{"id":108981,"date":"2008-08-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-25T01:29:43","modified_gmt":"2014-04-24T19:59:43","slug":"sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme … on 19 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme … on 19 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
 \n\nmrx\n\n \n\n-1-\n\nIN THE HIGH comm' OF' KARNATAKA CIRCUi'? \n\nAT BHARWAD \n\nQATED THIS THE 19TH DAY CJF AU_Cr.USF,x 3   b \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE Howam MRS. .}z:s'r1CE Ai:3;V.NACiAR)\u00a3THN'AA.'''~ ''\n\nM.1r.A.N{;L;\u00a735\/209'-:*._'_ T \nnmwmn: V' V'\n\nSri.C}:1an\u20aci:raka11th, 3\/0  ' :\nBaji Rag Patil, Aged 31Vv--\"\u00a7::*.  ; ,V = A \nR\/0 Maxaturga; aKhanz[1p\"l1I'   \nBelgaum Di\u00e9fgn-i<;7t;' _ . " I\n\n'   '......APPELLANT\n(By   Adv...95r K.Govi.13.da1aj, Adv.)\n\n3.. The l31wg_p1i.efi5\u00a3,  \u00b0 \nSuptzcme I3i1d._11S1I'i\u00a3'S, "Datta\n ~ Building, V\nMaJf'ad'01a"~Post,\n\n1" ._    Supzeme\n\ni1,_1\u00a2iust.1icS,-- _\u20aci\/9, 85 C[10,\n\u00a31i\ufb01us"m'a1'Estatc, Bachc-Ii,\nKhaxxapur Tq. ,\n\n .. Bglgaiim District.\n\n.... .. RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
.–f\u00a7(By Sri.Sachi11 S.Magdu1’n for V.S.Shasu’i, Adv.)<\/p>\n
-2-<\/span><\/p>\n
This MFA is \ufb01ied “under Section 173(1) of ti-16:’
\nagainst the Judgment and Awantl dated 24. I.20Gt\u00a7.;;3s._sssd in<\/p>\n
i{aPaKa:SR\/46\/ 2004 on the 131: of the (3oz:411hissionere:\ufb013rt’v.
\nWorkman Compensation, Sub–Division-II,.V’Be1ga’u1’n _psr’t1j,\u00ab:fu
\nallowing the ciaim petition for compensation” ‘sf11d”‘seekL*;g ‘<\/p>\n
further enhancement of CO131})CBS\u00a3ti2i0I1. ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
This MFA coming on for ADMISSICN  “tt1e’<\/p>\n
court delivered the fo11c;>wi.ngV.”_ _V<\/p>\n
Junsssag<\/p>\n
Though this matter actmission, with the
\nconsent of learned  it is heand and<\/p>\n
disp\ufb02sed       <\/p>\n
2. Th.is \u00e91p’_ties\u00a7:,_is  claimant seeking
\nenhalisementtv  by chailenghg the order
\npassed   W6r}ei;’\u00a7es,s”‘_.{“,empcnsation Commissioner Sub-<\/p>\n
I)ivj.sic>11+II, sesgam : in case No. KaPaI{a;SR\/46\/2004<\/p>\n
 ‘I’1v1Ae’.V’v’e:i_;\u00abs.sttisp’\u00a31ted facts of the case are that the<\/p>\n
  who was worlcing as a machine operator<\/p>\n
x V’ .. the  Iespontient establishment on 29.8.2003 suffered<\/p>\n
  injuries to his arms during the course of employment.<\/p>\n
 “”Ctont<:J:zding that there was loss of earning capacity as a<\/p>\n
\/'X'_
\nZ \/'<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
4. I have heard Sri.Sanjay Katageri for
\n   ?.\n<\/p>\n
and Sr\u00a7.Sachin S. Magdum for Sxi.Vigne:%hWaifj <53: <\/p>\n
behalf of the appellant and resp\u00a3mdent;sfivrE$p{c\u00a7\u00a2\ufb01~;f\u00e9}3?.:'-% :<\/p>\n
5. It is submitted on of V’ti_1’e’
\nmedical evidence onf  giv\ufb01n   and
\ndespite strong   in favour of the
\nclaimant\/app\ufb01\ufb02atnt,   in taking the
\npercentage:   of only 40% which is
\n  to the appe\ufb02ant was
\nsuch;    disability in as much as the
\nappe1IA\u00e9u1_t”is  hands for doing any kind of<\/p>\n
Wqrk a.nd Vt1=.::Arefo1re,   W. C. Commissioner ought tr; have<\/p>\n
  Aass”essed”*’t1;e  earning capacity at IGCPA: instead of<\/p>\n
 Vihi\u00e9itfom, Iequests this court to enhance the<\/p>\n
 by taking the percentage of loss of earning<\/p>\n
 capagcigg at 109%.\n<\/p>\n
  Per contm, it is submitted on behalf of the<\/p>\n
~ responde1::t\/ employer that the two doctors who were<\/p>\n
examined in the case were at consensus with regard to the<\/p>\n
-5,<\/p>\n
percentage of permancnt disability to “both the’: <\/p>\n
tak:m’ g that into considera\ufb01on, the Comm :”‘sv$i{\u00a7I’\u00a7.?:i*  Wa\u00a7\u00bb <\/p>\n
jus\ufb01\ufb01w in assessing the percentage  .:\u00a7qf’ .g_}.:;A.m_ j <\/p>\n
capacity at 40% and that the   : ‘\u00a3”_:i;1c<\/p>\n
Commissioner is just and  which  for <\/p>\n
interference in this aypeal.  ‘<\/p>\n
‘7. Based on the \u00e9lric\ufb01t\u00e9  only point that
\nhas to be  Q  v as to whether the
\npercentage”   i\ufb01apacity arrived at by the
\n  or it requims to be<\/p>\n
modi\ufb01ed?’  <\/p>\n
8. V’ _v I h\u00e9i\ufb01ra   evidence of Dr.Satish II}.Pat:il who<\/p>\n
 ”  A  czjzz\u00e9mixled  of the appellant who is Working as<\/p>\n
V V\ufb01sgmgcon in K.L.E.Hospita1, Bcigaum. While<\/p>\n
  of the disability caused to the appellant, he<\/p>\n
hag st\u00e9tgd ‘that there is disability of 35% to the right hand<\/p>\n
L  iai1d._3(V\u00a7’% to the left hand. Dr.Di.I3esiJ, R.KaI:: who was<\/p>\n
Z g-:;\u00bb’:\u00a7a’1An;i2:md on behalf of the mspondentf employer and who is<\/p>\n
u  “working as Oxthopacdic Surgeon at Bclgaum Orthopaedic<\/p>\n
\/9<\/p>\n
,9<\/p>\n
..7_<\/p>\n
10. But in the instant case neither of the <\/p>\n
deposed on thus ques\ufb01on of loss of earning’  <\/p>\n
further them is no evidenm as to;vet11cther’\u00a3Ifi\u00e9  ir\u00a2_i;ii \u00bb _ <\/p>\n
a position to do any other WGf}\u00a7 org”  iiitff <\/p>\n
disabled. This aspect has -got ‘beef:    *<\/p>\n
W.C. Commissioner who on  .a:2;$\u00a2:s;se\u00a3ifi\ufb021e loss of
\nearning capacity to   \u00e91b$fenceAA<)VAf categoricai
\nmedical evidenge on jfs\u00e9ipacity as Wei} as
\nthe \ufb01nding as'    in a posititon to do
\nany otlxef  fbf this court to make a
\nguesjsi iai\ufb01rk '1V(\ufb02)ss of earning capacity and
\n  in the absence of evidence with
\nmgaxjd t{V3'L'i}:1ev_V'a1fc:;i@s;.\u00e9i:\u00a7f'lV'2\u00a3Qpccts, I deem it proper to remand<\/p>\n
 n;att:::_r to thev='9J;C'Commissioner for \ufb02esh consideration<\/p>\n
'  \ufb011g 'a_sia\u00a7s3me3:1t loss of eaming capacity and as to<\/p>\n
"=.x.*.1i\u00e9ths\u00a7i"  is capable of doing any other work to<\/p>\n
  hlive\ufb01hocxd by giving another opportunity to both<\/p>\n
 .. AASi{}.f;S  lead additional evidence.<\/p>\n
" __51}. Keeping in mind the above obsmcvations, I dinzct the<\/p>\n
W.C.Commissi0ner to quan\ufb01iy the compensation after the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme … on 19 August, 2008 Author: B.V.Nagarathna mrx -1- IN THE HIGH comm’ OF’ KARNATAKA CIRCUi’? AT BHARWAD QATED THIS THE 19TH DAY CJF AU_Cr.USF,x 3 b BEFORE THE Howam MRS. .}z:s’r1CE Ai:3;V.NACiAR)\u00a3THN’AA.”’~ ” M.1r.A.N{;L;\u00a735\/209′-:*._’_ T nmwmn: V’ V’ Sri.C}:1an\u20aci:raka11th, 3\/0 ‘ : Baji Rag Patil, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme ... on 19 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme ... on 19 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-24T19:59:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme … on 19 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-24T19:59:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":745,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme ... on 19 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-24T19:59:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme … on 19 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme ... on 19 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme ... on 19 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-24T19:59:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme … on 19 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-24T19:59:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008"},"wordCount":745,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008","name":"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme ... on 19 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-24T19:59:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-chandrakanth-vs-the-proprietor-supreme-on-19-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Chandrakanth vs The Proprietor Supreme … on 19 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}