{"id":1097,"date":"2009-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-11T04:33:13","modified_gmt":"2017-03-10T23:03:13","slug":"r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009<\/div>\n
R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                   [1]\n\n                 In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh\n\n\n\n                                   Date of decision: February 10 ,2009\n\n\n1.      R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006\n\n        State of Haryana and another                         ..... Appellants\n                                         vs\n        Jagbir Singh and others                              .... Respondents<\/pre>\n
2.      R. F. A. No. 2642 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
3.      R. F. A. No. 2643 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
4.      R. F. A. No. 2644 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
5.      R. F. A. No. 2645 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
6.      R. F. A. No. 2646 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
7.      R. F. A. No. 2647 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
8.      R. F. A. No. 2648 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                          …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [2]<\/p>\n
9.      R. F. A. No. 2649 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
10.     R. F. A. No. 2650 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
11.     R. F. A. No. 2651 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
12.     R. F. A. No. 2652 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
13.     R. F. A. No. 2653 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
14.     R. F. A. No. 2654 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
15.     R. F. A. No. 2655 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
16.     R. F. A. No. 2656 of 2004 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sh. Harke and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
17.     R. F. A. No. 8 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Devinder Singh & others             ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others           …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                         [3]<\/p>\n
18.     R. F. A. No. 9 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Surjan                               ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
19.     R. F. A. No. 10 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Daya Kishan                          ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
20.     R. F. A. No. 11 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Neelam & others                      ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
21.     R. F. A. No. 12 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sarup Singh & others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
22.     R. F. A. No. 13 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mange Ram & others                   ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
23.     R. F. A. No. 14 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Tarif Singh                          ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
24.     R. F. A. No. 15 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Balbir Singh                         ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
25.     R. F. A. No. 16 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Chandan Singh                        ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
26.     R. F. A. No. 17 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Surjan                               ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                         [4]<\/p>\n
27.     R. F. A. No. 18 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Satbir Singh Rathee & others         ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
28.     R. F. A. No. 19 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Lilawati & others               ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
29.     R. F. A. No. 20 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mukhtiar Singh & others              ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
30.     R. F. A. No. 21 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Lachi Ram                            ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
31.     R. F. A. No. 22 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mange Ram                            ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
32.     R. F. A. No. 23 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ved Singh                            ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
33.     R. F. A. No. 24 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Bala & another                  ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
34.     R. F. A. No. 25 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Komal & others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
35.     R. F. A. No. 26 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sham Singh & others                  ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                         [5]<\/p>\n
36.     R. F. A. No. 27 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jot Ram                              ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
37.     R. F. A. No. 28 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ved Singh                            ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
38.     R. F. A. No. 29 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Om Parkash & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
39.     R. F. A. No. 30 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Shiv Devi & others              ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
40.     R. F. A. No. 31 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jai Ram Rathee                       ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
41.     R. F. A. No. 32 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt.Shanti                           ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
42.     R. F. A. No. 33 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Dharampal and others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
43.     R. F. A. No. 34 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Singh                            ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
44.     R. F. A. No. 35 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Davinder Singh and others            ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others            …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                         [6]<\/p>\n
45.     R. F. A. No. 36 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Surjan                                     ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
46.     R. F. A. No. 37 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Rati and another                       ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
47.     R. F. A. No. 38 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jai Ram Rathee                             ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
48.     R. F. A. No. 39 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Shamlat Panna and others                   ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
49.     R. F. A. No. 40 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Deep Chand                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
50.     R. F. A. No. 41 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ch.Deep Chand and others                   ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
51.     R. F. A. No. 42 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jai Bhagwan & another                      ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
52.     R. F. A. No. 43 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Kumar      and others                  ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
53.     R. F. A. No. 44 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Azad Singh                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [7]<\/p>\n
54.     R. F. A. No. 45 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Laxmi Devi                                ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
55.     R. F. A. No. 46 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Suraj Bhan and another                    ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
56.     R. F. A. No. 47 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Umed Singh and others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
57.     R. F. A. No. 48 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Azad Singh                                ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
58.     R. F. A. No. 49 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Dayawanti                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
59.     R. F. A. No. 50 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Umed Singh and others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
60.     R. F. A. No. 51 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Layak Ram and others                      ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
61.     R. F. A. No. 52 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt.Rajenderi                             ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
62.     R. F. A. No. 53 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jogi Ram and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                          [8]<\/p>\n
63.     R. F. A. No. 110 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Sumitra & others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
64.     R. F. A. No. 111 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sultan Singh & others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
65.     R. F. A. No. 112 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ganga Ram & others                    ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
66.     R. F. A. No. 113 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
         Smt. Prem Rathee & others            ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
67.     R. F. A. No. 114 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Kalawati & others                ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
68.     R. F. A. No. 115 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mahender Singh & others               ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
69.     R. F. A. No. 116 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Sunita & others                  ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
70.     R. F. A. No. 117 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ran Singh & others                    ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
71.     R. F. A. No. 118 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Joginder Singh & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                          [9]<\/p>\n
72.     R. F. A. No. 119 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Barfo & others                   ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
73.     R. F. A. No. 120 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Umed Kaur & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
74.     R. F. A. No. 121 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mahabir & others                      ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
75.     R. F. A. No. 143 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mukhtiar Singh                        ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
76.     R. F. A. No. 144 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mange Ram & others                    ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
77.     R. F. A. No. 171 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Om Parkash and others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
78.     R. F. A. No. 172 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        M\/s Shiv Flour Mills                         ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
79.     R. F. A. No. 173 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhim Singh and others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
80.     R. F. A. No. 174 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Attar Singh                                  ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                          [10]<\/p>\n
81.     R. F. A. No. 175 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Brahmo and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
82.     R. F. A. No. 176 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhim Singh and others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
83.     R. F. A. No. 177 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Om Parkash and another                       ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
84.     R. F. A. No. 178 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhim Singh and others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
85.     R. F. A. No. 179 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Roop Chand and another                       ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
86.     R. F. A. No. 180 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Diwan Chand and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
87.     R. F. A. No. 181 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Chattar Singh                                ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
88.     R. F. A. No. 182 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ishwar Singh                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
89.     R. F. A. No. 183 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Gopi Ram and another                         ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                          [11]<\/p>\n
90.     R. F. A. No. 184 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhim Singh and others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
91.     R. F. A. No. 185 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jagbir Singh and others                      ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
92.     R. F. A. No. 186 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Surat Singh                                  ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
93.     R. F. A. No.187 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Kanwar and others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
94.     R. F. A. No.188 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ch. Charan Singh                             ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
95.     R. F. A. No.189 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Kumar and others                         ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
96.     R. F. A. No.190 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ishwar Singh                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
97.     R. F. A. No.191 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Fakir Chand                                  ….. Appellant
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
98.     R. F. A. No.192 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Partap Singh and another                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                         [12]<\/p>\n
99.     R. F. A. No.193 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Surat Singh                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
100. R. F. A. No.195 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sat Narain and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
101. R. F. A. No.196 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Kanhiya                                     ….. Appellant
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
102. R. F. A. No.197 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Harkaur and others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
103. R. F. A. No.198 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Phool Singh and another                     ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
104. R. F. A. No.199 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Pardeep and others                          ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
105. R. F. A. No.200 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Harkaur and others                          ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
106. R.F.A. NO. 201 of 2005 (O&M)
\n     Smt. Chanderpati and others                    ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                        Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                 ….Respondents<\/p>\n
107. R.F.A. NO. 202 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ram Kumar and others                           ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                        Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                 ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [13]<\/p>\n
108. R.F.A. NO. 203 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ram Kanwar and others                        ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
109. R.F.A. NO. 204 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Mange Ram                                    ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
110. R.F.A. NO. 205 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Mehar Singh and others                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
111. R.F.A. NO. 206 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ram Phal                                     ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
112. R.F.A. NO. 207 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ram Phal                                     ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
113. R.F.A. NO. 208 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Phool Singh and another                      ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
114. R.F.A. NO. 209 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Smt. Chandro Devi                            ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
115. R.F.A. NO. 210 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Bijender Singh and others                    ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [14]<\/p>\n
116. R.F.A. NO. 211 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Pardeep and others                           ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
117. R.F.A. NO. 212 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Daulat Ram                                   ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
118. R.F.A. NO. 213 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ishwar                                       ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
119. R.F.A. NO. 214 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Smt. Brahmo Devi and others                  ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
120. R.F.A. NO. 215 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Kamlesh                                      ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
121. R. F. A. No. 216 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Kanwar & others                ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
122. R. F. A. No. 217 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Lali Devi & others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
123. R. F. A. No. 218 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bakhtawar                          ….. Appellant
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [15]<\/p>\n
124. R. F. A. No. 219 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Singh & others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
125. R. F. A. No. 220 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Chandro Devi & others         ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others
\n                                           …. Respondents\n<\/p>\n
126. R. F. A. No. 221 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Deepak Kumar & others              ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
127. R. F. A. No. 222 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ved Singh & others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
128. R. F. A. No. 223 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bijender Singh & others            ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
129. R. F. A. No. 224 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhim Singh & others                ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
130. R. F. A. No. 231 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Kumar & another                ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
131. R. F. A. No. 274 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Mohar Kaur & others           ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
132. R. F. A. No. 275 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhim Singh & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [16]<\/p>\n
133. R. F. A. No. 276 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Maha Singh Rathee & others         ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
134. R. F. A. No. 277 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Maha Singh Rathee & others         ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
135. R. F. A. No. 283 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Angoori & others              ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
136. R. F. A. No. 284 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Lachi Ram                          ….. Appellant
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
137. R. F. A. No. 285 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhim Singh & others                ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
138. R. F. A. No. 286 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jaipal Singh & others              ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
139. R. F. A. No. 287 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Puran Singh & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
140. R. F. A. No. 288 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Daya Nand                          ….. Appellant
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
141. R. F. A. No. 289 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Balbir Singh & others              ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others          …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [17]<\/p>\n
142. R.F.A. NO. 347 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Attar Singh and others                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
143. R.F.A. NO. 349 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Karan Singh and others                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
144. R.F.A. NO. 393 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Umed Singh and another                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
145. R.F.A. NO. 394 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ishwar Dass                                  ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
146. R.F.A. NO. 395 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Surender Pal Singh                           ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
147. R.F.A. NO. 396 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Maha Singh and others                        ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
148. R.F.A. NO. 397 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Premwati                                     ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
149. R.F.A. NO. 398 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Premwati                                     ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [18]<\/p>\n
150. R.F.A. NO. 399 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Surinder Kumar                               ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
151. R.F.A. NO. 400 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Surinder Kumar                               ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
152. R.F.A. NO. 401 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Maha Singh and others                        ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
153. R.F.A. NO. 402 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Amar Singh and another                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
154. R.F.A. NO. 403 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Phool Singh and others                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
155. R.F.A. NO. 404 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Shanti Devi                                  ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
156. R.F.A. NO. 405 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Samunder Singh                               ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
157. R.F.A. NO. 406 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Dayawanti                                    ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [19]<\/p>\n
158. R.F.A. NO. 407 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Rohit Kumar                                  ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
159. R.F.A. NO. 408 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Surinder Kumar                               ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
160. R.F.A. NO. 409 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ravinder and others                          ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
161. R.F.A. NO. 410 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Phool Singh and others                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
162. R.F.A. NO. 411 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ram Pal                                      ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
163. R.F.A. NO. 412 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Rahul Kumar Singh                            ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
164. R.F.A. NO. 413 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Smt. Satto Devi                              ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
165. R.F.A. NO. 414 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Laxmi Narain and another                     ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [20]<\/p>\n
166. R.F.A. NO. 415 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Ram Pyari and others                         ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
167. R.F.A. NO. 416 of 2005(O&M)
\n     Surinder Kumar                               ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
168. R.F.A. NO. 452 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Rishal Singh and others                   ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
169. R.F.A. NO. 453 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Anand Kumar and others                    ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
170. R.F.A. NO. 454 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sat Narain and others                     ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
171. R.F.A. NO. 455 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Risal Singh & another                     ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
172. R.F.A. NO. 488 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Singh and others                      ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [21]<\/p>\n
173. R.F.A. NO. 489 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Kanwar and others                      ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                       Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                ….Respondents<\/p>\n
174. R.F.A. NO. 490 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Barahmo Devi and others               …Appellants<\/p>\n
                                       Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                ….Respondents<\/p>\n
175. R.F.A. NO. 491 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ramesh Kumar and another                   ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                       Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                ….Respondents<\/p>\n
1765. R.F.A. NO. 492 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Kumar and others                       ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                       Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                ….Respondents<\/p>\n
177. R.F.A. NO. 493 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Gomati and others                          ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                       Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                ….Respondents<\/p>\n
178. R.F.A. NO. 494 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Saraswati and others                       .. Appellants<\/p>\n
                                       Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                ….Respondents<\/p>\n
179. R.F.A. NO. 496 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Gomati and others                     … Appellants<\/p>\n
                                       Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [22]<\/p>\n
180. R.F.A. NO. 508 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Kanwar and others                     ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
181. R.F.A. NO. 509 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jawala Parshad and others                 ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
182. R.F.A. NO. 517 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Om Parkash                                ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
183. R.F.A. NO. 550 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Attar Singh and others                    ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
184. R.F.A. NO. 551 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Partap Singh and others                   ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
185. R.F.A. NO. 552 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Omwati and others                         ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
186. R.F.A. NO. 553 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Kishan                                ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                      Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others               ….Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                  [23]<\/p>\n
187. R.F.A. NO. 554 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Kishan Chand and others                              ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                          Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                          ….Respondents<\/p>\n
188. R.F.A. NO. 555 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Anoop Singh and others                               ….Appellants<\/p>\n
                                          Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                          ….Respondents<\/p>\n
189. R.F.A. NO. 576 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Attar Singh                                          ….Appellant<\/p>\n
                                          Vs<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and others                          ….Respondents<\/p>\n
190. R. F. A. No. 605 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Paras Ram (deceased) through LRs and others          .. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
191. R. F. A. No. 610 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Hoshiyar Singh Rathi and others                      ….. Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
192. R. F. A. No. 611 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Inder Singh and another                              ….. Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
193. R. F. A. No. 612 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Parshotam Dass and others                            ….. Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
194. R. F. A. No. 613 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt.Shanti and others                                ….. Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & another                           …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                       [24]<\/p>\n
195. R. F. A. No. 654 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Maman Singh and others                    … Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
196. R. F. A. No. 655 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Devender and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
197. R. F. A. No. 656 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Usha Devi and others                      ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
198. R. F. A. No. 657 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Om Parkash & others                       …. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
199. R. F. A. No. 658 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Rajbir Singh                              ….. Appellant
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
200. R. F. A. No. 659 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Om Parkash and others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
201. R. F. A. No. 660 of 2005(O&M)<\/p>\n
        Shri Krishan and others                   ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
202. R.F.A. No. 661 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhup Singh & others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
203. R.F.A. No. 662 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Baljit Singh & others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                 …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                     [25]<\/p>\n
204. R.F.A. No. 663 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Nihalo Devi & others               ….. Appellants
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
205. R.F.A. No. 664 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sher Singh & others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
206. R.F.A. No. 665 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ram Pat & others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
207. R.F.A. No. 666 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sarto Devi & others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
208. R.F.A. No. 667 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Kuldeep & others                 ….. Appellants
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
209. R.F.A. No. 668 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Dharmo & others                    ….. Appellants
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
210. R.F.A. No. 669 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Laxmi Devi                         ….. Appellant
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
211. R.F.A. No. 670 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raghbir Singh                           ….. Appellant
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
212. R.F.A. No. 671 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Surender Kumar @ Surender               ….. Appellant
\n                                    vs
\n        State of Haryana & others               …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                           [26]<\/p>\n
213. R.F.A. No. 672 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mrs. Prajakta Sita Ram Kanitkor               ….. Appellant
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
214. R.F.A. No. 673 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sanjay & others                               ….. Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
215. R.F.A. No. 684 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jag Rup Singh                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
216. R.F.A. No. 685 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Attar Singh & another                         ….. Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
217     R.F.A. No. 686 of 2005 (O&M)<\/span><\/p>\n
        Om Parkash                                    ….. Appellant
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
218. R.F.A. No. 687 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Dankar                                   ….. Appellant
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
219. R.F.A. No. 688 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Vidyawati                                ….. Appellant
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
220. R.F.A. No. 707 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Charan Singh                                  ….. Appellant
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
221. R.F.A. No. 708 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mange Ram                                     ….. Appellant
\n                                          vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                   …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [27]<\/p>\n
222     R.F.A. No. 709 of 2005 (O&M)<\/span><\/p>\n
        Narender Singh and others                  ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
223. R.F.A. No. 710 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Pardeep Singh                              ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and another               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
224. R.F.A. No. 719 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Jagbir and others                          ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
225. R.F.A. No. 720 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Sube Singh                                 ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
226. R.F.A. No. 754 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhoop Singh                                ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and another               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
227. R.F.A. No. 755 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Kumar and others                       … Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
228. R.F.A. No. 760 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Phool Devi and others                 … Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
229. R.F.A. No. 776 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bimla and others                           ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
230. R.F.A. No. 777 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Suresh and others                          ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [28]<\/p>\n
231. R. F. A. No.958 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Shakuntla Rani @ Shakuntla            ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and another               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
232. R. F. A. No.1119 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mahabir and another                        ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
233. R. F. A. No.1120 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ajit Singh and others                      ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
234. R. F. A. No.1203 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Shanti Devi and others                     ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
235. R. F. A. No.1204 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Rajinder Singh and others                  ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
236. R. F. A. No.1205 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Smt. Sharbati and others                   ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
237. R. F. A. No.1206 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Singh and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
238. R. F. A. No.1207 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Bhagwan Singh and others                   … Appellants
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
239. R. F. A. No.1293 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Attar Singh                                ….. Appellant
\n                                      vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [29]<\/p>\n
240. R. F. A. No.1294 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ran Singh and another                      ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
241. R. F. A. No.1295 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Ran Singh and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
242. R. F. A. No.1296 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Karan Singh                                ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
243. R. F. A. No.1402 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Asha Devi and others                       ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
244. R. F. A. No.1745 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raghubir Singh                             ….. Appellant
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
245. R. F. A. No.3046 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Raj Bala and others                        ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana and another               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
246. R. F. A. No.3223 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bhim Singh and others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
247. R. F. A. No.3224 of 2005 (O &M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Sumitra and others                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
248. R. F. A. No.3225 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Wazir Singh and others                     …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [30]<\/p>\n
249.` R. F. A. No.3226 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Kanwar and others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
250. R. F. A. No.3227 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ved Singh and another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
251. R. F. A. No.3228 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Phal and another                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
252     R. F. A. No.3229 of 2005 (O&M)<\/span><\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Jogi Ram and others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
253. R. F. A. No.3230 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ved Singh and another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
254. R. F. A. No.3231 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bhim Singh and others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
255. R. F. A. No.3232 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Shri Harke and others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
256. R. F. A. No.3233 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Amar Singh and others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
257. R. F. A. No.3234 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Suresh and others                          …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                          [31]<\/p>\n
258. R. F. A. No.3235 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Kasturi and others                           …. Respondents<\/p>\n
259. R. F. A. No.3236 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Chattar Singh and another                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
260. R. F. A. No.3237 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Daulat Ram and another                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
261. R. F. A. No.3238 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Om Parkash Aggarwal and others               ….Respondents<\/p>\n
262. R.F.A. No. 3239 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Sardara & another                            …. Respondents<\/p>\n
263. R.F.A. No. 3240 of 2005 (O&M)
\n     State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Ram Phal & another                           …. Respondents<\/p>\n
264. R.F.A. No. 3241 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Ishwar Singh & another                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
265. R.F.A. No. 3242 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Om Parkash & others                          …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                      [32]<\/p>\n
266. R.F.A. No. 3243 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Smt. Rajenderi & another                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
267. R.F.A. No. 3244 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Luxmi Devi & another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
268. R.F.A. No. 3245 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Phool Singh & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
269. R.F.A. No. 3246 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Devinder Singh & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
270. R.F.A. No. 3247 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Surjan & another                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
271. R.F.A. No. 3248 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n     Om Parkash & others                         …. Respondents\n<\/p>\n
272. R.F.A. No. 3249 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Mahender Singh & others                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                          [33]<\/p>\n
273. R.F.A. No. 3250 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Smt.. Chandro & another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
274. R.F.A. No. 3251 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Murli Manohar Mandir & another               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
275. R.F.A. No.3252 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Smt. Manglo & others                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
276. R.F.A. No. 3253 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Ram Narain & others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
277. R.F.A. No. 3254 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Sh. Harke & others                           …. Respondents<\/p>\n
278. R.F.A. No. 3255 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n     Jai Bhagwan & others                            …. Respondents\n<\/p>\n
279. R.F.A. No. 3256 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                     ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Smt.. Premwati & another                     …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [34]<\/p>\n
280. R.F.A. No. 3257 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Raj Singh & others                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
281. R.F.A. No. 3258 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Dharam Pal & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
282. R.F.A. No. 3259 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Attar Singh & another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
283. R.F.A. No. 3260 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Raghbir Singh & another                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
284. R.F.A. No. 3261 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Om Parkash & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
285. R.F.A. No. 3295 of 2005 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        Mukhtiar Singh & others
\n                                                          ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        State of Haryana & others
\n                                                   …. Respondents\n<\/p>\n
286. R. F. A. No. 2 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Premwati and another                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [35]<\/p>\n
287. R.F.A. NO.4 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               …..Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Dayanand and another                       …..Respondents<\/p>\n
288. R.F.A. No. 5 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Dayawati and another                       …….Respondents<\/p>\n
289. R.F.A. No. 7 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Umed Singh and others                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
290. R.F.A. No. 8 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Fakir Chand and another                    ……Respondents<\/p>\n
291. R.F.A. No.19 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Shri Harke and others                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
292. R.F.A. No.23 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Kanwar and others                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
293. R.F.A. No.26 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Shri Harke and others                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
294. R.F.A. No.27 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Raj Singh and another                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
295. R.F.A. No.28 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Mehar and others                       ……Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [36]<\/p>\n
296. R.F.A. No.31 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Mange Ram and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
297. R.F.A. No.32 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Mehar and another                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
298. R.F.A. No.33 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Om Parkash and another                     ……Respondents<\/p>\n
299. R.F.A. No.35 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Surender and others                        ……Respondents<\/p>\n
300. R.F.A. No.37 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Kumar and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
301. R.F.A. No.38 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Mukhtiar Singh and others                  ……Respondents<\/p>\n
302. R.F.A. No.39 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Shanti and another                    ……Respondents<\/p>\n
303. R.F.A. No.41 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Dalel Singh and others                     ……Respondents<\/p>\n
304. R.F.A. No.42 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Lachi Ram and another                      ……Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [37]<\/p>\n
305. R.F.A. No.44 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Jai Singh and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
306. R.F.A. No.45 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bijender Singh and others                  ……Respondents<\/p>\n
307. R.F.A. No. 46 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Sarto Devi & others                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
308. R.F.A. No. 47 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Jai Ram Rathee & another                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
309. R.F.A. No. 48 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Inder Singh & others                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
310. R.F.A. No. 49 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Rameshwar & another                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
311. R.F.A. No. 50 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                   ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Sh. Harke & others                         …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                      [38]<\/p>\n
312. R.F.A. No. 51 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Daya Kishan & another                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
313. R.F.A. No. 52 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Shri Harke & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
314. R.F.A. No. 54 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Ram Kumar & others                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
315. R.F.A. No. 55 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Partap Singh & others                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
316. R.F.A. No. 57 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Sham Singh & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
317. R.F.A. No. 58 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n     Harke & others                              …. Respondents\n<\/p>\n
318. R.F.A. No. 59 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Raj Kumar & others                       …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                      [39]<\/p>\n
319. R.F.A. No. 60 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Smt. Sharbati & others                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
320. R.F.A. No. 61 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Ishwar Singh & another                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
321. R.F.A. No. 62 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Sh. Surender & another                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
322. R.F.A. No. 63 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Suraj Bhan & another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
323. R.F.A. No. 64 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Shri Harke & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
324. R.F.A. No. 65 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n     Smt. Mohar Kaur & others                    …. Respondents\n<\/p>\n
325. R.F.A. No. 66 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Smt. Lali Devi & others                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                      [40]<\/p>\n
326. R.F.A. No. 67 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Lachi Ram & another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
327. R.F.A. No. 68 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Ved Singh & others                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
328. R.F.A. No. 83 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another<\/p>\n
                                                 ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Daulat Ram & another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
329. R. F. A. No. 84 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Bhim Singh & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
330. R. F. A. No. 85 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Risal Singh & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
331. R. F. A. No. 92 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        S.V. Konitkar & another                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
332. R. F. A. No. 95 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Harke & others                           …. Respondents<\/p>\n
333. R. F. A. No. 114 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Smt. Shanti & another                    …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                      [41]<\/p>\n
334. R. F. A. No. 115 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Ram Pyari & others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
335. R. F. A. No. 116 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Mukhtiar Singh & others           …. Respondents<\/p>\n
336. R. F. A. No. 117 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Jaipal Singh & others             …. Respondents<\/p>\n
337. R. F. A. No. 171 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Mehar Singh & others              …. Respondents<\/p>\n
338. R. F. A. No. 172 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Lakhi Ram & others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
339. R. F. A. No. 174 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Puran Singh & others              …. Respondents<\/p>\n
340. R. F. A. No. 175 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Mukhtiar Singh & another          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
341. R. F. A. No. 181 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Maha Singh & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
342. R. F. A. No. 182 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another        ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Harke & others                    …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                            [42]<\/p>\n
343. R. F. A. No. 184 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Harke & others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
344. R. F. A. No. 185 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Harke & others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
345. R. F. A. No. 186 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Smt. Harkaur & others                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
346. R. F. A. No. 189 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Raghubir Singh & another                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
347. R. F. A. No. 190 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Harke & others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
348. R. F. A. No. 191 of 2006(O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another              ….. Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Harke & others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
349. R.F.A. No.259 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another            ……Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Surjan and another                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
350. R.F.A. No.260 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another            ……Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        M\/s Shiv Flour Mills and another        ……Respondents<\/p>\n
351. R.F.A. No.261 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                   ……Appellants
\n                                           vs
\n        Mahabir and others                             ……Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [43]<\/p>\n
352. R.F.A. No.264 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Indraj and others                          ……Respondents<\/p>\n
353. R.F.A. No.265 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Raj Singh and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
354. R.F.A. No.266 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Surat Singh and another                    ……Respondents<\/p>\n
355. R.F.A. No.267 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ramrati and others                         ……Respondents<\/p>\n
356. R.F.A. No.269 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Kishan Chand and others                    ……Respondents<\/p>\n
357. R.F.A. No.270 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Layak Ram and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
358. R.F.A. No.271 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n     Surender Kumar and another                    ……Respondents\n<\/p>\n
359. R.F.A. No.273 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Neelam and others                          ……Respondents<\/p>\n
360. R.F.A. No.274 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Brahno Devi and others                ……Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                           [44]<\/p>\n
361. R.F.A. No.277 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Ishwar Dass and another                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
362. R.F.A. No.278 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Smt. Brahmo Devi and others                   ……Respondents<\/p>\n
363. R.F.A. No.280 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Bhim Singh and others                         ……Respondents<\/p>\n
364. R.F.A. No.283 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Narender Singh Rathi and others               ……Respondents<\/p>\n
365. R.F.A. No.285 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Sanjay and others                             ……Respondents<\/p>\n
366. R.F.A. No.286 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Raj Singh and others                          ……Respondents<\/p>\n
367. R.F.A. No.287 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Azad Singh and another                        ……Respondents<\/p>\n
368. R.F.A. No.289 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Smt. Leelawati and others                     ……Respondents<\/p>\n
369. R.F.A. No.291 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                  ……Appellants
\n                                          vs
\n        Parshotam Dass and others                     ……Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                         [45]<\/p>\n
370. R.F.A. No.294 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ……Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Karan Singh and others                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
371. R.F.A. No.342 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ……Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Kanhiya and another                         ……Respondents<\/p>\n
372. R.F.A. No.343 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ……Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Suraj Bhan and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
373. R.F.A. No.344 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ……Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Ajit Singh and another                      ……Respondents<\/p>\n
374. R.F.A. No.345 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ……Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Ran Singh and others                        ……Respondents<\/p>\n
375. R. F. A. No.346 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Karan Singh and another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
376. R. F. A. No.389 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Rohit Kumar and another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
377. R. F. A. No.390 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Om Parkash and another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
378. R. F. A. No.391 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Rahul Kumar Singh and another               …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [46]<\/p>\n
379. R. F. A. No.392 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Pardeep and others                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
380. R. F. A. No.394 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Tarif Singh and another                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
381. R. F. A. No.395 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bakhtawar and another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
382. R. F. A. No.396 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Samunder Singh and another                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
383. R. F. A. No.398 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Charan Singh and another                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
384. R. F. A. No.399 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Dayawanti and another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
385. R. F. A. No.400 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Dharmo and others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
386. R. F. A. No.402 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Mange Ram and another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
387. R. F. A. No.403 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Rampat and others                          …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                         [47]<\/p>\n
388. R. F. A. No.407 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Umed Singh and others                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
389. R. F. A. No.447 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Kamlesh and another                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
390. R. F. A. No.448 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Smt. Chandro Devi and others                …. Respondents<\/p>\n
391. R. F. A. No.449 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Smt. Nihalo Devi and others                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
392. R. F. A. No.452 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Surinder Kumar and another                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
393. R. F. A. No.453 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Sultan Singh and others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
394. R. F. A. No.454 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Ran Singh and others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
395. R. F. A. No.455 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Phul Singh @ Phule and others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
396. R. F. A. No.456 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                ….. Appellants
\n                                        vs
\n        Smt. Laxmi Devi and another                 …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [48]<\/p>\n
397. R. F. A. No.458 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Sh. Mange Ram and others                   …. Respondents<\/p>\n
398. R. F. A. No.459 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Partap Singh and others                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
399. R. F. A. No.460 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bhup Singh and another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
400. R. F. A. No. 461 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Charan Singh & another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
401. R.F.A. No. 462 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bhim Singh & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
402. R.F.A. No. 464 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram pal & another                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
403. R.F.A. No. 465 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Shanti Devi & another                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
404. R.F.A. No. 466 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Umed Singh & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
405. R.F.A. No. 467 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Sat Narain & others                        …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [49]<\/p>\n
406. R.F.A. No. 469 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Davinder Singh & others                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
407. R.F.A. No. 472 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Deepak Kumar & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
408. R.F.A. No. 473 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Mange Ram & another                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
409. R.F.A. No. 474 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Roop Chand & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
410. R.F.A. No. 475 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Rishal Singh & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
411. R.F.A. No. 476 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Sh. Surinder Kumar & another               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
412. R.F.A. No. 536 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Mahabir Singh & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
413. R.F.A. No. 537 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Kumar & others                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
414. R.F.A. No. 722 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Pardeep & others                           …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [50]<\/p>\n
415. R.F.A. No. 723 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Surinder Pal Singh & another               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
416. R.F.A. No. 724 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Hoshiar Singh Rathi & others               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
417. R.F.A. No. 729 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Laxmi Narain & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
418. R.F.A. No. 730 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Kanwar & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
419. R.F.A. No. 731 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Phal & another                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
420. R.F.A. No. 732 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Deep Chand & another                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
421. R.F.A. No. 734 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Mange Ram & others                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
422. R. F. A. No. 738 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Paras Ram and others                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
423. R. F. A. No. 739 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Surjan and another                         …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [51]<\/p>\n
424. R. F. A. No. 740 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Maha Singh and others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
425. R. F. A. No. 742 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Dalip Singh and another                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
426. R. F. A. No. 743 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Attar Singh and another                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
427. R. F. A. No. 745 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Chandan Singh and another                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
428. R.F.A. No.746 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Angoori and others                    ……Respondents<\/p>\n
429. R.F.A. No.752 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Sh. Harke and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
430. R.F.A. No.753 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Baljit Singh and others                    ……Respondents<\/p>\n
431. R.F.A. No.754 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Chanderpati and others                ……Respondents<\/p>\n
432. R.F.A. No.762 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bhim Singh and others                      ……Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [52]<\/p>\n
433. R.F.A. No.763 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Maman Singh and another                    ……Respondents<\/p>\n
434. R.F.A. No.764 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Phool Singh and others                     ……Respondents<\/p>\n
435. R.F.A. No.766 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Dhan Kaur and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
436. R.F.A. No.768 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Jai Ram and another                        ……Respondents<\/p>\n
437. R.F.A. No.773 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Attar Singh and others                     ……Respondents<\/p>\n
438. R.F.A. No.774 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Omwati and others                          ……Respondents<\/p>\n
439. R.F.A. No.775 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ……Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Vidawati and another                  ……Respondents<\/p>\n
440. R. F. A. No. 776 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Dan Kaur and another                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
441. R. F. A. No. 779 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Bala and others                       …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                        [53]<\/p>\n
442. R. F. A. No. 781 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Attar Singh and others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
443. R. F. A. No. 783 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ram Kanwar and others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
444. R. F. A. No. 784 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Sube Singh and another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
445. R. F. A. No. 785 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another               ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bijender Singh and others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
446. R.F.A. No. 812 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Phool Singh & others                       …. Respondents<\/p>\n
447. R.F.A. No. 827 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Ganga Ram & others                         …. Respondents<\/p>\n
448. R.F.A. No. 828 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Bhim Singh & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
449.    R.F.A. No. 844 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Smt. Chandrawati & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
450. R.F.A. No. 845 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                 ….. Appellants
\n                                       vs
\n        Shanti Devi & others                       …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                      [54]<\/p>\n
451. R.F.A. No. 969 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Sahi Ram & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
452. R.F.A. No. 1020 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Gopi Ram & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
453. R.F.A. No. 1021 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Om Parkash & another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
454. R.F.A. No. 1022 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Smt. Satto & another                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
455. R.F.A. No. 1023 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Ranbir Singh & others                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
456. R.F.A. No. 1024 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Indraj & others                          …. Respondents<\/p>\n
457. R.F.A. No. 1025 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Ravinder & others                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
458. R.F.A. No. 1026 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Jawala Parshad & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
459. R.F.A. No. 1028 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Ch. Deep Chand & others                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                      [55]<\/p>\n
460. R.F.A. No. 1029 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Shamsher Singh & others                  …. Respondents<\/p>\n
461. R.F.A. No. 1105 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Dalbir Singh & others                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
462. R.F.A. No. 1106 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Roop Chand & others                      …. Respondents<\/p>\n
463. R.F.A. No. 1107 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Diwan Chand & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
464. R.F.A. No. 1108 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Rajinder Singh & another                 …. Respondents<\/p>\n
465. R.F.A. No. 1109 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Phool Singh & others                     …. Respondents<\/p>\n
466. R.F.A. No. 1110 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Jot Ram & another                        …. Respondents<\/p>\n
467. R.F.A. No. 1119 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Shri Krishan & others                    …. Respondents<\/p>\n
468. R.F.A. No. 1122 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another               ….. Appellants
\n                                     vs
\n        Sh. Mange Ram & another                  …. Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                          [56]<\/p>\n
469. R.F.A. No. 1126 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana & another                   ….. Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Komal & others                               …. Respondents<\/p>\n
470. R.F.A. No.1127 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Umed Singh and another                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
471. R.F.A. No.1130 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Sh. Attar Singh and others                   ……Respondents<\/p>\n
472. R.F.A. No.1131 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Azad Singh and another                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
473. R.F.A. No.1132 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Ishwar Singh and another                     ……Respondents<\/p>\n
474. R.F.A. No.1133 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Satbir Singh Rathee and others               ……Respondents<\/p>\n
475. R.F.A. No.1134 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Sarup Singh and others                       ……Respondents<\/p>\n
476. R.F.A. No.1136 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Raj Kumar and others                         ……Respondents<\/p>\n
477. R.F.A. No.1137 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                 ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Mahiender Singh and others                   ……Respondents
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                   [57]<\/p>\n
478. R.F.A. No.1138 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                          ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Smt. Brahmo and others                                ……Respondents<\/p>\n
479. R.F.A. No.1174 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                          ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Kuldeep Singh and another                             ……Respondents<\/p>\n
480. R.F.A. No.1212 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                          ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Balbir Singh and another                              ……Respondents<\/p>\n
481. R.F.A. No.1221 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                          ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Bhup Singh and others                                 ……Respondents<\/p>\n
482. R.F.A. No.1334 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                          ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Smt. Shiv Devi and others                             ……Respondents<\/p>\n
483. R.F.A. No.1435 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                          ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Surat Singh and another                               ……Respondents<\/p>\n
484. R.F.A. No.3239 of 2006 (O&M)<\/p>\n
        State of Haryana and another                          ……Appellants
\n                                         vs
\n        Smt. Brahno Devi and others                           ……Respondents<\/p>\n
Coram:          Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal<\/p>\n
Present:        Shri Lokesh Sinhal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.\n<\/p>\n
                S\/Shri R.A. Yadav, R. S. Dalal, G.S.Hooda, Mohnish Sharma
\n                for Narender Hooda, Sandeep K. Sharma, Amit Shivrain for
\n                M.P.S.Mann and S.S.Virk, Advocates for the land owners.\n<\/p>\n
 R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                      [58]<\/p>\n
                Shri Raman Gaur, Advocate for HUDA.\n<\/p>\n
                Shri Deepak Balyan, Advocate.\n<\/p>\n
Rajesh Bindal J.\n<\/p>\n
                This order shall dispose of a bunch of 484 appeals, as the same arise
\nout of a common acquisition.\n<\/p>\n
                R.F.A. Nos. 3223 to 3261 of 2005, 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 23, 26, 27, 28,
\n31 to 33, 35, 37 to 39, 41, 42, 44 to 52, 54, 55, 57 to 68, 83 to 85, 92, 95, 114 to
\n117, 171, 172, 174, 175, 181, 182, 184, 185, 186, 189, 190, 191, 259, 260, 261,
\n264, 265, 266, 267, 269, 270, 271, 273, 274, 277, 278, 280, 283, 285, 286, 287,
\n289, 291, 294, 342 to 346, 389 to 392, 394 to 396, 398 to 400, 402, 403, 407, 447,
\n448, 449, 452 to 456, 458 to 462, 464 to 467, 469, 472 to 476, 536, 537, 722 to
\n724, 729 to 732, 734, 738 to 740, 742, 743, 745, 746, 752 to 754, 762 to 764, 766,
\n768, 773 to 776, 779, 781, 783 to 785, 812, 827, 828, 844, 845, 969, 1020 to
\n1026, 1028, 1029, 1105 to 1110, 1119, 1122, 1126, 1127, 1130 to 1134, 1136 to
\n1138, 1174, 1212, 1221, 1334, 1435 and 3239 of 2006 by the State of Haryana
\nseeking reduction of the amount of compensation awarded to the land owners for
\nthe acquired land.\n<\/p>\n
                R.F.A. Nos. 2642 to 2656 of 2004, 8 to 53, 110 to 121, 143, 144, 171
\nto 193, 195 to 224, 231, 274 to 277, 283 to 289, 347, 349, 393 to 416, 452 to 455,
\n488 to 494, 496, 508, 509, 517, 550 to 555, 576, 605, 610 to 613, 654 to 673, 684
\nto 688, 707 to 710, 719, 720, 754, 755, 760, 776, 777, 958, 1119, 1120, 1203 to
\n1207, 1293 to 1296, 1402, 1745, 3046 and 3295 of 2005, have been filed by the
\nland owners seeking further enhancement of compensation for the acquired land.\n<\/p>\n
                The facts have been extracted from R. F. A. No. 1 of 2006.
\n                Briefly, the facts of the case are that the State of Haryana vide
\nnotification dated 12.5.1995 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act,
\n1894 (for short, “the Act”), acquired the land within the revenue estate of
\nBahadurgarh, Hadbast No. 38, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar,                 for
\ndevelopment and utilisation as residential and commercial area in Sector-9 and 9-
\nA, Bahadurgarh. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the
\nland at Rs. 6 lacs per acre for the land situated on Bahadurgarh-Delhi road upto
\nthe depth of 3 acres, Rs. 4 lacs per acre for the land situated on Bahadurgarh-
\nNajafgarh road upto the depth of 3 acres, Rs. 2.50 lacs per acre for nehri and chahi
\nand Rs. 2 lacs per acre for barani and other kinds of land. The
\nlandowners\/claimants feeling dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation
\nawarded by the Collector, filed objections. On reference under Section 18 of the
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                    [59]<\/p>\n
Act, the learned court below determined the market value of the acquired land by
\ngranting Rs. 50,000\/- per acre increase for each category. It is this award of the
\nlearned Reference Court which is impugned in the present set of appeals.\n<\/p>\n
                Learned counsel for the landowners referred to site plan Ex. R-66
\nplaced on record which shows the acquisition boundaries. The land is shown to be
\nlocated on one side of the National Highway No. 10 Delhi-Hisar and on the other
\nside, the land abuts the road, namely, Bahadurgarh-Najafgarh Road. Another site
\nplan, Ex. P-29 was referred to show that the acquired land is quite close to Delhi
\nborder. As far as determination of fair value of the acquired land is concerned,
\nlearned counsel for the landowners primarily relied upon sale-deeds and allotment
\nletters, Ex. P-12, P-13, P-14, P-30, P-31, P-41 and P-43. In addition to these
\ndocuments, Ex. P-28 was also relied upon i.e. an award of the Land Acquisition
\nCollector pertaining to the land of a small portion of land falling in Sector-9A
\nwhich was subsequently acquired vide notification under Section 4 of the Act
\nissued on 2.12.1998.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as the sale-deeds are concerned, it was submitted that vide
\nsale-deed Ex. P-12, a big chunk of land measuring 8 kanals 7\u00bd marlas falling in
\nVillage Hassanpur was sold vide sale-deed dated 22.4.1993 for a sale
\nconsideration of Rs. 20,26,800\/- i.e. @ Rs. 400\/- per square yard. This land is
\nstated to be about 3\u00bd acres away from the National-Highway. So far as the sale-
\ndeed, Ex. P-13 is concerned, it was submitted that vide sale-deed dated 28.2.1989,
\nland measuring 2550 square yards was sold for Rs. 5,87,500\/- at an average price
\nof Rs. 230\/- per square yard. This piece of land is located on Jhajjar road.
\nReferring to the aforesaid sale-deed, it was submitted that when the value of the
\nland near Bahadurgarh in the year 1989 was Rs. 230\/- per square yard, it cannot be
\nlesser in the year 1995 when the present land was acquired. Another sale-deed, Ex.
\nP-14 dated 23.5.1989 is referred to whereby 410 square yards land was sold for Rs.
\n80,000\/- at an average price of Rs. 195\/- per square yard. This portion of land is
\nstated to be located quite close to the acquisition boundary towards the abadi area.\n<\/p>\n
                Ex. P-41, is another sale-deed dated 6.10.1994 which is relied upon
\nwhereby 100 square yards of land was sold for Rs. 40,000\/- at an average price of
\nRs. 400\/- per square yard. Though the sale-deed is not located on any of the site
\nplan, however, khasra number which is located on Ex. R-66 shows its location
\ntowards the abadi area from the acquired land. Vide sale deed Ex. P-43 dated
\n15.3.1995, 30 square yards of land was sold for Rs. 12,000\/- at an average price of
\nRs. 400\/- per square yard. This portion of land is pertaining to Village Parnala and
\nthe khasra number which is evident from site plan, Ex. R-66, is located on the
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                     [60]<\/p>\n
main National-Highway No. 10 Delhi-Hisar Road.\n<\/p>\n
                 In addition to this, reliance was placed upon Ex. P-28, the award
\ndated 13.7.2001, whereby for small portion of land acquired subsequently vide
\nnotification dated 2.12.1998, the Land Acquisition Collector determined the value
\nof the acquired land therein at Rs. 9,50,000\/- per acre. This land is forming part of
\nSectors 9\/9A, Bahadurgarh. Ex. P-30 is a letter of intent issued by HUDA in
\nfavour of Indian Oil Corporation whereby an undeveloped big chunk of land was
\nsold for Rs. 2,97,30,200\/- at an average price of Rs. 1486.51 square yard. This
\nportion of land is located in Sector-7, Bahadurgarh which is on the other side of
\nthe city abutting the National Highway towards Rohtak side whereas the acquired
\nland is towards Delhi side. Ex. P-51 is the brochure              of Haryana Urban
\nDevelopment Authority for sale of plots in Sectors 9 and 9A, for the development
\nof which the present land was acquired, was also referred to where the value of
\nplots of different sizes was fixed ranging from Rs. 1733\/- to Rs. 2118\/- per square
\nyard.\n<\/p>\n
                In addition to the documentary evidence produced on record, learned
\ncounsel for the landowners have also referred to the oral evidence led by them in
\nthe form of statements of PW6 Jagdish Chander, Junior Engineer, Municipal
\nCommittee, Bahadurgarh and PW10 Surinder Singh Rathi, Advocate of
\nBahadugarh wherein the location as well as the potentiality was stated. The land is
\nsandwiched between the already existing Bahadurgarh town and Delhi Border. It
\nhas great potential for being developed as industrial and commercial purposes for
\nthe reason that it’s being part of National Capital Region and close to Delhi. It is
\nfurther submitted that the learned court below had not considered the evidence led
\nby the landowners and merely applied thumb rule by granting                  increased
\ncompensation for all categories of land at Rs. 50,000\/- each. If the evidence led by
\nthe landowners is considered in the light of settled principles for determination of
\nvalue of the land, it has to be assessed at much more rates. It was further argued
\nthat the categorisation of the land into nehri and barani by the learned court below
\nis totally against the principles of law. The land had great potential for being used
\nas urban area for industrial\/residential purposes and in such a situation, it could not
\nbe categorised as nehri and barani and compensation cannot be assessed in terms
\nthereof and for the purpose of urbanisation that categorisation looses its
\nsignificance. For that purpose,     reliance was placed upon Shangara Singh vs
\nPunjab State and others , 2006 (2) PLJ 389 and it was further submitted that the
\nentire chunk of land was falling within the municipal limits of Bahadurgarh and
\nconsidering that fact the value thereof should not be assessed in acres rather it
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                     [61]<\/p>\n
would be in square yards as the land in the urban area is sold in small pieces of
\nplots and not on per acre basis.\n<\/p>\n
                Judgment of this Court in R. F. A. No. 2501 of 2001 Ved Pal and
\nothers vs State of Haryana and others<\/a>, decided on 3.5.2006, was relied upon to
\nsubmit that price as was charged by HUDA for the sale of undeveloped plot of
\nmeasuring 20000 square meters to Indian Oil Corporation (Ex. P-30 and P-31),
\ntwo years prior to the acquisition should be relied upon for the purpose of
\ndetermination of value of the acquired land. In Ved Pal’s case (supra), the value of
\nthe acquired land was assessed on the basis of price charged by HUDA for sale of
\nbig chunk of land to M\/s. Escorts India Limited. This judgment was upheld by
\nHon’ble the Supreme Court.\n<\/p>\n
                In Pram Sukh and others vs State of Haryana and others, 2006 (2)
\nPLJ 39, this court had done away with the categorisation of land by holding that
\nonce the same was within the municipal limits and had great potential for being
\ndeveloped as residential\/commercial area. Reference was also made to the cross-
\nexamination of RW1 Bhisham Singh, Patwari, Faridabad HUDA, who admitted
\nthat the boundary of the acquired land is close to Delhi border. In addition to this,
\nit is submitted that purpose of the acquisition is for used as residential\/commercial,
\na uniform rate should be awarded to all the landowners for the acquisition of land
\nirrespective of the land or location thereof.\n<\/p>\n
                Controverting the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the
\nlandowners, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, submitted that none
\nof the sale-deeds as are sought to be relied upon by the landowners can be relied
\nupon for the purpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land in the
\npresent case as no site plan showing the location has been produced on record to
\nshow comparative value thereof. It is only before this court that the location of the
\nland pertaining to some of the sale-deeds is shown by referring to their khasra
\nnumbers. The sale-deeds which have been pointed out on the site plan, Ex. R-66,
\nshow that those were pertaining to small plots which were quite close to the abadi
\nor the already developed area. The same for that reason also cannot be relied.\n<\/p>\n
                Replying to the exhibits relied upon by the learned counsel for the
\nlandowners, it was submitted that as far as the land pertaining to sale-deed Ex. P-
\n13 is concerned, from the narration of facts, it is shown to be located on Jhajjar
\nRoad which originate from Bahadurgarh side and the location thereof has not been
\npointed out. It can be quite close to the abadi area as well. It was further pointed
\nout that the land acquired for Sector-7 in the year 1987 is also on the Jhajjar Road
\nside whereas in Delhi side the land was acquired in the year 1995 meaning thereby
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                      [62]<\/p>\n
that the other area had already been developed. So far as the plea regarding Ex. P-
\n30 is concerned, it was submitted that it was sale of 20000 square meters of land
\nby HUDA to the Indian Oil Corporation in Sector-7, Bahadurgarh which was
\nalready developed and all basic infrastructure was available there. Merely if it was
\na big chunk of land, it cannot be said to be an undeveloped area. The same cannot
\nbe compared vis-a-vis the location of the acquired land and consideration money
\nreceived by the HUDA cannot be made basis for determination of fair value of the
\nacquired land.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as sale-deeds Ex. P41 and P-43 are concerned, it is stated that
\nthese are of very small plots measuring 100 square yards and 30 square yards
\nwhich are located close to the abadi area or on the road. The same being close to
\nthe abadi or on the road and small pieces of land could not be relied for the
\npurpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land. Similar was the view
\nwith regard to the award, Ex. P-28, pertaining to the acquisition of 0.97 acres of
\nland which is close to the already acquired land for which the value was
\ndetermined at Rs. 9,50,000\/- per acre. It was submitted that even the award of the
\nCollector for the acquired land shows that the land which was acquired
\nsubsequently was close to the National-Highway and for that reason the
\ncompensation was assessed at Rs. 9,50,000\/- per acre. Even if that award is
\nconsidered which is for the acquisition carried out 2\u00bd years later in time from the
\nacquisition in the present case, the value of the acquired land cannot be increased
\nfurther where it was assessed at Rs. 6,00,000\/- per acre for the land located on the
\nNational-Highway and was enhanced by the learned Reference Court to Rs.
\n6,50,000\/- per acre. In addition to this, the reference was made to sale-deeds
\nproduced by the State, namely, Ex. R-15, R-59 and R-64. Referring to site plan,
\nEx. R-66, it was submitted that the land pertaining to sale-deed, Ex. R-15 which
\nwas registered on 9.4.1992 of a small piece of 6 biswas of land, at an average price
\nof Rs. 2,66,666\/- per acre. This land is located close to Najafgarh Road and near
\nthe acquisition boundary.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as the land pertaining to Ex. R-59 is concerned, it was
\nsubmitted that 7 biswas of land was sold for a sum of Rs. 32,000\/- at an average
\nprice of Rs. 4,38,877.85. This land is located on Jhajjar road whereas the
\nlandowners have referred to sale-deed Ex. P-13, showing the value therein at Rs.
\n230\/- per square yard. It is submitted that in October 1995, the value in that area
\nwas not more than Rs. 4,38,877.85 per acre as is shown in the aforesaid sale-deed.
\nIn sale-deed, Ex. R-64, a big area measuring 7 kanals 6 marlas of land was sold for
\na total consideration of Rs. 2,10,000\/- on 18.4.1994 at an average price of Rs.\n<\/p>\n
 R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                      [63]<\/p>\n
2,30,136.97 per acre. This land forms part of the revenue estate of Village Parnala
\nthough is located around 3 acres away from the National Highway quite close to
\nthe acquired land.\n<\/p>\n
                Learned counsel further submitted that the facts that the land falls
\nwithin the municipal limits have not been proved by leading any positive evidence.
\nThe site-plan, Ex. P-22, proved by the landowners on record only showed the
\nmunicipal limits but it does not show whether the acquired land is in municipal
\nlimits. He further submitted that this very small portion of acquired land which is
\nabutting the National Highway though on the other end it abuts the Najafgarh road.
\nThe entire land cannot be valued at the same rate as the land which is located far
\nfrom the road and is also not connected with any road, carry less value. Further
\nrelying upon Union of India and others v. Mangatu Ram and others<\/a>, (1997) 6
\nSCC 59, it is submitted that belting system as has been applied by the learned
\ncourt below for determination of fair value of the acquired land on the main road
\nand upto a depth of 3 acres has rightly been done. Reference was placed on para
\n30 of the impugned award, where the learned court below without referring to any
\nof the evidence led by the either of the parties has merely enhanced the
\ncompensation by considering the potentiality of the land which is stated to be
\ntotally against the law.\n<\/p>\n
                In so far as Ex. P-51 referred to by the learned counsel for the
\nlandowners regarding rates fixed by HUDA for sale of plots in Sectors 9 and 9-A
\nis concerned, the submission is that the broacher was issued on 25.5.1999 i.e. 4
\nyears after the acquisition and after the land had already been developed with all
\nbasic infrastructure. As far as the rates of plots which were subsequently sold in
\nthe developed area cannot be made basis for the determination of the fair value of
\nthe acquired land.\n<\/p>\n
                Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant
\nreferred record.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as location of the land is concerned, the fact is not in dispute
\nthat small portion of it is located on Delhi-Hissar road close to city of Bahadurgarh
\ntowards Delhi. The acquisition boundary does not abut Delhi border, as there is
\nland of another village in between, though it is not far off from there. It is part of
\nthe national capital region. The other end of the acquisition boundary abuts
\nNazafgarh road originating from Bahadurgarh. The urbanised area of the city of
\nBahadurgarh at the relevant time was abutting the acquisition boundary. Some
\nfactories were also situated near the acquired land. A perusal of site plan (Ex. P-\n<\/p>\n
29), which is draft development plan for controlled area No. 1, 2 and 3 -2021 AD
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                     [64]<\/p>\n
pertaining to the area of Bahadurgarh shows that the acquired land is about two
\nkilometers from Delhi border on one side, i.e., if moving from Hissar to Delhi on
\nNH-10, whereas its other boundary which falls on Bahadurgarh-Nazafgarh road is
\nalso at the same distance. The entire acquired land falls within the municipal
\nlimits extended in the year 1993. Towards the east of the acquired land, MIE
\nindustrial area is situated, which abuts Delhi border. Government College, other
\ncommercial establishments and residential colonies are also situated in the vicinity.
\nIt is also evident from the oral statements of the witnesses that some residential
\ncolonies were located in the vicinity of the acquired land and even certain
\nresidential houses which were located on the acquired land were released from
\nacquisition. Bus stand of Bahadurgarh is situated about 1-1\/2 kilometers from the
\nacquired land. Learned counsel for the land owners had relied upon sale deeds (Ex.
\nP12, Ex. P13, Ex. P14, Ex. P41 and Ex. P43). In addition to this, award (Ex. P28)
\npertaining to the acquisition of small portion of land falling within Sector 9\/9-A
\nwas also relied upon. Besides this, letter of intent (Ex. P30 and Ex. P31) issued by
\nHaryana Urban Development Authority to Indian Oil Corporation for allotment of
\n20,000 square meters of land in Sector 7, Bahadurgarh was also referred to. As
\nregards other evidence on record, no reliance was placed thereon keeping in view
\nthe fact that either the same was after the date of acquisition or much prior thereto.\n<\/p>\n
                On the other hand, learned State counsel had referred to and relied
\nupon sale deeds (Ex. R15, Ex. R.59 and Ex. R.64) to submit that the enhancement,
\nwhich has been made by the learned court below, was not called for and the award
\nof the Collector deserves to be upheld.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as sale deed (Ex. P12), relied upon by the land owners is
\nconcerned, it has come on record that the same was part of a developed area in a
\nresidential colony and situated towards Delhi side from the acquired land. As far as
\nsale deed (Ex. P13) is concerned, the land pertaining thereto is located on
\nBahadurgarh-Jhajjar road but the same has not been pointed out on any site plan on
\nrecord. Even otherwise, the sale deed was registered on 28.2.1989, whereas on
\nJhajjar road, the acquisition for development as Sector 7, HUDA, Bahadurgarh had
\nalready been carried out in the year 1987, meaning thereby some development
\nactivity had started towards that area and therefore, the price as is mentioned in the
\nsale deed, cannot as such be relied upon. As far as land pertaining to sale deed (Ex.
\nP14) is concerned, the same is dated 23.5.1989, whereby 410 square yards of land
\nwas sold at an average price of Rs. 195\/- per square yard. It was sold nearly 6 years
\nprior to the acquisition. The land as such has not been located on any site plan.
\nHowever, considering the khasra number, mentioned in the sale deed, learned
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                     [65]<\/p>\n
counsel for the land owners pointed out the same on the site plan located near the
\nmain Delhi-Hissar road.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as sale deeds (Ex. P41 and Ex. P.43) are concerned, the same
\npertain to 100 and 30 square yards respectively, which are located near the abadi
\non the road, the already developed area. The same otherwise also being for small
\npiece of land cannot be relied upon as such for determination of fair value of big
\nchunk of land. As far as reliance on brochure (Ex. P51) issued in 1999 by Haryana
\nUrban Development Authority for sale of plots in developed Sector 9\/9-A,
\nBahadurgarh, for which the land in question was acquired, is also not relevant for
\nthe purpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land, as by that time in
\n6-7 years gap, the land in question had been developed after providing all basic
\namenities and even the area in the vicinity had been developed. If the award (Ex.
\nP28) pertaining to the acquisition of small left over portion of Sector 9\/9-A, as was
\nnotified on 2.12.1998 is concerned, there is a gap of 3-1\/2 years in between. It is
\nfurther noticed in that award that compensation therefor is being assessed only at
\nthe rates at which the land on the main National Highway is assessed, as this
\nportion of the land was located on the Highway. If the time gap in the two
\nacquisitions is considered, further increase in the value of the acquired land will
\nnot be possible, as in the present case, the Collector himself had assessed the value
\nat Rs. 6,00,000\/- per acre for the land abutting the main Highway which was
\nfurther increased to Rs. 6,50,000\/- per acre by the learned court below. If an
\nincrease of 12% per annum is considered thereon, the value comes the same, as is
\ndetermined by the Collector.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as sale deeds relied upon by the State are concerned, the same
\nhave merely to be referred and rejected for the simple reason that all of them are
\nnot relevant. Sale deed (Ex. R59) is pertaining to the land, which is located on
\nJhajjar road on the other side of Bahadurgarh city. The land forming part of sale
\ndeed (Ex. R64), though is located near the acquired land, but the value thereof is
\nless than the award of the Collector. Similar is the position with regard to sale deed
\nEx. R.15, the land of which is located on Nazafgarh road beyond the acquisition
\nboundary. The exact location thereof is not known as it is only the khasra number
\nwhich is pointed out. The khasra will certainly have much bigger area, whereas the
\nsale deed is pertaining to only 6 biswas of land. Another document, on which
\nstrong reliance was placed upon by the learned counsel for the land owners, is
\nletter of intent (Ex. P30 and Ex. P.31) dated 19.1.1993, issued by Haryana Urban
\nDevelopment Authority to Indian Oil Corporation for allotment of 20,000 square
\nmeters of land in Sector 7, Bahadurgarh @ Rs. 1486.51 per square meter. It is not
\n R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                      [66]<\/p>\n
in dispute that this portion of land is located on the other side of the city towards
\nHissar. The land for Sector 7 was acquired way back in the year 1987. The area
\nhad been developed in 6 years till the land was allotted to Indian Oil Corporation.
\nThough it is a big chunk of land but cannot be said to be a plain land with no
\namenities as such. Accordingly, the same as such cannot be relied upon for the
\npurpose of determination of fair value of the acquired land. Another factor, which
\nmakes this piece of evidence to be not safe enough for the purpose of
\ndetermination of fair value of the acquired land is that it was a deed between two
\nentities of State, namely, Haryana Urban Development Authority and Indian Oil
\nCorporation Limited. However, the same will certainly throw some light on the
\nvalue of the land and its potential in the area.\n<\/p>\n
                From the material placed on record by the parties, there is no
\nconcrete evidence as such available on record which could be picked up
\nimmediately to be relied upon for the purpose of determination of fair value of the
\nacquired land. However, the transactions of sale in the area may be even for
\nsmaller or bigger plots certainly throw light on the prices of land in the area. As
\nhas already been noticed above, the distance of the acquired land from Delhi
\nborder is approximately two kilometers. Though, as discussed above, sale deed
\n(Ex. P12) as such could not be relied upon, where 8 kanals and 7-1\/2 marlas of
\nland was sold @ Rs. 400\/- per square yard registered on 22.4.1993 for the reason
\nthat this land was situated close towards Delhi from the acquired land and was
\nwithin the residential area. This portion of land is also stated to be 3-1\/2 acres off
\nthe National Highway. Meaning thereby that there was population even in between
\nthe area from the acquired land till Delhi border and a judicial notice can always
\nbe taken of the fact near the border, the immediate area in the vicinity on the road
\nor even behind that is always developed as Sales Tax Barrier or the security set up,
\nToll Tax Collection points etc. are not located just at the border, but at some place
\nwithin the boundaries of the State. For small piece of land near the acquired land,
\npurchased for shop or residence 5-6 years before the             acquisition, the sale
\nconsideration is ranging from Rs. 195\/- to Rs. 230\/- per square yard in terms of
\nthe evidence produced on record.\n<\/p>\n
                As far as the learned court below is concerned, it has assessed the
\nvalue of the acquired land upto a depth of three acres on Bahadurgarh-Delhi road
\nat Rs. 6,50,000\/- per acre, i.e., Rs. 134.29 per square yard, if one acre is considered
\nequivalent to 4840 square yards, whereas for the land, which is situated on
\nNazafgarh road, the value was assessed at Rs. 4,50,000\/- per acre, i.e., @ Rs. 92.97
\nper square yard. For the land in between, two rates were fixed, i.e., Rs. 3,00,000\/-\n<\/p>\n
 R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006                                     [67]<\/p>\n
per acre for nehri and chahi kind of land and Rs. 2,50,000\/- per acre for Barani and
\nother kind of land, which comes to Rs. 61.98 and Rs. 51.65 per square yard,
\nrespectively.\n<\/p>\n
                Considering the aforesaid facts, in my opinion, as far as belting of
\nthe land is concerned, i.e., land located on NH-10 – Delhi Hissar road and
\nBahadurgarh-Nazafgarh road, the learned court below has not committed any
\nillegality as the land on road upto a certain depth certainly carries more value and
\npotentiality. As far as the land behind that is concerned, in the present case, the
\nlearned court below has upheld the categorisation thereof as Nehri and Barani
\nwhich, in my opinion, is not called for in the facts and circumstances of the present
\ncase. That is for the simple reason that the land, which is strategically located,
\nhaving potential for being used as urban\/commercial\/industrial purposes, the
\nclassification thereof as Chahi\/Barani looses its significance, as it is to be used for
\nconstruction activity. Accordingly, the classification of land as Chahi\/Barani is
\ndone away with and the entire chunk of land beyond the depth of three acres on the
\nroads is to be assessed at the same rate.\n<\/p>\n
                Now the issue comes up about the assessment of value thereof. In my
\nopinion, it is a case where certain guess work has to be applied, taking an over-all
\nview of the factual situation, as discussed above, and accordingly, for the land
\nlocated on NH-10 Delhi-Hissar road upto a depth of three acres from the main
\nroad, the value is enhanced from Rs. 134.29 per square yard to Rs. 150\/- per
\nsquare yard. For the land located on Nazafgarh-Bahadurgarh road upto a depth of
\nthree acres is enhanced from Rs. 92.97 to Rs. 100\/- per square yard, whereas for
\nthe land situated behind that, the compensation is enhanced to Rs. 65\/- per square
\nyard. The land owners shall also be entitled to all the statutory benefits available
\nunder the Act.\n<\/p>\n
                The appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated above.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                (Rajesh Bindal)
\n                                                                       Judge
\nFebruary 10, 2009
\nmk\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009 R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 [1] In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision: February 10 ,2009 1. R.F.A. No. 1 of 2006 State of Haryana and another ….. Appellants vs Jagbir Singh […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-10T23:03:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"72 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-10T23:03:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":14454,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009\",\"name\":\"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-10T23:03:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-10T23:03:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"72 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-10T23:03:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009"},"wordCount":14454,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009","name":"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-10T23:03:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-f-a-no-1-of-2006-vs-jagbir-singh-and-others-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R.F.A. No. 1 Of 2006 vs Jagbir Singh And Others on 10 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1097"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1097\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}