{"id":109208,"date":"2009-06-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-06-07T04:27:12","modified_gmt":"2017-06-06T22:57:12","slug":"lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 20::)\"9\u00bb\nBEFORE C   K '\nTHE H0N'13LE MR.  \nM.F.A. N0. 1367:2T0E'2fjo\u00e9'~--    \nC\/W 13678, 13675. 13677, 13622. 13(3V8f3AVVf:)Ifi'v'V1V20'\u00a3:W\u00a76 =\n\nM.F.A. No. 13672 OF 2oo6:\u00a7\"x *\nBETWEE3N:-- _   '\n\nLAKSHMANA,   \\_  .   \nS\/OERAPPA @ VEENAPPA m\u00a5>1U:MATTi;.1'V_~v _ \nAGE 22 YEARS.'_  \"  \n\nR\/O.SANDA\"VILL{AGE:., =: \n\ns1~11KAR'TPUjE:A  _\n\nSHTMOQA D\u00a3sTRi'cT.'\u00ab..EV . '\n _ ' .   APPELLANT\n\n(BY SR1~.Sf\\i'. PR.A2\u00a7As1--1;~-.ADVoCATE)\n\n\n\n[U\n\n- _ 'vs \/0,; BAL.AKR1sHNA.\nA 'WAGE: MAJOR.\nR\/Oi; S\u00a7DDHARTHA NILAYA.\n,5' 'PPU, MANGALORE.\n\n\" ,. (OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING\nREGN N0.z<:A19\/11-05).\n\nB. PRAVEEN KUMAR. S\/O.\\\/ASU.\nAGE: MAJOR.\n\nR\/O.MAI\\\/IMALE3 HOUSE,\nKODIKAL. MANGALORE.\n\n[DRIVER OI?' THE LORRY BEARING\nREG-N N .KA19\/11-05).\n\n\n\n \n\nIx)\n\nM\/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO._.\n\nMANGALORE.\nREP. BY ITS MANAGER.\n\nH. CHANNABASAPPA.\nS\/OMADIVALAPPA,\nAGE: MAJOR,\n\nS\/O. KUMBARA STREET, 1 I \nSIRALAKOPPA, SHIKARIPURA._TQ.\nSHIMOGA DISTRICT.   V "\n\nOWNER OE TEMPO NO;--IgA.15\/ 1 1-~.Q2.-   \n\nSHIVARAJ, . \nS\/O. IIOLIYAPPA... \n\nAGE: MAJOR, " _  \nR\/O.KUIvI_BARA S,T.RE--I\u00a3T,._ .,\n\nSIRALAKOPPA. S_5HiKARIPU~RA_'\u00a3"Q;':\u00ab \n\n   \n\n:~I'j1'\u00a7Iv'I:i'I}iI OI5\u00a7I*EMPO-  'I5\/ I P02.\n\n I3I~I.ITE\u00a7I:~. SvIND"IA:iI\ufb01:ISURNACE CO., LTD.\n\nSAGAR, SHIMOGA'---DISTRICT.\n_ REP "BY "ITS 'VBRANQEI MANAGER.\n\n~   B__.S.  ADVOCATE POE\nF' .I_B'Y SP1  RAJU & P.S. JAGADISH, ADVS., FOR R3 & R6]\n\n~ . ._ A' '\u00ab"['H_IS .M.F'A IS FILED U\/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST\n'THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 3.5.2005 PASSED IN\nMVC 3510, 33\/97 ON THE FILE OF THE) ADDL, CIVIL JUDGE\n\n, (SR_.DN) AND ADDL. MACT, SHIMOGA, PARTLY ALLOWING\n I THE) CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPEZNSATION AND SEEKING\n\n2 \u00bb V EIIIIANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.\n\nZ}M."1\u00ab*.A. No. 13678 or 2006:\u00bb\n BETWEE3N:--\n\nSR1 BASAVARAJA,\nS \/ O. CHANNABASAPPA.\nAGED 2} YEARS.\n\nRESPOND ENTS\n\n\n\n \n\n'4.)\n\nR\/O. SANDA VILLAGE.\nSHIKARIPURA TALUK.\n\nSHIMOGA DISTRICT.\n\n{BY SR1 S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCA'I'f:}}b\n\nANDZ"\n\n1.\n\n!\\.J\n\nSRI B. JEEVAN,\nS\/OBALAKRISHNA.\n\nAGE: MAJOR,  \n\nR\/0. SI.DDHART=HA NII.AI'A,,j-- \nJAPPU.MANGALO}1E.*_  .  \n(OWNER OF THE LQ'RR';<f BEARIVNG. " --.\nREGNNOAKA19\/,1_.1:O5].'..  \nB. PRAivEi;i:.N ,I\u00bb:UMA:R'." 1'   \n     .\n<\/pre>\n
AGE’: AII$'{IALI’c5*R;S ” AV %
\nTR\/O;MAM\u00a3\\({AL,E”HOUE3–E.,<\/p>\n
K.OD_IKAL, MANGALQRE.\n<\/p>\n
(DRIVER OF’TI%~IE ‘LQRRY BEARING<\/p>\n
_ REGN NIvQ,.I\u00a7A1’9_\/1\u00ab..:”–05).<\/p>\n
 LINETED AINDIA INSURANCE co..<\/p>\n
MANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
 _ ‘RE3P_[‘B Y’—I’I’S MANAGER.<\/p>\n
I-I. 7\u00e9IjIj5IANNAI3ASAI3I>A,
\nS’\/OJVIADIVALAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
” ,. AGE: MAJOR,<\/p>\n
‘S\/O. KUMBARA STREET.\n<\/p>\n
SIRALAKOPPA, SHIKARIPURA TQ.<\/p>\n
.’ SHIMOGA DISTRICT.\n<\/p>\n
OVVNER OF TEMPO NOKA 15\/11-02.
\nSHIVARAJ.\n<\/p>\n
S \/ O. HOLIYAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR.\n<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
R\/OKUMBARA STREET,<\/p>\n
SIRALAKOPPA, SHIKARIPURA TQ,
\nSHIMOGA DISTRICT.   _ =
\nDRIVER OF TEMPO NO.KA 15\/ l._I–O2′.<\/p>\n
6. M\/S. UNITED INDIA INSURNACEOc’O.,’I;rD.., I ~
\nSAGAR, SIIIMOOA DISTRICT,’q —  ‘ ‘
\nREP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER’; I _ V  -‘ I
\n   ” ~. _ RESPOND ENTS
\n[BY SRI B.S. RAVIKIRAN, ADf\\zO_cAI”I\u00ab:_V FOR R-1]_
\n[BY SRI PB. RAJU &. P;~S_. JA:OADIS.II, “ADVS., FOR R3 3: R6}
\nTHIS MFA IS FILED ‘U\/IS _’si73{.1jVQ%’_i’\\\u00abTV ACT AGAINST
\nTHE IIUDOMENTVANDIAwAjI2D* DATI3,D;., 325.2005 PASSED IN
\nMVC NO. 5.73\/9’_>3 ON TESE ._O_I?f’ THE ADDL. CIVIL
\nJUDGE [S.R3-..,DE’\u00a7f_]VO’  A;-DDL; MACVT, SHIMOGA, PARTLY
\nALLOWING ‘1’E\u00a3E'”‘CLAIM-.IAI?EC[A”\u00a3TI’ON FOR COMPENSATION
\nAND SEEKING ‘::NIIIIN’cVE;M~I3NfI’ OFF COMPENSATION.<\/p>\n
 Ne. a’2_U06:- I
\nBETW:P1WI;_3_\u00a7: ‘   ..\n<\/p>\n
SMT. MOBINABIN A ._<\/p>\n
VV4\/\u00a30′; I\u00a7ASHI\u00a3ED’SAB,<\/p>\n
A._G’E: 47 YEARS; ‘  ———- ~ *<\/p>\n
 ” \u00abR\/O S”AjNDA_._vII.IIAOI5,
\n‘ .\u00bbS1mIIKAR1PVURA–TALUK,<\/p>\n
I  . SIIIIVIOOA D’IvS’-IRICT.<\/p>\n
. __ . APPELLA NT
\n{BY SR1  PRAKASH, ADVOCATE}<\/p>\n
 ..:L\\Nb”;.-._. O’<\/p>\n
   SR1 B. JEEVAN, S\/OBALAKRISHNA,<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR.\n<\/p>\n
R\/O. SEDDHARTHA NILAYA,
\nJAPPU, MANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
(OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING
\nREGN NO.KA19\/11-05).\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\n3 .\n<\/p>\n
Ex.)<\/p>\n
B. PRAVEEN KUMAR.\n<\/p>\n
S\/O.\\\/ASU.\n<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR.\n<\/p>\n
R\/O.MAI\\\/{MALE HOUSE,
\nKODIKAL, MANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
(DRIVER OF THE LORRY BEARING
\nREGN NOKA19\/11-05}.\n<\/p>\n
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE I ~ ‘I<\/p>\n
MANGALORE3.  _ A
\nREP. BY ITS I\\\/IAl\\IAGE’I?,_ <\/p>\n
H. CI-EANNABASAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
S\/o.MADIvAI4AIi’IAA,<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR,  _
\nS\/0. KUMBARA STRIa:I:.’I:” <\/p>\n
SIRALAKOPPA, S.I’III{ARCIP{.I’RAII’Sf’Q”:  * <\/p>\n
SHIMOGA;DISTf%:ICT. _<\/p>\n
OWN Ia;Ii:_ oI2j’I*I’SIIr1’P0 ‘No. I\u00a7ACjfI5\/I’I’:’02.<\/p>\n
S\/Q. IIDLIYAIDPA.  ‘
\nAGE:”l\\\/IAJOF-3,  ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
‘ ‘I1,\/.o.I<U-I.\u00ab.1I_I3ARA STREET.
\n"  SII<IA,;4AIIIA..SHIKARIPURA TQ.<\/p>\n
SIIIMOC-A DISTRICT.\n<\/p>\n
”  M\/SVLj’jII:NITED INDIA INSURNACE Co..<\/p>\n
SAC-AR. SHIMOGA DISTRICT,<\/p>\n
2 ,.R’I::_1=> BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.<\/p>\n
 AAIIBIASIII I3.S. RAVIKIRAN, ADVOCATE FOR
\n‘ -,T{BY=SRI IAB. RAJU (‘SI P.S. JAGADISH, ADVS., FOR R3 & R6}<\/p>\n
THIS MFA IS FILED U\/S 173(1) OF<\/p>\n
”  _  OF TEMPO No.I{A 15\/ 1 I-02.<\/p>\n
LTD. .\n<\/p>\n
RESPOND ENTS
\nR1)<\/p>\n
MV ACT AGAINST<\/p>\n
‘LATHE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 3.5.2005 PASSED IN<\/p>\n
MVC NO. 29\/97 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
\n[SRDN] AND ADDL. MACT. SHIMOGA, PARTLY ALLOWING<\/p>\n
Q\u00a7\/<\/p>\n
 5%’ _.\n<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION ANO…SEEI:ING
\nENHANCEMENT OE COMPENSATION. V  <\/p>\n
M.F.A. No. 13677 OF 2006:–\n<\/p>\n
I:’>_..T:3.’F__\\_7\\_LEE_T\u00a7LI;<\/p>\n
SMT. BHOODEVI.\n<\/p>\n
W\/O. SURESH,<\/p>\n
AGE: 24 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n
R\/O SANDA VILLAGE.\n<\/p>\n
SHIKARIPURA TALUKA.\n<\/p>\n
SHIMOGA DISTRICT;  \u00ab.\n<\/p>\n
‘ ‘I      _ APPELLANT<\/p>\n
(BY SRI S.V. PRAKASII, AB.VOcATE”;-, ; .. <\/p>\n
AND\u00bb    <\/p>\n
1.
\n‘vs\/O.1BALA,E_RISBNA.,.I____ — ‘
\nAGE; MAJOR,
\nR\/ O. SIDD.HARTPI}%_NILAYA.
\nJAPPU, MANGA,LOI”<E.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘ “(QWNER.,OFV1’IIIZ LORRY BEARING
\n”  REGVN NO.’I<A.I.9\/I I-05).<\/p>\n
._  'PRAVEEN KUMAB.\n<\/p>\n
I S[OV.vASU,
\nAGEIi’j_M_i1\\JOR.\n<\/p>\n
 P;\/’O,IVIAI\\\/[MALE HOUSE,
\n,. KODIKAL, MANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
IBRIVER OF THE LORRY BEARING<\/p>\n
”  REGN NO.KA19\/11~05).\n<\/p>\n
 I UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO..<\/p>\n
MAN GALORE.\n<\/p>\n
REP. BY ITS MANAGER.\n<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
4. H. CHANNABASAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
S\/QMADIVALAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR.\n<\/p>\n
S\/O. KUMBARA STREET,  ;\n<\/p>\n
SIRALAKOPPA, SHIKARIPURA TQ,’   -I’ 1. ‘
\nS1–11MOGA DISTRICT. ”   _ ~
\nOWNER OF TEMPO NORA 15\/A11+02.  , ” ”<\/p>\n
5. SHIVARAJ.\n<\/p>\n
S\/O. HOLIYAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
AGE:1\\\/IAJOR.  A S
\nR\/OKUMBARA S’-.FRI’\u00a7E.”[‘,  g  SA
\nSIRALAKOPPA. SHH<:AR1PURA.~fr
\nSHlMOGA'–DISTRi'CT. _ _  j
\nDRIVER 'OFTEMPQ NO.RA'~1.5.,\/.1 1–j02.<\/p>\n
6. MAi”R.SLIRr$;AcE CO., LTD..
\nSAOAR.”-S\u00a3::1MOOAVO1STR1c*1?.<\/p>\n
VREP-Ry:,1TS”:R’RAR.O’R MANAG ER.<\/p>\n
    . .’ RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
[BY SR1 B._.S. RAv1R1RAN–,. ADVOCATE FOR R1]<\/p>\n
[BY SR1 RAJU &  JAGADISH. ADVS. FOR R3 & R6}<\/p>\n
V  . rf\ufb02ls MFA’ 1S 1511.313 U \/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST<\/p>\n
‘  \u00ab THE ;ruOG.MENf’AN’O AWARD DATED: 3.5.2005 PASSED IN<\/p>\n
L’ 224\/98 ON T}-IF; FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL<\/p>\n
‘~.J1.1.063″_\u00a2{.SR;..1jN) AND ADDL. MACT, SHIMOGA. PARTLY<\/p>\n
_ A1..LOjN1N.G THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION<\/p>\n
 AND .Sj2:EK1NG ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.<\/p>\n
A’ <..V'M,.u14*.A. No. 13682 OF 2006:–
\n.7BERNEENe
\nSR1 JATIRULLA @ JABIULLA.\n<\/p>\n
S\/O. M.H. ANIFF SAB.\n<\/p>\n
AGE 20 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n
AK<\/p>\n
R\/OSANDA VILLAGE,
\nSHIKARIPURA TQ.\n<\/p>\n
SHIMOGA DISTRICT.\n<\/p>\n
[BY SR1 s_v. PRAKASH, ADVOCAIE]  1 I’<\/p>\n
AND:–\n<\/p>\n
1 .\n<\/p>\n
Ex)<\/p>\n
SR1 B. JEEVAN,<\/p>\n
S\/O.BALA.KRISH__NA,  _
\nAGEMAJOR,   ,
\nR\/0. sIDDHARTPm’1\\IILAY:iA; ” jv I
\nJAPPUMANGALORET    _
\n(OWNER OF THBLGRRY ‘BEA121\u00a3’_~:(;” ”
\nREGN N0:._K;i;x–19,-<_1 19.52}.   <\/p>\n
B.     I
\nS\/_Q.’v”<ASU1;.;.,V '
\nAGE: R1\\\/IfAJOF:,'"\n<\/p>\n
ZVR\/Q..MAR::\\.4ALB’HbusI::.I<\/p>\n
KQDIKAL, .MANCALQR.E.\n<\/p>\n
(DRIVER OF  LQRRY BEARING<\/p>\n
_ RBGR. N’O.VIf{A19–._\/I’I105]_<\/p>\n
 U_I$1I”1f_BD iN’mA…B\\:sURANcB co..<\/p>\n
MANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
I ”  _ REP  ITS MANAGER.\n<\/p>\n
H; \u00e9’}j~;A:qNABAsARpA.\n<\/p>\n
S.’\/O-MADIVALAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
I AGE: MAJOR,<\/p>\n
F-.,\/O. KUIVIBARA STREET.\n<\/p>\n
I  SIRALAKORPA, SHIKARIPURA T9,
\n= SHIMOGA DISTRICT.\n<\/p>\n
OWNER OI? TEMPO NO.KA 15\/1I~O2.<\/p>\n
SHIVARAJ .\n<\/p>\n
S \/ O. HOLIYAPPA.\n<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR,<\/p>\n
\u00a7}\/<\/p>\n
 _  ” ~  > .\n<\/p>\n
‘)<\/p>\n
R\/O.KUMBARA STREET.\n<\/p>\n
SIRALAKOPPA. SHIKARIPURA TQ,<\/p>\n
SHIMOGA DISTRICT.  *  S-\n<\/p>\n
DRIVER OF TEMPO NO.KA I5\/I l–02,…__ = ”<\/p>\n
6. M\/S. UNITED INDIA INSURNACE
\nSAGARSHIMOGA DIS’1’RiCT:_  ‘  W. ~ ”
\nREP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.*– _  1 = <\/p>\n
‘  ” I VREISIDQIVIDVENTS <\/p>\n
[BY SR1 B.S. RAVIKIRAN, ADVOCATE FOR RI} ‘ :<\/p>\n
[BY SR1 PB. RAJU & RS. IJAGADvISH.I_. ADVS.-,.IFfOR: R3 & R6)<\/p>\n
TI-IIS MFA IS FILED. .U’\/Si-,1:73’1′–1_j” DE MV ACT AGAINST
\nTHE JUDGMENT AND AWARD’DATED;–.:;3._5_’,2005 PASSED IN
\nMVC NO. 25\/9? ON TII”I;:-EILE”QF’TI~I.EI,ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
\n[SR.DN] AND ADIIL.  SIIIIvI._e.G_A,i PARTLY ALLOWING
\nTI-IE CLAIM ‘l?E’.5fI’\u00a7E”_..T;_OI\\I:i’?C)-R CQMPENSATION AND SEEKING
\nENHAI\\ICI=i:M “OFT. COVl\\}1.P’1*31\\I\u20ac~;A”I7IO1\\I.<\/p>\n
M.F.A. No. A 1Vf3″t71’8.I,v’\u00bb4V’1?_”;:2_iV(“)\u20ac!6:–‘
\n    ..\n<\/p>\n
SR1 AKEARKI-IAN., A _
\nS\/\u00a7).c:IAJAMPAI2’ALI KHAN.
\nAQI3: 2: YEARS,”  …..\n<\/p>\n
 ” R\/”0.JA;IjG:AIs;A.I–IALLI VILLAG
\n‘ :SHIKARi’P_URA~–TQ.\n<\/p>\n
A  .SH1MOGA_ DISTRICT.\n<\/p>\n
. __ . APPELLANT
\n[BY SR1  PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)<\/p>\n
”   SRI B. JEEVAN, S\/OBALAKRISHNA.<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR,<\/p>\n
R\/O. SIDDHARTI-IA NILAYA.\n<\/p>\n
JAPPU. MANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
(OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING
\nREIGN NOKA19\/l1~O5).\n<\/p>\n
I4<\/p>\n
B. RRAVEEN KUMAR.\n<\/p>\n
S\/O.\\\/ASU.\n<\/p>\n
AGE: MAJOR.\n<\/p>\n
R\/OMAMMALE HOUSE,   ._
\nKODIKAL, MANGALDRE.\n<\/p>\n
{DRIVER OF THE LORRY BEARING’
\nREGN NOKA19\/11\u00bbO5}._  <\/p>\n
3. UNITED INDIA INSURAN’C.ECO., ‘
\nMANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
REP. BY ITS MAI’_\\IA(_3ER. _ ‘  ,<\/p>\n
A. B.cRAI\\INABASAppA, I
\nS\/o.MAD;VALARRA; –\n<\/p>\n
AGE:MAJQR, , 2:   ”
\nS\/O..E{{IMi\u00a7\u00a7ARA STREET; 1}. S
\nSIRALAI{D.BRA. ,SH.1f’I{AP._II\u00a7fU’RATQ,
\nSRIM\u00bbQGA1′.;\u00a7)ISTRIC*I. ~ ._ 3<\/p>\n
V’Ov\\7I\\IEVI};:, oI?”%;’-EIvII>_O-  IS\/I 1~02.<\/p>\n
5. S.HIv1ARAJ.~~.”‘-\u00ab.\n<\/p>\n
S \/O. H.0LIYAPfPA,”‘-. ‘
\nAGE:-\u00ab.MA-.IOR. ‘ *
\ng ‘ “R,\/O.KiJ~E\\\/IBARASTREET,
\n‘  .;S_IVRAI.AKO’PRA. \u00abSHIKARIPURA TQ,<\/p>\n
SHIMQGA DISTRICT.\n<\/p>\n
  _ ‘DRIVER OF TEMPO NO.KA 15\/11-02.<\/p>\n
”  M\/S.;’;U]3II’I’ED INDIA INSURNACE CO.. LTD.<\/p>\n
C  SE1 B.S. RAVIKIRAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1]<\/p>\n
 SAGAR. SHIMOGA DISTRICT.\n<\/p>\n
,. REP BY ITS BRANCI-I MANAGER.
\n‘ ” RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
 –..V”{-BYAESRI RB. RAJU 81 RS. JAGADISH, ADVS, FOR R3 3: R6)<\/p>\n
THIS MFA ES FILED U\/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST<\/p>\n
I THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 3.5.2005 PASSED IN<\/p>\n
MVC NO. 21\/97 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
\n{SRDN} AND ADDL. MACT. SI-IIIVIOGA, PART LY ALLOVVING<\/p>\n
THE cL.A1M PETITEON FOR COMPENSATION Ali\\i.:54’1s:si”\u00a5i’fr{:’N..c;
\nENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.    N.<\/p>\n
These appeals are coming ontfor o::i’e1-s–  <\/p>\n
Court made the following:\n<\/p>\n
JUDQMEE\u00a7d<\/p>\n
All the appeals arise  acveident and
\ncommon judgment.   students on
\nexcursion, thelorry  The two
\ninmates of    injured.\n<\/p>\n
2.   negligence of the
\ndriver: of  and coverage of insurance are
\nnot in dispute.’   b T<\/p>\n
‘ ~ 3. uui:-1aal’l’ ‘tl”1e.’V’appeals “there is delay oi’ 509 days. The<\/p>\n
   coittedozied\ufb02dodn the condition that the claimant would<\/p>\n
  notVbegiventitlledto interest on the enhanced compensation for<\/p>\n
flied period ” delay.\n<\/p>\n
 M.F.;a,No.13s72\/2006:\n<\/p>\n
V  4. This appeal arises out of MVC No.33\/97. One<\/p>\n
‘Laxmana, aged about 12 years sustained fracture of shaft of<\/p>\n
right ‘femur. The petitioner is operated implants are put. The<\/p>\n
total body disability is assessed at 10%. Tiae notional income<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
MVC NO. 13678\/2006:\n<\/p>\n
7. This appeal arises gm  i\\1_s.’57a\/’ius\u00e9ie.<\/p>\n
The petitioner is aged about i34’years at tin1e’=.4ot*.tt–heL<\/p>\n
accident. The petitioner has    bones
\nof right isg. The totaii” b,sdy_.w*d’i’ss1i\u00a7ijiii;\u00a7f*-assessed  10%. The
\nnotionai income is to’be– 13.111. The
\nincome loss, utvouid be Rs.180\/-<\/p>\n
p.m.\n<\/p>\n
 It)t1  the facts and evidence
\nRS.4:0__.0Q0\/id’iS~..to'<b'evi._jVa'o.{a1'ded towards pain and agony.
\nRs.iO.A'0QO'\/_- ists  towards loss oi' amenities and
\nfuture discoinfoift  Rs.15,000\/~ is to be awarded
\n inedical '  incidental expenses.<\/p>\n
  "afI'i1e petitioner at the time of the accident did not<\/p>\n
"i_ia\\ke– eittpioyabie age. The compensation is assessed<\/p>\n
daindiost: 5'~:6_ years in advance on the basis oi' the notionai<\/p>\n
inconie: Hence to neutralise the accelerated benefit. one<\/p>\n
 AA inuitipiier is to be deducted and 17 ne1u.it.ipiier shouid be<\/p>\n
V v.ado;pted. Hence, the total ioss of future eamings on account<\/p>\n
50\/<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
of disability would be Rs.18(‘)\/– [income] X 12 {months} X1′?<\/p>\n
(multiplier) = Rs.36720\/–. In all, the petitioner  to<\/p>\n
a total compensation of Rs.i,Oi,’720\/g’;–. <\/p>\n
Rs.35,000\/~ awarded by the tr_ib.1.in_ai. V”d\u00e9’nVhaneVed”.y’<\/p>\n
compensation the interest payabie
\nof the petition tiii payment   \u00abd.eiay. VA ‘
\nMVC N0.13675\/2006:   it  I V<\/p>\n
10. This appVe’aii’ai’Ais\u00abes  No.i2,53A\/1997. One
\nBasha, studentand   accident. The<\/p>\n
mother is ti’1e_–so’ie Ci_a”im_ant’. The notional income of the<\/p>\n
deceased  to ‘be”assye.s’se4d\u00a3’at Rs.i800\/– p.in. The deceased<\/p>\n
 not hayeihe dprovper empioyable age, one multiplier is to<\/p>\n
   Hencei 15 muitipiier wiii apply taking the age of<\/p>\n
 : p.eti.tiVon:e=ii.:”[rnothe1’}. 125.900\/W to be deducted towards<\/p>\n
pei”so;1~ai_vie’X1\u00a7enses. Rs.900\/~ wouid enure to the ‘oeneiit of<\/p>\n
 A the zdefjendants. The total Ioss of dependency would be<\/p>\n
 ‘Rs:f300\/~[income}Xi2(rr1onths)X i5{1nuitip1ier]=Rs.162000\/–.<\/p>\n
__\u00a7The petitioner is entitled to Rs.25,000\/– towards toss oi”<\/p>\n
expectancy and Rs.i0,000\/– towards funeral expenses. in<\/p>\n
ail, the petitioner is eititied to a total compensatioii of<\/p>\n
[C<\/p>\n
Rs.1.97.000\/~ as against Rs.1.56.000\/~ the<\/p>\n
tribunal. On the enhanced compensation__f”fh’e[_’–i..nte.1fesp<\/p>\n
payable is 6% p.a. from the date of the pe.ti–ti.0.:n~,til’l~:pa.y’1:1e’r1\u00abt. <\/p>\n
except for the period of delay.<\/p>\n
M.F.A.NO. 13672\/2006:\n<\/p>\n
1}. This appeal ariseVsl*..e’12=.a pl’  iNVb.2’234\/ 98. One<\/p>\n
Boodevi aged about ye:_irs_a”s_t1.ide;it and” a minor girl
\nsustained fracture of right’.”femu.–izV”inVl’e_i4.i~or pubic ramus<\/p>\n
fracture lelLgn”:e;l.i21l i’nall_e6){1s'”l’1jae:{uiie_,_fclavicle l”1’aCiu1’e left.<\/p>\n
l’i*ac.ti.ii*e ._of” ljo”il”~i-._vl5onevs:”0.{f riglghta forearm. The peutioner is
\n0pe1’a1.eCl..Limplants’.l’az’e'”‘–.ep{1i,. The total body disability is<\/p>\n
ass;es”sec:1 at 2’O5\/d.V The notional income of the p\u20aci.lU()I’}(31′ is to<\/p>\n
‘A be  at Rs.1800\/– p.111. The irieoine loss<\/p>\n
 ‘V  disability would be R3360\/– pm,<\/p>\n
On reassessment of the facts and evidence<\/p>\n
 xRs.40’.vGOO\/- is to be awarded ‘towards pain and agony.
\n‘  V’R.<;..l.O,0OO\/– is 10 be awarded '\u00e9'0w\u00a31i'ds loss 0l"aIi'1ei1ities and<\/p>\n
__;luture dis<:oml'01'1' if any. Rs.l5,000\/- is to be awardecl<\/p>\n
towards nieclieal a 1d inciderital expenses.<\/p>\n
If:\n<\/p>\n
13. The petitioner at the time of the ac:cid4ent~.ydid_ not<\/p>\n
have the empioyablc age. The compensation”.”i5–\u00abd.V’g-sisesys\u00e9d<\/p>\n
almost 5-6 years in advance on the bas-iso.if”~the..:riotionai.b <\/p>\n
income. Hence to neutralise the accelerated “beiiefit,w.;one<\/p>\n
muitipiier is to be deducteedmandti?”:i1ulti;;iiief:_shoi;1ld <\/p>\n
adopted. Hence, the totai lossVd4i’oll:d”f11tu1’el’eaiiningsllpn account
\nof disability would  12A[mAonths) X 17
\n[multiplier] 3 Rs.7344Q_\/’fl;  tliepetit-i.onei* is entitled to<\/p>\n
a total C;()I41’i[‘}_C%,:.1″1SE\u00a3fi’OI15 “of  A’.Rs.:’i~,.38f,l44O\/- as against<\/p>\n
  On the enhanced
\ncon1p:Ve.nsation:  payable is 6% pa. from the date
\nof the petition  except for the period of delay.
\n 1s6s2_l2.tio6:\n<\/p>\n
 appeal arises out of MVC No.25\/97. The<\/p>\n
* pei;itioneif sustained fracture of right femur, fracture of<\/p>\n
lo4\\}ye.rVl”iV\/Sllof ieft radius and other injuries. The petitioner is<\/p>\n
 xopyerated implants are put. The total body disability is<\/p>\n
‘reassessed at 10%. The notional income of the petitioner is to<\/p>\n
H be assessed at Rs.i800\/~ pm. The income loss<\/p>\n
piopoi-tionate to disability would be Rs. l 80\/- 13.111.<\/p>\n
The petitioner was inpatient, for about 30 <\/p>\n
hospital. The vision of the petitioner is fThle.b<\/p>\n
tribunal has gramled global eon1_pen_satie=n”of:Rs:25v;_OQ0\/\u00a7_”.<\/p>\n
which appears to be irladequate.’-._ Tlile=1oe1.ioocionef is .\u00a7.’g::a_h7!oed<\/p>\n
compensation of Rs.30.000\/ 1′,OV\\laI’ClS pa[E::1;l’A{.a:1.dVVV agolxiyzil’<\/p>\n
Rs.15.000\/– towards medical “amid,mc1d’ea:;li eh?a1*ges and
\nRs.10.000\/- towards  of’}_1m;_enl.iti:_=;’sv.o l’u’tu1″e discomfort
\nif any. In all, the_…p.e1.iI.ionoer\u00e9  Veolgitlled to a total<\/p>\n
oompensatiofl l    A.. \u00a31S””‘2{gai11st, Rs.25.000\/–<\/p>\n
a\\lva1″dletlllbyeA1I\u00a7..e t1’ui1:bl{111al\u00bb….\u00abO11 Ihewtmhanced cc)n1])ens’c1t.ion the
\ninLeresl’t.pa:yable ‘!’s:l’69l\/o”..pl\u00a7’2;.’ from the date of the petition till
\npezyment e.iieepi for E:ha;= period of delay.<\/p>\n
 A.eco.1’di11glly “a’l’l’Vt,he appeals are disposed of in the<\/p>\n
V’ V tefnas md:::::\u00aba;e’d . ab ove.<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n
31* Chisel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 20::)”9\u00bb BEFORE C K ‘ THE H0N’13LE MR. M.F.A. N0. 1367:2T0E’2fjo\u00e9’~– C\/W 13678, 13675. 13677, 13622. 13(3V8f3AVVf:)Ifi’v’V1V20’\u00a3:W\u00a76 = M.F.A. No. 13672 OF 2oo6:\u00a7”x * BETWEE3N:– _ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nLakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-06T22:57:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-06T22:57:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2354,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-06T22:57:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-06T22:57:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-06T22:57:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009"},"wordCount":2354,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009","name":"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-06T22:57:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmana-vs-sri-b-jeevan-on-2-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lakshmana vs Sri B Jeevan on 2 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}