{"id":109791,"date":"2009-01-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-23T19:56:22","modified_gmt":"2017-11-23T14:26:22","slug":"vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nAFA.No. 64 of 1994()\n\n\n\n1. VANNANKANDI GANGADHARAN VYDYAR\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. V.NARAYANAN VYDYAR\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.K.ACHAN(SR)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.K.APPA NAIR,M.K.S.MENON\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR\n\n Dated :14\/01\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                               P.R. RAMAN &\n                           C.T.RAVI KUMAR, JJ.\n                          = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                          A.F.A. NO. 64 OF 1994\n                          = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n          DATED THIS, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2009.\n\n                              J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
Raman, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       This is an intra-court appeal filed against the judgment of the learned<\/p>\n
Single Judge in A.S. 5\/1982.       In a suit for partition, in the final decree<\/p>\n
proceedings, allotments were made as per the Commissioner’s report and<\/p>\n
account.   The third defendant filed an objection seeking to remit the<\/p>\n
commission report as he had some grievance in the matter of the allotment<\/p>\n
proposed. The court, after hearing the parties, passed an order and the<\/p>\n
report   was remitted to the Commissioner to file a revised report in<\/p>\n
accordance with the directions so issued. The Commissioner subsequently<\/p>\n
visited the property and filed a revised report, effecting modifications in<\/p>\n
the original report. Accepting the revised report,      the court below as per<\/p>\n
order dated 24.7.1981 in I.A. 1734\/1984 in O.S. 16\/1969, passed a final<\/p>\n
decree in terms thereof.     That was the subject matter of challenge in the<\/p>\n
first appeal. The learned Single Judge found no reason to interfere with the<\/p>\n
impugned order passed by the court below and accordingly, the first appeal<\/p>\n
was dismissed. Aggrieved thereby, this appeal is preferred.<\/p>\n
AFA 64\/1994                          :2:\n<\/p>\n
      2. Being an intra-court appeal, this Court cannot treat the present<\/p>\n
appeal in the same manner as an appeal arising from an order of the<\/p>\n
subordinate court. At the same time, if there is any illegality arises out of<\/p>\n
the order passed, necessarily, this Court will have to consider the same.<\/p>\n
Hence we heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri. Krishnankutty Achan<\/p>\n
appearing on behalf of the appellant who contended that the revised report<\/p>\n
submitted by the Commissioner ought to have been accepted. His main<\/p>\n
grievances are that there is no reason to keep the disputed kudikidappu<\/p>\n
without being partitioned and there is no justification for the allotment of<\/p>\n
the Vettilachanda.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    We have also heard the learned counsel Sri. Mohan C. Menon,<\/p>\n
and Sri. P.K. Suresh Kumar, appearing on behalf of the contesting<\/p>\n
respondents.\n<\/p>\n
      4. In the order of the Subordinate Court, it is stated in Paragraph 2<\/p>\n
that the Commissioner was appointed to divide the property in accordance<\/p>\n
with the directions contained in the preliminary decree and he filed a report<\/p>\n
and account which were remitted to him as per order in I.A. 2612\/76 dated<\/p>\n
13.7.1979. It is further stated that the parties have no objection to the<\/p>\n
allotment suggested by the Commissioner and so the revised share list<\/p>\n
submitted by the Commissioner is accepted. Though in the memorandum of<\/p>\n
AFA 64\/1994                           :3:\n<\/p>\n
appeal filed before this Court, in para 2, the observation of the court below<\/p>\n
that objection was not filed is disputed, no grounds as such is raised in the<\/p>\n
appeal. Besides it is not substantiated. Even we have asked the Registry to<\/p>\n
go through the records to see as to whether any such objection is filed; but it<\/p>\n
could not be tranced out. We asked the learned Senior counsel to place on<\/p>\n
record any such objection and admittedly no such objection is there in his<\/p>\n
files also. Despite the fact being thus, the learned Single Judge had<\/p>\n
considered the objection as raised by the counsel before that court as is<\/p>\n
evident from the judgment. Therefore, even in the absence of any such<\/p>\n
objection filed on record, that objection was considered by the learned<\/p>\n
Single Judge in the appeal. Those contentions were reiterated before us<\/p>\n
also.\n<\/p>\n
      5. As regards the non-allotment of the kudikidappu is concerned,<\/p>\n
there is a specific observation by the learned Single Judge that though the<\/p>\n
party wanted that plot also to be valued, he is not agreeable for allotment of<\/p>\n
that area towards his share. In other words, everybody thinks that there is<\/p>\n
a risk element involved in taking the property along with the kudikidappu<\/p>\n
towards his share because a claim is likely to be raised. Whether such a<\/p>\n
claim is raised or not, it remains that there exists a kudikidappu, which is<\/p>\n
excluded from partition. So that if in future, any party feels that there is no<\/p>\n
AFA 64\/1994                              :4:\n<\/p>\n
kudikidappu or kudikidappu right raised is rejected, it is open to the party<\/p>\n
then to apply for partition of that property as well. That right is left open.<\/p>\n
       6.   Regarding the allotment of Vettilachanda is concerned, it is<\/p>\n
allotted to the third defendant because it was used as a store house by him<\/p>\n
and it is not correct to say that this is something which is allotted to him free<\/p>\n
of cost or as excess of his share. As a matter of fact, we have found that<\/p>\n
what is allotted to him is only in accordance with his share as is due. There<\/p>\n
may be some minor variation herein and there as rightly pointed out by the<\/p>\n
learned Single Judge, which are not matters for rectification at this stage.<\/p>\n
As a matter of fact, in the matter of partitioning of property, it is not<\/p>\n
possible to divide the property to the fullest satisfaction of all. At the same<\/p>\n
time, the partition has been done in a fair manner without much grievance to<\/p>\n
any of the parties to be complained of and for a rectification by an appellate<\/p>\n
court, much less at a second appellate stage. In such circumstances, we<\/p>\n
refrain to interfere with the judgment under appeal. Accordingly, the appeal<\/p>\n
is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                  P.R. RAMAN,
\n                                                                       (JUDGE)<\/p>\n
                                                           C.T.RAVIKUMAR,
\n                                                                       (JUDGE)
\nknc\/-\n<\/p>\n
AFA 64\/1994    :5:\n\n\n\n\n                             P.R. RAMAN &\n                       C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.\n                     = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n\n\n\n                       A.F.A. NO. 64 OF 1994\n                       = = = = = = = = = = =\n\n\n\n\n                             J U D G M E N T\n\n\n\n                                    14.1.2009.\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM AFA.No. 64 of 1994() 1. VANNANKANDI GANGADHARAN VYDYAR … Petitioner Vs 1. V.NARAYANAN VYDYAR … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.N.K.ACHAN(SR) For Respondent :SRI.P.K.APPA NAIR,M.K.S.MENON The Hon’ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN The Hon’ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR Dated […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-23T14:26:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-23T14:26:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":886,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-23T14:26:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-23T14:26:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-23T14:26:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009"},"wordCount":886,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009","name":"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-23T14:26:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vannankandi-gangadharan-vydyar-vs-v-narayanan-vydyar-on-14-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vannankandi Gangadharan Vydyar vs V.Narayanan Vydyar on 14 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109791\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}