb01\ufb01on.\n<\/p>\n
 ,   Having heard the Learned Counsel for the parties,<\/p>\n
  the pleadings and examined the order impugned,<\/p>\n
ii the short question for decision making is Whether the order<\/p>\n
dtd. 03.01.2003 Annexme — ‘F’ of the State Govt. cails for<\/p>\n
interference?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6. This petition is not opposed by \ufb01lm” g of  of  it<\/p>\n
Objection of the State Govt. The onijfiiiother ‘i–obj;ectei’_ is ‘the <\/p>\n
Municipal Council which seeks to sulipoft. the  as: ”<\/p>\n
Well merited, fully justified and fexsinteiffei-ence,
\nin adciition to the allegation of  bf the petitioner
\nboth on the Municipalii  as  as the State<\/p>\n
Government.\n<\/p>\n
7.  .h”:o’ugh_Vt”before the court is as
\nto whether   without notice to the
\npetitionef’ was  issuing the order impugned,<\/p>\n
stating the  of.I:~3s.Ai{}t}]..- sq.ft., having taken a conscious<\/p>\n
it it  it~3;&ear1iiie1″‘()”ntV1er dtd. 18.01.1997 Annexuxe — ‘A’ to<\/p>\n
    from the petitioner the pxice of the land at<\/p>\n
Rs; I -_  Admittedly, the order Annexure -‘F; is<\/p>\n
‘knot preceded by a notice to the petitioner or an opportunity<\/p>\n
A “it ” rm’ g. The dispute relating to the payment of a higher<\/p>\n
i  \ufb01idce as the value of the pmperty in question, touches upon<\/p>\n
it the civil rights of the petitioner and therefore, it was<\/p>\n
incumbent on the part of the State Government to have<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
issued a notice and extended an opportunity to the  K<\/p>\n
before passing the order impugned. <\/p>\n
3. If there is power to
\nprejudice of a person, duty to   iniplicit in
\nthe exercise of such    and
\norder passed to the prej11.d,ice. V  order is a
\nnullity.  is common sense
\njustice.  ‘    of decision
\n  of that process is
\n = Ii  apprising the affected and<\/p>\n
appraising the “rep:eeerita.\u00a7ions is absent. The philosophy<\/p>\n
 ‘~    is, in one sense, participatory justice<\/p>\n
  democraiic \u00abrule of law. This is the law<\/p>\n
\u00a71e51sxe\u00a2i”bgiee%1×1::\u00a2\u00a7i’iiApcx Court in nlohinder Bing}: can 11:.<\/p>\n
 Thexuu  Election Commissioner, New Delhi and<\/p>\n
 ‘ .othega reported in AIR 1973 so 351.<\/p>\n
9. Applying the very same principles, it is needless to<\/p>\n
 state that the order Annexure F of the State Govt. is<\/p>\n
N<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
to the 21″‘ respondent to seek review of the  4_ ~<\/p>\n
Division Beach in an appropriate   ” ”<\/p>\n
is not for tins” court to consider  <\/p>\n
and review the order of the {)ivi.\u00a5Vai;’\u00a73″:…  V<\/p>\n
In the result, Qpetiii\u00e9n’ “anow\u00a2d;%~%AThe order
\ndated 3.1.2003 Atmexux\u00e9    is quashed,
\nmsciving hbe\ufb01gy \u00ab  ‘_-the  i”3’..;Ch action as is<\/p>\n
Permissible  19%.: * ”\n<\/p>\n
         sd\/s
\nA  %  ~ Iudd\u00e9<\/p>\n
 _\u00a7:Sg_ ”\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy IN THE ma:-1 comm or KARHATAKA, ~ DATED THIS THE aw DAYVOF 4 BEFORE Q THE }~ION’BLE MR. JUs’r1\u00a2Ei%fFj WRIT PETITION 1786 2993 a;B;RE\u00e9) BETWEEN ; P BHEEMANNA S\/O. OBAEAH 1. AGED ABou:r”45.__YE.e\u00a7Rs . PROP. OF MAHAiL\u00a3\u00a7_!(SE!&1.I […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nP Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-03T17:23:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-03T17:23:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1077,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008\",\"name\":\"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-03T17:23:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-03T17:23:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-03T17:23:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008"},"wordCount":1077,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008","name":"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-03T17:23:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-bheemanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P Bheemanna vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108904\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}