{"id":109117,"date":"2009-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009"},"modified":"2015-08-24T09:26:32","modified_gmt":"2015-08-24T03:56:32","slug":"k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 30\"' DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Aw.vENoGoPALA...G'oy\u00a7q'ba0* \n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.115.7..\/,  A A 1'\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n Sii\ufb01fsaffadya,\n\nK.V. Puttashetty,  _ '\n8\/0. Late Venkataramana Shettyy,\nDead by LR's  \n\n1(a) Shivakumar Shet'ty.,,_ _\nS\/o. Puttashetty\ufb01 ~  \ufb02 , _\nAged about 40 years,  '\n\n1(b) Tu|asina~t'r1j,Vy:y.\" \n\nS\/\"O\"; .~&lt;..V.;\\z&#039;;. PdVt:&#039;E:a&#039;sh&#039;etty,&#039;\n:Aged.abo.uVt..V_3&quot;8yy&#039;ear3, . &#039;\n\n1c) 1.a&#039;k..ghma Kvu\ufb01wt-ir,  \nD\/0. Oif..\\\/V. Put~tashetty,\n &#039;Aged ab&#039;o;4_t&quot;34 years.\n\n.. &quot;  _t3\/o&#039;. _i&#039;&lt;y..\\\/&#039;.-Puttashetty,\n A A-ge\u00abci&#039;_abVo.u&#039;t 27 years.\n\n1 (e). Ja__yasb~&#039;\u00e9ei a,\n..D\/&#039;&#039;-;_). K.V.Puttashetty,\nAged about 25 years.\n\n0 =.V1&quot;(f)Alijayaiakshmi\n\nD\/0. K.\\\/.Puttashetty,\nAged about 24 years.\n\n\n\n1(g) Prabhavathi,\n\nD\/o. K.V.Puttashetty,\n\nAged about 22 years.\n1(h) K.P. Komala,\nD\/o. K.V.Puttashetty,\nAged about 20 years,\nAll ARE r\/O. Basavangudi b\nK.R. Pet Town,\nMandya District.\n\n(By Sri. V.Srinivas, Adv.)\nAND:\n\nKS. Paramesh,   :\nS\/o. Late Stddas_hetty,,.-- &#039;\nAged about 4.4\u00abyea_rs,  _, \n\nR\/o. Agrahafa Beedicaiv, \n\nK.R. Pet Towty,   \nMandya DisstVrt&#039;c.t,i, &#039;  \n\nMandya --. _t;&#039;\n\neetdti &#039;,&#039;~ .\n\nT.   LL_i\u00a7\\i\\tT&#039;S:  &quot; .\n\n_..RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>ThiVst&#8221;R S&#8217;AVits-__fEied&#8217;\u00ab1&#8217;5thder Section 100 of cpc against<br \/>\ntheft:}Vudgmet{t&#8217;~._.at}d &#8216;Decree dated 25.1.2008 passed in<\/p>\n<p>V  R&#8217;._.E\\.No&#8221;.tE;&#8217;s9:\/ZQO6 (om No.51\/2004) on the file of the Civil<br \/>\n 3t;d&#8217;gee;j-gstst.&#8217;t2Ve\u00a2\u00a7.sion), &amp; JMFC., Krishnaraja Pete, dismissing<\/p>\n<p>.th\u00bbe&#8221;tappea&#8217;l.&#8217;j_a.rid confirming the Judgment and Decree dated<\/p>\n<p>12&#8243;&#8216;;*.t.2t&#8217;oo4&#8217;passed in o.s.235\/92 on the file of the Civii<\/p>\n<p> ..Jt1%dge;s&#8212;{&#8216;}r.Decision), &amp; 3M:&#8217;=c., KR. Pet.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; This appeal coming on for admission this day, the<\/p>\n<p> = ..-Court delivered the f0ilOwEng:~<\/p>\n<p>property of the plaintiff and hence, suit was filed for the<\/p>\n<p>said reliefs.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The suit was contested by the   <\/p>\n<p>filing written statement. He adrni&#8217;tt\u00abed iivsfbthe<\/p>\n<p>maternal uncle of plaintiff. VAcco\u00e9\u00e9d_ilra&#8211;gA&#8221;to the *~d,efe&#8217;ii:l:cil&#8217;an&#8217;t,._V<\/p>\n<p>one Siddashetty S\/o Kala Shet.t:y&#8217;*..pf Bharatl&#8211;pu_&#8217;i&#8217;_au\ufb01ilvlage was&#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>residing at KR. Pet &#8220;&#8216;f&#8221;ow..n  property by way<br \/>\nof a grant and was   Said<br \/>\nsmdasheuy had no eggggganaaas was had med nithe<br \/>\nyear 1967 are hekuas under no Care nu hm death. Itis<br \/>\nhis ciase&#8221;   executed a will dated<br \/>\n10.12v:.&#8221;:_9\u00a3&#8217;3:7,&#8217;  suit property in his favour<\/p>\n<p>and also d&#8217;e.livered._ all theloriginal document of title. It was<\/p>\n<p> st.a_jt&#8217;ed,&#8217;._,A&#8217;\u00a7f&#8217;ia_t, pla&#8217;in.t.iff&#8217;s claim is unsustainable, the suit is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; shad\u00bb for,:rloii.:jo~i_nder of necessary parties and is also barred<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;bviwnuau\ufb01n\u00a7<\/p>\n<p> Based on the pleadings, Trial Court framed the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;g_&#8217;f&#8217;o-il-owing issues and additional issues:<\/p>\n<p>l\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>\/,<\/p>\n<p>i) Whethm&#8217; the plaim&#8217;ii&#8217;\u00a7&#8221; proves that he is the<br \/>\nabsoiute owner in p0ssess1&#8217;on of the suit.<\/p>\n<p>s&lt;&#039;?hedL1ie pr0pe1*t.y by Vir&#039;i&#039;ue of i.h.\u00a3:i_T&#039;~.gra:1:&#039;11.<\/p>\n<p>(&#039;e1&#039;ti1&#039;ic211e 1&#039;ei&#039;erred \u00a30 at para 1 of ,-T.:1:1t&quot;.&quot;}&quot;)&#039;~:..\u00a3&#039;-V&#039;v1i.I1__V&#039;1 -1\u00e9_;&#039;1&quot; _<\/p>\n<p>fav()L.1r of his lmiler&#039;?\n<\/p>\n<p>ii] Whether fhe def&#8217;e11dz1hf1&#8242;. p-licnyiesh&#8217;&#8211;1.ha&#8217;1&#8243;-he&#8217;fig <\/p>\n<p>owner in possessxionJ)1\u00b0&#8211;._1he s.i.;;r1&#8243; s\u00a7(rhed&#8221;ui\u00e9&#8217;&#8211;..<\/p>\n<p>prc)pe:&#8221;t.y for the  V&#8221; &#8220;.;ja1:&#8217;1}Vj&#8217;Vzi&#8217;1&#8243;&#8216;2&#8242;:&#8221;*4 of&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>written s3ia1.en1e11i.&#8217;?_____VV&#8221;- _ K  V<br \/>\niii} Whether  j.L$l&#8217;c1i:.IV1A1v\u00e9&#8217;i\u00a3~7{: &#8216;. ij&#8217;3TQV\u20acS &#8220;the alleged<br \/>\ni11terE&#8217;t.&#8217;h-\u00a3\u00a7 d.efet\u00e9dani proves Lhai the suii is<br \/>\n&#8221; VV 4&#8217; bad.i}:51&#8217;~.lt&#8217;ioki&#8221;j.Q&#8217;i&#8221;1&#8217;3 der of necessary parties?<\/p>\n<p>Addi\u20ac&#8211;i.o1&#8217;1a.1V I55 L1t?\u00a7u;\u00a7 &#8216;  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>  VV VV&#8217;H\u20ac&#8217;i&#8221;.h.\u00a7E__1_&#8217;__&#8221;vihC piaimiff proves that, his Ember&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>. &#8217;11_a.n1e1y S1&#8217;i.Sidciash.ei.1&#8242;.y was granted suit<br \/>\nVhv$vfi\u00a3&#8217;?v1%1_&#8217;,t=.&#8221;.(hi1&lt;;&#039;. p1&#039;0pc*:1&#039;1y by the G-ovi. vide<br \/>\n&quot;xi&#039;QAiasi..C0mmiss.i0ne1&#039; for disposal of Dharkasth.<br \/>\n&quot;vMys&lt;.n&#039;e and Manclya {&#039;)ist1&quot;ic1.s. as for order<br \/>\nN0.SP1.:D{)R\/40\/60-61 dated 30.:196&#039;1?<\/p>\n<p>vi)<\/p>\n<p>(3<\/p>\n<p>Whether the pia1&#8242;.I1tifI&#8217; proves that the Tahsildas&#8221;.<br \/>\nKR. Pet issmed g:&#8221;a1111. (*e1&#8217;t.ifieate to plaintiff&#8221;:-3.<br \/>\nI&#8221;a&#8217;:.he1&#8243; in 1&#8217;es;.)e(.&#8217;.1 of st-mil. schedtlle pr()pe1*iy?<\/p>\n<p>Whether the p1ainEiiTp1&#8242;()ves his title to the suit<\/p>\n<p>S(Tht&#8217;dL11C property&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p>Whether the defendant proves that stat<br \/>\nproperty was g1~a1&#8217;1teCE to<br \/>\nKa1as}1etty of B1&#8217;1a1&#8217;atipuI&#8217;a.  .   &#8216;<br \/>\nAsst.Cemmissiones&#8221; f0 He1i&#8217;Spe,sa1_ of<br \/>\nI&#8217;\\\/Iysore and Mandya   &#8211;;de:j <\/p>\n<p>No.SPL\/DIDR\/44f60.;V61 ttclatteci 3Q&#8221;.&#8217;e:,11.9_a1  and  v<\/p>\n<p>{hereafter the &#8216;I&#8217;21I*1\u00a7i*1..r;.1&#8217;a1&#8217; issLie~d_ &#8216;\u00a7};:&#8217;an1&#8243;:&lt;;ertificaE.e<br \/>\nto him dz11e:d,{1.9. 1.96 x . &#039;t V&#039;<\/p>\n<p>Whether&#039; the VeEe\u00a3&#039;et-1.d\u00e9\u00a7h}t  that Siddashetty<br \/>\nS\/o.AV_Ka1ashe1&#039;:1&#039;:y &#039;-QE&quot;  &#039;txillage executed<\/p>\n<p>_Wiv1&#039;\u00a7_..c1_g1t.3<a>VL1\u00ab1.(2:&#8217;f) 1&#8243;&#8216;Q.pe1&#8243;1&#8242;.y&#8217;?<\/p>\n<p>Vt&#8221;\u00bb._4Whei.Vhe1;\u00a5t1&#8243;ie.:_if;21ief of declaration of title sought<\/p>\n<p>E3y&#8221;&#8216;t:.f1ej&gt;1a1ii1tiI&#8221;\u00a3&#8221;is barred by Iinlitation&#8217;?<\/p>\n<p>.44vAP&#8217;:..aintiff has deposed as PW&#8211;1 and has<\/p>\n<p>e&gt;\u20aca_n1in&#8217;ed_&#8221;_v.4}&#8217;egiitnesses. Defendant has deposed as DW&#8211;1<\/p>\n<p>artdhasiexattmined 4 witnesses. For the piaintiff, E&gt;&lt;s.P1 to<\/p>\n<p> P21__ have been marked and for the defendant, Exs.D1 to<\/p>\n<p> &#039;nave been marked. On appreciation of evidence, Trial<\/p>\n<p>Ry<\/p>\n<p>e \/<\/p>\n<p>Court answered issue Nos. (i), (iii) and additional issues (i)<\/p>\n<p>to (iii) 8: (vi) in the affirmative and issue No.(ii), add&#039;i.t:i&#039;o.na!<\/p>\n<p>issue Nos.(iv) &amp; (V) in the negative. As a <\/p>\n<p>findings, suit was partiy decreed.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Aggrieved, defendantiifi 2&#8242; firstv_..&#8217;gAa&#8217;ppea&#8221;i  <\/p>\n<p>assailed the judgment of Tria\u00a7..i.&#8217;:C&#8217;ourt, &#8220;both~.or&#8221;i_i&#8221;and int&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>iaw by contending th\u00a2a&#8221;t,._.there&#8221;isngnoirr..e0nsiderat&#8221;ion of his<\/p>\n<p>case in the proper perisiiprectiivei&#8217;iantjiitfiat&#8217;,-appreciation of<\/p>\n<p>evidence is bad&#8217;:a;n_&#8217;d iil\u00a7j&#8211;A_&#8217;=ga:,l\u00bb.&#8217;;}<\/p>\n<p>6. V -wCo:~nV:iii_:dering.&#8217;tithe. Vrivaiivig. contentions of parties,<br \/>\nlearned A_p.r)Ae&#8217;!&#8217;ii&#8217;ateV_fitigdgeihas.raised the foliowing points for<br \/>\nconsideration: &#8216;  V<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8221;i}_ V\\fhAeE&#8217;h&#8217;er the trial court. erred in f1*arning proper<br \/>\n&#8221;  &#8216;     &#8211; . . . H \u00ab<\/p>\n<p> i&#8217;:aVs&#8217;Lies together for dis(&#8216;ussir.)11&#8217;?<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;~_Whei.he1&#8242; the trial rrourt erred in taking ail. the<\/p>\n<p>i_i.i&#8221;}* _n:~&#8217;VVhC&#8217;i}1\u20ac?I&#8221; the jticigment and decree of the irial<br \/>\nctouri Calls for any rrlodificaticm at the hands of<\/p>\n<p>this CC)Ui&#8221;1(.&#8217;)<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; iv) Whai order&#8217;? XV<\/p>\n<p>7. After examining the record and after re\u00bb<br \/>\nappreciation of evidence, learned Appeiiate Judge has<br \/>\nanswered points No. (i) to (iii) in the negative and as a<br \/>\nresuit, has dismissed the appeal. This second avpp&#8217;eaI.. is<\/p>\n<p>directed against the said judgments \/ decrees.  i&#8217; H&#8217; &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>8. Sri V. Sririivas, iearned advocate&#8211;auppVea&#8211;ri:ng   <\/p>\n<p>appeilant contended that, Triai :\u00a3:;OLAl:IF-t::&#8217;V&#8217;Ai:v&#8217;:&#8217;3&#8243;&#8216;n&gt;O.:t.&#8217;.&#8217;jVU\u00e9t\u00e9f%\ufb02&#8221;d\\nag&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>decreeing the suit in part and__ theiiovver ago&#8217;piieVi.|ate <\/p>\n<p>has erred in dismissing the firs&#8217;t.._a&#8217;ppeaiV,&#8211;&#8216;  plaintiff<br \/>\nhas faiied to produce th4_e&#8221;V\u00ab0rig_Vina.I.At&#8217;iti.e\u00bbd&#8217;eed of  property<\/p>\n<p>and thva&#8217;ti&#8221;&#8216;tiieA:&#8217;:j;Vev&#8217;i&#8217;dfe&#8217;nce~on reco&#8217;rd&#8221;:cieariy admits that, the<\/p>\n<p>possessi_orig&#8217;_of&#8217; Jishwith defendant \/ appeiiant.<\/p>\n<p>He further&#8221;-\u00abcionterideditthat, appreciation of evidence by<\/p>\n<p> Cgourts&#8221;&#8216;be.i.o.w, is perverse and illegal and hence<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;t.h\u00e9~iimvpijgn&#8217;ed&#8217;-judgments have given rise to substantial<\/p>\n<p>q&#8217;uestions&#8217;.VofVieavv, which are required to be considered by<\/p>\n<p> this &#8220;Coijr;t, in exercise of the jurisdiction under 8,100 CPC.<\/p>\n<p> _ V  Point for consideration is: X<br \/>\n\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8221; Whether the impugned judgments have given rise<br \/>\nto any substantiai question of Saw to admit this<\/p>\n<p>second appeaE?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>10. Plaintiff &#8212; PW&#8211;1 has produced 21 docurhents.<\/p>\n<p>Exs.Pl to P5, P14 &amp; E315 are the RTC of <\/p>\n<p>Exs.P6 to P8 are the tax paid receipts. P9lis&#8230;tf\u00a7e&#8217;~death<\/p>\n<p>certificate of Siddashetty. Ex.P1O   patta <\/p>\n<p>Ex.P11 is the loan discharge endorsement.  is noti&#8221;ce&#8221;g<\/p>\n<p>of the bank and repayment  Ex.VP~1p3&#8243;&#8216;isV-I tippani,<\/p>\n<p>Ex.P16 is the re&#8211;survey~-i_recotd_.:A is Hvvmahazar.<\/p>\n<p>Ex.P18 is the grant certifieat\u00e9&#8221;.&#8217;ViE\u00e9x\ufb01tgi.ji3_&#8217;_the office note<\/p>\n<p>relatirig\ufb02tov   thesketch of the suit property.<br \/>\nEx.P21xis the grant certificate. P\\\/V-1 has<\/p>\n<p>reiterated  casehfpiead\u00e9\u00e9d in the piaint. PWs 2 and 3 are<\/p>\n<p> rel.ativesVVot&#8217;Apiaintiff and defendant. They have<\/p>\n<p>_stated stiit property was granted to the father of<\/p>\n<p>piai._nVtiff,V..yyh&#8211;o&#8217;iV.was in possession and enjoyment of the<\/p>\n<p>Hsame &#8220;tyiiiA&#8217;1~his death and thereafter, the property is in the<\/p>\n<p>V.&#8217;-V&#8217;pos_sje&#8217;ssion and enjoyment of the piaintiff. PW&#8211;4 is the<\/p>\n<p> fahsiidar of K.R.Pet Taiuk who has depofd about the<\/p>\n<p>H)<\/p>\n<p>grant of the suit property in favour of Siddashetty. PW~5<\/p>\n<p>is the person who has attested the signature&#8230;Vof]tVhe<\/p>\n<p>grantee &#8212; Siddashetty. Their evidence has <\/p>\n<p>accepted by the Courts be|ow.MAs \u00abhsaid <\/p>\n<p>evidence, defendant has deposedgas:_-DW&#8211;&#8216;4:i;ri,.an.d&#8221;-ex&#8217;a:rnin.ed\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>the attestors to E&gt;&lt;.D1<br \/>\ncame Ato=..gthe  &#039;defendant has also been<\/p>\n<p>con:side.red and__Vc&#039;o&quot;rrectIy appreciated. The material fact of<\/p>\n<p> the su;&#039;it&quot;pro\u00abp_erty having been mortgaged in favour of the<\/p>\n<p> .b&#039;a&#039;ri!\u00a7A a\u00bbn&quot;d._i&#039;_ts:V.&quot;discharge has been correctly assessed. On an<\/p>\n<p>overa|!__&quot;assessment of the evidence, the learned Trial Judge<\/p>\n<p> ..ha__s held that the property had been granted to plaintiff&#039;s<\/p>\n<p>&quot;;:fath&#039;er &#8212; Siddashetty and after the demise of the grantee,<\/p>\n<p> &quot; -~-plaintiff has been in possession and enjoyment of the suit<\/p>\n<p>l\/<\/p>\n<p>property with which the defendant interfered, which can be<br \/>\ninferred from the fact that, the defendant attemptedto put<br \/>\nforth claim on the suit property on the basis <\/p>\n<p>alleged will of Siddashetty.\n<\/p>\n<p>11. The finding of fact b&#8217;y&#8221;&#8221;t*hegTrial.&#8221;Co&#8217;urt,i-afte-r<\/p>\n<p>examination, has been affirmed by  lea&#8217;i&#8217;ne&#8217;d., lud&#8211;ge.,Vof._V<\/p>\n<p>the first Appellate Court.  theft<\/p>\n<p>Courts below are purerfindin,g&#8221;Ofi.fact1&#8217;TE&#8221;he find~ing&#8217;s are with<br \/>\nreference to the material&#8217;e&#8217;v-ideinceii&#8217;:plaLc&#8217;ed on record by<\/p>\n<p>both the parti,es,: =-The,Adefeildajntfsi..atte&#8217;irnVpt to create doubt<\/p>\n<p>regard&#8217;i&#8217;n&#8217;g&#8217; idiehtity-.vof&#8217;the&#8221;&#8221;g&#8217;ra\u00a7ntee &#8212; Siddashetty, has<br \/>\nrightly&#8221;&#8216;-been  in view, the parties being<\/p>\n<p>related toi&#8221;e\u00e9ich,ot_he~r&#8221;an-d the evidence that has come on<\/p>\n<p>  re._cjo:rd,_.ilnci,,uding&#8221;tti.a.t\u00abPWs 2 and 3, who are the brothers of<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; thlelcief,e&#8217;ndan&#8221;t,~-_supports the case of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p>12&#8242;. .:&#8217;In view of the above, since the circumstances<\/p>\n<p> ..rel_ati.n&#8221;g to the custody of Ex.D1 being with defendant, has<\/p>\n<p> explained by the plaintiff, which circumstance has<\/p>\n<p> V\u00bb ..&#8211;rightly been appreciated by the Courtsxbelow and since<\/p>\n<p>both the Courts beiow have referred to the materiai<br \/>\nevidence on record and have drawn correct inference on<br \/>\nappreciation of the oral and documentary evidence, no<\/p>\n<p>substantial question of Jaw arises for considerationyv.t:&#8221;~.._ <\/p>\n<p>In the resuit, the appeai stands rejectet\u00a7&#8217;,~..Vfor.A_1wanthof b<\/p>\n<p>substantial question of law.\n<\/p>\n<pre>sac*    '\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 30&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Aw.vENoGoPALA&#8230;G&#8217;oy\u00a7q&#8217;ba0* REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.115.7..\/, A A 1&#8217; BETWEEN: Sii\ufb01fsaffadya, K.V. Puttashetty, _ &#8216; 8\/0. Late Venkataramana [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-24T03:56:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-24T03:56:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1684,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009\",\"name\":\"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-24T03:56:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-24T03:56:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-24T03:56:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009"},"wordCount":1684,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009","name":"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-24T03:56:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-puttashetty-vs-k-s-paramesh-on-30-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K V Puttashetty vs K S Paramesh on 30 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109117\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}