{"id":110116,"date":"2010-05-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-24T02:01:13","modified_gmt":"2016-07-23T20:31:13","slug":"joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 2144 of 2010(O)\n\n\n1. JOSEPH, S\/O.ULAHANNAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. PAILY, S\/O.ULAHANNAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THOMMAN PAILY @ REJU,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :24\/05\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                    THOMAS P JOSEPH, J.\n\n                   ----------------------------------------\n\n                       W.P.C.No.2144 of 2010\n\n                   ---------------------------------------\n\n                 Dated this 24th day of May, 2010\n\n                             JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
      Claiming title and possession of plaint A schedule and right of<\/p>\n
easement by way of prescription over plaint B schedule way,<\/p>\n
petitioner filed O.S.No.89 of 2007 in the court of learned Munsiff,<\/p>\n
Thodupuzha.      On the application of petitioner learned Munsiff<\/p>\n
issued an ex parte interim order of injunction restraining<\/p>\n
respondents from interfering with plaint B schedule property. The<\/p>\n
advocate commissioner who inspected the properties submitted<\/p>\n
report as to the state of affairs of plaint A and B schedule.<\/p>\n
Thereafter there was an alleged obstruction to plaint B schedule at<\/p>\n
the instance of respondent, according to the petitioner in violation<\/p>\n
of the interim order of injunction. For removal of that obstruction<\/p>\n
petitioner filed I.A.No.488 of 2007 and obtained a favourable order.<\/p>\n
Respondents challenged that order as well as order of prohibitory<\/p>\n
injunction in C.M.Appeal No.39 of 2007. Learned District Judge<\/p>\n
while confirming the order of injunction granted I.A.No.426 of<\/p>\n
2007, set aside the order on I.A.No.488 of 2007 and directed<\/p>\n
learned Munsiff to postpone the relief of mandatory injunction to<\/p>\n
the final disposal of the suit preferably along with I.A.No.487 of<\/p>\n
W.P.C.No.2144 of 2010
\n                                 : 2 :<\/span><\/p>\n
2007. Petitioner, feeling aggrieved by that part of the judgment to<\/p>\n
the extent learned District Judge interfered with the order on<\/p>\n
I.A.No.488 of 2007 filed W.P.C.No.26789 of 2009 in this court.<\/p>\n
This court vide judgment dated 20-11-2009 set aside the judgment<\/p>\n
of learned District Judge to the extent it concerned I.A.No.488 of<\/p>\n
2007 and directed learned District Judge to decide the relief prayed<\/p>\n
for in that application on merit. Pursuant to that direction, learned<\/p>\n
District Judge considered the appeal and dismissed the same in<\/p>\n
confirmation of the order passed by learned Munsiff on I.A.No.488<\/p>\n
of 2007.    Thereafter petitioner filed Exts.P4 to P6 applications.<\/p>\n
Ext.P4 is to depute an advocate commissioner for local inspection<\/p>\n
and to report on the matters asked for therein.        Ext.P5 is an<\/p>\n
application to remove case from the list accompanied by a medical<\/p>\n
certificate and Ext.P6 is an application to direct respondents to<\/p>\n
implement the order on I.A.No.488 of 2007, ie. the order of<\/p>\n
mandatory injunction. Apprehending that learned Munsiff might<\/p>\n
proceed with trial of the suit before disposing of Exts.P4 to P6.<\/p>\n
Petitioner\/plaintiff has preferred this writ petition praying that<\/p>\n
appropriate direction may be issued to the learned Munsiff to pass<\/p>\n
final orders on Exts.P4 to P6 before the case is included in the list<\/p>\n
for trial.   Learned counsel for petitioner contends that while<\/p>\n
disposing of W.P.C.No.26789 of 2009 this court has specifically<\/p>\n
referred to the relevant aspects, highhanded act of the respondents<\/p>\n
W.P.C.No.2144 of 2010
\n                                 : 3 :<\/span><\/p>\n
in flouting the order of injunction passed by learned Munsiff and<\/p>\n
obstructing plaint B schedule way which is the only means of<\/p>\n
access to the petitioner to the plaint A schedule. According to the<\/p>\n
learned counsel if without enforcing the order on I.A.No.488 of<\/p>\n
2007 learned Munsiff proceeds to dispose of the suit, that in effect<\/p>\n
would negate the relief granted to the petitioner on I.A.No.488 of<\/p>\n
2007.    Learned counsel for respondent No.2 (to whom it is<\/p>\n
admitted, respondent No.1 has transferred the property pending<\/p>\n
suit) would submit that petitioner has other alternative access to<\/p>\n
the plaint A schedule and non implementation of the order on<\/p>\n
I.A.No.488 of 2007 until disposal of the suit would not in any way<\/p>\n
prejudice or affect the petitioner. It is also contended that going by<\/p>\n
the materials on record petitioner is not entitled to get any relief in<\/p>\n
respect of plaint B schedule way which can be revealed in the trial<\/p>\n
of the suit.\n<\/p>\n
      2.    I am not at the question in this proceeding whether<\/p>\n
petitioner has any right of access to plaint A schedule through<\/p>\n
plaint B schedule as contended by respondents which is to be<\/p>\n
adjudicated in the suit.      Indisputably there was an order of<\/p>\n
temporary injunction against respondents causing obstruction to<\/p>\n
the plaint B schedule reported by the advocate commissioner.<\/p>\n
From the reports at various stages it is seen that there was<\/p>\n
obstruction caused to the plaint B schedule after the interim order<\/p>\n
W.P.C.No.2144 of 2010
\n                                   : 4 :<\/span><\/p>\n
of injunction was issued.           This court while disposing of<\/p>\n
W.P.C.No.26789 of 2009 (though for the purpose of deciding the<\/p>\n
writ petition challenging judgment of the learned District Judge in<\/p>\n
C.M.Appeal.No.39 of 2007) has observed that the interim order of<\/p>\n
prohibitory injunction so far it remained in force had to be obeyed<\/p>\n
by the parties concerned and that violation of the order of<\/p>\n
injunction is not only a matter which is affected the right of<\/p>\n
petitioner but, affecting the majesty of court and the confidence of<\/p>\n
the public in the process of the court. In the circumstances the<\/p>\n
contention that petitioner ultimately would not be entitled to get<\/p>\n
relief does not require to be considered at this stage.<\/p>\n
      3.    As it now stands, the order of mandatory injunction on<\/p>\n
I.A.No.488 of 2007 has become final and it is to be complied. When<\/p>\n
there is an order of mandatory injunction on I.A.No.488 of 2007<\/p>\n
directing removal of obstruction in plaint B schedule and that order<\/p>\n
has    been   confirmed    by     the   learned  District  Judge    in<\/p>\n
C.M.Appeal.No.39 of 2007. Learned Munsiff has to enforce that<\/p>\n
order as requested for in Ext.P6 application. If trial of the suit is<\/p>\n
conducted before doing so, it would have the effect of negating the<\/p>\n
relief granted to the petitioner on I.A.No.488 of 2007. After the<\/p>\n
order of mandatory injunction on I.A.No.488 of 2007 is enforced it<\/p>\n
will be open to the learned Munsiff to post the case for trial without<\/p>\n
loosing further time if pre-trial steps are over.<\/p>\n
W.P.C.No.2144 of 2010
\n                                 : 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n
      This writ petition is allowed.            The learned Munsiff,<\/p>\n
Thodupuzha is directed to dispose of Exts.P4 to P6 applications<\/p>\n
before the case is posted for trial in the list.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                               (THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
Sbna\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 2144 of 2010(O) 1. JOSEPH, S\/O.ULAHANNAN … Petitioner Vs 1. PAILY, S\/O.ULAHANNAN, … Respondent 2. THOMMAN PAILY @ REJU, For Petitioner :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) For Respondent :SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI The Hon’ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH Dated :24\/05\/2010 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-110116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJoseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-23T20:31:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-23T20:31:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1010,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-23T20:31:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-23T20:31:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-23T20:31:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010"},"wordCount":1010,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010","name":"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-23T20:31:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/joseph-vs-paily-on-24-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Joseph vs Paily on 24 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110116\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}