{"id":110025,"date":"2008-08-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-02-07T19:24:43","modified_gmt":"2017-02-07T13:54:43","slug":"nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada … on 13 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada … on 13 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V Jagannathan<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH, GULBARGA\n\nDated the 13th day omugust 2008  T   \n\n:BEFORE:\n\nTHE HOWBLE MRJUSTICE  i?.J;a<}zxNrzA?r1L:;,:q%%?k\u00ab%  \nCRIMINAL APPEAL No. a'1.3i*'Z_ 1\/  % = "  \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nS \/ o Vaijin:a.t11,';'ag'td a'b0\u00a7:.t "  _\n36years.    "\n\n2.  ~ V\n\nwe  ab\u00e9\ufb01t\nBciiiiz. _gu*c:    ',\n\n' 'Bidar  &}')istrict.\n'  .....   Appellants\n\n '  'By  & S.K.Venkata Raddy, Advocates. )\n\n  \n\n by Jam\u00e9azia Folios,\n\nV ' 3 Bidar Taluk & District.\n\n. . .Reswndent\n\n( By Sri Subhash Maliapm', I~I.C.G.P. )\n\nCriminal Appeal \ufb01led under Sectien 374(2) of\nthe Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 26.7.2063\n\n \n\n\n\n 2.  4Vfjee.i~~pmsecu\ufb01on, in brief, is tie the\n  Baeawa was gven in marriage\n\n. '   about 21\/2 years prior to her death\nV time of marniage, Rs.25,000\/- was given\n A  with one thela geid. The eeupled lived\n\n fer some time and, thereafter, the accused\n\nof the I.P.C. and in respect of Section 498-A, \nbeen sentenced to $3.1. far one year and  \nof Rs.5,000\/- and in reswt ef \ufb01ne   " \nSection 4 of the D.P.Act, he is  \nmonths and to pay a    \nsentenced to one ye:-:1'r S.I. \nunder Section 498~A tqpay a fine of\nRs.3,000\/- a1\u00a7"3e."--}.,__  :'e\ufb01'enoe under\nSection   to six\nn1ont\u00a71s...S .AI';V  ;:;<;\u00bb_"   Q1': \u00a7VRe. 2,000 \/ -. Default\nsentences were  eppe\ufb02ants herein,\ntherefore,   .  \ufb01le conviction and\n\n_  \n\neereons began tie treat Baeamma cruelly for\n\nE\n\n, ,3\n\n \n\n\n\n4\n\nadditional dcwry of one thola gold and, in this\nconnectien, the deceased was abused. Again on\n\n23.10.1995<\/pre>\n
, in cennection with the jawala cemmg\ufb01tay<\/p>\n
of the child, the accused demanded one A’ <\/p>\n
and otherwise they would not allow thf:  V’   > <\/p>\n
be cemple-ted and then, the ac\u00a2:1A_1se\u00a73%.4i;p%sf%ep  by’: <\/p>\n
family of the deceased that -(me    V.<\/p>\n
gven at the time of  gge  of  1 timiher of
\ndeceased Basamma. ~. ~ ‘  10. 1996, at<\/p>\n
about 2.00 p.m..,  home and<\/p>\n
irxfermed tt1a\u00a3r..ABasamB3′    ” away from the<\/p>\n
house and, later  th\u00e9    of Basamma was<\/p>\n
feu;_z;} ig1   91’ ;3id\u00a71a__;;p.a and the complainant,<\/p>\n
Who\ufb01s ‘tiie’  Basamma, idtmti\ufb01ecl the dead<\/p>\n
 of.I;i\u00a3\u00a7’~.\u00a23\u00a3s\u00a7\u00a7{\u00a7I\u00a7’_\u00a7f,g\u00a7.{hen the cempiaint came to be<\/p>\n
_ ‘s.:;c: “e’he chargeushcaet Ming submitted<\/p>\n
  Afmgzr accused persons fer the o\ufb01hnces<\/p>\n
  gzimishabae imaer Sections 493-9., so-4–B and 34 of<\/p>\n
   and Section 3 and 4 of the 13.1’, Act.<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
‘V    judgment of the tna1’ court<\/p>\n
 ca\ufb02ed in,___q\ufb01\u00e9i~3’ti0n by A– I am} A\u00bb:-3.<\/p>\n
  the mtxments cf tha learned
\n   far the appenams Shri B.C.Jaka and me
\n  ‘ Government Pieader for the State 8111*}<\/p>\n
V\ufb01kiiahash Mallapur and perused the records of this<\/p>\n
3. As the accusw did not plead guiltyV,x <\/p>\n
prosecution led the evidence by examining  <\/p>\n
17 and documents Exs.P-I to\u00bb    \u00bb <\/p>\n
M.Os.1 to 3 were also
\nthe case of the prosecuti{_m_V in  th\u00e9iz-‘V   <\/p>\n
statement and led no defen\u00a2\u00a7e;:Vi?.\u00ab1%id<:3:1ce;" \u00ab.   I<\/p>\n
4. The learned jx\u00a5dg\u00e9_ court, after
\nappreciagjng.    came to the
\nconclusioigi  had proved the case
\nagainst A-1  therefore,
\ncannot be conx\u00e9ictgad  the trial court
\nacquitted t11<\u00a7:–:s.3.i<i ' \u00e9'acs\u00a71"1*s.e$:i A}=;~\ufb01" and A-4. But, A-1<\/p>\n
and' A'-\u00a53~  \u00e9dnxiicted \u00e9i\u00a7" af'aresa1'd and sentsnced<\/p>\n
case. }<\/p>\n
' I<\/p>\n
   j_reasonable doubt. Hence, no
\n is for against the judgment of the<\/p>\n
  -T\ufb01ough the proseeutien has examined number<\/p>\n
 ‘Witnesses, the material Witnesses are the<\/p>\n
6. The learned counsel for the ”
\nsubmitted that the trial court was
\nconvicting the appellants,  A’-3,1′
\nevidence on record does’  ”\n<\/p>\n
against them. In this coneeggidn, me<\/p>\n
referred to the evide3’ice_ <\/p>\n
7. On the  eutlf_1er ikiaedjgii  ‘JGove:mme11t<\/p>\n
Pleader  taken all the<\/p>\n
car’? ,’t’.o.._   of the material
\nwitnesses end,’  regard to the
\nevidence on A    medical evidence
\ni;;d.iea\ufb01I;g.\u00a7:4\ufb02\u00a7:e’  suicide by the deceased,<\/p>\n
 ‘1iee.__b:reug’r1t home the guilt of A-I<\/p>\n
3\/<\/p>\n
‘ I<\/p>\n
8<\/span>
\nBasamma was driven to commit suicide because of<\/p>\n
the deman\u00e9 of dowry by accused Nagshetty.<\/p>\n
10. P.W.2 Sengramappa has 2<\/p>\n
evidence that he attendw the marriage <\/p>\n
with A-1, and there was tI’ouI\u00a7ieM<\/p>\n
and A-3 regarding additional dem3>–..end   * W <\/p>\n
know that the dispute  the  (iewiy
\namount and one V \ufb01fiola   jawala<\/p>\n
ceremony.\n<\/p>\n
11.  P.w;3   pf Basamma and she has<\/p>\n
also   that, at the time of marnag’ e<\/p>\n
 ~.  of  ‘\u00b0Re..25,i)OO\/- was gven in cash and also<\/p>\n
‘  at the time of jawala eeremony, the<\/p>\n
 additional dowry of one thola and<\/p>\n
 the  of Baeawa eeuid not meet the demand<\/p>\n
A 57  to \ufb01xeir wenomic eendi\ufb01tm. This witness also<\/p>\n
”   [deposed about Basemma having gven a complaint<\/p>\n
earlier awinst A-1 and A-3 nmaxdirlg their demand
\nand terture in respect of cash and gold. It is ales in<\/p>\n
the evidence ef this witness that Ad; came in search<\/p>\n
3%\u00bb<\/p>\n
4’<\/p>\n
of Basamma and later on, this witnsss came to <\/p>\n
that Basamma was dead.\n<\/p>\n
12. P.W.4 Shivaraj Patil  his ‘V<\/p>\n
evidence about tht: ma1nage’_ A   <\/p>\n
and attending the jawala
\npersons demanding   and
\nthe fa\ufb01ler of Basam111\u00a3a:’  later on, the
\ndeath of Ba\u00aea \ufb01\u00a7\u00a7:1a    the dead body<\/p>\n
was four1d_\ufb01:;\u00e9r;1iiig”in4″\u00e91fyz\u00e9\ufb01~..,.  <\/p>\n
13.  ‘~1n’– ‘  f of the amve
\n has been elicited to doubt<\/p>\n
 with regard to the demand of dowry<\/p>\n
 ‘ V b’y.A_-3 and harassing the deceased in that<\/p>\n
‘ ‘  <\/p>\n
 . 34. &r\u20ac.w.s Dr.Mas:Ihukar Ran has deposed in his<\/p>\n
‘ V\u00e9v\ufb01\u00e9ience that ha found fmm the emiuation of the<\/p>\n
 ~”TV:;\u00a7$ad body that the deceased had consumed<\/p>\n
carlxmatr: insecticide and he has wen his; opinion<\/p>\n
s.tati.ng that the death was on account sf<\/p>\n
32<\/span><\/p>\n
3\u00bb . F’<\/p>\n
I1<\/p>\n
concerned, the trial court took note of his age, <\/p>\n
was 98 ymrs and he was also having fading   _<\/p>\n
Thus, taking into account the  vi”   ” 2 <\/p>\n
under the circumstances otk1er’\u00bb._tk1zgn ..I:1oi*m’al”‘ex1’dV jthez; AA<\/p>\n
death having taken  ‘seiren  <\/p>\n
marriage of Basamme.    no
\n(iif\ufb01culty in invoking” ..1_II1df:I’ Section
\n113-A of the   note of the
\nlaw laid   case reported
\nin    decisions referred to
\nby die paiagraph Nos. 44, 45 and<\/p>\n
46, the  A—1 and A-3 were convicted<\/p>\n
  a.1f_1E3.  were also sentenced as<\/p>\n
‘ .~.ti:eI;tier1e{1. gibove.<\/p>\n
1’7~..  thus examirzed the evidence on record in<\/p>\n
 n the  cf apprmle tion 01′ the esvidence by the via’ 1<\/p>\n
‘  I am of the View that no interference is called<\/p>\n
‘ ‘  for in respect ef the conviction and sentence passed<\/p>\n
against A~1 and A-3 and, as such, this is not a cease<\/p>\n
to intexfeze with the trial court’s judgment as the<\/p>\n
E’?\n<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
conclusion reached is based on evidence <\/p>\n
cannot be termed as unreasonable.\n<\/p>\n
18. The appeal, therefore, st21\u00a71ti’s”c1is\ufb011Iiiss;V-\u00a7(:’3V%VI.   <\/p>\n
eke] ~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada … on 13 August, 2008 Author: V Jagannathan IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, GULBARGA Dated the 13th day omugust 2008 T :BEFORE: THE HOWBLE MRJUSTICE i?.J;a<}zxNrzA?r1L:;,:q%%?k\u00ab% CRIMINAL APPEAL No. a'1.3i*'Z_ 1\/ % = " BETWEEN : S \/ o Vaijin:a.t11,';'ag'td […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada ... on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada ... on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-07T13:54:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada … on 13 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-07T13:54:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":880,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada ... on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-07T13:54:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada … on 13 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada ... on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada ... on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-07T13:54:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada … on 13 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-07T13:54:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008"},"wordCount":880,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008","name":"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada ... on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-07T13:54:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagshetty-so-vaijinath-vs-state-of-karnataka-by-janwada-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nagshetty S\/O Vaijinath vs State Of Karnataka By Janwada … on 13 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}