{"id":109829,"date":"2011-01-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011"},"modified":"2015-09-07T03:28:03","modified_gmt":"2015-09-06T21:58:03","slug":"kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 795 of 2008()\n\n\n1. KAMALAKSHI, D\/O. AMBU, AGED 58,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BHARATHAN.M.C, S\/O. RAMAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.GOPAKUMAR G. (ALUVA)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :11\/01\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                  S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J\n                  --------------------------------------\n                      R.S.A No.795 OF 2008\n                      --------------------------------\n           Dated this the 11th day of January 2011\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
           Plaintiff is the appellant in O.S No.817\/1999 on the file<\/p>\n
of Principal Munsiff Court, Kannur. Concurrent decision rendered<\/p>\n
by the two courts below that the plaintiff is not entitled to the<\/p>\n
reliefs canvassed in her suit, which initially was filed as one for<\/p>\n
injunction, but, later amended for declaration of her title and<\/p>\n
possession over the suit property as well, is challenged in the<\/p>\n
appeal. Suit property has been described as having an extent of<\/p>\n
26 cents of paddy land.          Resisting the claim for decree of<\/p>\n
injunction, the defendant, who is none other than the husband of<\/p>\n
the younger sister of the plaintiff, contended that over 5 = cents<\/p>\n
covered by the suit property, the plaintiff had executed Ext.B1<\/p>\n
sale deed in his favour receiving the consideration thereof.<\/p>\n
Pursuant to Ext.B1 sale deed, he got title and possession over the<\/p>\n
aforesaid 5 = cents of land was the case of the defendant. He<\/p>\n
also contended that as against the husband of the plaintiff,<\/p>\n
execution proceedings were pending towards the debt to be<\/p>\n
realised from him under a money decree and, to discharge such<\/p>\n
debt, the property covered by Ext.B1 was conveyed to him for a<\/p>\n
R.S.A No.795 OF 2008            – 2 –<\/span><\/p>\n
consideration of Rs.2,25,000\/-. However, the sale price shown<\/p>\n
under Ext.B1 deed was a lesser sum to have reduction of the<\/p>\n
stamp fee payable thereof. Contentions as above being raised by<\/p>\n
the defendant persuaded the plaintiff to seek amendment for<\/p>\n
declaration of her title and possession over the suit property<\/p>\n
impeaching the sale deed as void.        Ext.B1 was a fraudulent<\/p>\n
document was her case alleging that she is an illiterate lady. On<\/p>\n
the materials placed by both sides, challenge raised by the<\/p>\n
plaintiff against Ext.B1 as a product of fraud was found meritless<\/p>\n
by the trial court, which noticed that the son of the plaintiff with<\/p>\n
another was an attester to that deed. The trial court found that<\/p>\n
the defense raised by the defendant that Ext.B1 sale deed was<\/p>\n
executed to discharge a decree debt was acceptable. DW2, who<\/p>\n
was examined by the defendant to substantiate his defense was<\/p>\n
none other than the brother of the plaintiff. He also supported the<\/p>\n
case of the defendant. It was also noticed that Ext.B1 sale deed<\/p>\n
was executed within two weeks after the plaintiff had discharged<\/p>\n
the decree debt of more than rupees two lakhs. The dismissal of<\/p>\n
the suit by the trial court after reappreciating the materials<\/p>\n
tendered was confirmed in appeal by the lower appellate court<\/p>\n
turning down the challenges to such decree raised by the<\/p>\n
R.S.A No.795 OF 2008           – 3 –<\/span><\/p>\n
appellant herein. As against that concurrent decision, the present<\/p>\n
Second Appeal is preferred.\n<\/p>\n
      2.     Respondent who had filed a caveat has entered<\/p>\n
appearance through counsel. I heard the counsel on both sides<\/p>\n
on the entertainability of the appeal. The insufficiency of the<\/p>\n
consideration stated in Ext.B1 sale deed, which was stated as<\/p>\n
having been done to avoid the stamp fee payable, even from the<\/p>\n
admission made by the defendant, according to the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the appellant, would advance the case of the<\/p>\n
appellant that the said deed was a product of fraud. I do not find<\/p>\n
any merit in that submission. Even assuming that the stamp fee<\/p>\n
and registration fee paid on the deed is insufficient, it is a matter<\/p>\n
for the competent authority as under the Kerala Stamp Act to<\/p>\n
initiate appropriate proceedings under Section 45(B) of that Act to<\/p>\n
realise the balance amount, if any, payable towards deficit<\/p>\n
registration and stamp fee.     A lessor amount was shown as<\/p>\n
consideration in the deed and it was got registered not paying the<\/p>\n
amount of stamp fee required on the actual consideration cannot<\/p>\n
be given any merit to consider the validity of that deed. At any<\/p>\n
rate, that circumstance canvassed by the counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant to impeach the decision concurrently rendered by the<\/p>\n
R.S.A No.795 OF 2008            – 4 –<\/span><\/p>\n
courts below that the appellant is not entitled to the reliefs<\/p>\n
canvassed, declaration and also injunction, has no merit at all. I<\/p>\n
find no infirmity leave alone any illegality in the concurrent<\/p>\n
decision rendered by the court below. The appeal is devoid of<\/p>\n
any merit, and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                              Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                     S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN
\n                                            JUDGE<\/p>\n
                   \/\/True Copy\/\/<\/p>\n
                                          P.A to Judge<\/p>\n
vdv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 795 of 2008() 1. KAMALAKSHI, D\/O. AMBU, AGED 58, … Petitioner Vs 1. BHARATHAN.M.C, S\/O. RAMAN, … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.GOPAKUMAR G. (ALUVA) For Respondent :SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER The Hon’ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN Dated :11\/01\/2011 O R […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109829","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-06T21:58:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-06T21:58:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":737,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-06T21:58:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-06T21:58:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-06T21:58:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011"},"wordCount":737,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011","name":"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-06T21:58:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kamalakshi-vs-bharathan-m-c-on-11-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kamalakshi vs Bharathan.M.C on 11 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109829","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109829"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109829\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}